Impact of Glucocorticoid Cumulative Doses in a Real-Life Cohort of Patients Affected by Giant Cell Arteritis

Polymyalgia rheumatica is a risk factor for more recalcitrant disease in giant cell arteritis: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate differences in presentation and outcome of giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients with and without polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) symptoms.

METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed with GCA between 2000 and 2020 and followed for ≥12 months at the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium), were included retrospectively.

RESULTS

We included 398 GCA patients, of which 181 (45%) with PMR symptoms. Patients with PMR symptoms had a longer symptom duration (11 vs 6 weeks, p < 0.001). They less frequently reported fever (19% vs 28%, p = 0.030) and fatigue (52% vs 64%, p = 0.015) and tended to have less permanent vision loss (12% vs 19%, p = 0.052). There was no difference in the cumulative oral GC dose at 2 years (4.4 vs 4.3 g methylprednisolone, p = 0.571). However, those with PMR symptoms were treated with higher GC doses during subsequent follow-up (p < 0.05 from 38 months after diagnosis) and had a lower probability of stopping GC (62% vs 71%, HR 0.74 [95%CI 0.58-0.94], p = 0.018) with a longer median duration of GC treatment (29 vs 23 months, p = 0.021). In addition, presence of PMR symptoms was associated with an increased risk of relapse (64% vs 51%, HR 1.38 [95%CI 1.06-1.79], p = 0.017) with a higher number of relapses (1.47 [95%CI 1.30-1.65] vs 1.16 relapses [95%CI 1.02-1.31], p = 0.007). Patients with PMR symptoms less frequently developed thoracic aortic aneurysms during follow-up (3% vs 11%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

GCA patients with PMR symptoms had more recalcitrant disease with a higher risk of relapse and longer duration of GC treatment with need for higher GC doses.

Updates in the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To briefly review the latest updates in management in giant cell arteritis, an autoimmune vasculitis affecting the medium to large vessels.

RECENT FINDINGS

Here, we review the known and newer trends in management of giant cell arteritis. While high dose glucocorticoids remain the mainstay of therapy, immunosuppressive medications are increasingly utilized to reduce the burden and risk of long-term glucocorticoid use. Published guidelines by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) suggest early use of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive medications in patients with recently diagnosed or relapsing giant cell arteritis. Immunosuppressive medications include oral small molecules such as methotrexate and leflunomide and biologics, including the recently Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved tocilizumab. Glucocorticoids remain the cornerstone of management for newly diagnosed disease but with the increasing use of medications such as IL-6 inhibitors, patients are decreasing steroid use within weeks, thereby limiting risks associated with long-term steroid use.

Relapses in giant cell arteritis: Updated review for clinical practice

Giant cell arteritis (GCA), the most common primary vasculitis in adults, is a granulomatous systemic vasculitis usually affecting the aorta and its major branches, particularly the carotid and vertebral arteries. Although remission can be achieved in most patients with GCA using high-dose glucocorticoids (GC), relapses are frequent, occurring in >40% of GC-only treated patients, mostly during the first two years after diagnosis. Relapsing courses lead to high GC exposure, increasing the risk of treatment-related adverse effects. Although tocilizumab is an efficacious GC-sparing therapy that allows increased sustained remission and reduced cumulative GC doses, relapses are common after drug discontinuation. This narrative review examines the most relevant features of relapses in GCA, including its definition, classification, frequency, clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics, chronology, probable pathophysiology, and predictive factors. In addition, we discuss treatment options for relapsing patients and the effect of relapses on patient outcomes.

Autoimmune blistering diseases treated with glucocorticoids: An international study of steroid-induced myopathy

BACKGROUND

Patients with autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) are often exposed to chronic glucocorticoid (GC) treatment with many side effects. Glucocorticoid-induced myopathy (GIM) is a well-established side effect, which particularly affects the proximal muscles. The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) is a validated global assessment tool which quantifies GC toxicity over time.

OBJECTIVES

This study marks the first study which analyses GIM in patients with AIBDs. The objectives of this study were to utilize the GTI to investigate the nature and prevalence of GIM in AIBD patients and explore potential risk factors.

METHODS

This international cohort study was conducted in blistering disease clinics across Australia, China, Greece, Iran, Japan, the Philippines, Turkey and the United States of America between February 2019 and July 2023. The GTI tool was completed by a medical practitioner at each patient visit. Data related to glucocorticoid toxicity were entered into the Steritas GTI 2.0 to generate an aggregate improvement and cumulative worsening score at each visit.

RESULTS

The study included 139 patients. There were 132 episodes of myopathy, and 47.5% of patients developed muscle weakness at some point during the study period. Cumulative GC dose correlated positively with myopathy risk, while average dose and treatment duration were not significant. Older age, male gender and obesity more than doubled the likelihood of developing GIM.

CONCLUSIONS

GIM is a common side effect experienced by AIBD patients on GC treatment. Muscle weakness is less likely to occur if cumulative GC dose is less than 0.75 mg/kg/day. Studies of exercise programs to mitigate myopathy and newer alternative treatments to reduce cumulative GC dose should be considered.

Advances and challenges in management of large vessel vasculitis

Glucocorticoids (GC) remains the mainstay for management of large vessel vasculitis (LVV). Recent introduction of interleukin-6 signaling blocker, tocilizumab has substantially changed the practice in management of patients with LVV, in particular, giant cell arteritis (GCA). Benefit of tocilizumab to patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is supported by observational studies, but randomized clinical trials are lacking. Addition of tocilizumab enables reduction of the total amount of GC in patients with GCA, but GC burden remains high and to be further reduced. Ongoing studies aim at minimal use of GC or even GC-free. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors appear to be beneficial to TAK despite their ineffectiveness to GCA. Randomized clinical trials are undergoing to target other inflammatory cytokines in both GCA and TAK. Janus kinase inhibitors alone or in combination with conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs showed promising results in treatment of TAK.

Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study

Introduction

No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results

Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.

Evolution of the Therapeutic Management of Giant Cell Arteritis: Analysis of Real-Life Practices over Two Timeframes (2014-2017 and 2018-2020)

Objectives: To determine how therapeutic strategies for giant cell arteritis (GCA), especially glucocorticoid (GC) management, evolved between 2014 and 2020. Patients and Methods: Consecutive GCA patients followed for at least 24 months in a single tertiary center were enrolled and separated into two groups: those diagnosed from 2014 to 2017 and those diagnosed from 2018 to 2020. GC doses (mg/kg/day) were analyzed at onset, at Month 3 (M3) and, if continued, at M6, M12, M18 and M24. Physicians' practices were also individually analyzed. Results: Among the 180 patients included, 96 (53%) were diagnosed in 2014-2017 and 84 (47%) in 2018-2020. All patients received GC at diagnosis without a difference in the initial dose between the two groups (p = 0.07). At M3, the daily dose was lower in patients treated after 2017 (p = 0.002). In patients who still received GC at M6 (p = 0.0008), M12 (p = 0.01) and M24 (p = 0.02), the daily GC dose was still lower in patients treated after 2017. The proportion of patients who definitively discontinued GC use before M18 (42% versus 21%, p = 0.003) was higher in those treated after 2017. The rates of immunosuppressant use were not different between the two time periods (31% versus 38%, p = 0.34), but tocilizumab replaced methotrexate. Significant differences were observed among practitioners regarding the GC doses at M6 (p = 0.04) and M12 (p = 0.04), the total GC duration (p = 0.02) and the ability to stop GC before M18 (p = 0.007). Conclusions: This real-life study showed a global change in GC management over time for GCA patients, with important variability among physicians' practices.

Relapse after cessation of weekly tocilizumab for giant cell arteritis: a multicentre service evaluation in England

OBJECTIVES

The National Health Service in England funds 12 months of weekly subcutaneous tocilizumab (qwTCZ) for patients with relapsing or refractory giant cell arteritis (GCA). During the COVID-19 pandemic, some patients were allowed longer treatment. We sought to describe what happened to patients after cessation of qwTCZ.

METHODS

Multicentre service evaluation of relapse after stopping qwTCZ for GCA. The log-rank test was used to identify significant differences in time to relapse.

RESULTS

336 GCA patients were analysed from 40 centres, treated with qwTCZ for a median (interquartile range, IQR) of 12 (12-17) months. At time of stopping qwTCZ, median (IQR) prednisolone dose was 2 (0-5) mg/day. By 6, 12 and 24 months after stopping qwTCZ, 21.4%, 35.4% and 48.6% respectively had relapsed, requiring an increase in prednisolone dose to a median (IQR) of 20 (10-40) mg/day. 33.6% of relapsers had a major relapse as defined by EULAR. Time to relapse was shorter in those that had previously also relapsed during qwTCZ treatment (P = 0.0017); in those not in remission at qwTCZ cessation (P = 0.0036); and in those with large vessel involvement on imaging (P = 0.0296). Age ≥65, gender, GCA-related sight loss, qwTCZ treatment duration, TCZ taper, prednisolone dosing, and conventional synthetic DMARD use were not associated with time to relapse.

CONCLUSION

Up to half our patients with GCA relapsed after stopping qwTCZ, often requiring a substantial increase in prednisolone dose. One third of relapsers had a major relapse. Extended use of TCZ or repeat treatment for relapse should be considered for these patients.

Burden, Causes, and Outcomes of Hospitalization in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis: A US National Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) has a relapsing-remitting course and is associated with a high burden of comorbidities, leading to repeated hospitalizations. This study was undertaken to investigate the burden, risk factors, causes, and outcomes of hospitalization and readmission in GCA patients in a US national cohort.

METHODS

Using the 2017 US National Readmission Database, we identified adults ≥50 years of age hospitalized with GCA between January and June 2017, with at least 6 months of follow-up. We estimated the burden of hospitalization including 6-month risk of readmission, total days spent in hospital, and costs, annually. We examined patient-, hospital-, and index hospitalization-related factors for 6-month readmission and total days of hospitalization using binomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

Our study included 1,206 patients hospitalized with GCA (70% women, median age 77 years), with 13% of patients experiencing GCA-related ophthalmologic complications at index hospital admission. On follow-up, 3% died, and 34% of patients were readmitted within 6 months, primarily for infections (23%) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) (15%). Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of ≥1, smoking, and obesity were associated with readmission. GCA patients spent a median of 5 days/year in hospital (interquartile range [IQR] 3-11), with those in the top quartile spending 19 days/year in hospital (IQR 14-26).

CONCLUSION

GCA patients frequently experience unplanned health care utilization, with 1 in 3 patients experiencing readmission within 6 months, and 3% dying within the follow-up period. Infection and CVDs are common causes of readmission and may be related to glucocorticoid exposure. Population health management strategies are required in these vulnerable GCA patients.

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in the management of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and metaanalysis of cohort studies

OBJECTIVE

The search for new glucocorticoid-sparing disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs continues to be an unmet need in large vessel vasculitis (LVV). This report aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of leflunomide (LEF) in Takayasu arteritis (TA) and giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature, searching for studies evaluating the efficacy of LEF in LVV. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects method.

RESULTS

The literature search identified eight studies that assessed LEF in TAK and seven in GCA. All were uncontrolled observational studies with a high risk of bias, implying a low or very-low certainty of evidence. In TAK, the pooled proportion of patients achieving at least a partial remission was 75% (95% CI: 0.64-0.84), angiographic stabilization was observed in 86% (0.77-0.94) and relapses in 12% (0.05-0.21). The mean reduction in the prednisolone dose (MRPD) after LEF treatment was 15.7 mg/d (10.28-21.16). Adverse events were observed in 8% of patients (0.02-0.16). Comparison of LEF with methotrexate (MTX) or cyclophosphamide revealed LEF to be superior in terms of remission induction, relapse prevention, and tolerance. When compared with tofacitinib, both drugs demonstrated comparable efficacy. In GCA, the pooled proportion of patients achieving at least a partial remission was 60% (0.17-0.95). The MRPD after LEF treatment was 15.63 mg/d (1.29-32.55) and 53% of the patients were able to discontinue glucocorticoids (0.25 - 0.80). Relapses were observed in 21% of cases (0.14- 0.28) and adverse events in 28% (0.12-0.46). Comparison of LEF with MTX showed similar efficacy and tolerance.

CONCLUSION

LEF is well tolerated and might be effective for patients with TAK and GCA.

Efficacy and tolerance of methotrexate in a real-life monocentric cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the indications, efficiency and tolerance profiles of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a real-life setting.

METHODS

From a monocentric database of >500 GCA patients, we retrospectively selected 49 patients who received MTX between 2010 and 2020. Cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) doses, the number of relapses and GC-related adverse events were recorded before, during and after MTX. We separately analyzed the 3 main indications of MTX, i.e., disease relapse, GC-sparing strategy, and GCA presentation.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 84 [10-255] months, 25 (51%) and 18/41 (44%) patients relapsed during MTX treatment and after its discontinuation, respectively. Among the 40 patients who relapsed before MTX, 26 (65%) experienced a new relapse after MTX introduction. Once MTX was introduced, 24 (49%) patients were able to discontinue GC after 20.5 [7-64] months. No significant difference in cumulative GC doses were noted before and after MTX introduction with a total GC dose of 14.7 [1.05-69.4] grams. At the last follow-up, MTX was discontinued in 41 patients, including 13 (32%) due to clinicobiological remission, 12 (30%) due to treatment failure and 15 (36%) due to side effects.

CONCLUSION

Our real-life study showed a modest beneficial effect of MTX on relapse in patients with GCA. However, we did not observe any GC-sparing effect in this study. Other studies are needed to assess the GC-sparing effect in patients in whom GC management is adapted from recent recommendations.

Patients' Baseline Characteristics, but Not Tocilizumab Exposure, Affect Severe Outcomes Onset in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Real-World Study

Objectives: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is associated with severe outcomes such as infections and cardiovascular diseases. We describe here the impact of GCA patients’ characteristics and treatment exposure on the occurrence of severe outcomes. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from real-world GCA patients with a minimum of six-months follow-up. We recorded severe outcomes and treatment exposure. In the survival analysis, we studied the predictive factors of severe outcomes occurrence, including treatment exposure (major glucocorticoids (GCs) exposure (>10 g of the cumulative dose) and tocilizumab (TCZ) exposure), as time-dependent covariates. Results: Among the 77 included patients, 26% were overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2). The mean cumulative dose of GCs was 7977 ± 4585 mg, 18 patients (23%) had a major GCs exposure, and 40 (52%) received TCZ. Over the 48-month mean follow-up period, 114 severe outcomes occurred in 77% of the patients: infections—29%, cardiovascular diseases—18%, hypertension—15%, fractural osteoporosis—8%, and deaths—6%. Baseline diabetes and overweight were predictive factors of severe outcomes onset (HR, 2.41 [1.05−5.55], p = 0.039; HR, 2.08 [1.14−3.81], p = 0.018, respectively) independently of age, sex, hypertension, and treatment exposure. Conclusion: Diabetic and overweight GCA patients constitute an at-risk group requiring tailored treatment, including vaccination. The effect of TCZ exposure on the reduction of severe outcomes was not proved here.