1
|
Meziyerh S, Bouwmans P, van Gelder T, van der Helm D, Messchendorp L, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Moes DJAR, de Vries APJ. Mycophenolic Acid Exposure Determines Antibody Formation Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Nested Cohort Study. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023. [PMID: 36789469 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Despite (repeated) boosting, kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) may remain at increased risk of severe COVID-19 since a substantial number of individuals remain seronegative or with low antibody titers. In particular, mycophenolic acid use has been shown to affect antibody formation negatively and may be an important modifiable risk factor. We investigated the exposure-response relationship between mycophenolic acid 12-hour area under the curve (AUC0-12h ) exposure and seroconversion including antibody titers after vaccination using mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Moderna) in 316 KTRs from our center that participated in the national Dutch renal patients COVID-19 vaccination - long term efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney disease patients vaccination study. After two vaccination doses, 162 (51%) KTRs seroconverted. KTRs treated with mycophenolic acid showed less seroconversion and lower antibody titers compared with KTRs without mycophenolic acid (44% vs. 77%, and 36 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL vs. 340 BAU/mL; P < 0.001). The mean mycophenolic acid AUC0-12h exposure was significantly lower in KTRs who seroconverted compared with KTRs who did not (39 vs. 29 mg⋅h/L; P < 0.001). High mycophenolic acid exposure (±90 mg⋅h/L) and no exposure to mycophenolic acid resulted in a seroconversion rate ranging from 10% to 80%. Every 10 mg⋅h/L increase in mycophenolic acid AUC0-12h gave an adjusted odds ratio for seroconversion of 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.97; P = 0.010) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93; P < 0.001) for KTRs on dual and triple maintenance immunosuppressive therapy, respectively. Higher mycophenolic acid AUC0-12h correlated with lower antibody titers (R = 0.44, P < 0.001). This study demonstrates the exposure-response relationship between gold standard mycophenolic acid exposure and antibody formation to support interventional studies investigating mycophenolic acid adjustment to improve antibody formation after further boosting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soufian Meziyerh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Leiden University Medical Center Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Bouwmans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht School for Cardiovascular Disease, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Teun van Gelder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Danny van der Helm
- Leiden University Medical Center Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lianne Messchendorp
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J M van der Boog
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Leiden University Medical Center Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Leiden University Medical Center Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Jan A R Moes
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht School for Cardiovascular Disease, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Aiko P J de Vries
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Leiden University Medical Center Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Immune Response to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in Previous Nonresponder Kidney Transplant Recipients After Short-term Withdrawal of Mycophenolic Acid 1 and 3 Months After an Additional Vaccine Dose. Transplantation 2023; 107:1139-1150. [PMID: 36617671 PMCID: PMC10125015 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impaired immune response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) leads to an urgent need for adapted immunization strategies. METHODS Sixty-nine KTRs without seroconversion after ≥3 COVID-19 vaccinations were enrolled, and humoral response was determined after an additional full-dose mRNA-1273 vaccination by measuring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibodies and neutralizing antibody activity against the Delta and Omicron variants 1 and 3 mo postvaccination. T-cell response was analyzed 3 mo postvaccination by assessing interferon-γ release. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) was withdrawn in 41 KTRs 1 wk before until 4 wk after vaccination to evaluate effects on immunogenicity. Graft function, changes in donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, and donor-derived cell-free DNA were monitored in KTRs undergoing MPA withdrawal. RESULTS Humoral response to vaccination was significantly stronger in KTRs undergoing MPA withdrawal 1 mo postvaccination; however, overall waning humoral immunity was noted in all KTRs 3 mo after vaccination. Higher anti-S1 immunoglobulin G levels correlated with better neutralizing antibody activity against the Delta and Omicron variants, whereas no significant association was detected between T-cell response and neutralizing antibody activity. No rejection occurred during study, and graft function remained stable in KTRs undergoing MPA withdrawal. In 22 KTRs with Omicron variant breakthrough infections, neutralizing antibody activity was better against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 wild-type and the Delta variants than against the Omicron variant. CONCLUSIONS MPA withdrawal to improve vaccine responsiveness should be critically evaluated because withdrawing MPA may be associated with enhanced alloimmune response, and the initial effect of enhanced seroconversion rates in KTRs with MPA withdrawal disappears 3 mo after vaccination.
Collapse
|
3
|
What Is New in Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19 in Renal Transplant Patients? A Report from an ESOT Meeting on the Topic. TRANSPLANTOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/transplantology3040030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
I should highlight that this manuscript is not a formal review on the topic, but a report from an ESOT meeting held on 22 June 2022. The assumption of immunosuppressants exposes kidney transplant recipients to the risk of infections, including COVID-19 infection. A transplant patient having COVID-19 infection raises several questions, including whether the immunosuppressive therapy should be reduced with the consequent risk of favoring acute rejections. Patient vaccination before transplantation is probably the gold standard to avoid the risk of COVID-19 infection after transplantation. In the case of transplant patients, three measures may be undertaken: vaccination, use of monoclonal antibodies and use of therapeutic antiviral small molecules. Concerning vaccination, it is still debated which one is the best and how many doses should be administered, particularly considering the new variants of the virus. The onset of virus variants has stimulated researchers to find new active vaccines. In addition, not all transplant patients develop antibodies. An alternative prophylactic measure to be principally used for patients that do not develop antibodies after vaccination is the use of monoclonal antibodies. These drugs may be administered as prophylaxis or in the early stage of the disease. Finally, the small antiviral molecules may be used again as prophylaxis or treatment. Their major drawbacks are their interference with immunosuppressive drugs and the fact that some of them cannot be administered to patients with low eGFR.
Collapse
|
4
|
Osmanodja B, Stegbauer J, Kantauskaite M, Rump LC, Heinzel A, Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Oberbauer R, Benotmane I, Caillard S, Masset C, Kerleau C, Blancho G, Budde K, Grunow F, Mikhailov M, Schrezenmeier E, Ronicke S. Development and validation of multivariable prediction models of serological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients. Front Immunol 2022; 13:997343. [PMID: 36268021 PMCID: PMC9576943 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.997343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Repeated vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 increases serological response in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with high interindividual variability. No decision support tool exists to predict SARS-CoV-2 vaccination response to third or fourth vaccination in KTR. We developed, internally and externally validated five different multivariable prediction models of serological response after the third and fourth vaccine dose against SARS-CoV-2 in previously seronegative, COVID-19-naïve KTR. Using 20 candidate predictor variables, we applied statistical and machine learning approaches including logistic regression (LR), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-regularized LR, random forest, and gradient boosted regression trees. For development and internal validation, data from 590 vaccinations were used. External validation was performed in four independent, international validation cohorts comprising 191, 184, 254, and 323 vaccinations, respectively. LASSO-regularized LR performed on the whole development dataset yielded a 20- and 10-variable model, respectively. External validation showed AUC-ROC of 0.840, 0.741, 0.816, and 0.783 for the sparser 10-variable model, yielding an overall performance 0.812. A 10-variable LASSO-regularized LR model predicts vaccination response in KTR with good overall accuracy. Implemented as an online tool, it can guide decisions whether to modulate immunosuppressive therapy before additional active vaccination, or to perform passive immunization to improve protection against COVID-19 in previously seronegative, COVID-19-naïve KTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilgin Osmanodja
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- *Correspondence: Bilgin Osmanodja,
| | - Johannes Stegbauer
- Department of Nephrology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marta Kantauskaite
- Department of Nephrology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Lars Christian Rump
- Department of Nephrology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Heinzel
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ilies Benotmane
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, INSERM Unit 1109, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sophie Caillard
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, INSERM Unit 1109, Strasbourg, France
| | - Christophe Masset
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, UMR 1064, INSERM, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
| | - Clarisse Kerleau
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, UMR 1064, INSERM, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
| | - Gilles Blancho
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, UMR 1064, INSERM, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fritz Grunow
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Mikhailov
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Schrezenmeier
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Ronicke
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Benning L, Morath C, Kühn T, Bartenschlager M, Kim H, Beimler J, Buylaert M, Nusshag C, Kälble F, Reineke M, Töllner M, Schaier M, Klein K, Blank A, Schnitzler P, Zeier M, Süsal C, Bartenschlager R, Tran TH, Speer C. Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in previous non-responder kidney transplant recipients after short-term withdrawal of mycophenolic acid. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:958293. [PMID: 36059830 PMCID: PMC9433830 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.958293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Seroconversion rates after COVID-19 vaccination are significantly lower in kidney transplant recipients compared to healthy cohorts. Adaptive immunization strategies are needed to protect these patients from COVID-19. In this prospective observational cohort study, we enrolled 76 kidney transplant recipients with no seroresponse after at least three COVID-19 vaccinations to receive an additional mRNA-1273 vaccination (full dose, 100 μg). Mycophenolic acid was withdrawn in 43 selected patients 5–7 days prior to vaccination and remained paused for 4 additional weeks after vaccination. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and neutralization of the delta and omicron variants were determined using a live-virus assay 4 weeks after vaccination. In patients with temporary mycophenolic acid withdrawal, donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and donor-derived cell-free DNA were monitored before withdrawal and at follow-up. SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies significantly increased in kidney transplant recipients after additional COVID-19 vaccination. The effect was most pronounced in individuals in whom mycophenolic acid was withdrawn during vaccination. Higher SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody titers were associated with better neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variants. In patients with short-term withdrawal of mycophenolic acid, graft function and donor-derived cell-free DNA remained stable. No acute rejection episode occurred during short-term follow-up. However, resurgence of prior anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies was detected in 7 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Benning
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Louise Benning,
| | - Christian Morath
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tessa Kühn
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marie Bartenschlager
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heeyoung Kim
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Beimler
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mirabel Buylaert
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Nusshag
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Kälble
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marvin Reineke
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Schaier
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katrin Klein
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Blank
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Schnitzler
- Department of Virology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ralf Bartenschlager
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division Virus-Associated Carcinogenesis, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thuong Hien Tran
- Institute of Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudius Speer
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit Heidelberg, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lombardi Y, François H. Belatacept in Kidney Transplantation: What Are the True Benefits? A Systematic Review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:942665. [PMID: 35911396 PMCID: PMC9329606 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.942665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The current gold standard to prevent allograft rejection for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation currently consists in glucocorticoids, an antiproliferative agent and a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), with better outcome for tacrolimus than cyclosporin. Although, CNI drastically improved early graft survival, so far, CNI have failed to significantly improve long-term survival mainly because of nephrotoxicity. In addition, CNI carry several other side effects such as an increased risk for cardiovascular events and for diabetes mellitus. Therefore, seeking alternatives to CNI remains of paramount importance in kidney transplantation. Belatacept is a fusion protein composed of the human IgG1 Fc fragment linked to the modified extracellular domain of cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated antigen 4. In kidney transplant recipients, pivotal phase III randomized studies suggested clinical benefits of belatacept as an initial maintenance regimen, as compared with cyclosporine, mainly on kidney function. Recently, a randomized study also suggested a clinical benefit on renal function of a conversion from a CNI-based to a belatacept-based maintenance regimen in patients. However, conversion from CNIs to belatacept is probably associated with an increased risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection and should prompt close clinical surveillance. On the other hand, other studies suggest a decrease in de novo humoral transplant immunization. Belatacept is probably associated with an increase in both risk and severity of some infectious diseases, including EBV-linked post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders, and with a decreased response to vaccines. Most studies on belatacept are observational, retrospective, and non-comparative. Consequently, high-quality data about the safety and efficacy profile of belatacept, as compared with the current gold standard for maintenance regimens (tacrolimus-based), is uncertain. Our review will therefore focus on the most recent published data aiming at evaluating the evidence-based or the “true” benefits and risks of belatacept-based regimens in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannis Lombardi
- Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Hélène François
- Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR_S 1155, Paris, France
- *Correspondence: Hélène François
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lindemann M, Baumann C, Wilde B, Gäckler A, Meller L, Horn PA, Krawczyk A, Witzke O. Prospective, Longitudinal Study on Specific Cellular Immune Responses after Vaccination with an Adjuvanted, Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10060844. [PMID: 35746452 PMCID: PMC9227383 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10060844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Solid organ transplant recipients have an up to ninefold higher risk of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) reactivation than the general population. Due to lifelong immunosuppressive therapy, vaccination against VZV may be less effective in kidney transplant (KTX) recipients. In the current study, twelve female and 17 male KTX recipients were vaccinated twice with the adjuvanted, recombinant zoster vaccine Shingrix™, which contains the VZV glycoprotein E (gE). Cellular immunity against various VZV antigens was analyzed with interferon-gamma ELISpot. We observed the strongest vaccination-induced changes after stimulation with a gE peptide pool. One month after the second vaccination, median responses were 8.0-fold higher than the responses prior to vaccination (p = 0.0006) and 4.8-fold higher than responses after the first vaccination (p = 0.0007). After the second vaccination, we observed an at least twofold increase in ELISpot responses towards gE peptides in 22 out of 29 patients (76%). Male sex, good kidney function, early time point after transplantation, and treatment with tacrolimus or mycophenolate were correlated significantly with higher VZV-specific cellular immunity, whereas diabetes mellitus was correlated with impaired responses. Thus, our data indicate that vaccination with Shingrix™ significantly augmented cellular, VZV gE-specific immunity in KTX recipients, which was dependent on several covariates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Lindemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (C.B.); (P.A.H.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-723-4217
| | - Charleen Baumann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (C.B.); (P.A.H.)
- Department of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Essen-Duisburg, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.M.); (A.K.); (O.W.)
| | - Benjamin Wilde
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (B.W.); (A.G.)
| | - Anja Gäckler
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (B.W.); (A.G.)
| | - Lara Meller
- Department of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Essen-Duisburg, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.M.); (A.K.); (O.W.)
| | - Peter A. Horn
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (C.B.); (P.A.H.)
| | - Adalbert Krawczyk
- Department of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Essen-Duisburg, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.M.); (A.K.); (O.W.)
| | - Oliver Witzke
- Department of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Essen-Duisburg, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.M.); (A.K.); (O.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Osmanodja B, Ronicke S, Budde K, Jens A, Hammett C, Koch N, Seelow E, Waiser J, Zukunft B, Bachmann F, Choi M, Weber U, Eberspächer B, Hofmann J, Grunow F, Mikhailov M, Liefeldt L, Eckardt KU, Halleck F, Schrezenmeier E. Serological Response to Three, Four and Five Doses of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092565. [PMID: 35566691 PMCID: PMC9105533 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Mortality from COVID-19 among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is high, and their response to three vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 is strongly impaired. We retrospectively analyzed the serological response of up to five doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in KTR from 27 December 2020 until 31 December 2021. Particularly, the influence of the different dose adjustment regimens for mycophenolic acid (MPA) on serological response to fourth vaccination was analyzed. In total, 4277 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 in 1478 patients were analyzed. Serological response was 19.5% after 1203 basic immunizations, and increased to 29.4%, 55.6%, and 57.5% in response to 603 third, 250 fourth, and 40 fifth vaccinations, resulting in a cumulative response rate of 88.7%. In patients with calcineurin inhibitor and MPA maintenance immunosuppression, pausing MPA and adding 5 mg prednisolone equivalent before the fourth vaccination increased the serological response rate to 75% in comparison to the no dose adjustment (52%) or dose reduction (46%). Belatacept-treated patients had a response rate of 8.7% (4/46) after three vaccinations and 12.5% (3/25) after four vaccinations. Except for belatacept-treated patients, repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of up to five times effectively induces serological response in kidney transplant recipients. It can be enhanced by pausing MPA at the time of vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilgin Osmanodja
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-614-368
| | - Simon Ronicke
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Annika Jens
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Charlotte Hammett
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Nadine Koch
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Evelyn Seelow
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Johannes Waiser
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Bianca Zukunft
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Friederike Bachmann
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Mira Choi
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Ulrike Weber
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | | | - Jörg Hofmann
- Labor Berlin—Charité Vivantes GmbH, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (B.E.); (J.H.)
| | - Fritz Grunow
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Michael Mikhailov
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Lutz Liefeldt
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Kai-Uwe Eckardt
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Fabian Halleck
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
| | - Eva Schrezenmeier
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.R.); (K.B.); (A.J.); (C.H.); (N.K.); (E.S.); (J.W.); (B.Z.); (F.B.); (M.C.); (U.W.); (F.G.); (M.M.); (L.L.); (K.-U.E.); (F.H.); (E.S.)
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Serological Response to Three, Four and Five Doses of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients. J Clin Med 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092565
expr 939359460 + 834636087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Mortality from COVID-19 among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is high, and their response to three vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 is strongly impaired. We retrospectively analyzed the serological response of up to five doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in KTR from 27 December 2020 until 31 December 2021. Particularly, the influence of the different dose adjustment regimens for mycophenolic acid (MPA) on serological response to fourth vaccination was analyzed. In total, 4277 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 in 1478 patients were analyzed. Serological response was 19.5% after 1203 basic immunizations, and increased to 29.4%, 55.6%, and 57.5% in response to 603 third, 250 fourth, and 40 fifth vaccinations, resulting in a cumulative response rate of 88.7%. In patients with calcineurin inhibitor and MPA maintenance immunosuppression, pausing MPA and adding 5 mg prednisolone equivalent before the fourth vaccination increased the serological response rate to 75% in comparison to the no dose adjustment (52%) or dose reduction (46%). Belatacept-treated patients had a response rate of 8.7% (4/46) after three vaccinations and 12.5% (3/25) after four vaccinations. Except for belatacept-treated patients, repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of up to five times effectively induces serological response in kidney transplant recipients. It can be enhanced by pausing MPA at the time of vaccination.
Collapse
|