Measurement of Serum IgG Anti-Integrin αvβ6 Autoantibodies Is a Promising Tool in the Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative colitis: clinical biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and emerging treatments

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is one of the two forms of inflammatory bowel disease. It affects 5 million people globally, and is a chronic and recurring inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract with clinical presentation of abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. The cause and the etiology of UC remain poorly understood. There is no cure and no 'gold standard diagnostic' for UC. The existing treatments are ineffective, and UC patients have a lower life expectancy with a risk of colorectal cancer. Recent studies in pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and biomarkers have significantly improved our understanding of UC. In this review we summarize recent advances in identifying novel clinical biomarkers, diagnostics, treatment targets, and emerging therapeutics. These insights are expected to assist in developing effective treatments for UC.

Precision Medicine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Spotlight on Emerging Molecular Biomarkers

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remain challenging in terms of understanding their causes and in terms of diagnosing, treating, and monitoring patients. Modern diagnosis combines biomarkers, imaging, and endoscopic methods. Common biomarkers like CRP and fecal calprotectin, while invaluable tools, have limitations and are not entirely specific to IBD. The limitations of existing markers and the invasiveness of endoscopic procedures highlight the need to discover and implement new markers. With an ideal biomarker, we could predict the risk of disease development, as well as the possibility of response to a particular therapy, which would be significant in elucidating the pathogenesis of the disease. Recent research in the fields of machine learning, proteomics, epigenetics, and gut microbiota provides further insight into the pathogenesis of the disease and is also revealing new biomarkers. New markers, such as BAFF, PGE-MUM, oncostatin M, microRNA panels, αvβ6 antibody, and S100A12 from stool, are increasingly being identified, with αvβ6 antibody and oncostatin M being potentially close to being presented into clinical practice. However, the specificity of certain markers still remains problematic. Furthermore, the use of expensive and less accessible technology for detecting new markers, such as microRNAs, represents a limitation for widespread use in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the need for non-invasive, comprehensive markers is becoming increasingly important regarding the complexity of treatment and overall management of IBD.

Diagnostic Procedures for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Laboratory, Endoscopy, Pathology, Imaging, and Beyond

Diagnosing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can often be challenging, and differentiating between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis can be particularly difficult. Diagnostic procedures for IBD include laboratory tests, endoscopy, pathological tests, and imaging tests. Serological and stool tests can be easily performed in an outpatient setting and provide critical diagnostic clues. Although endoscopy is an invasive procedure, it offers essential diagnostic information and allows for tissue biopsy and therapeutic procedures. Video capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy are endoscopic procedures used to evaluate the small bowel. In addition to endoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and ultrasound (US) are valuable tools for small bowel assessment. Among these, US is noninvasive and easily utilized, making its use highly practical in daily clinical practice. Endoscopic biopsy aids in the diagnosis of IBD and is crucial for assessing the histological activity of the disease, facilitating a thorough evaluation of disease remission, and aiding in the development of treatment strategies. Recent advances in artificial intelligence hold promise for enhancing various aspects of IBD management, including diagnosis, monitoring, and precision medicine. This review compiles current procedures and promising future tools for the diagnosis of IBD, providing comprehensive insights.

Challenges in IBD Research 2024: Precision Medicine

Precision medicine is part of 5 focus areas of the Challenges in IBD Research 2024 research document, which also includes preclinical human IBD mechanisms, environmental triggers, novel technologies, and pragmatic clinical research. Building on Challenges in IBD Research 2019, the current Challenges aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current gaps in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) research and deliver actionable approaches to address them with a focus on how these gaps can lead to advancements in interception, remission, and restoration for these diseases. The document is the result of multidisciplinary input from scientists, clinicians, patients, and funders, and represents a valuable resource for patient-centric research prioritization. In particular, the precision medicine section is focused on the main research gaps in elucidating how to bring the best care to the individual patient in IBD. Research gaps were identified in biomarker discovery and validation for predicting disease progression and choosing the most appropriate treatment for each patient. Other gaps were identified in making the best use of existing patient biosamples and clinical data, developing new technologies to analyze large datasets, and overcoming regulatory and payer hurdles to enable clinical use of biomarkers. To address these gaps, the Workgroup suggests focusing on thoroughly validating existing candidate biomarkers, using best-in-class data generation and analysis tools, and establishing cross-disciplinary teams to tackle regulatory hurdles as early as possible. Altogether, the precision medicine group recognizes the importance of bringing basic scientific biomarker discovery and translating it into the clinic to help improve the lives of IBD patients.

Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies are a potential biomarker for ulcerative colitis-like immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis

BACKGROUND

No specific biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced colitis has been established. Previously, we identified anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies in >90% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Given that a subset of ICI-induced colitis is similar to UC, we aimed to clarify the relationship between such autoantibodies and ICI-induced colitis.

METHODS

Serum anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibody levels were compared between 26 patients with ICI-induced colitis and 157 controls. Endoscopic images of ICI-induced colitis were centrally reviewed. Characteristics of anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies in the ICI-induced colitis patients were compared with those of UC patients.

RESULTS

Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies were found in 8/26 (30.8%) patients with ICI-induced colitis and 3/157 (1.9%) controls (P < 0.001). Patients with anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies had significantly more typical UC endoscopic features than those without the autoantibodies (P < 0.001). Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies in ICI-induced colitis patients were associated with grade ≥3 colitis (P = 0.001) and steroid resistance (P = 0.005). Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibody titers correlated with ICI-induced colitis disease activity. Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies of ICI-induced colitis exhibited similar characteristics to those of UC.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies may serve as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis, classification, risk management, and monitoring the disease activity, of ICI-induced colitis.

Astragalus polysaccharides ameliorates experimental colitis by regulating memory B cells metabolism

It is well-established that the reduced Memory B cells (MBCs) play an important role in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC), rendering them a potential therapeutic target for UC intervention. Astragalus polysaccharide (APS), a primary active constituent derived from the classic traditional Chinese medicine Astragalus membranaceus (AM), has been used for centuries in the treatment of UC in both human and animal subjects due to its renowned immunomodulatory properties. However, it is unknown whether APS can regulate MBCs to alleviate experimental colitis. In the present investigation, the murine colitis was successfully induced using dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) and subsequently treated with APS for a duration of 7 days. APS exhibited significant efficacy in reducing the disease activity index (DAI), colonic weight index, the index of colonic weight/colonic length. Furthermore, APS mitigated colonic pathological injuries, restored the colonic length, elevated the immunoglobulin A (IgA), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and interleukin (IL)-10 levels, while concurrently suppressing IgG, IgM, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels. Crucially, the quantities of MBCs, IgA+MBCs and forkhead box P3 (Foxp3+) MBCs were notably increased along with a concurrent decrease in IgG1+MBCs, IG2a+MBCs, IgG2b+MBCs after APS administration in colitis mice. Additionally, the Mitotracker red expressions of MBCs and their subgroups demonstrated a significantly up-regulation. Meanwhile, the transcriptomics analysis identified mitochondrial metabolism as the predominant and pivotal mechanism underlying APS-mediated mitigation of DSS-induced colitis. Key differentially expressed genes, including B-cell linker (BLNK), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1), B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL-6), B-lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1 (Blimp-1), paired box gene 5 (PAX5), purinergic 2 × 7 receptor (P2X7R), B Cell activation factor (BAFF), B Cell activation factor receptor (BAFFR), CD40, nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB), IL-6 and so on were implicated in this process. These mRNA expressions were validated through quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and immunohistochemistry. These findings revealed that APS effectively restored MBCs and their balance to ameliorate DSS-induced colitis, which was potentially realized via promoting mitochondrial metabolism to maintain MBCs activation.

The diagnostic performance of serum αvβ6 autoantibodies for ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Currently, there is no single golden standard for diagnosing ulcerative colitis (UC). Now serum αvβ6 autoantibodies have shown promise as a diagnostic tool for UC. Here the aim was to determine the diagnostic performance of serum αvβ6 autoantibodies for UC.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Embase, and the Web of Science were searched comprehensively. STATA software was utilized to analyze the relevant data.

RESULTS

9 studies from 6 articles with 1827 subjects were eligible. The summary sensitivity and specificity of serum αvβ6 autoantibodies to diagnose UC were 0.82 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.65-0.92) and 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.90-0.97) with an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 (95 % CI: 0.94-0.97). Subgroup analysis was conducted owning to substantial heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 97 % and P < 0.001). The aggregate sensitivity and specificity to diagnose UC in adults were 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.86) and 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.90-0.97), and when using a threshold of mean control+3SD, 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.60-0.91) and 0.96 (95 % CI: 0.90-0.99), respectively. Additionally, to differentiate UC from healthy participants, non-inflammatory bowel disease, and Crohn's disease, the overall specificity was 0.96, 0.88, and 0.80, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

serum αvβ6 autoantibodies, as a non-invasive tool, demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy for UC. However, their application may be limited in some immune-related disorders, and further studies are needed for validation.

Predictive biomarkers of rapidly developing insulin deficiency in children with type 1 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

The rate of progression to complete insulin deficiency varies greatly in type 1 diabetes. This constitutes a challenge, especially when randomizing patients in intervention trials aiming to preserve beta cell function. This study aimed to identify biomarkers predictive of either a rapid or slow disease progression in children with new-onset type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of children (<18 years) with type 1 diabetes (N=46) was included at diagnosis and followed until complete insulinopenia (C-peptide <0.03 nmol/L). Children were grouped into rapid progressors (n=20, loss within 30 months) and slow progressors (n=26). A sex-matched control group of healthy children (N=45) of similar age was included for comparison. Multiple biomarkers were assessed by proximity extension assay (PEA) at baseline and follow-up.

RESULTS

At baseline, rapid progressors had lower C-peptide and higher autoantibody levels than slow. Three biomarkers were higher in the rapid group: carbonic anhydrase 9, corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1, and tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 21. In a linear mixed model, 25 proteins changed over time, irrespective of group. One protein, a coxsackievirus B-adenovirus receptor (CAR) increased over time in rapid progressors. Eighty-one proteins differed between type 1 diabetes and healthy controls. Principal component analysis could not distinguish between rapid, slow, and healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences in individual proteins, the combination of multiple biomarkers analyzed by PEA could not distinguish the rate of progression in children with new-onset type 1 diabetes. Only one marker was altered significantly when considering both time and group effects, namely CAR, which increased significantly over time in the rapid group. Nevertheless, we did find some markers that may be useful in predicting the decline of the C-peptide. Moreover, these could potentially be important for understanding type 1 diabetes pathogenesis.

Diagnostic value of anti-integrin αvβ6 antibodies in ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC)-related mucosal inflammation is characterized by the production of various autoantibodies with limited clinical relevance. Recent studies have shown that circulating levels of IgG against integrin αvβ6 are increased in UC patients as compared to Crohn's disease (CD) patients and healthy controls (HC). The present study assessed the diagnostic value of circulating IgG anti-αvβ6 in UC. Sera were prospectively collected from 108 outpatients with UC, 103 patients with CD, and 62 HC, and the levels of IgG anti-αvβ6 were measured using a commercially available ELISA kit. The cut-off for positive results was defined as the 95th percentile of the values of the autoantibodies in HC serum samples. Levels of IgG anti-αvβ6 were significantly higher in UC than in CD patients, including those with colonic localization, and HC. Fifty-six of the 108 (51.8%) UC patients had a positive test whereas only 17/103 (16.5%) patients with CD, and among these, 4/16 (25%) patients with colonic CD, were positive. In UC, there was no statistical difference between patients with IgG anti-αvβ6 positivity and those negative in terms of clinical disease activity, fecal calprotectin values, and disease extent. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value, and predictive negative value of the test to differentiate between UC and CD were 51.9% (C.I.42.4-61.3), 83.5% (C.I. 76.3-90.7), 76.7% (C.I. 67.0-86.4), and 62.3% (C.I. 54.2-70.4) respectively. Our study confirms that anti-αvβ6 antibodies are demonstrable in the serum of the majority of UC patients and suggests the necessity of further research to understand if the anti-αvβ6 antibody determination could have a place in the clinical decision-making of IBD.

Mini review of first-in-human integrin αvβ6 PET tracers

This mini review of clinically-evaluated integrin αvβ6 PET-tracers reveals distinct differences in human-biodistribution patterns between linear peptides, including disulfide-stabilized formats, compared to head-to-tail cyclized peptides. All PET tracers mentioned in this mini review were able to delineate disease from normal tissues, but some αvβ6 PET tracers are better than others for particular clinical applications. Each αvβ6 PET tracer was validated for its ability to bind integrin αvβ6 with high affinity. However, all the head-to-tail cyclized peptide PET-tracers reviewed here did not accumulate in the GI-tract, in striking contrast to the linear and disulfide-bonded counterparts currently undergoing clinical evaluation in cancer, IPF and long COVID. Multiple independent investigators have reported the presence of β6 mRNA as well as αvβ6 protein in the GI-tract. Currently, there remains further need for biochemical, clinical, and structural data to satisfactorily explain the state-of-the-art in human αvβ6-imaging.

Biomarkers in IBD: What to Utilize for the Diagnosis?

The role of biomarkers in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease is not fully characterized. C-reactive protein has a short half-life and elevates quickly after the onset of an inflammatory process; the performance is better in Crohn's disease than in ulcerative colitis. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is easy to determine, widely available, and cheap, but the long half-life, the influence of age, anemia, smoking, and drugs limit its usefulness. Fecal markers have good specificity, but suboptimal accuracy. Microbial antibodies and novel immunological markers show promise but need further evidence before entering clinical practice. Proteomic methods could represent the dawn of a new era of stool protein/peptide biomarker panels able to select patients at risk of inflammatory bowel disease.

Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) possess autoantibodies against biliary epithelial cells. However, the target molecules remain unknown.

METHODS

The sera of patients with PSC and controls were subjected to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to detect autoantibodies using recombinant integrin proteins. Integrin αvβ6 expression in the bile duct tissues was examined using immunofluorescence. The blocking activity of the autoantibodies was examined using solid-phase binding assays.

RESULTS

Anti-integrin αvβ6 antibodies were detected in 49/55 (89.1%) patients with PSC and 5/150 (3.3%) controls (P < 0.001), with a sensitivity and specificity of 89.1% and 96.7%, respectively, for PSC diagnosis. When focusing on the presence or absence of IBD, the proportion of the positive antibodies in PSC with IBD was 97.2% (35/36) and that in PSC alone was 73.7% (14/19) (P = 0.008). Integrin αvβ6 was expressed in bile duct epithelial cells. Immunoglobulin (Ig)G from 15/33 patients with PSC blocked integrin αvβ6-fibronectin binding through an RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) tripeptide motif.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoantibodies against integrin αvβ6 were detected in most patients with PSC; anti-integrin αvβ6 antibody may serve as a potential diagnostic biomarker for PSC.

Current and emerging biomarkers for ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic illness requiring lifelong management that could be enhanced by personalizing care using biomarkers.

AREAS COVERED

The main biomarker discovery modalities are reviewed, highlighting recent results across the spectrum of applications, including diagnostics (serum anti-αvβ6 antibodies achieving an area under the curve [AUC] = 0.99; serum oncostatin M AUC = 0.94), disease activity assessment (fecal calprotectin and serum trefoil factor 3: AUC > 0.90), prognostication of the need for treatment escalation (whole blood transcriptomic panels and CLEC5A/CDH2 ratio: AUC > 0.90), prediction of treatment response, and early identification of patients with subclinical disease. The use of established biomarkers is discussed, along with new evidence regarding autoantibodies, proteins, proteomic panels, transcriptomic signatures, deoxyribonucleic acid methylation patterns, and UC-specific glycomic and metabolic disturbances.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel biomarkers will pave the way for optimized UC care. However, validation, simplification, and direct clinical translation of complex models may prove challenging. Currently, few candidates exist to assess key characteristics, such as UC susceptibility, histological disease activity, drug response, and long-term disease behavior. Further research will likely not only reveal new tools to tackle these issues but also contribute to understanding UC pathogenesis mechanisms.

Integrin β6 deficiency protects mice from experimental colitis and colitis-associated carcinoma by altering macrophage polarization

Background

Given the key role of integrins in maintaining intestinal homeostasis, anti-integrin biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are being investigated in full swing. However, the unsatisfactory efficacy and safety of current anti-integrin biologics in clinical trials limit their widespread use in clinic. Therefore, it is particularly important to find a target that is highly and specifically expressed in the intestinal epithelium of patients with IBD.

Methods

The function of integrin αvβ6 in IBD and colitis-associated carcinoma (CAC) with the underlying mechanisms has been less studied. In the present study, we detected the level of integrin β6 within inflammation including colitis tissues in human and mouse. To investigate the role of integrin β6 in IBD and CAC, integrin β6 deficient mice were hence generated based on the construction of colitis and CAC model.

Results

We noted that integrin β6 was significantly upregulated in inflammatory epithelium of patients with IBD. Integrin β6 deletion not only reduced infiltration of pro-inflammatory cytokines, but also attenuated disruption of tight junctions between colonic epithelial cells. Meanwhile, lack of integrin β6 affected macrophage infiltration in mice with colitis. This study further revealed that lack of integrin β6 could inhibit tumorigenesis and tumor progression in CAC model by influencing macrophage polarization, which was also involved in attenuating the degree of intestinal symptoms and inflammatory responses in mice suffering from colitis.

Conclusions

The present research provides a potentially new perspective and option for the treatment of IBD and CAC.

Impacts of plasma microbial lipopolysaccharide translocation on B cell perturbations and anti-CD4 autoantibody production in people with HIV on suppressive antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

. Up to 20% of people with HIV (PWH) who undergo virologically suppressed antiretroviral therapy (ART) fail to experience complete immune restoration. We recently reported that plasma anti-CD4 IgG (antiCD4IgG) autoantibodies from immune non-responders specifically deplete CD4 + T cells via antibody-dependent cytotoxicity. However, the mechanism of antiCD4IgG production remains unclear.

METHODS

. Blood samples were collected from 16 healthy individuals and 25 PWH on suppressive ART. IgG subclass, plasma lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and antiCD4IgG levels were measured by ELISA. Gene profiles in B cells were analyzed by microarray and quantitative PCR. Furthermore, a patient-derived antiCD4IgG-producing B cell line was generated and stimulated with LPS in vitro. B cell IgG class switch recombination (CSR) was evaluated in response to LPS in splenic B cells from C57/B6 mice in vitro.

RESULTS

. Increased plasma anti-CD4 IgGs in PWH were predominantly IgG1 and associated with increased plasma LPS levels as well as B cell expression of TLR2, TLR4, and MyD88 mRNA in vivo. Furthermore, LPS stimulation induced antiCD4IgG production in the antiCD4IgG B cell line in vitro. Finally, LPS promoted CSR in vitro.

CONCLUSION

. Our findings suggest that persistent LPS translocation may promote anti-CD4 autoreactive B cell activation and antiCD4IgG production in PWH on ART, which may contribute to gradual CD4 + T cell depletion. This study suggests that reversing a compromised mucosal barrier could improve ART outcomes in PWH who fail to experience complete immune restoration.