Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Maternal Well-Being during Pregnancy

The Emotional Experience of Mexican Women with SARS-CoV-2 during Pregnancy-A Qualitative Study

Pregnant women have been considered a high-risk group for SARS-CoV-2 infection; the impact of the disease on the health of a mother and her child is still being studied. The emotional impact of the pandemic on pregnant women has been extensively studied. Emotional distress is proposed as a perspective to explain the emotional manifestations in women during this stage as something common rather than pathological. The objective of this study was to explore the emotional experience of women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 towards the end of their pregnancy, during the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Mexico. A qualitative study was carried out: 18 pregnant women with COVID-19 were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the data was performed, resulting in 3 main themes and 14 subthemes. The COVID-19-infected mothers-to-be experienced mild to moderate emotional distress. It was more intense for those with comorbidities. This distress was aggravated during obstetrical complications and comorbidities, as well as during COVID-19 and postpartum. The emotional distress was appeased by both the perception of medical care and social support. The emotional distress of pregnant women with COVID-19 requires emotional support to reduce its impact.

Exploring social complexities of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal anxiety: A mixed-methods observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this mixed-methods, small-scale observational cohort study was to examine if anxiety in pregnant women increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and to examine the subsequent impact on birth outcomes and psychological well-being. This research was conducted across two hospital sites in North London, with participation from 194 pregnant women.

METHODS

The GAD-7 questionnaire assessed for mild, moderate and high anxiety at one time point during the antenatal period and was repeated 6 weeks postnatally. Women with moderate to high scores on the GAD-7 were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. The primary outcome measure was assessment of antenatal and postnatal anxiety. Secondary outcome measures assessed if women with moderate/high GAD-7 scores were more likely to develop a mental health condition during pregnancy, or up to 6 weeks postnatally, and if risk of preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation) and instrumental birth or cesarean section increased.

RESULTS

Pearson’s correlation indicated a positive and significant correlation between the COVID-19 pandemic, and increased self-reported antenatal GAD-7 anxiety scores (r=0.47, n=194, p<0.001). GAD-7 scores were higher during pregnancy compared to the postnatal period [t(193)=4.63; p=0.001; 95% CI: 0.87–2.16]. Logistic regression did not show an increased likelihood of preterm birth [χ²(1, n=184)=0.999; p=0.971] or instrumental/cesarean section birth in women who scored moderately to highly on the antenatal GAD-7 [χ²(1, n=184)=2.73; p=0.165]. Qualitative analysis was carried out within a social constructionist framework and identified the following themes: anxiety, maternity care, social impact, and coping.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women self-reported an increase in antenatal anxiety during July 2020 to April 2021 of the COVID-19 pandemic. Moderate to high anxiety scores were not found to increase the likelihood of preterm birth and birth intervention or developing a mental health condition up to 6 weeks postnatally.