Postoperative Outcomes and Reinterventions Following Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair in Post-Dissection and Complex Degenerative Abdominal and Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Complete Endovascular Repair of Entire Aorta for Extensive Pathologies -A set of China Strategies

Endovascular aortic repair was first clinically applied in China in 1997. In subsequent years, this technique was rapidly adopted across the country and has since evolved with ongoing device development. Domestically produced endovascular devices began to emerge after 2000 and have been continuously growing, benefiting from advancements of materials and manufacturing processes. Nonetheless, the availability of devices for complex aortic pathologies remains limited in China, leading to prevalent use of physician-modified devices by vascular surgeons. For nearly two decades, our center has been committed to advancing endovascular technologies for the treatment of aortic diseases. We have designed innovative devices for reconstructing aortic arch branches, visceral arteries and internal iliac arteries, specifically the devices for post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Now we have developed a stent graft system which can be used for complete endovascular repair of the entire aorta in the high-risk patients with expansive aortic diseases. This article aims to discuss the design principles of these novel devices, the progress of clinical trials or applications, and the technical challenges encountered during development.

Disease-specific patient-reported quality of life after fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVES

Fenestrated-branched endovascular technology (F/B-EVAR) is increasingly used to repair complex aortic aneurysms. While reintervention, morbidity and mortality after F/B-EVAR have been well-characterized, studies on patient-reported quality of life (QOL) after F/B-EVAR have been limited in their use of non-specific instruments and measures. We report on disease-specific QOL in patients that underwent F/B-EVAR using a validated QOL survey for aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained databases were used to contact living patients that underwent F/B-EVAR for pararenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms at two institutions. Eligible patients (n = 286) were asked to complete a disease-specific QOL survey previously validated in patients that underwent repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. An emotional impact score (EIS) from 0-100 was derived from the survey with higher scores indicating more emotional impact and worse QOL. Respondent behavior change following F/B-EVAR was evaluated in four domains (strenuous activity, travel, heavy lifting, and sexual activity) previously identified by patients to be most impacted by an aortic aneurysm.

RESULTS

In total, 234 patients (82%) completed surveys. Mean post-operative interval to survey completion was 3.4 ± 2.8 years. Mean EIS was 16 (range 0-91) for all patients surveyed, with higher mean EIS among those within the first year after F/B-EVAR (20 vs 14). Most respondents demonstrated limited adverse emotional impact after F/B-EVAR. However, the 4th quartile of EIS was broad (22-91), indicating that a subset of respondents had significantly worse QOL after repair. While most patients reported no post-procedure change in each of the activity domains, over 40% of patients did report decrease in strenuous activity and heavy lifting after F/B-EVAR. Those with decreased activity after repair had corresponding deficiencies in disease-specific knowledge for the domains of heavy lifting (P <.001) and sexual activity (P = .17).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients who underwent F/B-EVAR in this cohort had low emotional impact on their QOL after repair. One-quarter of patients did report significant post-procedure anxiety about their aneurysm, with improvement observed beyond one year after repair. Most patients reported unchanged or decreased activity levels following F/B-EVAR, and less aneurysm-specific patient knowledge was associated with decreased activity after repair. These findings are similar to those seen in prior work using this survey instrument in patients that underwent infrarenal aneurysm repair. This work confirms the feasibility of using this survey to evaluate QOL in patients with complex aortic disease. Longitudinal evaluation in these patients may identify those at high-risk for worse QOL after F/B-EVAR.

Postdissection Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Aneurysm Open Repair: A Surgical Technique Description and Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Postdissection abdominal aortic aneurysms (pDAAA) may develop in up to 7% of patients affected by aortic dissection. However, there is no consensus on the optimal management. Different endovascular and open surgical techniques have been reported. This case series describes the open surgical technique employed at a tertiary vascular surgery center to manage this complex pathology to allow future treatment of the visceral aorta if needed. A systematic review of the relevant literature on surgical and endovascular management of pDAAA was conducted.

METHOD

Consecutive patients surgically treated at a single center for pDAAA metachronous to a Stanford type A or type B aortic dissection from January 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively retrieved. The surgical technique we employed entails the use of large-diameter bifurcated grafts (≥9 mm branches) with longer main body, fenestration of the septum at renal arteries ostia and landing on a common femoral artery in case of small caliber iliac arteries (<8 mm) to provide a suitable landing zone and access route for future endovascular thoracoabdominal repair in case of subsequent aneurysmal degeneration. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were major complications, late mortality, aortic-related mortality, and aortic-related reinterventions. Then, a systematic review of the literature until March 2023 was conducted.

RESULTS

Five patients were included, all males with a mean age of 61 years. The 30-day mortality was 0. One patient suffered from postoperative acute kidney injury and acute distress respiratory syndrome, and another one underwent repeat laparotomy for abdominal seroma. The mean follow-up was 44 months with no aortic-related reinterventions to date. One patient died from nonaortic-related causes 9 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Open repair of pDAAA appears to be an effective treatment in selected patients, with low mortality rates, and technical choices should consider future endovascular treatment of the thoracoabdominal aorta.

Outcome of Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair

INTRODUCTION

Despite the widespread use of branched (bEVAR) and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (fEVAR) for complex aortic pathologies, there are no reliable recommendations regarding postsurgery antiplatelet therapy. We therefore evaluated the outcome of single (SAPT) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following fEVAR and bEVAR.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients from two German centers treated for complex aortic pathologies were included in this retrospective study. Patient data and computed tomography angiograms were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analyses for overall survival and freedom from target vessel (TV)-related complications were performed. The outcomes were compared between SAPT versus DAPT and bEVAR versus fEVAR. Univariate logistic regression was applied to analyze the correlation between TV patency and various anatomical aortic parameters.

RESULTS

In total, 30 patients were treated with fEVAR and 33 with bEVAR. Of these, 19 patients received SAPT and 44 received DAPT postsurgery. Anatomical aortic characteristics and comorbidities were comparable among groups. Overall survival was 95% (±5.1) for SAPT and 88% (±8.8) for DAPT after 36 mo of follow-up. Patency was evaluated individually for each TV SAPT versus DAPT (celiac trunk 100% ± 0 versus 87% ± 9.6; superior mesenteric artery 86% ± 13.2 versus 100% ± 0; left renal artery 92% ± 8.0 versus 95% ± 3.6; right renal artery 72% ± 15.2 versus 81% ± 9.9). Freedom from endoleak was 35% (±13.7) for SAPT versus 30% (±13.8) for DAPT. There was no statistically significant difference for SAPT versus DAPT or for bEVAR versus fEVAR. Further, none of the anatomical aortic characteristics and bridging stent graft-related parameters analyzed predicted TV occlusion in logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe differences in overall survival, endoleak, and TV patency rates between SAPT and DAPT treated patients following bEVAR and/or fEVAR. Patient-specific factors therefore appear to be more relevant for the long-term outcomes rather than the antiplatelet regime applied postsurgery.

The Gore Viabahn balloon-expandable stent graft as a bridging stent in complex endovascular aortic procedures at 3 years performs better in fenestrations

OBJECTIVE

Complex endovascular procedures are now recognized as the gold standard treatments for extensive aortic diseases. Bridging stents (covered stents used to couple the aortic graft to the visceral vessels) play a pivotal role, yet there is currently no dedicated device available on the market. The aim of the study was to evaluate the midterm performance of the Gore Viabahn balloon-expandable (VBX) stent graft as a bridging stent for target visceral vessels (TVVs).

METHODS

Data from all consecutive patients who underwent a fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair and received the VBX stent graft as a bridging stent between July 2018 and September 2022 were prospectively collected and subsequently analyzed retrospectively. Primary end points included freedom from TVV instability and freedom from TVV-related reinterventions, both overall and in comparison between branched and fenestrated graft configurations. Secondary end points were overall survival, procedure and TVV-related (in an intent-to-treat basis) technical success, freedom from type IC/IIIC endoleak, and freedom from TVV patency loss.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were treated with a fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair using the VBX stent graft as a bridging stent, of whom 47 (74.6%) presented an atherosclerotic aneurysm, 7 (11.1%) a post-dissecative aneurysm, and 9 (14.3%) an anastomotic pseudoaneursym or a type IA endoleak in a previous endovascular aortic repair. Included in the aortic repair were 231 of 243 (95.1%) total visceral vessels. The intraoperative requirement of 13 additional VBX stent grafts determined a TVV-related technical success of 94.4%. The mean follow-up was 26.1 ± 16.4 months. The estimated overall survival at 36 months was 73% ± 7.5%. The estimated rates at 36 months for freedom from type IC/IIIC endoleaks and TVV primary patency were 90.6% ± 3.9% and 99% ± 0.7%, respectively. The estimated rate at 36 months for freedom from TVV instability was 92.1% ± 3% and did not differ between branched and fenestrated configurations, whereas freedom from TVV-related reinterventions was 90.6% ± 3.1% and significantly in favor of fenestrations (69.4% vs 96.8%, P < .001). Multivariate analyses confirmed fenestrated configuration as a protective factor against TVV-related reinterventions (hazard ratio: 0.079; 95% confidence interval: 0.016-0.403).

CONCLUSIONS

The VBX stent graft proves to be a reliable bridging stent for complex aortic procedures involving both fenestrated and branched endografts. Although immediate results are deemed satisfactory, they favor fenestrations regarding the need of reinterventions through 3 years. The success of the procedure heavily relies on a thorough understanding of the unique characteristics of this stent.

Prendes C, Stana J, Tsilimparis N. Analysis of Target Vessel Instability in Fenestrated Endovascular Repair (f-EVAR) in Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Pathologies

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of target vessel anatomy and post-stenting geometry on the outcome of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (f-EVAR). Methods: A retrospective review of data from a single center was conducted, including all consecutive fenestrated endovascular aortic repairs (f-EVARs) performed between September 2018 and December 2023 for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) and complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs). The analysis focused on the correlation of target vessel instability to target vessel anatomy and geometry after stenting. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of target vessel instability. Secondary endpoints were the 30-day and follow-up re-interventions. Results: A total of 136 patients underwent f-EVAR with 481 stented target vessels. A total of ten target vessel instabilities occurred including three in visceral and seven instabilities in renal vessels. The cumulative incidence of target vessel instability with death as the competing risk was 1.4%, 1.8% and 3.4% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. In renal target vessels (260/481), a diameter ≤ 4 mm (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.035-1.274, p = 0.009) and an aortic protrusion ≥ 5.75 mm (OR 8.21, 95% CI 3.150-12-23, p = 0.027) was associated with an increased target vessel instability. In visceral target vessels (221/481), instability was significantly associated with a preoperative tortuosity index ≥ 1.25 (HR 15.19, CI 95% 2.50-17.47, p = 0.045) and an oversizing ratio of ≥1.25 (HR 7.739, CI % 4.756-12.878, p = 0.049). Conclusions: f-EVAR showed favorable mid-term results concerning target vessel instability in the current cohort. A diameter of ≤4 mm and an aortic protrusion of ≥5.75 mm in the renal target vessels as well as a preoperative tortuosity index and an oversizing of the bridging stent of ≥1.25 in the visceral target vessels should be avoided.

Outcome of the Be Graft Bridging Stent in Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair in a High-Volume Single Center and an Overview of Current Evidence

OBJECTIVE

Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) has become one of the standard treatment options for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs) and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Despite technological advances in the main endograft design, the lack of dedicated bridging stent-grafts (BSGs) is still the Achilles heel of the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of the BeGraft stent-graft as a dedicated bridging stent for FEVAR and to review the current evidence in literature.

METHODS

Retrospective single center study, including all consecutive FEVARs performed between September 2018 and December 2022 for the treatment of cAAAs and TAAAs with implantation of at least one BeGraft peripheral as the main BSG in one of the target vessels (TVs). Primary endpoints were technical success and TV instability of TV bridged with a BeGraft stent, as well as 30-day mortality and re-intervention rates. Secondary endpoints were follow-up TV instability, re-interventions, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients (93 male, mean age 71.1±9.7) and 440 TV (14 scallops and 426 fenestrations) were included. Of the 440 TV, 406 received primary stenting. Be Grafts were used in 88.9% of these (n=361; celiac trunk [CT]=67, superior mesenteric artery [SMA]=98, right renal artery [RRA]=97, and left renal artery [LRA]=99). The technical success rate was 99.4% (359/361). The 30-day TV instability rate was 0.27% (1/361) with one early renal artery occlusion. During a median follow-up of 20 months (6-32), TV instability rate was 0.8% (3/361). Freedom from TV instability was 99.3%, 98.8%, and 98.8% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Early-term and mid-term results regarding TV instability are satisfactory and support the use of BeGraft as BSG in FEVAR for cAAAs and TAAAs.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The findings of the current study show that the use of the BeGraft stent graft as bridging stent in FEVAR is associated with a high technical success and low early and mid-term instability rate and support the standard use as a bridging stent in fenestrated aneurysm repair.

A Systematic Review and an Updated Meta-Analysis of Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair of Chronic Post-Dissection Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

The objective of this study is to present the current outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular repair (F/BEVAR) for post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PDTAAAs). A systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines up to October 2023 was conducted (protocol CRD42023473403). Studies were included if ≥10 patients were reported and at least one of the major outcomes was stated. A total of 10 studies with 585 patients overall were included. The pooled estimate for technical success was 94.3% (95% CI 91.4% to 96.2%). Permanent paraplegia developed with a pooled rate of 2.5% (95% CI 1.5% to 4.3%), whereas a cerebrovascular event developed with a pooled rate of 1.6% (95% CI 0.8% to 3.0%). An acute renal function impairment requiring new-onset dialysis occurred with a pooled rate of 2.0% (95% CI 1.0% to 3.8%). Postoperative respiratory failure was observed with a pooled estimate of 5.5% (95% CI 3.8% to 8.1%). The pooled estimate for 12-month overall survival was 90% (95% CI 85% to 93.5%), and the pooled estimates for 24-month and 36-month survival were 87.8% (95% CI 80.9% to 92.5%) and 85.5% (95% CI 76.5% to 91.5%), respectively. Freedom from reintervention was estimated at 83.9% (95% CI 75.9% to 89.6%) for 12 months, 82.8% (95% CI 68.7% to 91.4%) for 24 months and 76.1% (95% CI 60.6% to 86.8%) for 36 months. According to the present findings, F/BEVAR can be performed in PD-TAAAs with high rates of technical success and good mid-term results.