1
|
Silverberg JI, Wollenberg A, Reich A, Thaçi D, Legat FJ, Papp KA, Stein Gold L, Bouaziz JD, Pink AE, Carrascosa JM, Rewerska B, Szepietowski JC, Krasowska D, Havlíčková B, Kalowska M, Magnolo N, Pauser S, Nami N, Sauder MB, Jain V, Padlewska K, Cheong SY, Fleuranceau Morel P, Ulianov L, Piketty C. Nemolizumab with concomitant topical therapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2): results from two replicate, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet 2024:S0140-6736(24)01203-0. [PMID: 39067461 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01203-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nemolizumab, an interleukin (IL)-31 receptor subunit α antagonist, inhibits the IL-31 pathway of itch and skin inflammation in atopic dermatitis. Two international phase 3 studies were done to assess the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab in atopic dermatitis. In this Article we report results for the 16-week initial treatment period of both trials. METHODS ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 were identical 48-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials in adult and adolescent participants (aged ≥12 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, associated pruritus, and inadequate response to topical steroids. Participants were enrolled from 281 clinics, hospitals, and academic centres in 22 countries across both trials, and were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nemolizumab 30 mg subcutaneously (baseline loading dose 60 mg) or matching placebo once every 4 weeks with background topical corticosteroids (TCS) with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI; ie, TCS-TCI background treatment). Randomisation was done via interactive response technology and stratified by baseline disease and pruritus severity. Study staff and participants were masked throughout the study, with outcome assessors masked until database lock. Coprimary endpoints at week 16 post-baseline were Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) success (score of 0 [clear skin] or 1 [almost clear skin] with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline) and at least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index score from baseline (EASI-75 response). Outcome rates were compared between groups with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for randomisation strata. The key secondary endpoints were the proportion of participants with Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score improvement of at least 4 points at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 16; PP-NRS score below 2 at weeks 4 and 16; Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; EASI-75 response plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; and IGA success plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16. Efficacy analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis; safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of nemolizumab or placebo. Both studies are completed (ClinicalTrials.gov: ARCADIA 1, NCT03985943 and ARCADIA 2, NCT03989349). FINDINGS Between Aug 9, 2019, and Nov 2, 2022, 1728 participants were enrolled across both trials: 1142 were allocated to nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI (620 in ARCADIA 1 and 522 in ARCADIA 2) and 586 to placebo plus TCS-TCI (321 in ARCADIA 1 and 265 in ARCADIA 2). ARCADIA 1 included 500 (53%) male participants and 441 (47%) female participants, and ARCADIA 2 included 381 (48%) male participants and 406 (52%) female participants. Mean age ranged from 33·3 (SD 15·6) years to 35·2 (17·0) years across the treatment groups. Both trials met the coprimary endpoints; at week 16, a greater proportion of participants receiving nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI versus placebo plus TCS-TCI had IGA success (ARCADIA 1: 221 [36%] of 620 vs 79 [25%] of 321, adjusted percentage difference 11·5% [97·5% CI 4·7-18·3], p=0·0003; ARCADIA 2: 197 [38%] of 522 vs 69 [26%] of 265, adjusted difference 12·2% [4·6-19·8], p=0·0006) and an EASI-75 response (ARCADIA 1: 270 [44%] vs 93 [29%], adjusted difference 14·9% [7·8-22·0], p<0·0001; ARCADIA 2: 220 [42%] vs 80 [30%], adjusted difference 12·5% [4·6-20·3], p=0·0006). Significant benefits were observed with nemolizumab for all key secondary endpoints including improvement in itch, as early as week 1, and sleep improvement by week 16. The safety profile was similar between nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI and placebo plus TCS-TCI. In the safety sets, 306 (50%) of 616 participants (ARCADIA 1) and 215 (41%) of 519 participants (ARCADIA 2) who received nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in six [1%] and 13 [3%], respectively); and 146 (45%) of 321 (ARCADIA 1) and 117 (44%) of 263 (ARCADIA 2) who received placebo plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in four [1%] and three [1%], respectively). Ten serious treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to nemolizumab were reported in five (1%) participants in ARCADIA 2. No deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION Nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI was efficacious and showed statistically and clinically significant improvements in inflammation and itch in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Nemolizumab might offer a valuable extension of current therapies if approved. FUNDING Galderma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan I Silverberg
- Department of Dermatology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Andreas Wollenberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Adam Reich
- Department of Dermatology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Diamant Thaçi
- Institute and Comprehensive Center for Inflammation Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Franz J Legat
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Kim A Papp
- Probity Medical Research and Alliance Clinical Trials, Waterloo, ON, Canada; Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Linda Stein Gold
- Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jean-David Bouaziz
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Andrew E Pink
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - José Manuel Carrascosa
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol, Autonomous University of Barcelona, IGTP, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Jacek C Szepietowski
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Dorota Krasowska
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Pediatric Dermatology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | | | | | - Nina Magnolo
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Navid Nami
- Dermatology Clinical Trials, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Maxwell B Sauder
- Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada; Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vipul Jain
- Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada; Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Allergy Research Canada, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rothenberg-Lausell C, Bar J, Del Duca E, Guttman-Yassky E. Diversity of atopic dermatitis and selection of immune targets. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2024; 132:177-186. [PMID: 38008215 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous immune-mediated skin disorder affecting people of all ages and ethnicities. Despite the development of targeted therapeutics such as biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors, attaining complete clinical efficacy remains difficult. This therapeutic challenge may be attributed to the complex pathogenesis of AD. Although the TH2 axis has been extensively studied, recent advancements have started to reveal the involvement of additional immune pathways including TH1, TH17, and TH22. Understanding the interplay of these immune axes may contribute to a more personalized therapeutic approach based on patients' molecular profile, with the prospect of improving clinical outcome. This review will discuss studies exploring the molecular profile of AD in both skin and blood across age, ethnicity/race, disease chronicity, IgE levels, filaggrin mutation status, and AD association with other atopic conditions. Moreover, it will explore the potential of personalized treatment strategies based on a patient's distinct immune signature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Rothenberg-Lausell
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York; University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Jonathan Bar
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Ester Del Duca
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York; Department of Dermatology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|