Pain Management and Functional Recovery after Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Pediatric Hip Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in pediatric hip surgeries is limited mainly to case reports. This study assessed the efficacy of ultrasound-guided PENG block versus lumbar ESPB under spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

Ninety patients aged 2 to 7 years, ASA I-III scheduled for hip surgery were randomly assigned to 3 equal groups, each receiving the PENG block group (n=30), the ESPB group (n=30), or the control group (n=30). After the spinal anesthesia, the block was performed with 0.5 kg/mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the pain scores (FLACC) 48 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes included postoperative FLACC pain scores, neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and total opioid consumption.

RESULTS

The FLACC score was significantly lower in the lumbar ESPB and PENG groups compared with the control group (P<0.0001) at all time points. The NLR and PLR levels were substantially lower in the PENG and lumbar ESPB groups (P<0.0001) compared with the control group. The NLR and PLR levels were significantly lower in the PENG and lumbar ESPB groups compared with the control group (P<0.0001). The total opioid consumption was significantly lower in the PENG and lumbar ESPB groups compared with the control group (P<0.0001). Forty-three percent of children in the PENG group and 50% of children in the lumbar ESPB group did not require opioids postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The PENG block and the lumbar ESPB provide efficient postoperative analgesia in children undergoing hip surgery. The PENG block and lumbar ESPB lower cumulative opioid consumption and the stress response to surgery, expressed by NLR and PLR levels.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Pericapsular nerve group block reduces opioid use and pain after hip surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

While the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has become increasingly popular for managing pain after hip surgery, its efficacy remains controversial.

METHODS

We systematically searched Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials to assess current evidence about the efficacy of the PENG block. Patients who received PENG block were compared to those who received sham/no block in terms of opioid consumption and pain within 24h after surgery, time to first opioid requirement, functional recovery, risk of nausea and vomiting, and patient dissatisfaction. The quality of evidence was assessed using the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

We meta-analyzed six trials involving 416 patients who received preoperative PENG block and 415 who received sham/no block. Patients did not receive any other type of multimodal analgesia. Within 24 h after hip surgery, PENG block significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption (MD = -12.03, 95% CI: -21.47 to -2.59, P < 0.01, I2 = 97%), particularly in subpopulations undergoing hip replacement, hip fracture, or who had spinal anesthesia, and it significantly decreased dynamic pain scores, but not static scores, without increasing risk of nausea or vomiting or patient dissatisfaction. Individual studies suggested that the PENG block can prolong the time to the first opioid requirement and can improve functional recovery. Most meta-analyses provided evidence of moderate quality according to the GRADE system.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence indicates that preoperative PENG block can significantly decrease opioid consumption and pain early after hip surgery, and it may also promote early functional rehabilitation. However, the limited number of included studies and sample size make it difficult to draw firm conclusions. The decision on whether to apply the PENG block should take into account the patient's age and the type of surgery and anesthesia.

Nerve Blocks for Post-Surgical Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Research

Opioids remain the mainstay of post-surgical pain management; however, concerns regarding addiction and side effects necessitate the exploration of alternatives. This narrative review highlights the potential of nerve blocks as a safe and effective strategy for post-surgical pain control. This review explores the use of various nerve block techniques tailored to specific surgical procedures. These include nerve blocks for abdominal surgeries; fascial plane blocks for chest surgeries; nerve blocks for arm surgeries; and nerve blocks for lower limb surgery including; femoral, hip, and knee surgeries. By targeting specific nerves, these blocks can provide targeted pain relief without the negative side effects associated with opioids. Emerging evidence suggests that nerve blocks can be as effective as opioids in managing pain, while potentially offering additional benefits such as faster recovery, improved patient satisfaction, and reduced reliance on opioids. However, the effectiveness of nerve blocks varies depending on type of surgery, and in individual patients. Rebound pain, which temporary increase in pain after a block wears off, can occur. In addition, some techniques require specialized guidance for accurate placement. In conclusion, nerve blocks show great promise as effective alternatives for managing post-surgical pain. They can reduce the need for opioids and their side effects, leading to better patient outcomes and satisfaction. Future studies should assess the long-term impacts of specific nerve blocks on mortality rates, cost-effectiveness, and their incorporation into multimodal pain management approaches to further enhance post-surgical care.

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elective Hip Surgery

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) and lumbar erector spinae plane (L-ESP) blocks, both administered with a high volume (40 mL) of local anesthetic (LA), for multimodal postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing hip surgery. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized study that included 75 adult patients who were divided into three equal groups: control, PENG, and L-ESP. The study compared pain intensity, morphine consumption, time to first morphine request, and postoperative satisfaction between the control group, which received standard multimodal analgesia, and the block groups, which received PENG or L-ESP block in addition to multimodal analgesia. The numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to measure pain intensity. Results: The results showed that the block groups had lower pain intensity scores and morphine consumption, a longer time to the first morphine request, and higher postoperative satisfaction compared to the control group. The median maximum NRS score during the first 12 h was four in the control group, two in the PENG group, and three in the L-ESP group. The control group (21.52 ± 9.63 mg) consumed more morphine than the two block groups (PENG, 11.20 ± 7.55 mg; L-ESP, 12.88 ± 8.87 mg) and requested morphine 6.8 h earlier and 5 h earlier than the PENG and L-ESP groups, respectively. The control group (median 3) had the lowest Likert satisfaction scores, while the PENG group (median 4) had the lowest NRS scores (L-ESP, median 4). Conclusions: The application of PENG or L-ESP blocks with high-volume LA in patients undergoing hip surgery reduces the need for postoperative analgesia and improves the quality of multimodal analgesia.

The efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block for reducing pain and opioid consumption after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) is an emerging regional anesthesia technique for hip surgery. However, its efficacy in total hip arthroplasty (THA) isn't well defined. We perform this meta-analysis aiming to assess the effect of Pericapsular nerve group block on pain control and morphine consumption in patients with total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

We searched four electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science dated from 2018 to October 2023) for published eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PENG with placebo (no block/sham block) after THA. The outcome measurements consisted of pain score, opioid consumption, Time to first opioid, and postoperative complications. All data analyses were performed using STATA 12.0.

RESULTS

Five RCTs comprising 808 participants were included. Our meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences between two groups in terms of pain score in PACU (WMD =  - 0.598, 95% CI [- 0.886, - 0.310], P < 0.001), pain score at 6 h (WMD =  - 0.614, 95% CI [- 0.835, - 0.392], P < 0.001) and time to first opioid (WMD = 5.214, 95% CI [4.545, 5.883], P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were revealed from the pain score at 24 h after THA (WMD =  - 0.924, 95% CI [- 1.929, 0.081], P = 0.072). Meanwhile, the meta-analysis indicated that PENG significantly reduced 24-h opioid consumption (WMD =  - 6.168, 95% CI [- 6.667, - 5.668], P < 0.001) and 48-h opioid consumption (WMD =  - 7.171, 95% CI [- 8.994, - 5.348], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pericapsular nerve group block was effective for pain control up to postoperative 6 h and extending the time to the first opioid after THA. Moreover, it reduced postoperative opioid consumption when compared with a placebo group. Due to the high heterogeneity of the pain score after 24 h and the low-quality evidence, more high-quality RCTs are required to draw a definitive conclusion about pain control.

Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy between Levobupivacaine 0.25% and Ropivacaine 0.375% for PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) Block in the Context of Hip Fracture Surgery of Elderly Patients: A Single-Center, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Trial

Previous studies have compared levobupivacaine versus ropivacaine in various peripheral nerve blocks in terms of block duration, quality of analgesia, and onset time, but this has not occurred in the PENG block. Here, a single-center, randomized, and controlled clinical trial is presented. One hundred and twenty patients older than 65 years suffering from hip fractures and surgically treated at our institution under spinal anesthesia were eligible for participation; of them, one hundred and eight were analyzed. Patients were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided PENG blocks using 20 mL of either 0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.375% ropivacaine (both of which are equipotent concentrations). The primary endpoint was to compare the analgesic duration (time to first rescue) and analgesic quality (pain scores using the VAS, PAINAD, and AlgoPlus scales) between the groups. Secondary endpoints included comparing the onset time, describing the need for and type of rescue analgesics, and possible associated adverse effects. There were no statistically significant differences in analgesic duration between levobupivacaine (median 861.0, IQR 960) and ropivacaine (median 1205.0, IQR 1379; p = 0.069). Likewise, the quality of analgesia and onset time were comparable among the groups. A small number of patients required opioids as rescue analgesics (4.6%). The possible associated adverse effects included postoperative infection (11.1%) and delirium (2.8%).

Novel Techniques for Musculoskeletal Pain Management after Orthopedic Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review

Effective postoperative pain management is critical for recovery after orthopedic surgery, but often remains inadequate despite multimodal analgesia. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on innovative modalities for enhancing pain control following major orthopedic procedures. Fifteen randomized controlled trials and comparative studies evaluating peripheral nerve blocks, local anesthetic infiltration, cryotherapy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, adjunct medications, and other techniques are included. Thematic analysis reveals that peripheral nerve blocks and local anesthetic infiltration consistently demonstrate reduced pain scores, opioid consumption, and side effects versus conventional analgesia alone. Oral multimodal medications also show promise as part of opioid-sparing regimens. Adjunctive approaches like cryotherapy, music, and dexmedetomidine require further research to optimize protocols. Despite promising innovations, critical knowledge gaps persist regarding comparative effectiveness, optimal interventions and dosing, combination strategies, cost-effectiveness, and implementation. High-quality randomized controlled trials using standardized protocols are essential to guide the translation of enhanced multimodal regimens into clinical practice. This review provides a framework for pursuing research priorities and advancing evidence-based postoperative pain management across orthopedic surgeries.