REM-OSA as a Tool to Understand Both the Architecture of Sleep and Pathogenesis of Sleep Apnea-Literature Review

Exploring the link between comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) and erectile dysfunction: implications for male sexual health

INTRODUCTION

This review explores the interplay between comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) and erectile dysfunction (ED), 2 conditions that significantly impact men's health. COMISA, a recently recognized condition characterized by the coexistence of insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea, has been shown to disrupt sleep architecture and cause intermittent hypoxia. These disturbances are increasingly linked to the exacerbation of ED, a prevalent issue among men. Understanding the connection between COMISA and ED is crucial for developing integrated treatment approaches that address both sleep and sexual health.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to explore the epidemiological, physiological, and potential therapeutic intersections of COMISA and ED. This review sets out to develop a better understanding of the relationship between these conditions and to emphasize the need for an integrated diagnostic and therapeutic approach that addresses both sleep and sexual health.

METHODS

Through a comprehensive analysis, including a detailed examination of extant studies, we address the hormonal imbalances and alterations in neural pathways that collectively contribute to the complex pathophysiology of ED and how these are particularly susceptible to the concurrent presence of COMISA.

RESULTS

Our analysis indicates that disruptions in sleep architecture and intermittent hypoxia associated with COMISA can exacerbate ED. Hormonal imbalances, endothelial dysfunction, autonomic imbalance, and increased inflammation and oxidative stress are key mechanisms through which COMISA influences ED. These factors collectively impair vascular health, reduce testosterone levels, disrupt neural control of erections, and contribute to the severity of ED.

CONCLUSIONS

This review underscores the necessity for an integrated approach to diagnosis and therapy that considers both sleep and sexual health to improve overall outcomes. These insights should foster a deeper understanding of the relationship between COMISA and ED, encourage further research in this area, and potentially lead to the development of innovative treatment strategies to manage these closely intertwined health concerns.

Evaluation of daytime sleepiness and insomnia symptoms in OSA patients with a characterization of symptom-defined phenotypes and their involvement in depression comorbidity-a cross-sectional clinical study

Introduction

Recent research highlights the significance of insomnia and sleepiness, shifting from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity and sleep structure, in defining OSA phenotypes.

Objectives

This study aimed to characterize insomnia and sleepiness associated with OSA phenotypes and assess their involvement in depression symptoms (DS) in OSA.

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional, clinical study included 181 participants who underwent polysomnography (PSG) and filled out questionnaires, including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Beck Depression Index (BDI). They were categorized into phenotypes: insomnia-sleepiness (I + S; ESS ≥ 11; ISI ≥ 15; n = 20), sleepiness (S; ESS ≥ 11; ISI < 15; n = 22), insomnia (I; ESS < 11; ISI ≥ 15), and asymptomatic (A; ESS < 11; ISI<15; n=55).

Results

A linear regression model for the BDI score (R2 = 0.357, p < 0.001) included ISI score and subjective-to-objective sleep latency ratio. The ISI score was a predictive factor for mild and moderate DS [OR = 1.23 (95% CI: 1.09-1.38), p < 0.001 and OR = 1.39 (95% CI: 1.13-1.72), p = 0.002]. The I and I + S phenotypes are characterized by higher BDI scores (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02), longer subjective sleep latency (p = 0.008 and p = 0.04), and shorter subjective total sleep time (TST; p = 0.049 and p = 0.006) compared to A. Furthermore, the I and I + S groups had shorter subjective TST than S (p = 0.03 and p = 0.047). The I and I + S had higher BDI scores than A (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively) and S (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). The I phenotype was associated with the risk of mild and moderate DS (OR = 5.61 (95% CI: 1.91-16.53), p < 0.001 and OR = 9.55 (95% CI: 1.81-50.48), p = 0.008 respectively). Moreover, the I + S phenotype presented an even greater risk for mild DS (OR = 10.29 (95% CI: 2.95-35.85), p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Using clinical features for OSA phenotyping holds promise for finding OSA individuals with increased risk for DS occurrence.

REM sleep obstructive sleep apnoea

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) can occur in both rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM sleep or be limited to REM sleep, when the upper airway is most prone to collapse due to REM sleep atonia. Respiratory events are usually longer and more desaturating in REM than in NREM sleep. The prevalence of REM OSA is higher in women than in men and REM OSA usually occurs in the context of mild-moderate OSA based on the apnoea-hypopnoea index calculated for the entire sleep study. Studies have highlighted some detrimental consequences of REM OSA; for example, its frequent association with systemic hypertension and a degree of excessive daytime sleepiness similar to that found in nonsleep-stage-dependent OSA. Moreover, REM OSA could increase cardiometabolic risk. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment aimed at preventing REM OSA should be longer than the 4 h usually considered as good compliance, since REM sleep occurs mostly during the second half of the night. Unfortunately, patients with REM OSA show poor adherence to CPAP. Alternative non-CPAP treatments might be a good choice for REM OSA, but data are lacking. This review summarises the available data on REM OSA and critically examines the weaknesses and strengths of existing literature.