When Less Is Good, Is None Better? The Prognostic and Therapeutic Significance of Peri-Transplant Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Disease Status and Interval between Hematopoietic Cell Transplantations Predict Outcome of Pediatric Patients Who Undergo Subsequent Transplantation for Relapsed Hematologic Malignancy

Patients with hematologic malignancies who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have a poor prognosis. Although proceeding to subsequent HCT can provide potential for long-term survival, there are limited data to guide which patients are most likely to benefit and which HCT strategies are best in this heavily pretreated population. The goals of this study were to describe the clinical outcomes of subsequent HCT in pediatric patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies in a cohort enriched for haploidentical donors, and to evaluate the associations of patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors with survival. We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent a subsequent HCT for management of post-HCT relapse at a single institution between 2000 and 2021. Among 106 patients who underwent a second allogeneic HCT, the 1-year event-free survival (EFS) was 34% and 1-year overall survival (OS) was 46%, with a 5-year EFS of 26% and 5-year OS of 31%. Only disease-related factors were associated with outcome after second HCT-specifically, the interval between HCTs and the presence or absence of active disease at the time of HCT. In this cohort, patient- and treatment-related factors were not associated with differences in EFS or OS. Patients undergoing a third or fourth HCT (n = 13) had comparable survival outcomes to those undergoing a second HCT. Our experience highlights that a subsequent HCT has curative potential for a subset of patients who relapse after HCT, including those who undergo a subsequent HCT from a haploidentical donor. Although relapse and treatment-related toxicities remain major challenges, our study indicates that achieving complete remission prior to subsequent HCTs has the potential to further improve outcomes.

Blinatumomab Therapy Is Associated with Favorable Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Patients with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blinatumomab, a bispecific T cell engager that binds CD19 in leukemic cells and CD3 in cytotoxic T cells and leads to leukemic blast lysis, is often used in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Concerns about the potential risk of blinatumomab-related immune-mediated toxicities after allo-HCT have not been adequately addressed. These include graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), delayed engraftment, and graft failure or rejection. Pediatric-specific data reporting post-HCT outcomes of patients treated with blinatumomab are scarce and limited to small cohorts. We sought to investigate the clinical outcomes of pediatric patients with R/R B-ALL who received blinatumomab therapy pre-HCT, focusing on overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), as well as the incidence of immune-mediated post-HCT complications including GVHD, delayed neutrophil or platelet engraftment, graft failure, and graft rejection. We also investigated blinatumomab's effects on B cell reconstitution based on achievement of i.v. immunoglobulin (IVIG) independence post-HCT. This single-center, retrospective study included patients with B-ALL receiving blinatumomab therapy before undergoing allo-HCT, with transplantation performed between 2016 and 2021 at our institution. Patients receiving blinatumomab for relapse after allo-HCT were excluded. Patients receiving chemotherapy alone before allo-HCT during the same period composed the control group. Seventy-two patients were included, 31 of whom received blinatumomab before allo-HCT. Survival estimates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to analyze differences between groups. Categorical variables were compared between groups using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Cumulative incidences were estimated using the competing risks method, and Gray's test was used to analyze differences between groups. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for univariate and multivariable analyses for OS. Landmark analysis was performed at the set time points of 30 days and 100 days post-allo-HCT. Most patients in the study cohort had high-risk relapsed B-ALL. Blinatumomab therapy induced minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remissions in all patients, whereas 5 patients (12.2%) receiving chemotherapy alone had persistent MRD pre-allo-HCT. Time from the start of therapy to the date of allo-HCT was shorter for patients who received blinatumomab compared with those who received chemotherapy (P < .0001). Blinatumomab therapy was associated with greater LFS compared to chemotherapy alone (P = .049), but when limited to 1 year, LFS was not significantly different from control (P = .066). There appeared to be higher OS, lower CIR, and lower NRM in patients receiving blinatumomab compared to the control group; however, the differences were not significant. None of the variables assessed in multivariable analysis was associated with differences in OS. When compared to the controls, blinatumomab therapy did not result in a higher incidence of acute or chronic GVHD, delayed neutrophil or platelet engraftment, or graft failure or rejection. The time to IVIG infusion independence post-allo-HCT was similar in the 2 groups. This study supports the use of blinatumomab salvage therapy for R/R B-ALL before allo-HCT given its efficacy in inducing MRD-negative remissions and optimizing LFS, as well as its lack of association with an increased incidence of post-allo-HCT adverse immune-mediated toxicities. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to investigate blinatumomab's effects in long-term post-allo-HCT events.

Immunotherapy and Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation in B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: How to Sequence?

Long-term disease control is achieved in 80–90% of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia of B origin (B-ALL). About half of adult and 10% of pediatric patients develop refractory or relapsed disease, whereas survival after relapse accounts about 10% in adults and 30–50% in children. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation offers remarkable benefit in cases with unfavorable outcome. Nevertheless, novel immunotherapeutic options have been approved for patients with adverse prognosis. Immunotherapeutic agents, nowadays, are preferred over standard chemotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory B-ALL The mode of action, efficacy and safety data of immunotherapeutic agents released, indications and sequence of those therapies over the course of treatment, are herein reviewed.

Reducing minimal residual disease with blinatumomab prior to HCT for pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Children treated with blinatumomab for B-ALL with MRD had few side effects and proceeded to hematopoietic cell transplant without delay. Blinatumomab given prior to transplant reduces MRD and results in favorable leukemia-free survival, toxicity, and overall survival.

Let's Talk About BiTEs and Other Drugs in the Real-Life Setting for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background: Therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are currently initially efficient, but even if a high percentage of patients have an initial complete remission (CR), most of them relapse. Recent data shows that immunotherapy with either bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can eliminate residual chemotherapy-resistant B-ALL cells.

Objective: The objective of the manuscript is to present improvements in the clinical outcome for chemotherapy-resistant ALL in the real-life setting, by describing Romania's experience with bispecific antibodies for B-cell ALL.

Methods: We present the role of novel therapies for relapsed B-cell ALL, including the drugs under investigation in phase I-III clinical trials, as a potential bridge to transplant. Blinatumomab is presented in a critical review, presenting both the advantages of this drug, as well as its limitations.

Results: Bispecific antibodies are discussed, describing the clinical trials that resulted in its approval by the FDA and EMA. The real-life setting for relapsed B-cell ALL is described and we present the patients treated with blinatumomab in Romania.

Conclusion: In the current manuscript, we present blinatumomab as a therapeutic alternative in the bridge-to-transplant setting for refractory or relapsed ALL, to gain a better understanding of the available therapies and evidence-based data for these patients in 2019.

Measurable residual disease, conditioning regimen intensity, and age predict outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: A registry analysis of 2292 patients by the Acute Leukemia Working Party European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in morphological first complete remission (CR1) pre-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may have measurable residual disease (MRD) by molecular and immunophenotyping criteria. We assessed interactions of MRD status with HCT conditioning regimen intensity in patients aged <50 years (y) or ≥50y. This was a retrospective study by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Patients were >18y with AML CR1 MRD NEG/POS and recipients of HCT in 2000-2015. Conditioning regimens were myeloablative (MAC), reduced intensity (RIC) or non-myeloablative (NMA). Outcomes included leukemia free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), chronic graft-vs-host (cGVHD), and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS). The 2292 eligible patients were categorized into four paired groups: <50y MRD POS MAC (N = 240) vs RIC/NMA (N = 58); <50y MRD NEG MAC (N = 665) vs RIC/NMA (N = 195); ≥50y MRD POS MAC (N = 126) vs RIC/NMA (N = 230), and ≥50y MRD NEG MAC (N = 223) vs RIC/NMA (N = 555). In multivariate analysis RIC/NMA was only inferior to MAC for patients in the <50y MRD POS group, with worse RI (HR 1.71) and LFS (HR 1.554). Patients <50Y MRD NEG had less cGVHD after RIC/NMA HCT (HR 0.714). GRFS was not significantly affected by conditioning intensity in any group. Patients aged <50y with AML CR1 MRD POS status should preferentially be offered MAC allo-HCT. Prospective studies are needed to address whether patients with AML CR1 MRD NEG may be spared the toxicity of MAC regimens. New approaches are needed for ≥50y AML CR1 MRD POS.