Targeting Endotypic Traits with Medications for the Pharmacological Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A Review of the Current Literature

Effect of melatonin on insomnia and daytime sleepiness, in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and insomnia (COMISA): A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

COMISA is a common disorder that results in nighttime awakenings ,daytime sleepiness and PAP intolerance. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia is used to improve PAP adherence and no medication has been evaluated in such population yet. Melatonin with its chronobiotic and antioxidant effects may have potential benefits on COMISA consequences at the appropriate dose and time. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of melatonin on sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and PAP Compliance in patients with COMISA.

METHODS

This double-blind placebo trial randomly assigned eligible OSA patients who suffered from insomnia despite using PAP for over a month to receive either melatonin 10 mg or placebo. The primary outcomes were measured by changes in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ-10) over one month. Adherence to PAP was measured by the results of the PAP device reports on the average length of time and number of nights that the device was used.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled in the study after randomization. The melatonin arm showed significant improvement in all four primary outcomes compared to the placebo arm. The PSQI score was 3.836±1.839 in the melatonin arm versus 10.522±3.626 in the placebo arm (Pvalue<0.001). The ISI score was 8.476±3.568 in the melatonin arm versus 14.47±4.50 in the placebo arm (Pvalue<0.001). The ESS score was 6.854±4.334 in the melatonin arm versus 13.298±5.119 in the placebo arm (Pvalue<0.001). The FOSQ-10 score was 24.93±5.02 in the melatonin arm versus 19.87±4.24 in the placebo arm (Pvalue= 0.006). Additionally, nighttime consequences such as sleep latency and awakenings showed significant improvement in the melatonin arm. PAP devices results revealed improvement in duration of PAP use overnight.  CONCLUSIONS: Administering melatonin has been shown to improve self-reported sleep quality and PAP adherence in patients with COMISA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration number IRCT20220105053635N1 was issued by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT).

Pharmacological treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Summarize the evidence on drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on February 17th, 2023. A search strategy retrieved randomized clinical trials comparing the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) in pharmacotherapies. Studies were selected and data was extracted by two authors independently. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RevMan 5.4. was used for data synthesis.

RESULTS

4930 articles were obtained, 68 met inclusion criteria, and 29 studies (involving 11 drugs) were combined in a meta-analysis. Atomoxetine plus oxybutynin vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -7.71 (-10.59, -4.83) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 50 %, overall effect: Z = 5.25, p < 0.001]. Donepezil vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -8.56 (-15.78, -1.33) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 21 %, overall effect: Z = 2.32, p = 0.02]. Sodium oxybate vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -5.50 (-9.28, -1.73) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 32 %, overall effect: Z = 2.86, p = 0.004]. Trazodone vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -12.75 (-21.30, -4.19) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 0 %, overall effect: Z = 2.92, p = 0.003].

CONCLUSION

The combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic drugs shows promising results. Identifying endotypes may be the key to future drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea. Moreover, studies with longer follow-up assessing the safety and sustained effects of these treatments are needed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022362639.

Drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder that can affect the quality of life and increase the risk for psychiatric, neurological and cardiometabolic diseases. Despite the significant burden, it poses on health and well-being, there is a lack of evidence regarding the use of drug therapies in these patients. This work aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment alternatives for patients with OSA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov, will be used for the search. A search strategy was developed to retrieve clinical trials that have evaluated polysomnographic primary outcome (Apnoea-Hypopnoea index) and secondary outcomes (eg, daytime sleepiness, adverse events) of any drug therapy used for OSA. No date or language restrictions will be applied. Two authors will independently select the studies meeting the inclusion criteria by screening the title, abstract and full text. Data will be extracted, and the risk of bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Review Manager V.5.4.1 will be used for data synthesis. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to assess the strength of the evidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As a review of published data, it is not necessary to obtain ethical approval. The findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022362639.

Drive versus Pressure Contributions to Genioglossus Activity in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Rationale: Loss of pharyngeal dilator muscle activity is a key determinant of respiratory events in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). After the withdrawal of wakefulness stimuli to the genioglossus at sleep onset, mechanoreceptor negative pressure and chemoreceptor ventilatory drive feedback govern genioglossus activation during sleep, but the relative contributions of drive and pressure stimuli to genioglossus activity across progressive obstructive events remain unclear. We recently showed that drive typically falls during events, whereas negative pressures increase, providing a means to assess their individual contributions to the time course of genioglossus activity. Objectives: For the first time, we critically test whether the loss of drive could explain the loss of genioglossus activity observed within events in OSA. Methods: We examined the time course of genioglossus activity (EMGgg; intramuscular electromyography), ventilatory drive (intraesophageal diaphragm electromyography), and esophageal pressure during spontaneous respiratory events (using the ensemble-average method) in 42 patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index 5-91 events/h). Results: Multivariable regression demonstrated that the falling-then-rising time course of EMGgg may be well explained by falling-then-rising drive and rising negative pressure stimuli (model R = 0.91 [0.88-0.98] [95% confidence interval]). Overall, EMGgg was 2.9-fold (0.47-∞) more closely associated with drive than pressure stimuli (ratio of standardized coefficients, βdrive:βpressure; ∞ denotes absent pressure contribution). However, individual patient results were heterogeneous: approximately one-half (n = 22 of 42) exhibited drive-dominant responses (i.e., βdrive:βpressure > 2:1), and one-quarter (n = 11 of 42) exhibited pressure-dominant EMGgg responses (i.e., βdrive:βpressure < 1:2). Patients exhibiting more drive-dominant EMGgg responses experienced greater event-related EMGgg declines (12.9 [4.8-21.0] %baseline/standard deviation of βdrive:βpressure; P = 0.004, adjusted analysis). Conclusions: Loss of genioglossus activity precipitating events in patients with OSA is strongly associated with a contemporaneous loss of drive and is greatest in those whose activity tracks drive rather than pressure stimuli. These findings were upheld for events without prior arousal. Responding to falling drive rather than rising negative pressure during events may be deleterious; future therapeutic strategies whose aim is to sustain genioglossus activity by preferentially enhancing responses to rising pressure rather than falling drive are of interest.

Optical and pharmacological manipulation of hypoglossal motor nucleus identifies differential effects of taltirelin on sleeping tonic motor activity and responsiveness

Pharyngeal muscle activity and responsiveness are key pathophysiological traits in human obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and strong contributors to improvements with pharmacotherapy. The thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) analog taltirelin is of high pre-clinical interest given its neuronal-stimulant properties, minimal endocrine activity, tongue muscle activation following microperfusion into the hypoglossal motor nucleus (HMN) or systemic delivery, and high TRH receptor expression at the HMN compared to rest of the brain. Here we test the hypothesis that taltirelin increases HMN activity and/or responsivity to excitatory stimuli applied across sleep-wake states in-vivo. To target hypoglossal motoneurons with simultaneous pharmacological and optical stimuli we used customized "opto-dialysis" probes and chronically implanted them in mice expressing a light sensitive cation channel exclusively on cholinergic neurons (ChAT-ChR2, n = 12) and wild-type mice lacking the opsin (n = 10). Both optical stimuli applied across a range of powers (P < 0.001) and microperfusion of taltirelin into the HMN (P < 0.020) increased tongue motor activity in sleeping ChAT-ChR2 mice. Notably, taltirelin increased tonic background tongue motor activity (P < 0.001) but not responsivity to excitatory optical stimuli across sleep-wake states (P > 0.098). This differential effect on tonic motor activity versus responsivity informs human studies of the potential beneficial effects of taltirelin on pharyngeal motor control and OSA pharmacotherapy.

Beyond CPAP: modifying upper airway output for the treatment of OSA

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is exceedingly common but often under-treated. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has long been considered the gold standard of OSA therapy. Limitations to CPAP therapy include adherence and availability. The 2021 global CPAP shortage highlighted the need to tailor patient treatments beyond CPAP alone. Common CPAP alternative approaches include positional therapy, mandibular advancement devices, and upper airway surgery. Upper airway training consists of a variety of therapies, including exercise regimens, external neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and woodwind instruments. More invasive approaches include hypoglossal nerve stimulation devices. This review will focus on the approaches for modifying upper airway muscle behavior as a therapeutic modality in OSA.

Targets for obstructive sleep apnea pharmacotherapy: principles, approaches, and emerging strategies

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common and serious breathing disorder. Several pathophysiological factors predispose individuals to OSA. These factors are quantifiable, and modifiable pharmacologically.

AREAS COVERED

Four key pharmacotherapeutic targets are identified and mapped to the major determinants of OSA pathophysiology. PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched through April 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

Target #1: Pharyngeal Motor Effectors. Increasing pharyngeal muscle activity and responsivity with noradrenergic-antimuscarinic combination is central to recent breakthrough OSA pharmacotherapy. Assumptions, knowledge gaps, future directions, and other targets are identified. #2: Upper Airway Sensory Afferents. There is translational potential of sensitizing and amplifying reflex pharyngeal dilator muscle responses to negative airway pressure via intranasal delivery of new potassium channel blockers. Rationales, advantages, findings, and potential strategies to enhance effectiveness are identified. #3: Chemosensory Afferents and Ventilatory Control. Strategies to manipulate ventilatory control system sensitivity by carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are supported in theory and initial studies. Intranasal delivery of agents to stimulate central respiratory activity are also introduced. #4: Sleep-Wake Mechanisms. Arousability is the fourth therapeutic target rationalized. Evolving automated tools to measure key pathophysiological factors predisposing to OSA will accelerate pharmacotherapy. Although not currently ready for general clinical settings, the identified targets are of future promise.

Pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnea: targeting specific pathophysiological traits

INTRODUCTION

The pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is multi-factorial and complex. Varying OSA's pathophysiological traits have been identified, including pharyngeal collapsibility, upper airway muscle reactivity, arousal threshold, and regulation of the ventilatory drive. Being CPAP of difficult tolerance and other interventions reserved to specific subpopulations new pharmacological treatments for OSA might be resolutive.

AREAS COVERED

Several existing and newly developed pharmacological drugs can impact one or more endotypes and could therefore be proposed as treatment options for sleep disordered breathing. With this review we will explore different pathophysiological traits as new targets for OSA therapy. This review will summarize the most promising pharmacological treatment for OSA accordingly with their mechanisms of action on upper airway collapsibility, muscle responsiveness, arousal threshold, and loop gain.

EXPERT OPINION

Only understanding the pathophysiological traits causing OSA in each patient and placing the disease in the framework of patient comorbidities, we will be able to evolve interventions toward OSA. The development of new drug's combinations will permit different approaches and different choices beside conventional treatments. In the next future, we hope that sleep specialists will select the treatment for a specific patient on the base of its pathophysiology, defining a precision medicine for OSA.

The combination of atomoxetine and dronabinol for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a dose-escalating, open-label trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The potential sedative effect of dronabinol and the high expression of cannabinoid receptors on the hypoglossal motor nuclei makes this agent a good candidate for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) pharmacotherapy to be tested with atomoxetine, a noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor that reduced OSA severity in combination with oxybutynin. Here we tested the effect of atomoxetine 80 mg plus dronabinol (Ato-Dro) at 2 different doses (5 and 10 mg) vs. baseline and atomoxetine alone in a 2-center, open-label, dose-escalating trial. The primary outcome was the effect of Ato-Dro vs. baseline on OSA severity (apnea-hypopnea index, hypopneas associated with 4% oxygen desaturation). Safety of the combination and self-reported outcomes were also assessed.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with OSA received progressively increasing Ato-Dro doses (dose escalation was performed every week, starting from Ato-Dro 40-2.5 mg, then 80-5 mg and finally 80-10 mg). A clinical, in-lab polysomnography was performed at baseline, on Ato-Dro 80-5 and Ato-Dro 80-10 mg.

RESULTS

Ato-Dro 80-10 mg did not significantly reduce apnea-hypopnea index, hypopneas associated with 4% oxygen desaturation, and hypoxic burden and yielded limited clinical benefit vs. baseline and atomoxetine alone. However, Ato-Dro 80-5 mg did improve OSA severity (Δapnea-hypopnea index = 8.3[0.3, 16.3] events/h; mean [confidence interval]; Δhypoxic burden = 37.7[12.5, 62.7] %min/h) and multiple self-reported outcomes vs. baseline and/or atomoxetine alone. Ato-Dro administration was characterized by several potentially harmful side effects and treatment discontinuation in 1/3 of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Ato-Dro 80-5 mg might be useful to reduce OSA severity and lead to self-reported improvement in those who could tolerate the combination. However, given the numerous side effects and the exploratory nature of this open-label study, our results warrant further validation in larger trials.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Title: Study for Efficacy and Dose Escalation of AD313 + Atomoxetine (SEED) (SEED); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05101122; Identifier: NCT05101122.

CITATION

Messineo L, Norman D, Ojile J. The combination of atomoxetine and dronabinol for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a dose-escalating, open-label trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(7):1183-1190.

Association of Low Arousal Threshold Obstructive Sleep Apnea Manifestations with Body Fat and Water Distribution

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with a low arousal threshold (low-ArTH) phenotype can cause minor respiratory events that exacerbate sleep fragmentation. Although anthropometric features may affect the risk of low-ArTH OSA, the associations and underlying mechanisms require further investigation. This study investigated the relationships of body fat and water distribution with polysomnography parameters by using data from a sleep center database. The derived data were classified as those for low-ArTH in accordance with criteria that considered oximetry and the frequency and type fraction of respiratory events and analyzed using mean comparison and regression approaches. The low-ArTH group members (n = 1850) were significantly older and had a higher visceral fat level, body fat percentage, trunk-to-limb fat ratio, and extracellular-to-intracellular (E-I) water ratio compared with the non-OSA group members (n = 368). Significant associations of body fat percentage (odds ratio [OR]: 1.58, 95% confident interval [CI]: 1.08 to 2.3, p < 0.05), trunk-to-limb fat ratio (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.43, p < 0.05), and E-I water ratio (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.62, p < 0.01) with the risk of low-ArTH OSA were noted after adjustments for sex, age, and body mass index. These observations suggest that increased truncal adiposity and extracellular water are associated with a higher risk of low-ArTH OSA.

Impact of reboxetine plus oxybutynin treatment for obstructive sleep apnea on cardiovascular autonomic modulation

The combination of noradrenergic (reboxetine) plus antimuscarinic (oxybutynin) drugs (reb-oxy) reduced obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity but no data are available on its effects on cardiac autonomic modulation. We sought to evaluate the impact of 1-week reb-oxy treatment on cardiovascular autonomic control in OSA patients. OSA patients were randomized to a double-blind, crossover trial comparing 4 mg reboxetine plus 5 mg oxybutynin to a placebo for OSA treatment. Heart rate (HR) variability (HRV), ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) over 24 h baseline and after treatment were performed. Baroreflex sensitivity was tested over beat-to-beat BP recordings. 16 subjects with (median [interquartile range]) age 57 [51-61] years and body mass index 30 [26-36]kg/m² completed the study. The median nocturnal HR was 65 [60-69] bpm at baseline and increased to 69 [64-77] bpm on reb-oxy vs 66 [59-70] bpm on placebo (p = 0.02). The mean 24 h HR from ABPM was not different among treatment groups. Reb-oxy administration was not associated with any modification in HRV or BP. Reb-oxy increased the baroreflex sensitivity and did not induce orthostatic hypotension. In conclusion, administration of reb-oxy did not induce clinically relevant sympathetic overactivity over 1-week and, together with a reduction in OSA severity, it improved the baroreflex function.

New pharmacologic agents for obstructive sleep apnoea: what do we know and what can we expect?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides a condensed description of pharmacological remedies explored in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) as well as projections of what we might expect in terms of clinical performance of these drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conventional drug therapies explored in OSA have generally produced disappointing results and there is a shortage of pharmacological treatment alternatives in this disorder. Recent insights into pathophysiological mechanisms potentially involved in OSA suggest that the condition may be divided into distinct subgroups based on clusters or defined by means of unique functional endotypic criteria. In fact, positive outcomes in clinical trials have now resulted in several drug candidates that show a convincing reduction of sleep disordered breathing in both short and intermediate term. Such drugs may be particularly useful in certain variants of OSA but not in others. These insights have also raised the ambition to create personalized therapies in OSA. Another recent development is the insight that OSA-linked conditions such as obesity, daytime somnolence and various forms of cardiovascular/metabolic disease may provide drug-based targets. For instance, pharmacological obesity therapy may provide not only positive metabolic effects but may also be a way to eliminate the anatomic component in obese OSA patients.

SUMMARY

Recent insights into the pathophysiology of OSA have opened possibilities to develop personalized therapy. Drugs addressing fundamental aspects of the sleep and breathing disorder provide a particularly promising avenue for development of novel forms of treatment in OSA.

Prevalence, characteristics, and respiratory arousal threshold of positional obstructive sleep apnea in China: a large scale study from Shanghai Sleep Health Study cohort

Purpose

To evaluate the prevalence, characteristics, and respiratory arousal threshold (ArTH) of Chinese patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) according to the Cartwright Classification (CC) and Amsterdam Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea Classification (APOC).

Methods

A large-scale cross-sectional study was conducted in our sleep center from 2007 to 2018 to analyze the clinical and polysomnography (PSG) data of Chinese POSA patients. Low ArTH was defined based on PSG indices.

Results

Of 5,748 OSA patients, 36.80% met the CC criteria, and 42.88% the APOC criteria, for POSA. The prevalence of POSA was significantly higher in women than men (40.21% and 46.52% vs. 36.13% and 42.18% for CC and APOC, respectively). Chinese POSA patients had a lower apnea hypopnea index (AHI) and lower oxygen desaturation index, shorter duration of oxygen saturation (SaO₂) < 90%, and a higher mean SaO₂ and higher lowest SaO₂ value compared to subjects with non-positional OSA (NPOSA). More than 40% of the POSA patients had a low ArTH; the proportion was extremely high in the supine-isolated-POSA (si-POSA) group and APOC I group. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, higher mean SaO₂ and lower AHI during sleep were positive predictors of POSA.

Conclusions

According to the CC and APOC criteria, more than 1/3 of our Chinese subjects with OSA had POSA. Chinese POSA patients had less severe OSA and nocturnal hypoxia. Compared to NPOSA patients, significantly more patients with POSA had a low ArTH. A low ArTH may be an important endotype in the pathogenesis of POSA, especially in patients with si-POSA and APOC I. Further studies are necessary to develop personalized management strategies for POSA patients.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn; No. ChiCTR1900025714 (retrospectively registered).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02141-3.

Differential pharmacological and sex-specific effects of antimuscarinic agents at the hypoglossal motor nucleus in vivo in rats

Successful cholinergic-noradrenergic pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is thought to be due to effects at the hypoglossal motor nucleus (HMN). Clinical efficacy varies with muscarinic-receptor (MR) subtype affinities. We hypothesized that oxybutynin (cholinergic agent in successful OSA pharmacotherapy) is an effective MR antagonist at the HMN and characterized its efficacy with other antagonists. We recorded tongue muscle activity of isoflurane anesthetized rats (121 males and 60 females, 7–13 per group across 13 protocols) in response to HMN microperfusion with MR antagonists with and without: (i) eserine-induced increased endogenous acetylcholine at the HMN and (ii) muscarine. Eserine-induced increased acetylcholine decreased tongue motor activity (p < 0.001) with lesser cholinergic suppression in females versus males (p = 0.017). Motor suppression was significantly attenuated by the MR antagonists atropine, oxybutynin, and omadacycline (MR2 antagonist), each p < 0.001, with similar residual activity between agents (p ≥ 0.089) suggesting similar efficacy at the HMN. Sex differences remained with atropine and oxybutynin (p < 0.001 to 0.05) but not omadacycline (p = 0.722). Muscarine at the HMN also decreased motor activity (p < 0.001) but this was not sex-specific (p = 0.849). These findings have translational relevance to antimuscarinic agents in OSA pharmacotherapy and understanding potential sex differences in HMN suppression with increased endogenous acetylcholine related to sparing nicotinic excitation.

Obstructive sleep apnea: personalizing CPAP alternative therapies to individual physiology

Introduction The recent continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) crisis has highlighted the need for alternative obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) therapies. This article serves to review OSA pathophysiology and how sleep apnea mechanisms may be utilized to individualize alternative treatment options.Areas covered: The research highlighted below focuses on 1) mechanisms of OSA pathogenesis and 2) CPAP alternative therapies based on mechanism of disease. We reviewed PubMed from inception to July 2022 for relevant articles pertaining to OSA pathogenesis, sleep apnea surgery, as well as sleep apnea alternative therapies.Expert opinion: Although the field of individualized OSA treatment is still in its infancy, much has been learned about OSA traits and how they may be targeted based on a patient's physiology and preferences. While CPAP remains the gold-standard for OSA management, several novel alternatives are emerging. CPAP is a universal treatment approach for all severities of OSA. We believe that a personalized approach to OSA treatment beyond CPAP lies ahead. Additional research is needed with respect to implementation and combination of therapies longitudinally, but we are enthusiastic about the future of OSA treatment based on the data presented here.

A single dose of noradrenergic/serotonergic reuptake inhibitors combined with an antimuscarinic does not improve obstructive sleep apnoea severity

Previous trials have demonstrated that the combination of noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors with an antimuscarinic can substantially reduce the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) and improve airway collapsibility in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, some studies have shown that when administered individually, neither noradrenergic or serotonergic agents have been effective at alleviating OSA. This raises the possibility that serotonergic agents (like noradrenergic agents) may also need to be delivered in combination to be efficacious. Therefore, we investigated the effect of an antimuscarinic (oxybutynin) on OSA severity when administered with either duloxetine or milnacipran, two dual noradrenergic/serotonergic reuptake inhibiters. A randomized, double-blind, 4 way cross-over, placebo-controlled trial in ten OSA patients was performed. Patients received each drug condition separately across four overnight in-lab polysomnography (PSG) studies ~1-week apart. The primary outcome measure was the AHI. In addition, the four key OSA endotypes (collapsibility, muscle compensation, arousal threshold, loop gain) were measured non-invasively from the PSGs using validated techniques. There was no significant effect of either drug combinations on reducing the total AHI or improving any of the key OSA endotypes. However, duloxetine+oxybutynin did significantly increase the fraction of hypopnoeas to apnoeas (F_Hypopnoea ) compared to placebo (p = 0.02; d = 0.54). In addition, duloxetine+oxybutynin reduced time in REM sleep (p = 0.009; d = 1.03) which was positively associated with a reduction in the total AHI (R²  = 0.62; p = 0.02). Neither drug combination significantly improved OSA severity or modified the key OSA endotypes when administered as a single dose to unselected OSA patients.

Brazilian Thoracic Association Consensus on Sleep-disordered Breathing

Sleep is essential for the proper functioning of all individuals. Sleep-disordered breathing can occur at any age and is a common reason for medical visits. The objective of this consensus is to update knowledge about the main causes of sleep-disordered breathing in adult and pediatric populations, with an emphasis on obstructive sleep apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea is an extremely prevalent but often underdiagnosed disease. It is often accompanied by comorbidities, notably cardiovascular, metabolic, and neurocognitive disorders, which have a significant impact on quality of life and mortality rates. Therefore, to create this consensus, the Sleep-Disordered Breathing Department of the Brazilian Thoracic Association brought together 14 experts with recognized, proven experience in sleep-disordered breathing.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Treatment: Let's Talk about Partners!

BACKGROUND

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The benefits of this therapy were studied and analyzed over time; patient adherence is often poor, as many factors negatively influence it. A topic that needs clarification is whether adherence to CPAP treatment in a patient with OSA is influenced by the behavior of a partner or spouse.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted to evaluate the role of partner involvement in the CPAP treatment management in a patient with OSA. The research project was performed between August and September 2021 by consulting the main biomedical databases: CINHAL, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed.

RESULTS

Among 21 articles considered valid for our aim, 15 are qualitative studies, 5 are quantitative and 1 presents a mixed method. We identified several thematic areas and "key" elements, which are prevalent in the studies evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a partner promotes adherence to CPAP therapy in patients with OSA, resulting in ameliorating their overall quality of life. To increase CPAP adherence, a trained nurse could represent a reference figure to technically and emotionally support couples during the adaptation period and in the long term.

Efficacy of atomoxetine plus oxybutynin in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with moderate pharyngeal collapsibility

Purpose

Preliminary studies have shown a significant decrease in severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with the use of a combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin, with patients having moderate pharyngeal collapsibility during sleep more likely to respond. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of AD036 (atomoxetine 80 mg and oxybutynin 5 mg) in the treatment of OSA.

Methods

This trial was a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study comparing AD036, atomoxetine 80 mg alone, and placebo during three home sleep studies, each separated by about 1 week. The trial included patients with OSA and moderate pharyngeal collapsibility as defined by a higher proportion of hypopneas to apneas and mild oxygen desaturation.

Results

Of 62 patients who were randomized, 60 were included in efficacy analyses. The apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) from a median (interquartile range) of 14.2 (5.4 to 22.3) events/h on placebo to 6.2 (2.8 to 13.6) with AD036 and 4.8 (1.4 to 11.6) with atomoxetine alone (p < .0001). Both drugs also decreased the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and the hypoxic burden (p < .0001). AD036, but not atomoxetine alone, reduced the respiratory arousal index and improved ventilation at the respiratory arousal threshold (greater V_active). There was a trend for total sleep time to be decreased more with atomoxetine alone than with AD036. The most common adverse event was insomnia (12% with AD036, 18% with atomoxetine).

Conclusion

AD036 significantly improved OSA severity in patients with moderate pharyngeal collapsibility. Atomoxetine may account for the majority of improvement in OSA severity, while the addition of oxybutynin may mitigate the disruptive effect of atomoxetine on sleep and further improve ventilation.

Trial registration

Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04445688).

Overview of the Role of Pharmacological Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remains a prominent disease state characterized by the recurrent collapse of the upper airway while sleeping. To date, current treatment may include continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), lifestyle changes, behavioral modification, mandibular advancement devices, and surgical treatment. However, due to the desire for a more convenient mode of management, pharmacological treatment has been thoroughly investigated as a means for a potential alternative in OSA treatment. OSA can be distinguished into various endotypic or phenotypic classes, allowing pharmacological treatment to better target the root cause or symptoms of OSA. Some medications available for use include antidepressants, CNS stimulants, nasal decongestants, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, and potassium channel blockers. This review will cover the findings of currently available and future study medications that could potentially play a role in OSA therapy.

Phenotyping OSAH patients during wakefulness

PURPOSE

Although currently there are simplified methods to measure the pathophysiological traits that stimulate the occurrence and maintenance of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea (OSAH), they remain difficult to implement in routine practice. This pilot study aimed to find a simpler daytime approach to obtain a meaningful, similar pathophysiological phenotypic profile in patients with OSAH.

METHODS

After obtaining diagnostic polygraphy from a group of consecutive patients with OSAH, we performed the dial-down CPAP technique during nocturnal polysomnography and used it as reference method. This allowed assessment of upper airway collapsibility, loop gain (LG), arousal threshold (AT), and upper airway muscle gain (UAG). We compared these results with a daytime protocol based on negative expiratory pressure (NEP) technique for evaluating upper airway collapsibility and UAG, on maximal voluntary apnea for LG, and on clinical predictors for AT.

RESULTS

Of 15 patients studied, 13 patients with OSAH accurately completed the two procedures. There were strong (all r² > 0.75) and significant (all p < 0.001) correlations for each phenotypic trait between the measurements obtained through the reference method and those achieved during wakefulness.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to phenotype patients with OSAH from a pathophysiological point of view while they are awake. Using this approach, cutoff values corresponding to those usually adopted using the reference method can be identified to detect abnormal traits, achieving profiles similar to those obtained through the dial-down CPAP technique.

The Combination of Betahistine and Oxybutynin Increases Respiratory Control Sensitivity (Loop Gain) in People with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

RATIONALE

There are widespread histaminergic projections throughout the brain, including hypoglossal nuclei, that modulate pharyngeal muscle tone and respiratory control. Hence, histaminergic stimulation pharmacologically may increase pharyngeal muscle tone and stabilize respiratory control (loop gain) to reduce obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity. Antimuscarinics also increase REM pharyngeal muscle tone in rats. Thus, a combination of histaminergic and anti-muscarinic drugs may be a novel target for OSA pharmacotherapy. However, this has not been investigated. Accordingly, we aimed to test the effects of betahistine (Beta), an H3-autoreceptor antagonist which thereby increases histamine levels, in combination with the antimuscarinic oxybutynin (Oxy), on OSA severity, OSA endotypes, polysomnography parameters and next-day sleepiness and alertness.

METHODS

Thirteen adults with OSA received either Beta-Oxy (96-5mg) or placebo according to a randomized, crossover, double-blind design, prior to polysomnography. Participants completed the Karolinska Sleep Scale and Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire and a driving simulation task to quantify next-day sleepiness and alertness. OSA endotypes were estimated through validated algorithms using polysomnography.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, Beta-Oxy increased respiratory control sensitivity (loop gain) (0.52[0.24] vs 0.60[0.34], median [IQR], P = 0.021) without systematically changing OSA severity (34.4±17.2 vs 40.3±27.3 events/h, mean±SD, P = 0.124), sleep efficiency, arousal index or markers of hypoxemia. Beta-Oxy was well tolerated and did not worsen next-day sleepiness/alertness.

CONCLUSION

Rather than stabilize breathing during sleep, Beta-Oxy increases loop gain, which is likely to be deleterious for most people with OSA. However, in certain conditions characterized by blunted respiratory control (eg, obesity hypoventilation syndrome), interventions to increase loop gain may be beneficial.

Is There a Place for Medicinal Cannabis in Treating Patients with Sleep Disorders? What We Know so Far

The legalization of cannabis for medicinal, and in some countries, recreational, purposes in addition to growth in the cannabis industry has meant that cannabis use and interest in the area has increased rapidly over the past 20 years. Treatment of poor sleep and sleep disorders are two of the most common reasons for the current use of medicinal cannabis. However, evidence for the role of medical cannabis in the treatment of sleep disorders has not been clearly established, thus making it challenging for clinicians to make evidence-based decisions regarding efficacy and safety. This narrative review summarizes the highest quality clinical evidence currently available in relation to the use of medicinal cannabis for the treatment of sleep disorders including insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, nightmare disorder and narcolepsy. A summary of the effect of cannabis on sleep quality and architecture is also presented. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of medicinal cannabis as an effective and safe treatment option for any sleep disorder. Nevertheless, emerging evidence is promising and warrants further investigation using standardized cannabinoid products and validated quantitative measurement techniques.

Novel avenues to approach non-CPAP therapy and implement comprehensive OSA care

Recent advances in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) pathophysiology and translational research have opened new lines of investigation for OSA treatment and management. Key goals of such investigations are to provide efficacious, alternative treatment and management pathways that are better tailored to individual risk profiles to move beyond the traditional, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-focused, "one size fits all", trial and error approach which is too frequently inadequate for many patients. Identification of different clinical manifestations of OSA (clinical phenotypes) and underlying pathophysiological phenotypes (endotypes), that contribute to OSA have provided novel insights into underlying mechanisms and have underpinned these efforts. Indeed, this new knowledge has provided the framework for precision medicine for OSA to improve treatment success rates with existing non-CPAP therapies such as mandibular advancement devices and upper airway surgery, and newly developed therapies such as hypoglossal nerve stimulation and emerging therapies such as pharmacotherapies and combination therapy. These concepts have also provided insight into potential physiological barriers to CPAP adherence for certain patients. This review summarises the recent advances in OSA pathogenesis, non-CPAP treatment, clinical management approaches and highlights knowledge gaps for future research. OSA endotyping and clinical phenotyping, risk stratification and personalised treatment allocation approaches are rapidly evolving and will further benefit from the support of recent advances in e-health and artificial intelligence.

Obstruktive Schlafapnoe: Klug entscheiden, das Richtige tun

Die obstruktive Schlafapnoe (OSA) kann zu einer erheblichen Einschränkung der Lebensqualität führen, und eine nicht behandelte mittel- bis schwergradige OSA (Apnoe-Hypopnoe-Index ≥ 15/h) erhöht das Risiko vieler – überwiegend kardiovaskulärer – Erkrankungen deutlich. In Anbetracht der Häufigkeit des Krankheitsbilds und der damit verbundenen Beeinträchtigungen ist eine effektive Diagnostik und Therapie der OSA von besonderer Bedeutung.

Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin (DGSM) hat daher jeweils fünf praxisnahe Positiv- und Negativempfehlungen zusammengestellt, die das diagnostische und therapeutische Vorgehen bei OSA erleichtern sollen. Sie beziehen sich insbesondere auf die Indikationen zur schlafmedizinischen Diagnostik und zu spezifischen Therapieoptionen unter Berücksichtigung von Alter, Klinik, Risikofaktoren und Komorbiditäten.

Die Auswahl der Empfehlungen orientiert sich an der klinischen Relevanz, an bestehenden Defiziten im Sinne einer Über- oder Unterversorgung und an der Stärke der Empfehlungen in der aktuellen S3-Leitlinie der DGSM zu den schlafbezogenen Atmungsstörungen.

Treatment preferences and willingness to pay in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: relevance of treatment experience

Background

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) most commonly receive positive airway pressure therapy (PAP) as primary treatment, which is highly effective when used consistently. Little is known about the preferences for and relevance of attributes of OSA treatments, especially of non-PAP alternatives. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) among patients with and without previous experience of OSA therapies.

Methods

A discrete choice experiment and a structured survey were applied to patients presenting for overnight polysomnography at a tertiary sleep center. Medical variables were obtained from hospital case records.

Results

Over a period of 4 months, 241 subjects were enrolled and answered the questionnaire (61.8% with an existing diagnosis, 38.2% with a new diagnosis). The most preferred treatment among all patients was PAP therapy (51.1%), followed by mandibular advancement devices (18.1%), hypoglossal nerve stimulation (17.2%), and medication (13.7%). Approval for the different treatments varied by gender as well as by OSA therapy experience. The importance of attributes of OSA treatment varied too, with low rates of treatment-related side effects being equally important, independent of the preferred therapy. The most often stated monthly WTP for optimal sleep was € 50, with increasing age leading to lower WTP values.

Conclusion

Preferences for OSA therapies vary among patients and patient subgroups. PAP therapy is the most preferred treatment, though non-PAP interventions receive high approval ratings too, particularly in treatment-naïve patients. The importance of treatment attributes varies as well, depending on the choice of preferred treatment.

Upper airway muscles: influence on obstructive sleep apnoea pathophysiology and pharmacological and technical treatment options

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent with numerous deleterious effects on neurocognitive and cardiovascular health. It is characterized by collapse of the upper airway during sleep, due to the decrease in both basal and compensatory UA muscle activities. However, the leading treatment, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. This review presents latest works focusing on novel interventions targeting upper airway muscles to alleviate OSA severity.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last years, researchers have focused on the development of alternative treatment strategies targeting UA muscle activation, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions.

SUMMARY

Among the nonpharmacological treatments, hypoglossal nerve stimulation aims to increase upper airway muscle phasic activity during sleep through electrical stimulation, while myofunctional therapy improves the activity and coordination of upper airway dilator muscles.Regarding OSA pharmacotherapy, recent findings strongly suggest that selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors such as atomoxetine and reboxetine, when administered with antimuscarinics such as oxybutynin, can alleviate OSA in most patients increasing pharyngeal dilator muscles activity during sleep. New combinations of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and antimuscarinics have further been explored with variable success and animal models showed that leptin, thyrothropin releasing hormone analogues and gene therapy hold potential for the future of OSA pharmacotherapy.

Impact of nocturnal oxygen and CPAP on the ventilatory response to hypoxia in OSA patients free of overt cardiovascular disease

A primary characteristic of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is chronic exposure to intermittent hypoxia (IH) due to repeated upper airway obstruction. Chronic IH exposure is believed to increase OSA severity over time by enhancing the acute ventilatory response to hypoxia (AHVR), thus promoting ventilatory overshoot when apnea ends and perpetuation of apnea during sleep. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the gold-standard treatment of OSA, reduces the AHVR, believed to result from correction of IH. However, CPAP also corrects ancillary features of OSA such as intermittent hypercapnia, negative intrathoracic pressure and surges in sympathetic activity, which may also contribute to the reduction in AHVR. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the impact of nocturnal oxygen therapy (to remove IH only) and CPAP (to correct IH and ancillary features of OSA) on AHVR in newly diagnosed OSA patients. Fifty-two OSA patients and twenty-two controls were recruited. The AHVR was assessed using a 5 min iscopanic-hypoxic challenge before, and after, treatment of OSA by nocturnal oxygen therapy and CPAP. Following baseline measurements, OSA patients were randomly assigned to nocturnal oxygen therapy (Oxygen, n = 26) or no treatment (Air; n = 26). The AHVR was re-assessed following two weeks of oxygen therapy or no treatment, after which all patients were treated with CPAP. The AHVR was quantified following ~4 weeks of adherent CPAP therapy (n = 40). Both nocturnal oxygen and CPAP treatments improved hypoxemia (p < 0.05), and, as expected, nocturnal oxygen therapy did not completely abolish respiratory events (i.e., apneas/hypopneas). Averaged across all OSA patients, nocturnal oxygen therapy did not change AHVR from baseline to post-oxygen therapy. Similarly, the AHVR was not altered pre- and post-CPAP (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant decrease in AHVR with both nocturnal oxygen therapy and CPAP in patients in the highest OSA severity quartile (p < 0.05). Nocturnal oxygen therapy and CPAP both reduce the AHVR in patients with the most severe OSA. Therefore, IH appears to be the primary mechanism producing ventilatory instability in patients with severe OSA via enhancement of the AHVR.

A Novel Model to Estimate Key Obstructive Sleep Apnea Endotypes from Standard Polysomnography and Clinical Data and Their Contribution to Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity

Rationale: There are at least four key pathophysiological endotypes that contribute to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) pathophysiology. These include 1) upper-airway collapsibility (Pcrit); 2) arousal threshold; 3) loop gain; and 4) pharyngeal muscle responsiveness. However, an easily interpretable model to examine the different ways and the extent to which these OSA endotypes contribute to conventional polysomnography-defined OSA severity (i.e., the apnea-hypopnea index) has not been investigated. In addition, clinically deployable approaches to estimate OSA endotypes to advance knowledge on OSA pathogenesis and targeted therapy at scale are not currently available.Objectives: Develop an interpretable data-driven model to 1) determine the different ways and the extent to which the four key OSA endotypes contribute to polysomnography-defined OSA severity and 2) gain insight into how standard polysomnographic and clinical variables contribute to OSA endotypes and whether they can be used to predict OSA endotypes.Methods: Age, body mass index, and eight polysomnography parameters from a standard diagnostic study were collected. OSA endotypes were also quantified in 52 participants (43 participants with OSA and nine control subjects) using gold-standard physiologic methodology on a separate night. Unsupervised multivariate principal component analyses and data-driven supervised machine learning (decision tree learner) were used to develop a predictive algorithm to address the study objectives.Results: Maximum predictive performance accuracy of the trained model to identify standard polysomnography-defined OSA severity levels (no OSA, mild to moderate, or severe) using the using the four OSA endotypes was approximately twice that of chance. Similarly, performance accuracy to predict OSA endotype categories ("good," "moderate," or "bad") from standard polysomnographic and clinical variables was approximately twice that of chance for Pcrit and slightly lower for arousal threshold.Conclusions: This novel approach provides new insights into the different ways in which OSA endotypes can contribute to polysomnography-defined OSA severity. Although further validation work is required, these findings also highlight the potential for routine sleep study and clinical data to estimate at least two of the key OSA endotypes using data-driven predictive analysis methodology as part of a clinical decision support system to inform scalable research studies to advance OSA pathophysiology and targeted therapy for OSA.

Addition of zolpidem to combination therapy with atomoxetine-oxybutynin increases sleep efficiency and the respiratory arousal threshold in obstructive sleep apnoea: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Atomoxetine combined with oxybutynin (Ato-Oxy) has recently been shown to reduce obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity by >60%. However, Ato-Oxy also modestly reduced the respiratory arousal threshold, which may decrease sleep quality/efficiency. We sought to investigate the additional effect of zolpidem with Ato-Oxy on sleep efficiency (primary outcome), the arousal threshold, OSA severity, other standard polysomnography (PSG) parameters, next-day sleepiness and alertness (secondary outcomes).

METHODS

Twelve participants with OSA received 10 mg zolpidem plus Ato-Oxy (80-5 mg, respectively) or Ato-Oxy plus placebo prior to overnight in-laboratory PSG according to a double-blind, randomized, crossover design (1-week washout). Participants were fitted with an epiglottic catheter, a nasal mask and pneumotachograph to quantify arousal threshold and airflow. Next-day sleepiness and alertness were assessed via the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and a driving simulation task.

RESULTS

The addition of zolpidem increased sleep efficiency by 9% ± 13% (80.9% ± 16.9% vs. 88.2% ± 8.2%, p = 0.037) and the respiratory arousal threshold by 17% ± 18% (-26.6 ± 14.5 vs. -33.8 ± 20.3 cm H₂ O, p = 0.004) versus Ato-Oxy + placebo. Zolpidem did not systematically change OSA severity. Combination therapy was well tolerated, and zolpidem did not worsen next-day sleepiness. However, median steering deviation during the driving simulator task increased following the zolpidem combination.

CONCLUSION

Zolpidem improves sleep efficiency via an increase in the respiratory arousal threshold to counteract potential wake-promoting properties of atomoxetine in OSA. These changes occur without altering the rate of respiratory events or overnight hypoxaemia. However, while the addition of zolpidem does not increase next-day perceived sleepiness, caution is warranted given the potential impact on next-morning objective alertness.

The association between beta-blocker therapy and daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea

Daytime sleepiness is a cardinal symptom of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and a well-recognised side effect of beta-blockers, therefore patients with OSA under this treatment may have worse sleepiness. However, the interaction between daytime sleepiness and beta-blockers use has not been thoroughly investigated in patients with OSA before. We analysed the data of 2183 individuals (1852 patients with OSA and 331 snorer controls) from 3 countries (Greece, Hungary and Moldova). Medical history, including medication usage and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were recorded. Patients and controls were divided into somnolent (ESS ≥ 11) and non-somnolent (ESS < 11) groups, and the association between-blocker use with the somnolent group was investigated with multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders. Sensitivity analyses were performed in each cohort, in the severity subgroups, in patients who did not take statins and in those who had polysomnography as a diagnostic test. There was no relationship between beta-blocker usage and the somnolent OSA (p = 0.24) or control (p = 0.64) groups. These results were similar in sensitivity analyses (all p > 0.05). ESS was related to BMI (ρ = 0.25), total sleep time (ρ = 0.07), AHI (ρ = 0.32), oxygen desaturation index (ρ = 0.33) and minimum oxygen saturation (ρ =  – 0.32, all p < 0.05) in OSA, and was higher in patients with hypertension, diabetes and cerebro/cardiovascular disease and those who took statins (all p < 0.05). In general, beta-blockers are not associated with increased daytime sleepiness in OSA. Thus, the diagnosis of OSA should not discourage initiation of beta-blocker treatment, if it is clinically indicated.

The association between beta-blocker therapy and daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea

Daytime sleepiness is a cardinal symptom of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and a well-recognised side effect of beta-blockers, therefore patients with OSA under this treatment may have worse sleepiness. However, the interaction between daytime sleepiness and beta-blockers use has not been thoroughly investigated in patients with OSA before. We analysed the data of 2183 individuals (1852 patients with OSA and 331 snorer controls) from 3 countries (Greece, Hungary and Moldova). Medical history, including medication usage and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were recorded. Patients and controls were divided into somnolent (ESS ≥ 11) and non-somnolent (ESS < 11) groups, and the association between-blocker use with the somnolent group was investigated with multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders. Sensitivity analyses were performed in each cohort, in the severity subgroups, in patients who did not take statins and in those who had polysomnography as a diagnostic test. There was no relationship between beta-blocker usage and the somnolent OSA (p = 0.24) or control (p = 0.64) groups. These results were similar in sensitivity analyses (all p > 0.05). ESS was related to BMI (ρ = 0.25), total sleep time (ρ = 0.07), AHI (ρ = 0.32), oxygen desaturation index (ρ = 0.33) and minimum oxygen saturation (ρ =  – 0.32, all p < 0.05) in OSA, and was higher in patients with hypertension, diabetes and cerebro/cardiovascular disease and those who took statins (all p < 0.05). In general, beta-blockers are not associated with increased daytime sleepiness in OSA. Thus, the diagnosis of OSA should not discourage initiation of beta-blocker treatment, if it is clinically indicated.

Noninvasive electrical stimulation of oropharyngeal muscles in obstructive sleep apnea

Introduction: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy remains the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. However, its proven effect is useless if the patient does not tolerate the treatment. The electrical stimulation approach has been investigated for several decades now and it seems that the implantable devices for invasive electrical stimulation of hypoglossal nerve are viewed as effective with some of them already approved for human use.Areas covered: in this review, we intent to summarize the existing records of noninvasive stimulation in sleep apnea to make the scientific community aware of the details before deciding on its future. We believe that this is a battle still to fight and more could be done bearing in mind the safety of this method.Expertopinion: noninvasive electrical stimulation has been left behind based on few, small and inconsistent studies using different stimulation parameters. These studies are difficult to compare and to draw conclusions.Electrical stimulation is a field for research in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, with many aspects still to be discovered, and which may become a therapeutic alternative to the use of CPAP in certain patients.

Estimated respiratory arousal threshold in patients with rapid eye movement obstructive sleep apnea

Purpose

Rapid eye movement (REM) obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent clinical phenotype. However, the literature focusing on the pathophysiology of REM OSA is limited. This study compared the proportion of individuals with a low respiratory arousal threshold between patients with REM and non-REM OSA.

Methods

REM OSA was defined as having an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 and AHI during REM (AHI-REM)/AHI during NREM (AHI-NREM) ≥ 2. REM OSA was sub-divided into REM-predominant OSA and REM-isolated OSA. REM-predominant OSA was defined as satisfying the definition of REM OSA and having an AHI-NREM ≥ 5. REM-isolated OSA was defined as satisfying the definition of REM OSA and having an AHI-NREM < 5. Patients with an AHI-REM/AHI-NREM < 2 were defined as having non-REM OSA. A low respiratory arousal threshold was defined as having 2 or more of the following conditions: AHI < 30 events/h, proportion of hypopnea > 58.3%, and nadir SpO₂ > 82.5%.

Results

The proportions of individuals with low respiratory arousal thresholds among individuals with REM-predominant OSA and REM-isolated OSA were significantly higher (77.2% and 93.7%, respectively) than that of patients with non-REM OSA (48.6%). This was also true when the analysis was performed according to sex.

Conclusion

These results indicate that a low respiratory arousal threshold might be an important endotype that contributes to the pathogenesis of REM OSA, especially in REM-isolated OSA.

Modulation of TASK-1/3 channels at the hypoglossal motoneuron pool and effects on tongue motor output and responses to excitatory inputs in vivo: implications for strategies for obstructive sleep apnea pharmacotherapy

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) occurs exclusively during sleep due to reduced tongue motor activity. Withdrawal of excitatory inputs to the hypoglossal motor nucleus (HMN) from wake to sleep contributes to this reduced activity. Several awake-active neurotransmitters with inputs to the HMN (e.g. serotonin [5-HT]) inhibit K+ leak mediated by TASK-1/3 channels on hypoglossal motoneurons, leading to increased neuronal activity in vitro. We hypothesize that TASK channel inhibition at the HMN will increase tongue muscle activity in vivo and modulate responses to 5-HT. We first microperfused the HMN of anesthetized rats with TASK channel inhibitors: doxapram (75 μM, n = 9), A1899 (25 μM, n = 9), ML365 (25 μM, n = 9), acidified artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF, pH = 6.25, n = 9); and a TASK channel activator terbinafine (50 μM, n = 9); all with and without co-applied 5-HT (10 mM). 5-HT alone at the HMN increased tongue motor activity (202.8% ± 45.9%, p < 0.001). However, neither the TASK channel inhibitors, nor activator, at the HMN changed baseline tongue activity (p > 0.716) or responses to 5-HT (p > 0.127). Tonic tongue motor responses to 5-HT at the HMN were also not different (p > 0.05) between ChAT-Cre:TASKf/f mice (n = 8) lacking TASK-1/3 channels on cholinergic neurons versus controls (n = 10). In freely behaving rats (n = 9), microperfusion of A1899 into the HMN increased within-breath phasic tongue motor activity in wakefulness only (p = 0.005) but not sleep, with no effects on tonic activity across all sleep-wake states. Together, the findings suggest robust maintenance of tongue motor activity despite various strategies for TASK channel manipulation targeting the HMN in vivo, and thus currently do not support this target and direction for potential OSA pharmacotherapy.

International Consensus Document on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

The main aim of this international consensus document on obstructive sleep apnea is to provide guidelines based on a critical analysis of the latest literature to help health professionals make the best decisions in the care of adult patients with this disease. The expert working group was formed primarily of 17 scientific societies and 56 specialists from a wide geographical area (including the participation of 4 international societies), an expert in methodology, and a documentalist from the Iberoamerican Cochrane Center. The document consists of a main section containing the most significant innovations and a series of online manuscripts that report the systematic literature searches performed for each section of the international consensus document. This document does not discuss pediatric patients or the management of patients receiving chronic non-invasive mechanical ventilation (these topics will be addressed in separate consensus documents).

Risk factors and clinical prediction formula for the evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea in Asian adults

Obstructive sleep apnea is a highly prevalent cyclic repetitive hypoxia-normoxia respiratory sleep disorder characterized by intermittent upper-airway collapse. It is mainly diagnosed using in-laboratory polysomnography. However, the time-spatial constraints of this procedure limit its application. To overcome these limitations, there have been studies aiming to develop clinical prediction formulas for screening of obstructive sleep apnea using the risk factors for this disorder. However, the applicability of the formula is restricted by the group specific factors included in it. Therefore, we aimed to assess the risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea and develop clinical prediction formulas, which can be used in different situations, for screening and assessing this disorder. We enrolled 3,432 Asian adult participants with suspected obstructive sleep apnea who had successfully undergone in-laboratory polysomnography. All parameters were evaluated using correlation analysis and logistic regression. Among them, age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, anthropometric factors, Berlin questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores, and anatomical tonsil and tongue position were significantly associated with obstructive sleep apnea. To develop the clinical formulas for obstructive sleep apnea, the participants were divided into the development (n = 2,516) and validation cohorts (n = 916) based on the sleep laboratory visiting date. We developed and selected 13 formulas and divided them into those with and without physical examination based on the ease of application; subsequently, we selected suitable formulas based on the statistical analysis and clinical applicability (formula including physical exam: sensitivity, 0.776; specificity, 0.757; and AUC, 0.835; formula without physical exam: sensitivity, 0.749; specificity, 0.770; and AUC, 0.839). Analysis of the validation cohort with developed formulas showed that these models and formula had sufficient performance and goodness of fit of model. These tools can effectively utilize medical resources for obstructive sleep apnea screening in various situations.

Impact of cold and flu medication on obstructive sleep apnoea and its underlying traits: A pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Animal studies indicate that alpha-1 adrenergic receptor agonists and antimuscarinic agents improve genioglossus muscle activity during sleep and may be candidates for the pharmacological treatment of OSA. On the other hand, noradrenergic stimulants may be wake-promoting or cause insomnia symptoms if taken before bedtime, and the addition of a medication with sedative properties, such as an antihistaminic, may reduce these side effects. In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of the combination of an alpha-1 adrenergic agonist (pseudoephedrine) and an antihistaminic-antimuscarinic (diphenhydramine) on OSA severity (AHI), genioglossus responsiveness and other endotypic traits (V_passive , muscle compensation, LG and arousal threshold).

METHODS

Ten OSA patients performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial comparing one night of pseudoephedrine 120 mg plus diphenhydramine 50 mg (DAW1033D) to placebo administered prior to sleep. The AHI, genioglossus muscle responsiveness to negative oesophageal pressure and the endotypic traits were measured via PSG.

RESULTS

The participants' median (interquartile range) age was 50 (46-53) years and body mass index (BMI) was 34.3 (30.6-39.2) kg/m² . The drug combination had no effect on AHI (21.6 (9.1-49.8) on placebo vs 37.9 (5.1-55.4) events/h on DAW1033D, P > 0.5) or genioglossus responsiveness (6.0 (2.6-9.2) on placebo vs 4.0 (3.5-7.3) %/cm H₂ O). Amongst the phenotypic traits, only V_passive was improved by 29 (3-55) % eupnoea, P = 0.03 (mean (95% CI)).

CONCLUSION

The combination of pseudoephedrine and diphenhydramine did not improve OSA severity or genioglossus responsiveness but induced a small improvement in upper airway collapsibility, possibly due to the decongestant effect of the medications. The results of this study do not support the use of these medications for OSA treatment.

A New Wearable System for Home Sleep Apnea Testing, Screening, and Classification

We propose an unobtrusive, wearable, and wireless system for the pre-screening and follow-up in the domestic environment of specific sleep-related breathing disorders. This group of diseases manifests with episodes of apnea and hypopnea of central or obstructive origin, and it can be disabling, with several drawbacks that interfere in the daily patient life. The gold standard for their diagnosis and grading is polysomnography, which is a time-consuming, scarcely available test with many wired electrodes disseminated on the body, requiring hospitalization and long waiting times. It is limited by the night-by-night variability of sleep disorders, while inevitably causing sleep alteration and fragmentation itself. For these reasons, only a small percentage of patients achieve a definitive diagnosis and are followed-up. Our device integrates photoplethysmography, an accelerometer, a microcontroller, and a bluetooth transmission unit. It acquires data during the whole night and transmits to a PC for off-line processing. It is positioned on the nasal septum and detects apnea episodes using the modulation of the photoplethysmography signal during the breath. In those time intervals where the photoplethysmography is detecting an apnea, the accelerometer discriminates obstructive from central type thanks to its excellent sensitivity to thoraco-abdominal movements. Tests were performed on a hospitalized patient wearing our integrated system and the type III home sleep apnea testing recommended by The American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Results are encouraging: sensitivity and precision around 90% were achieved in detecting more than 500 apnea episodes. Least thoraco-abdominal movements and body position were successfully classified in lying down control subjects, paving the way toward apnea type classification.

Zolpidem increases sleep efficiency and the respiratory arousal threshold without changing sleep apnoea severity and pharyngeal muscle activity

KEY POINTS

A decreased respiratory arousal threshold is one of the main contributors to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) pathogenesis. Several recent studies have sought to find a drug capable of increasing the respiratory arousal threshold without impairing pharyngeal muscle activity to reduce OSA severity, with variable success. Here we show that zolpidem increases the respiratory arousal threshold by ∼15%, an effect size which was insufficient to systematically decrease OSA severity as measured by the apnoea-hypopnoea index. Unlike recent physiological findings that showed paradoxical increases in pharyngeal muscle responsiveness during transient manipulations of airway pressure, zolpidem did not alter pharyngeal muscle responsiveness during natural sleep. It did, however, increase sleep efficiency without changing apnoea length, oxygen desaturation, next-day perceived sleepiness and alertness. These novel findings indicate that zolpidem was well tolerated and effective in promoting sleep in people with OSA, which may be therapeutically useful for people with OSA and comorbid insomnia.

ABSTRACT

A recent physiology study performed using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) manipulations indicated that the hypnotic zolpidem increases the arousal threshold and genioglossus responsiveness in people with and without obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Thus, zolpidem may stabilise breathing and reduce OSA severity without CPAP. Accordingly, we sought to determine the effects of zolpidem on OSA severity, upper airway physiology and next-day sleepiness and alertness. Nineteen people with OSA with low-to-moderate arousal threshold received 10 mg zolpidem or placebo according to a double-blind, randomised, cross-over design. Participants completed two overnight in-laboratory polysomnographies (1-week washout), with an epiglottic catheter, intramuscular genioglossus electromyography, nasal mask and pneumotachograph to measure OSA severity, arousal threshold and upper airway muscle responsiveness. Next-morning sleepiness and alertness were also assessed. Zolpidem did not change the apnoea-hypopnoea index versus placebo (40.6 ± 12.3 vs. 40.3 ± 16.4 events/h (means ± SD), p = 0.938) or nadir oxyhaemoglobin saturation (79.6 ± 6.6 vs. 79.7 ± 7.4%, p = 0.932), but was well tolerated. Zolpidem increased sleep efficiency by 9 ± 14% (83 ± 11 vs. 73 ± 17%, p = 0.010). Arousal threshold increased by 15 ± 5% with zolpidem throughout all sleep stages (p = 0.010), whereas genioglossus muscle responsiveness did not change. Next-morning sleepiness and alertness were not different between nights. In summary, a single night of 10 mg zolpidem is well tolerated and does not cause next-day impairment in alertness or sleepiness, or overnight hypoxaemia in OSA. However, despite increases in arousal threshold without any change in pharyngeal muscle responsiveness, zolpidem does not alter OSA severity. It does, however, increase sleep efficiency by ∼10%, which may be beneficial in people with OSA and insomnia.

Variations in loop gain and arousal threshold during NREM sleep are affected by time of day over a 24-hour period in participants with obstructive sleep apnea

We investigated whether time of day affects loop gain (LG) and the arousal threshold (AT) during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Eleven men with obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index > 5 events/h) completed a constant-routine protocol that comprised 3-h sleep sessions in the evening [10 PM (1) to 1 AM], morning (6 AM to 9 AM), afternoon (2 PM to 5 PM), and subsequent evening [10 PM (2) to 1 AM]. During each sleep session LG and the AT were measured during NREM sleep with a model-based approach. Our results showed the presence of a rhythmicity in both LG (P < 0.0001) and the AT (P < 0.001) over a 24-h period. In addition, LG and the AT were greater in the morning compared with both evening sessions [6 AM vs. 10 PM (1) vs. 10 PM (2): LG (1 cycle/min): 0.71 ± 0.23 vs. 0.60 ± 0.22 (P = 0.01) vs. 0.56 ± 0.10 (P < 0.001), AT (fraction of eupneic breathing): 1.45 ± 0.47 vs. 1.28 ± 0.36 (P = 0.02) vs. 1.20 ± 0.18 (P = 0.001)]. No difference in LG and the AT existed between the evening sessions (LG: P = 0.27; AT: P = 0.24). LG was correlated to measures of the hypocapnic ventilatory response (i.e., a measure of chemoreflex sensitivity) (r = 0.72 and P = 0.045) and the critical closing pressure (i.e., a measure of airway collapsibility) (r = 0.77 and P = 0.02) that we previously published. We conclude that time of day, independent of hallmarks of sleep apnea, affects LG and the AT during NREM sleep. These modifications may contribute to increases in breathing instability in the morning compared with other periods throughout the day/night cycle in individuals with obstructive sleep apnea. In addition, efficaciousness of treatments for obstructive sleep apnea that target LG and the AT may be modified by a rhythmicity in these variables.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Loop gain and the arousal threshold during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep are greater in the morning compared with the afternoon and evening. Loop gain measures are correlated to chemoreflex sensitivity and the critical closing pressure measured during NREM sleep in the evening, morning, and afternoon. Breathing (in)stability and efficaciousness of treatments for obstructive sleep apnea may be modulated by a circadian rhythmicity in loop gain and the arousal threshold.