Influence of Preformed Antibodies in Liver Transplantation

The fate of anti-HLA antibodies following liver transplantation

Introduction

Liver transplant recipients may have pre-formed anti-HLA antibodies directed to mismatched HLA of the liver donor (donor specific antibodies, DSA) or not directed to the liver donor (non-donor specific, non-DSA). We observed the fate of these antibodies (DSA and non-DSA) at 12 months after transplant.

Methods

Patients transplanted between 4/2015 and 12/2018 (N = 216) who had anti-HLA antibody measurements at both transplant and 12 months posttransplant (N = 124) and with DSAs at transplant (N = 31) were considered informative for a paired analysis of the natural history of DSA and non-DSA following liver transplantation.

Results

Class I DSAs and non-DSAs decreased between transplant and 12 months; however, Class I DSAs essentially disappeared by 12 months while Class I non-DSAs did not. Anti-HLA Class II DSAs performed differently. While there was a significant drop in values between transplant and 12 months, these antibodies mostly persisted at a low level.

Discussion

Our study demonstrated a significant difference in the kinetics of DSA compared to non-DSA following liver transplantation, most profoundly for anti-HLA Class I antibodies. Class I DSAs were mostly absent at 12 months while Class II DSAs persisted, although at lower levels. The mechanisms of reduction in anti-HLA antibodies following liver transplantation are not completely understood and were not pursued as a part of this study. This detailed analysis of Class I and Class II DSAs and non-DSAs represents and important study to explore the change in antibodies at one year from liver transplantation.

The Jewish Perspectives on Xenotransplantation

Xenotransplantation represents a viable solution to meet the great need to provide organ donors at a time when there are not enough human organ donors. A lot of clinical studies have focused on using genetically engineered pigs as the prime source for organ transplantation. However, several religions, such as Judaism and Islam, have restrictions on the use of pigs for food or in business. In this article, we review the Jewish perspectives on xenotransplantation. Overall, the preservation of human life trumps most of the potential religious concerns associated with xenotransplantation. However, there are religious nuances related to xenotransplantation that are highlighted here, and that must be addressed by rabbinical scholars.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Patients with Preformed Donor-Specific Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies Using Preoperative Desensitization Therapy According to Intensity of Donor-Specific Antibodies: A Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND In liver transplantation (LT), preoperative desensitization therapy is considered necessary in patients positive for donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs). However, the relationship between DSA intensity and the necessary desensitization therapy is unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 37 adult living donor (LD) LTs performed between January 2016 and March 2022 were examined. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was administered preoperatively in DSA-positive cases with positive lymphocyte cross-matching who underwent LDLT. In those with strongly positive DSA (mean fluorescence intensity 10 000), rituximab was administered 2 weeks before LDLT in addition to MMF. Cross-reactive epitope group antigen (CREG)-alone-positive cases were also treated with preoperative MMF when lymphocyte cross-matching was positive. RESULTS Of the 37 patients, 9 were DSA-positive, 7 were CREG-alone-positive, and the others were double-negative. Of 9 DSA-positive cases, desensitization therapy was performed in 7, among which rituximab administration was performed in 3 strongly DSA-positive cases. Of 7 CREG-alone-positive cases, 2 were lymphocyte cross-match-positive and underwent desensitization therapy. The 1-year survival rate was 100% in both DSA- and CREG-alone-positive cases. The frequency of T-cell mediated rejection in DSA-positive, CREG-alone-positive, and double-negative cases was 22%, 43%, and 29%, respectively, with no significant difference. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in only 1 patient, who was strongly DSA-positive and blood-group incompatible. There was also no significant difference among the 3 groups in terms of the frequency of biliary complications or 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS Satisfactory LDLT results were achieved in DSA- and CREG-alone-positive cases following desensitization therapy.

Importance of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and leukocyte antigen/killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genes in liver transplantation

Many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the hypothetical state of hepatic tolerance, which is described by eventual imbalances or deregulation in the balance of cytokines, mediators, effectors, and regulatory cells in the complex milieu of the liver. In this section, we will comment on the importance of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) as well as the compatibility and pairings of HLA and killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) genotypes in the evolution of liver transplantation. Thus, HLA compatibility, viral infections, and HLA-C/KIR combinations have all been linked to liver transplant rejection and survival. There have been reports of increased risk of acute and chronic rejection with ductopenia, faster graft fibrosis, biliary problems, poorer survival, and even de novo autoimmune hepatitis when DSAs are present in the recipient. Higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of the DSAs and smaller graft size were associated with poorer patient outcomes, implying that high-risk patients with preformed DSAs should be considered for selecting the graft placed and desensitization methods, according to the investigators. Similarly, in a combined kidney-liver transplant, a pretransplant with a visible expression of several DSAs revealed that these antibodies were resistant to treatment. The renal graft was lost owing to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The HLA antigens expressed by the transplanted liver graft influenced antibody elimination. Pathologists are increasingly diagnosing AMR in liver transplants, and desensitization therapy has even been employed in situations of AMR, particularly in patients with DSAs in kidney-hepatic transplants and high-class II MFI due to Luminex. In conclusion, after revealing the negative impacts of DSAs with high MFI, pretransplant virtual crossmatch techniques may be appropriate to improve evolution; however, they may extend cold ischemia periods by requiring the donor to be typed.

Risk factors for acute rejection in liver transplantation and its impact on the outcomes of recipients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors for acute rejection in liver transplantation and its impact on the outcomes of the recipients.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data of 290 patients who underwent liver transplantation from January 2012 to December 2021 at our center were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were grouped into an acute rejection (AR) group and a normal (NM) group based on the confirmed histopathological diagnosis of acute rejection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine the risk factors for acute rejection.

RESULTS

244 patients were included in the study. Acute rejection occurred in 27 (11.1%) of the patients. Warm ischemia time (P = 0.137), cold ischemia time (P = 0.064) and chronic liver failure (P = 0.001) were potential risk factors for acute rejection. Chronic liver failure (P < 0.001, OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.47-27.32) was the independent risk factor. There was no significant difference in overall survival between recipients with acute rejection and those without it (P = 0.985). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival in the NM group was 98.1%, 85.7% and 78.6% respectively vs 88.9%, 82.5% and 82.5% respectively in the AR group.

CONCLUSION

Acute rejection does not appear to affect the long-term survival of the recipients. Only chronic liver failure was an independent risk factor for acute rejection. Our findings further illustrate that contradictions still exist on which factors influence acute rejection in liver transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

Clinicopathological data of 290 liver transplant recipients at our center between January 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated to determine the risk factors for acute rejection and its impact on the outcomes of the recipients. 244 patients were included in the analysis. 27 of the 244 experienced acute rejection. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce the confounding effect. Patients were assigned to an acute rejection group (n = 27) and a normal group (n = 54). Chronic liver failure (P < 0.001, OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.47-27.32) was the determined to be independent risk factor for acute rejection. Acute rejection did not appear to affect the long-term survival of the recipients and there was no significant difference in overall survival between the patients with acute rejection and those without it.

Current Approaches in the Allocation of Liver Transplantation

In recent decades, important advances have been made in the field of liver transplantation. One of the major problems remaining in this area is the small number of donors. Thus, recent data bring multiple updates of the indications and contraindications of this therapeutic method. The main goal is to increase the number of patients who can benefit from liver transplantation, a therapeutic method that can improve life expectancy and the quality of life of patients with end-stage liver disease. Another goal in the management of these patients is represented by the optimal care of those on the waiting list during that period. A multidisciplinary team approach is necessary to obtain the best results for both the donor and the recipient.

Monitoring of Soluble Forms of BAFF System (BAFF, APRIL, sR-BAFF, sTACI and sBCMA) in Kidney Transplantation

BAFF system plays an essential role in B cells homeostasis and tolerance, although it has widely not been tested in transplantation with doubtful results. The main purpose was to study the BAFF soluble forms and their correlation with acute rejection (AR) and donor-specific antibodies production. Serum levels of BAFF, APRIL, and soluble forms of their receptors were analyzed in renal recipients with and without acute rejection (AR/NAR) appearance. All molecules were evaluated at pre- and post-transplantation. sTACI showed a significant correlation with BAFF and sR-BAFF levels, and sBCMA also showed a positive correlation with sAPRIL levels. A significant increase in sAPRIL levels in patients suffering AR was also found, and ROC curves analysis showed an AUC = 0.724, a concentration of 6.05 ng/ml (sensitivity: 66.7%; specificity: 73.3%), the best cutoff point for predicting AR. In the post-transplant dynamics of sAPRIL levels in the longitudinal cohort, we observed a significant decrease at 3 and 6 month post-transplantation compared to pretransplantation status. We also observed that recipients with high pre-transplant levels of sAPRIL generated antibodies earlier than those with lower sAPRIL levels, although their long-term post-transplantation was not different. Our results show that elevated serum levels of APRIL may be helpful as a biomarker for the diagnosis of AR, although the longitudinal study shows that it is not helpful as a prognostic biomarker.

Evaluating the Link between BAFF System Gene Expression and Acute Rejection Development in Kidney Transplantation

B-cell activating factor (BAFF) system signaling is critical for B-cell homeostasis, effector functions, and tolerance maintenance in transplants, but it has not been studied in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The aim was to analyze the changes in BAFF system expression in KTRs with/without acute rejection (AR/NAR). The BAFF system expression was analyzed by qPCR in 40 KTRs. A meta-analysis of BAFF system expression and histological renal damage was identified by the Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI) and performed from the GEO database. Proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) expression increased at three- and six-months post-KT (p = 0.014 and p < 0.001). B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) expression increased at six-months post-KT (p = 0.038). BAFF expression remained stable in NAR-KTRs, but was increased in CADI concerning the No-CADI group at one year (p = 0.008). BCMA expression increased in the CADI group at one- (p = 0.001) and six-years post-KT (p = 0.024). At three months, the transmembrane activator and calcium modulator interactor (TACI) gene significantly elevated KTRs with DSAs (donor-specific antibody; p = 0.034). KTRs with DSAs significantly increase the B-cell activating factor receptor (R-BAFF; p = 0.021) and TACI (p = 0.018) between pre- and three-month post-KT. Changes in the expression of the BAFF system increase during post-KTR in the development of AR and chronic allograft damage, and could be an important pathological tool to detect and prevent kidney graft outcomes.

Computational Prediction of Biomarkers, Pathways, and New Target Drugs in the Pathogenesis of Immune-Based Diseases Regarding Kidney Transplantation Rejection

Background

The diagnosis of graft rejection in kidney transplantation (KT) patients is made by evaluating the histological characteristics of biopsy samples. The evolution of omics sciences and bioinformatics techniques has contributed to the advancement in searching and predicting biomarkers, pathways, and new target drugs that allow a more precise and less invasive diagnosis. The aim was to search for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in patients with/without antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and find essential cells involved in AMR, new target drugs, protein-protein interactions (PPI), and know their functional and biological analysis.

Material and Methods

Four GEO databases of kidney biopsies of kidney transplantation with/without AMR were analyzed. The infiltrating leukocyte populations in the graft, new target drugs, protein-protein interactions (PPI), functional and biological analysis were studied by different bioinformatics tools.

Results

Our results show DEGs and the infiltrating leukocyte populations in the graft. There is an increase in the expression of genes related to different stages of the activation of the immune system, antigenic presentation such as antibody-mediated cytotoxicity, or leukocyte migration during AMR. The importance of the IRF/STAT1 pathways of response to IFN in controlling the expression of genes related to humoral rejection. The genes of this biological pathway were postulated as potential therapeutic targets and biomarkers of AMR. These biological processes correlated showed the infiltration of NK cells and monocytes towards the allograft. Besides the increase in dendritic cell maturation, it plays a central role in mediating the damage suffered by the graft during AMR. Computational approaches to the search for new therapeutic uses of approved target drugs also showed that imatinib might theoretically be helpful in KT for the prevention and/or treatment of AMR.

Conclusion

Our results suggest the importance of the IRF/STAT1 pathways in humoral kidney rejection. NK cells and monocytes in graft damage have an essential role during rejection, and imatinib improves KT outcomes. Our results will have to be validated for the potential use of overexpressed genes as rejection biomarkers that can be used as diagnostic and prognostic markers and as therapeutic targets to avoid graft rejection in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

Chronic rejection after liver transplantation: Opening the Pandora’s box

Chronic rejection (CR) of liver allografts causes damage to intrahepatic vessels and bile ducts and may lead to graft failure after liver transplantation. Although its prevalence has declined steadily with the introduction of potent immunosuppressive therapy, CR still represents an important cause of graft injury, which might be irreversible, leading to graft loss requiring re-transplantation. To date, we still do not fully appreciate the mechanisms underlying this process. In addition to T cell-mediated CR, which was initially the only recognized type of CR, recently a new form of liver allograft CR, antibody-mediated CR, has been identified. This has indeed opened an era of thriving research and renewed interest in the field. Liver biopsy is needed for a definitive diagnosis of CR, but current research is aiming to identify new non-invasive tools for predicting patients at risk for CR after liver transplantation. Moreover, the minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy might influence the establishment of subclinical CR-related injury, which should not be disregarded. Therapies for CR may only be effective in the “early” phases, and a tailored management of the immunosuppression regimen is essential for preventing irreversible liver damage. Herein, we provide an overview of the current knowledge and research on CR, focusing on early detection, identification of non-invasive biomarkers, immunosuppressive management, re-transplantation and future perspectives of CR.

Personalized Medicine for Kidney Transplantation: Association of Graft Survival and Acute Transplant Rejection with Genetic Variation in B Cell Activating Factor System Signaling

Kidney transplantation (KT) clinical outcomes are highly variable across patients and would benefit from predictive biomarkers to achieve personalized/precision medicine. The B cell activating factor (BAFF) system signaling plays an essential role in B lymphocytes' homeostasis, and is implicated in activation and survival of B lymphocytes. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in BAFF system genes are therefore strong candidates to identify the genetic mechanisms underpinning variable clinical outcomes in KT. We report here new findings on BAFF system genetic polymorphisms in KT patients in relation to two key phenotypes of clinical interest: graft survival and acute rejection (AR). A total of 168 KT patients, of which 29 suffered AR, participated in this study. The BAFF system polymorphisms in five genes TNFSF13B, TNFSF13, TNFRSF13C, TNFRSF13B, and TNFRSF17 were characterized using TaqMan SNP genotyping. Patients with KT who had an AA genotype in polymorphism rs3803800 of the TNFSF13 gene had a higher risk of suffering AR (p = 0.046; odds ratios = 3.38, 95% CI: 1.02-11.2). Moreover, patients with AA genotype (rs3803800) in the TNFSF13 gene had a significantly lower AR-free time than the GG/GA genotypes (69.2% vs. 85.7%; p = 0.037). Of importance, bioinformatics analysis showed that the polymorphism rs3803800 could alter splicing regulation and affect the proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) expression levels. The analysis of graft survival did not show a significant association with the polymorphisms analyzed in this study. In conclusion, the rs3803800 genetic polymorphism from this study of BAFF system genes appears to display importance in AR-free time for KT patients, and thus, warrants further research in independent populations as a putative predictive biomarker of AR. These findings also inform future personalized/precision medicine efforts and functional genomic studies in KT patients.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Literature Review

Antibody-mediated rejection is a rare complication following liver transplantation and there is a lack of a comprehensive treatment strategy to provide detailed information about the dose and duration of antibody-mediated rejection treatment. This study describes eight adult liver transplantation recipients who developed antibody-mediated rejection between 2002 and 2021 in our center, as well as a review of the literature on the reported cases of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation recipients. Our center's medical records were reviewed retrospectively to extract the necessary data on patients' characteristics, management, and outcomes. Then, a comprehensive search using Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar databases was conducted without time limitation until June, 2021. Finally, a stepwise protocol was developed for managing acute, chronic, and recurrent antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation patients, based on our own experience, reported cases in the literature, and data from kidney transplantation. By review of the literature, 24 case studies containing 64 patients were identified and their management strategies and outcomes were evaluated. Although, various combinations of corticosteroids, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and biological agents are used in the treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, treatment strategies should be classified according to the type, severity, and the timing of its onset. Given the importance of early treatment, rituximab and/or bortezomib should be started as soon as possible if no improvement in liver enzymes/bilirubin is observed during the initial treatment strategy using corticosteroids, plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Rituximab Desensitization in Liver Transplant Recipients With Preformed Donor-specific HLA Antibodies: A Japanese Nationwide Survey

Background.

The significance of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplant recipients is controversial. Moreover, there has been no established desensitization protocol for DSA-positive recipients.

Methods.

A Japanese nationwide survey was performed to investigate the clinical practice among preformed DSA-positive patients with special reference to rituximab desensitization.

Results.

There was a total of 47 cases, including 2 pediatric cases, in which rituximab (287 ± 159 mg [319 (50–916)/m²]) was administered to desensitize preformed DSA. The decision for the indication of rituximab desensitization was based on a single-antigen assay in the majority of cases (83%, 39/47), and the most frequent protocol was rituximab monotherapy (n = 12) followed by quadruple treatment with rituximab tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and plasmapheresis (n = 11). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-y graft and patient survival rates among adult patients were 85%, 83%, 83%, and 81%, 77%, 74%, respectively, while neither graft loss nor death was observed in the 2 pediatric cases. The 1-, 3-, and 12-mo cumulative incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was 11%, 13%, and 13%, respectively. The incidence of AMR was significantly higher in the lower rituximab dose group than in the higher rituximab dose group (cutoff 300 mg/m², 4% versus 24%, P = 0.041). The rate of infusion-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 4.4%, and all ADRs were mild and self-limiting. A total of 99 ADRs among 27 patients were reported, none of which were severe adverse events associated with rituximab.

Conclusions.

The rituximab induction was well tolerated among DSA-positive liver transplant recipients with a satisfactory outcome. A rituximab dose >300 mg/m² was observed to achieve less incidence of the development of AMR.

Donor-Specific Antibodies Against Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen are Associated with Graft Inflammation but Not with Fibrosis Long-Term After Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of Protocol Biopsies

Background

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against donor human leukocyte antigen after liver transplantation, which are associated with histological changes, have been widely studied with respect to their sustained impact on transplant function. However, their long-term impact after liver transplantation remains unclear.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional analysis from June 2016 to July 2017 that included all patients who presented themselves for scheduled follow-up after receiving a liver transplantation between September 1989 and December 2016. In addition to a liver protocol biopsy, patients were screened for human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLAab) and donor-specific antibodies. Subsequently, the association between human leukocyte antigen antibodies, donor-specific antibodies, histologic and clinical features, and immunosuppression was analyzed.

Results

Analysis for human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was performed for 291 and 271 patients. A significant association between higher inflammation grades and the presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies was detected, while fibrosis stages remained unaffected. These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic regression for inflammation showing a significant increase for presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies (OR: 4.43; 95% CI: 1.67–12.6; p=0.0035). Furthermore, the use of everolimus in combination with tacrolimus was significantly associated with the status of negative human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies. Viral etiology for liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and higher steatosis grades of the graft were significantly associated with a lower rate of human leukocyte antigen antibodies. The impact of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was associated with higher levels of laboratory parameters, such as transaminases and bilirubin.

Conclusion

Donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen are associated with histological and biochemical graft inflammation after liver transplantation, while fibrosis seems to be unaffected. Future studies should validate these findings for longer observation periods and specific subgroups.

PCR Array Technology in Biopsy Samples Identifies Up-Regulated mTOR Pathway Genes as Potential Rejection Biomarkers After Kidney Transplantation

Background: Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the major cause of kidney transplant rejection. The donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (DSA) response to a renal allograft is not fully understood yet. mTOR complex has been described in the accommodation or rejection of transplants and integrates responses from a wide variety of signals. The aim of this study was to analyze the expression of the mTOR pathway genes in a large cohort of kidney transplant patients to determine its possible influence on the transplant outcome. Methods: A total of 269 kidney transplant patients monitored for DSA were studied. The patients were divided into two groups, one with recipients that had transplant rejection (+DSA/+AMR) and a second group of recipients without rejection (+DSA/-AMR and -DSA/-AMR, controls). Total RNA was extracted from kidney biopsies and reverse transcribed to cDNA. Human mTOR-PCR array technology was used to determine the expression of 84 mTOR pathway genes. STRING and REVIGO software were used to simulate gene to gene interaction and to assign a molecular function. Results: The studied groups showed a different expression of the mTOR pathway related genes. Recipients that had transplant rejection showed an over-expressed transcript (≥5-fold) of AKT1S1, DDIT4, EIF4E, HRAS, IGF1, INS, IRS1, PIK3CD, PIK3CG, PRKAG3, PRKCB (>12-fold), PRKCG, RPS6KA2, TELO2, ULK1, and VEGFC, compared with patients that did not have rejection. AKT1S1 transcripts were more expressed in +DSA/-AMR biopsies compared with +DSA/+AMR. The main molecular functions of up-regulated gene products were phosphotransferase activity, insulin-like grown factor receptor and ribonucleoside phosphate binding. The group of patients with transplant rejection also showed an under-expressed transcript (≥5-fold) of VEGFA (>15-fold), RPS6, and RHOA compared with the group without rejection. The molecular function of down-regulated gene products such as protein kinase activity and carbohydrate derivative binding proteins was also analyzed. Conclusions: We have found a higher number of over-expressed mTOR pathway genes than under-expressed ones in biopsies from rejected kidney transplants (+DSA/+AMR) with respect to controls. In addition to this, the molecular function of both types of transcripts (over/under expressed) is different. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine if variations in gene expression profiles can act as predictors of graft loss, and a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of the involved proteins would be necessary.

Identification of peripheral CD154+ T cells and HLA-DRB1 as biomarkers of acute cellular rejection in adult liver transplant recipients

Decreasing graft rejection and increasing graft and patient survival are great challenges facing liver transplantation (LT). Different T cell subsets participate in the acute cellular rejection (ACR) of the allograft. Cell-mediated immunity markers of the recipient could help to understand the mechanisms underlying acute rejection. This study aimed to analyse different surface antigens on T cells in a cohort of adult liver patients undergoing LT to determine the influence on ACR using multi-parametric flow cytometry functional assay. Thirty patients were monitored at baseline and during 1 year post-transplant. Two groups were established, with (ACR) and without (NACR) acute cellular rejection. Leukocyte, total lymphocyte, percentages of CD4+ CD154+ and CD8+ CD154+ T cells, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch between recipient-donor and their relation with ACR as well as the acute rejection frequencies were analysed. T cells were stimulated with concanavalin A (Con-A) and surface antigens were analysed by fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. A high percentage of CD4+ CD154+ T cells (P = 0·001) and a low percentage of CD8+ CD154+ T cells (P = 0·002) at baseline were statistically significant in ACR. A receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the cut-off values capable to stratify patients at high risk of ACR with high sensitivity and specificity for CD4+ CD154+ (P = 0·001) and CD8+ CD154+ T cells (P = 0·002). In logistic regression analysis, CD4+ CD154+ , CD8+ CD154+ and HLA mismatch were confirmed as independent risk factors to ACR. Post-transplant percentages of both T cell subsets were significantly higher in ACR, despite variations compared to pretransplant. These findings support the selection of candidates for LT based on the pretransplant percentages of CD4+ CD154+ and CD8+ CD154+ T cells in parallel with other transplant factors.

Chronic Antibody-Mediated Liver Rejection: More than Meets the Eye

Understanding the role of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplantation remains an investigative priority. Acute and chronic rejection associated with DSAs have been described. However, most transplant protocols did not consider the presence of DSAs at the moment of liver transplantation (LTx) or for the follow-up. A 65-year-old man received an ABO-compatible LTx for cirrhosis. Ten years after the LTx, he presented with a progressive elevation of liver enzymes and bilirubin. The single antigen Luminex bead assay showed the presence of DSAs against several DQ2, DQ7, and DQ8 alleles. The patient received several desensitization treatments regarding the persistence of DSAs. The anatomopathological study confirms chronic rejection. Although in this case the immunohistochemical deposits of C4d were negative, the data revealed morphological criteria of chronic graft injury and DSAs’ incompatibilities explained by structural analysis. These data support an antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). It could be reasonable to establish a protocol for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing of every LTx donor and recipient as well as a periodic follow-up to assess the presence of DSAs. This will make it possible to carry out studies of donor–recipient incompatibility and to confirm the existence of probable cases of AMR.

De novo HLA Class II antibodies are associated with the development of chronic but not acute antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation - a retrospective study

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) cause antibody-mediated rejection (AMR); however, their pathogenic role has not yet been adequately investigated after liver transplantation. The aim of our study was to analyse the clinical significance of DSA and complement-binding DSA for the prediction of AMR after liver transplantation. Our cohort included 120 liver recipients with assessed protocol biopsies one year post-transplant. All patients had defined HLA-specific and complement-binding (C1q + and C3d+) antibodies before and in regular intervals after transplantation. The incidence of DSA was evaluated in relation with clinical and histopathological data in the liver allografts. A higher occurrence of acute AMR was observed in recipients with preformed complement-binding DSA to HLA Class I antigens. Patients who developed chronic AMR had more frequently de novo-produced antibodies against HLA Class II antigens (P = 0.0002). A correlation was also found between de novo-formed C1q + and C3d+-binding antibodies to HLA Class II antigens and the development of chronic AMR (P = 0.043). Our study implies that preformed complement-binding DSA to HLA Class I antigens are related to increased risk of acute antibody-mediated rejection, while chronic AMR is more frequent in patients with de novo-produced antibodies to HLA Class II antigens after liver transplantation.

Donor-specific antibodies in liver transplantation: challenges in diagnosis and determining clinical impact

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our understanding of the clinical impact of donor-specific antibodies in liver transplant recipients has evolved in recent years as outcomes for liver allografts have improved and advances in diagnostic testing have made recognition of antibody mediated rejection in transplant patients more sensitive.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two main types of donor-specific antibodies - preformed and de novo - have been reported in the literature to have a negative impact on graft survival, and researchers have been able to further identify subclasses of class II donor-specific antibodies as being the most clinically impactful. Furthermore, there is evidence that donor-specific antibody formation can augment cellular rejection in liver grafts and lead to worsened clinical outcomes. Recent data have shown a higher prevalence of donor-specific antibody formation than previously reported.

SUMMARY

This review explores the most recent literature regarding the clinical impact of both preformed and de-novo donor-specific antibodies and potential management guidelines for patients undergoing liver transplantation. The best practice guidelines for undergoing monitoring for donor-specific antibody formation and protocol biopsies in sensitized patients will depend on further multiinstitutional studies.