Rituximab in the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Autoimmune Diseases: Experience from a Single Referral Center and Literature Review

Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at summarizing the evidence of efficacy and safety of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

Materials and methods

PubMed and Embase databases were searched until June 22, 2022, to identify studies on RA-ILD treated with rituximab, confined to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on the included studies to assess the overall stabilization or improvement in ILD, changes in percent-predicted (%-predicted) forced vital capacity (FVC), and %-predicted diffusion capacity of lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) following rituximab therapy.

Results

A total of 15 studies (4 prospective and 11 retrospective studies) were included, with a total of 314 patients. There were 105 (60.7%) females out of 173 subjects for whom sex details were available from seven studies. The overall pooled proportion of patients with stabilization or improvement in ILD was 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.96, p=0.02]. Rituximab improved FVC from baseline by 7.50% (95% CI: 1.35-13.65; p=0.02, fixed effect). Similarly, rituximab improved DLCO by 6.39% (95% CI: 1.366-14.43; p=0.12, random-effect). Two retrospective studies reported reduced mortality with rituximab therapy compared to tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors.

Conclusion

Treatment with rituximab in RA-ILD was associated with a significant improvement in %-predicted FVC, as well as stabilization or improvement in ILD after one year of treatment.

The Pattern and Progression of "Usual" Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features: Comparison with Patients with Classic Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

We proposed the term "UIPAF" to define patients with Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) associated with only one domain of the classification called "Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features" (IPAF). The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical presentation and prognosis of UIPAF patients, compared with two cohorts, composed of IPAF and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients, respectively.

METHODS

The patients were enrolled as IPAF, UIPAF, or IPF based on clinical, serological, and radiological data and evaluated by a multidisciplinary team.

RESULTS

We enrolled 110 patients with IPF, 69 UIPAF, and 123 IPAF subjects. UIPAF patients were similar to IPAF regarding autoimmune features, except for the prevalence of Rheumatoid Factor in UIPAF and anti-SSA in IPAF. A similar proportion of the two cohorts progressed toward a specific autoimmune disease (SAD), with differences in the kind of SAD developed. The real-life management and prognosis of UIPAF patients proved to be almost identical to IPF.

CONCLUSIONS

UIPAF shared with IPAF similar autoimmune features, suggesting the opportunity to be considered IPAF, excluding the morphological domain by the classification. However, the real-life management and prognosis of UIPAF are similar to IPF. These data suggest a possible modification in the therapeutic management of UIPAF.

Abatacept in usual and in non-specific interstitial pneumonia associated with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) in Rheumatoid Arthritis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease (RA-ILD) according to the radiological patterns of usual (UIP) or non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP).

METHODS

From an observational longitudinal multicentre study of 263 RA-ILD patients treated with ABA, those with UIP or NSIP were selected. Lung function, chest high resolution computerised tomography (HRCT) and dyspnoea were recorded and compared in both groups from baseline to the end of follow-up (progression definitions: improvement or worsening >10% of FVC or DLCO, changes in HRCT extension and 1-point change in the mMRC scale, respectively). Differences between final and baseline visits were calculated as the average difference (95% CI) through mixed effects models regression.

RESULTS

We studied 190 patients with UIP (n=106) and NSIP (n=84). General features were similar in both groups except for older age, positive rheumatoid factor, and previous sulfasalazine therapy, which were more frequent in patients with UIP. ILD duration up to ABA initiation was relatively short: median 16 [4-50] and 11 [2-36] months (p=0.36) in UIP and NSIP, respectively. Mean baseline FVC and DLCO were 82% and 63% in UIP and 89% and 65% in NSIP, respectively. Both parameters remained stable during 24 months with ABA. HRCT lesions and dyspnoea improved/stabilized in 73.1% and 90.5% and 72.9% and 94.6% of UIP and NSIP patterns, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ABA seems equally effective in stabilizing dyspnoea, lung function and radiological impairment in both UIP and NSIP patterns of RA-ILD. Early administration of ABA may prevent RA-ILD progression, regardless of the radiological pattern.

Efficacy of non-conventional synthetic DMARDs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of non-conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (ncs-DMARD) strategies on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles from inception to 1 June 2022. The results obtained from the analysis were expressed as mean difference (MD), effect size and 95% CI.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies, including 1315 patients with RA-ILD, were eligible. The ncs-DMARDs included abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, tumour necrosis factor and Janus kinase inhibitors. Compared with the baseline, there were no significant changes in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) values in the pooled data after ncs-DMARD treatment (alone or combined with conventional therapy) (p=0.36 for FVC; p=0.96 for FEV1 and p=0.46 for DLCO). Of note, FVC was obviously increased in rituximab subgroup (MD=-4.62, 95% CI -8.90 to -0.33, p=0.03). Also, high-resolution CT non-progression rate and fatality rate due to ILD progression in patients with RA-ILD were 0.792 (95% CI 0.746 to 0.834, p=0.015) and 0.049 (95% CI 0.035 to 0.065, p=0.000), respectively.

CONCLUSION

ncs-DMARDs alone or combined with conventional therapy might be an optimal and promising treatment for stabilising or improving ILD in patients with RA-ILD.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022356816.

Rituximab as the first-line therapy in anti-synthetase syndrome-related interstitial lung disease

Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). In comparison to interstitial lung disease (ILD) in polymyositis and dermatomyositis (PM/DM), ILD in ASS is more frequent, has a more aggressive phenotype, a greater involvement of the lungs, and a more rapid onset of pulmonary symptoms. Continuous declines in predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and dyspnea were the main features of patients who developed end-stage ILD. The severity of ASS at diagnosis dictates when and which immunosuppressant will be started. There is an experience for the usage of RTX in the first, second, and subsequent lines, as well as for reintroduction and salvage therapies. Not all ASS patients will develop severe illness and require intense immunosuppression. Some features associated with poor prognosis include older age, acute or subacute onset, lack of response to steroids, and lower baseline values for FVC and DLCO. Here we hypothesize that RTX should be the first line of treatment for high-risk ILD in ASS to preserve lung function and then maintenance therapy should be continued with the same or another drug depending on the recovery of lung function.

Efficacy and Safety of intravenous monoclonal antibodies in patients with moderate-to-severe active Graves'ophthalmopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Backgrounds

The effects of various treatments on Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) have been studied. As monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been proposed for the treatment of moderate to severe GO, direct comparisons between different mAbs are lacking.We therefore conducted this meta-analysis to objectively compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous mAbs.

Methods

To identify eligible trials, references published before September 2022 were electronically searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Pubmed, Embase,Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI,Wan-Fang and ICTRP databases.The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool were used to assess the risk of bias of the original studies.The primary and secondary outcomes were the response and inactivation rates, with the secondary outcomes being the clinical activity score (CAS),the improvement of proptosis and diplopia improvement,and the adverse event rate. Publication bias was evaluated, along with subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Results

A total of 12 trials with 448 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that TCZ (tocilizumab) was most likely to be the best treatment in terms of response according to indirect contrast, followed by TMB (teprotumumab) and RTX (rituximab).TCZ, followed by TMB and RTX, was also most likely to be the best treatment in terms of reducing proptosis. In terms of improving diplopia, TMB was most likely to be the best treatment, followed by TCZ and RTX.TCZ was the highest probability of safety, followed by RTX and TMB.

Conclusions

Based on the best available evidence,TCZ should be the preferred treatment for moderate to severe GO.In the absence of head-to-head trials,indirect comparisons of treatments are routinely used to estimate the effectiveness of the treatments of interest. In addition,the optimal dose and potential mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies remain to be established,and it is encouraging that the treatment paradigm for GO may change in the future.This study was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for conducting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)(27).

Systematic Review Registration

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42023398170.

Antigenic responses are hallmarks of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases independent of underlying etiologies

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are heterogeneous conditions that may lead to progressive fibrosis and death of affected individuals. Despite diversity in clinical manifestations, enlargement of lung-associated lymph nodes (LLN) in fibrotic ILD patients predicts worse survival. Herein, we revealed a common adaptive immune landscape in LLNs of all ILD patients, characterized by highly activated germinal centers and antigen-activated T cells including regulatory T cells (Tregs). In support of these findings, we identified serum reactivity to 17 candidate auto-antigens in ILD patients through a proteome-wide screening using phage immunoprecipitation sequencing. Autoantibody responses to actin binding LIM protein 1 (ABLIM1), a protein highly expressed in aberrant basaloid cells of fibrotic lungs, were correlated with LLN frequencies of T follicular helper cells and Tregs in ILD patients. Together, we demonstrate that end-stage ILD patients have converging immune mechanisms, in part driven by antigen-specific immune responses, which may contribute to disease progression.

Diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung disease related to systemic autoimmune myopathies: a narrative review

Systemic autoimmune myopathies (SAMs) are rare diseases that lead to muscle inflammation and may be associated with a variety of systemic manifestations. Although there is great heterogeneity in the spectrum of extra-muscular involvement in SAMs, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most frequent lung manifestation. SAM-related ILD (SAM-ILD) presents significant variations according to geographic location and temporal trends and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Several myositis autoantibodies have been discovered over the last decades, including antibodies targeting aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase enzymes, which are associated with a variable risk of developing ILD and a myriad of other clinical features. In this review, the most relevant topics regarding clinical manifestations, risk factors, diagnostic tests, autoantibodies, treatment, and prognosis of SAM-ILD are highlighted. We searched PubMed for relevant articles published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish from January 2002 to September 2022. The most common SAM-ILD patterns are nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and organizing pneumonia. The combination of clinical, functional, laboratory, and tomographic features is usually sufficient for diagnostic confirmation, without the need for additional invasive methods. Glucocorticoids remain the first-line treatment for SAM-ILD, although other traditional immunosuppressants, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate, and cyclophosphamide have demonstrated some efficacy and, therefore, have an important role as steroid-sparing agents.

Bacterial Infections Associated with Immunosuppressive Agents Commonly Used in Patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases

There are about 200 different types of interstitial lung disease (ILD), and a crucial initial step in the assessment of a patient with suspected ILD is achieving an appropriate diagnosis. Some ILDs respond to immunosuppressive agents, while immunosuppression can be detrimental in others, hence treatment is based on the most confident diagnosis with consideration of a patient's risk factors. Immunosuppressive medications have the potential to result in substantial, and perhaps life-threatening, bacterial infections to a patient. However, data on the risk of bacterial infections from immunosuppressive treatment specifically in patients with interstitial lung disease is lacking. We hereby review the immunosuppressive treatments used in ILD patients excluding sarcoidosis, highlight their risk of bacterial infections, and discuss the potential mechanisms that contribute to the increased risk of infections.

Rituximab for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) on lung function and the prevalence of adverse events (AEs) in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) by meta-analysis.

METHODS

EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed and ClinicalKey were searched up to July 16, 2021. The lung function (forced vital capacity, FVC% predicted, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, DLCO% predicted) and prevalence of AEs of RTX in CTD-ILD were analyzed by meta-analysis, and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to explore the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We identified 29 studies, including 827 CTD-ILD patients with a median age of 53.05 years. In observational studies, FVC% (mean difference - 1.24, 95% CI [-2.35, -0.12]; P = .030) and DLCO% (-7.71, [-11.79, -3.63]; P = .014) of CTD-ILD decreased significantly after RTX treatment. In randomized controlled trials, FVC% of CTD-ILD decreased after RTX treatment (-5.24, [-9.94, - 0.54]; P = .029), but the difference of DLCO% was not significant (1.15, [-4.33, 6.63]; P = .681). The prevalence of AEs, all-cause mortality and infections was 29.7% (95% CI [0.17, 0.42]), 11.6% (95% CI [0.08, 0.16]) and 20.9% (95% CI [0.15, 0.27]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RTX was associated with AEs such as decreased pulmonary function, all-cause mortality, and infections in CTD-ILD. Adverse reactions during and after RTX treatment should be carefully monitored. Further prospective studies are needed to compare RTX with other immunosuppressants, antifibrotic drugs or placebos, which can provide therapeutic approaches for CTD-ILD.

Endothelin-1 as a Biomarker of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Autoimmune Diseases

The aim of this study was to determine the role of endothelin-1 (ET-1), a molecule involved in multiple vascular and fibrosing abnormalities, as a biomarker of interstitial lung disease (ILD), as well as its use for the differential diagnosis between idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and ILD associated with autoimmune diseases (AD-ILD), using a large and well-defined cohort of patients with ILD. A total of 112 patients with IPF, 91 patients with AD-ILD (28 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 26 systemic sclerosis, 20 idiopathic inflammatory myositis and 17 interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features) and 44 healthy controls were included. ET-1 serum levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A significant increase in ET-1 levels was found in patients with IPF compared to controls. Likewise, AD-ILD patients also showed higher ET-1 levels than controls when the whole cohort was stratified by the type of AD. Similar ET-1 levels were found in IPF and AD-ILD patients, regardless of the underlying AD. Interestingly, increased ET-1 levels were correlated with worse lung function in IPF and RA-ILD patients. Our study supports that serum ET-1 may be useful as a biomarker of ILD, although it could not help in the differential diagnosis between IPF and AD-ILD. Moreover, ET-1 levels may be associated with ILD severity.

Systemic complications of rheumatoid arthritis: Focus on pathogenesis and treatment

As a systemic autoimmune disease, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) usually causes damage not only to joints, but also to other tissues and organs including the heart, kidneys, lungs, digestive system, eyes, skin, and nervous system. Excessive complications are closely related to the prognosis of RA patients and even lead to increased mortality. This article summarizes the serious complications of RA, focusing on its incidence, pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment methods, aiming to provide a reference for clinicians to better manage the complications of RA.

Treating Autoimmune-Related Interstitial Lung Disease With B Cell Depletion

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases may affect vital organs with lung involvement being severe and difficult to treat manifestation. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) commonly affects the lung in the form of interstitial lung disease (ILD). ILD may be also seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), inflammatory myositis (IM), antisynthetase syndrome (AS), and the ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV). Rituximab (RTX) is an anti-CD20 B lymphocyte depleting mAb, often administered in the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Although RTX is an off-label treatment for CTD–ILD, there are numerous reports providing data that is effective in improving both pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and chest computed tomography findings consistent with ILD. There are retrospective uncontrolled studies that assess RTX as a treatment of ILD in autoimmune diseases. These studies, apart from one, do not include patients with AAV-ILD. In SSc-ILD, in particular, there are both controlled and uncontrolled studies displaying encouraging results following B cell depletion. In addition, a number of retrospective uncontrolled studies and fewer prospective studies evaluate RTX in connective tissue diseases CTD–ILD. Although RTX is an approved treatment for AAV there are scarce only data focusing on patients with AAV-ILD specifically. The results of a handful of studies comparing treatment of CTD-ILD with RTX to treatment with other agents are in favor of RTX. Results from large, still ongoing controlled trials are awaited to ascertain RTX effects in ILD encountered in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. We review herein the results of the different RTX trials in patients with autoimmune disease–associated with ILD. Despite the heterogeneity of these studies, RTX may be considered an alternative and safe but still off-label treatment for patients with refractory CTD–ILD.

B cells as target for immunotherapy in rheumatic diseases - current status

This mini-review is a short overview of different therapeutical strategies targeting B cells in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, mainly: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary Sjogren Syndrome (pSS). Many strategies and their rationale are discussed in this review: B cells' depletion (anti-CD20, anti-CD22), long-lived plasma cells depletion (anti-CD19, anti-CD27, anti-CD38 and anti-CD138), changing activation of B cells (anti-BAFF) and inhibiting proteasomes in plasma cells (bortezomib). The past successful therapies and less successful are shown, and the possible reasons for failures are discussed.

Successful treatment of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features using rituximab as salvage therapy

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features is a complex and heterogeneous research classification without clear management and should be discussed on a case-by-case basis in a pluridisciplinary way. Rituximab could be used for severe lung involvement. The coronavirus crisis can hide other pathologies in such a way that a diagnosis can be overlooked.

Efficacy and safety of abatacept in interstitial lung disease of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious complication that represents the second leading cause of death in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Treatment of RA-ILD remains controversial. The absence of randomized clinical trials and specific ACR or EULAR therapeutic guidelines makes it difficult to establish solid therapeutic recommendations on this issue. In this scenario, real-world data is especially valuable.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature evidence on the efficacy and safety of abatacept (ABA) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), given its clinical relevance and the lack of consensus on its therapeutic management.

METHODS

PUBMED and EMBASE were searched from the date of approval of ABA to the end of 2020 using a combination of RA, ILD and ABA terms following PRISMA guidelines. Identified studies were evaluated by two independent investigators.

RESULTS

Nine original studies (1 case series and 8 observational studies) were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. No randomized trial or meta-analysis were identified. The mean age of patients ranged from 61.2 to 75 years and the mean RA duration varied from 7.4 to 18 years. Subcutaneous ABA (74.5%-91%) predominated in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) (58%-75%), and it was used as first-line biologic agent in 22.8%-64.9% of the patients. The mean course of ILD ranged from 1 to 6.7 years, being usual and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia the most frequent patterns. Improvement or stabilization of ILD imaging (76.6%-92.7%) and FVC or DLCO (>85%) was described after a mean follow-up of 17.4-47.8 months, regardless of the pattern of lung involvement, being more remarkable in patients with shorter evolution of ILD. ABA led to significantly lower ILD worsening rates than TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and was associated with a 90% reduction in the relative risk of deterioration of ILD at 24 months of follow-up compared to TNFi and csDMARDs. Combination with methotrexate may have a corticoid-sparing effect. No unexpected adverse events were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that ABA may be a plausible alternative to treat RA patients with ILD. It would be highly desirable to develop prospective randomized controlled studies to confirm these findings.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of rheumatic disease-related interstitial lung disease: a narrative review

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an antimetabolite with a potent inhibitory effect on proliferation of T and B lymphocytes used since the early 1990s for the prevention of acute allograft rejection after organ transplant. MMF is also widely used for the treatment of a variety of rheumatic diseases (RDs) and their pulmonary involvement. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a heterogeneous group of progressive fibrotic diseases of the lung, which is often secondary to RD and represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality. MMF is considered the main alternative to cyclophosphamide as a first-line agent to treat RD-related ILD or as possible maintenance therapy after cyclophosphamide, with a lower rate of side-effects. However, as for other immunosuppressive agents, the use of MMF in RD-ILD is supported by poor scientific evidence. In this narrative review, we describe the available data and recent advances on the effectiveness and safety of MMF for the treatment of ILD related to RD, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, primary Sjögren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, undifferentiated connective tissue disease, interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.