3D Non-Local Neural Network: A Non-Invasive Biomarker for Immunotherapy Treatment Outcome Prediction. Case-Study: Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Machine learning models for predicting of PD-1 treatment efficacy in Pan-cancer patients based on routine hematologic and biochemical parameters

Immune checkpoint blockade therapy targeting the programmed death-1(PD-1) pathway has shown remarkable efficacy and durable response in patients with various cancer types. Early prediction of therapeutic efficacy is important for optimizing treatment plans and avoiding potential side effects. In this work, we developed an efficient machine learning prediction method using routine hematologic and biochemical parameters to predict the efficacy of PD-1 combination treatment in Pan-Cancer patients. A total of 431 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, esophageal cancer and lung cancer who underwent PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: progressive disease (PD) and disease control (DC) groups. Hematologic and biochemical parameters were collected before and at the third week of PD-1 therapy. Six machine learning models were developed and trained to predict the efficacy of PD-1 combination therapy at 8-12 weeks. Analysis of 57 blood biomarkers before and after three weeks of PD-1 combination therapy through statistical analysis, heatmaps, and principal component analysis did not accurately predict treatment outcome. However, with machine learning models, both the AdaBoost classifier and GBDT demonstrated high levels of prediction efficiency, with clinically acceptable AUC values exceeding 0.7. The AdaBoost classifier exhibited the highest performance among the 6 machine learning models, with a sensitivity of 0.85 and a specificity of 0.79. Our study demonstrated the potential of machine learning to predict the efficacy of PD-1 combination therapy based on changes in hematologic and biochemical parameters.

Imaging to predict checkpoint inhibitor outcomes in cancer. A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibition has radically improved the perspective for patients with metastatic cancer, but predicting who will not respond with high certainty remains difficult. Imaging-derived biomarkers may be able to provide additional insights into the heterogeneity in tumour response between patients. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarise and qualitatively assess the current evidence on imaging biomarkers that predict response and survival in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors in all cancer types.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched from database inception to 29th November 2021. Articles eligible for inclusion described baseline imaging predictive factors, radiomics and/or imaging machine learning models for predicting response and survival in patients with any kind of malignancy treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS and PROBAST tools and data was extracted.

RESULTS

In total, 119 studies including 15,580 patients were selected. Of these studies, 73 investigated simple imaging factors. 45 studies investigated radiomic features or deep learning models. Predictors of worse survival were (i) higher tumour burden, (ii) presence of liver metastases, (iii) less subcutaneous adipose tissue, (iv) less dense muscle and (v) presence of symptomatic brain metastases. Hazard rate ratios did not exceed 2.00 for any predictor in the larger and higher quality studies. The added value of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters in predicting response to treatment was limited. Pilot studies of radioactive drug tracer imaging showed promising results. Reports on radiomics were almost unanimously positive, but numerous methodological concerns exist.

CONCLUSIONS

There is well-supported evidence for several imaging biomarkers that can be used in clinical decision making. Further research, however, is needed into biomarkers that can more accurately identify which patients who will not benefit from checkpoint inhibition. Radiomics and radioactive drug labelling appear to be promising approaches for this purpose.

Artificial intelligence and radiomics: fundamentals, applications, and challenges in immunotherapy

Immunotherapy offers the potential for durable clinical benefit but calls into question the association between tumor size and outcome that currently forms the basis for imaging-guided treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics allow for discovery of novel patterns in medical images that can increase radiology’s role in management of patients with cancer, although methodological issues in the literature limit its clinical application. Using keywords related to immunotherapy and radiomics, we performed a literature review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase from database inception through February 2022. We removed all duplicates, non-English language reports, abstracts, reviews, editorials, perspectives, case reports, book chapters, and non-relevant studies. From the remaining articles, the following information was extracted: publication information, sample size, primary tumor site, imaging modality, primary and secondary study objectives, data collection strategy (retrospective vs prospective, single center vs multicenter), radiomic signature validation strategy, signature performance, and metrics for calculation of a Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). We identified 351 studies, of which 87 were unique reports relevant to our research question. The median (IQR) of cohort sizes was 101 (57–180). Primary stated goals for radiomics model development were prognostication (n=29, 33.3%), treatment response prediction (n=24, 27.6%), and characterization of tumor phenotype (n=14, 16.1%) or immune environment (n=13, 14.9%). Most studies were retrospective (n=75, 86.2%) and recruited patients from a single center (n=57, 65.5%). For studies with available information on model testing, most (n=54, 65.9%) used a validation set or better. Performance metrics were generally highest for radiomics signatures predicting treatment response or tumor phenotype, as opposed to immune environment and overall prognosis. Out of a possible maximum of 36 points, the median (IQR) of RQS was 12 (10–16). While a rapidly increasing number of promising results offer proof of concept that AI and radiomics could drive precision medicine approaches for a wide range of indications, standardizing the data collection as well as optimizing the methodological quality and rigor are necessary before these results can be translated into clinical practice.

Advanced Computational Methods for Oncological Image Analysis

The Special Issue "Advanced Computational Methods for Oncological Image Analysis", published for the Journal of Imaging, covered original research papers about state-of-the-art and novel algorithms and methodologies, as well as applications of computational methods for oncological image analysis, ranging from radiogenomics to deep learning [...].