Could Long-Acting Cabotegravir-Rilpivirine Be the Future for All People Living with HIV? Response Based on Genotype Resistance Test from a Multicenter Italian Cohort

Impact of rilpivirine cross-resistance on long-acting cabotegravir-rilpivirine in low and middle-income countries

Baseline rilpivirine drug resistance mutations (DRMs) are a risk factor for virological failure in patients treated with long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB/RPV LA). We investigated rilpivirine cross-resistance in treatment-naive and experienced patients in South Africa. One in 10 treatment-naive patients and 74.5% of patients failing treatment presented with rilpivirine DRMs. Our data suggest targeted genotyping may be required for patients initiating CAB/RPV LA, which significantly complicates the currently used public health approach.

Injectable Long-Acting Cabotegravir-Rilpivirine Therapy for People Living With HIV/AIDS: Addressing Implementation Barriers From the Start

ABSTRACT

Injectable cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB/RPV), administered bimonthly by a medical provider, is convenient and improves privacy and medication management. One year after approval, myriad implementation barriers threaten the access and sustainability of this life-saving innovation: (1) eligibility issues (viral suppression, drug resistance, and failed oral regimens); (2) injection requires medical provider and transportation to facility; (3) strict medication adherence; (4) life challenges-mental health, homelessness, joblessness; and (5) lack of insurance and high cost. Universal implementation of CAB/RPV calls for social, human, and health organizations to partner and provide HIV continuum of care and prevention services to facilitate CAB/RPV access and maintenance and for transparent health insurance billing practices to abate uncertainty concerning CAB/RPV's classification as a pharmaceutical or medical benefit and related cost implications.

Immune Responses to HBV Vaccine in People Living with HIV (PLWHs) Who Achieved Successful Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Understanding immune responses after HBV vaccination is important to prevent HBV infection in PLWH and to achieve successful treatment.

METHODS

Thirty-two PLWHs with CD4⁺ cell count > 350 cells/µL and HIV RNA < 200 copies/mL were vaccinated with 20 µg of HBV vaccine at weeks 0, 4, and 24 in this prospective study. We measured total HIV DNA levels, HBsAb titers and HBsAg-specific T-cell responses during follow-up time.

RESULTS

All patients achieved protective HBsAb titer after immunization. The magnitude of the IFN-r and TNF-a response to HBsAg was 22.0 (IQR: 6.5-65.0) and 106.50 (IQR: 58.5-203.0) spot-forming cells (SFC)/10⁵ PBMC, respectively at week 0. The level of IFN-r secreted at weeks 12 and weeks 36 to 48 was comparable with that at week 0. However, IFN-r response was higher at weeks 12 than that at weeks 36 to 48 (p = 0.02). The level of TNF-a secreted at weeks 12 was higher than that at week 0 (p < 0.001). Total HIV DNA levels were 2.76 (IQR: 2.47-3.07), 2.77 (IQR: 2.50-3.09), 2.77 (IQR: 2.41-2.89) log₁₀ copies/10⁶ PBMCs at weeks 0, 12, 36 to 48, respectively. No correlation was observed between IFN-r and TNF-a levels and HBsAb titer as well as total HIV DNA levels after immunization.

CONCLUSION

Humoral immunity was satisfactory, but cellular immunity and decline in HIV reservoir were not optimal after HBV vaccine immunization in these patients.

Are we ready for long-acting? A feasibility evaluation of long-acting cabotegravir-rilpivirine in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Cabotegravir and rilpivirine are the first drugs to be approved as injectable therapy to treat individuals with HIV. Despite encouraging results, the guidelines specify strict criteria for eligibility that could limit the feasibility of this strategy.

METHODS

We collected the clinical data of HIV-positive patients who were being treated at a single, third-level center in Italy. All patients were on stable therapy and showed suppressed viral load on their most recent analyses. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the clinical and viro-immunological characteristics of this population and excluded patients who had had previous virological failures, RAMs to rilpivirine or integrase inhibitors in the historical genotype, hepatitis B infection, absence of previous genotypes and the co-existence of HIV-subtype A and obesity. Our aim was to evaluate the proportion of patients who could be eligible for switching to this strategy.

RESULTS

1,752 patients were eligible. 148 were excluded because of a detectable viral load. With regard to the exclusion criteria, 48 patients had coinfection with HBV and 744 had a history of previous virological failures. Of the 896 patients with at least one genotypic resistance test, 161 had one or more RAMs to rilpivirine and 3 had RAMs to cabotegravir. None of the patients presented the combination of obesity and the A viral subtype. Overall, 31.2% of the patients were ineligible for cabotegravir-rilpivirine and the proportion increased to 47.3% when we considered only patients with all available information concerning resistance tests.

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of our cohort of patients did not fulfill the criteria and even more patients were potentially ineligible for cabotegravir-rilpivirine due to the lack of genotypic resistance tests. Also, fertile women had to be excluded due to the lack of data about this combination during pregnancy and breastfeeding. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.