Intermittent Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Treatment Maintains High Level of Viral Suppression in Virally Suppressed People Living with HIV

Relationship between adherence to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate and clinical outcomes in people with HIV in Japan: a claims database analysis

A lack of adherence to long-term antiretroviral therapy may impact viral suppression. The current study examined the relationship between medication adherence and clinical outcomes in people with human immunodeficiency virus infection (PWH) receiving bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (B/F/TAF). A retrospective cohort study using two Japanese claims databases was conducted. Adherence was measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC). Patients were grouped into 3 PDC category and persistence was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate whether the PDC was associated with treatment discontinuation. Among 952 patients, 820 (86.1%), 95 (10.0%), and 37 (3.9%) patients were grouped into the PDC ≥ 90%, 80- < 90%, and < 80% groups, respectively. Across all PDC groups, more than 90% of patients who received B/F/TAF were receiving treatment at 1 year. There was no significant difference in the risk of discontinuation between the lower PDC groups (80- < 90% and < 80%) and the PDC ≥ 90% group (0.400 [0.096, 1.661]; 2.244 [0.663, 7.594], hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], respectively). A drug resistance test was implemented for 15 patients, none of whom discontinued B/F/TAF after the test. The results suggest that events that could cause discontinuation, such as virologic failure, were not associated with PDC.

Use of genotypic HIV DNA testing: a DELPHI-type consensus

OBJECTIVES

As many disparities in the clinical use of HIV DNA sequencing are observed, a DELPHI-type consensus was initiated in France to homogenize use, techniques and interpretation of results.

METHODS

Based on a literature review and clinical experience, a steering committee (SC) of eight virologists and one infectious disease specialist formulated statements. Statements were submitted to an independent and anonymous electronic vote of virologists and HIV clinicians in France, between October 2022 and December 2022.

RESULTS

The SC developed 20 statements grouped into six categories: clinical situations for the use of HIV DNA genotyping; techniques for performing HIV DNA genotyping; consideration of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme (APOBEC) mutations; genotyping results reporting; recycling of antiretrovirals; and availability of HIV DNA genotyping tests and delays. Twenty-one virologists and 47 clinicians participated in two voting rounds and 18/20 (90%) assertions reached a 'strong' consensus. For example, that prior genotyping on HIV DNA is useful for clinical decision-making when considering switching to some long-acting regimens or to reduce the number of antiretroviral agents in virologically suppressed patients for whom RNA data are unavailable/not exploitable/not sufficiently informative. Two statements achieved no consensus: reporting any detected viral minority population for discussion in multidisciplinary meetings (virologists), and possible risk of virological failure when using a second-generation InSTI plus lamivudine or emtricitabine regimen in patients with undetectable viral load within ≥1 year and in the presence of a documented M184V mutation within the last 5 years (clinicians).

CONCLUSIONS

This DELPHI-type consensus will facilitate the strengthening and harmonization of good practice when performing HIV DNA sequencing.

Short Cycle, Intermittent Therapy: A Valuable Option in Selected, Virologically Suppressed People Living with HIV

The use of long-acting antiretroviral regimens will not be suitable for all people living with HIV for various reasons (previous virological failure with drugs of the same class, side effects, logistic difficulties, and costs). We think that short-cycle therapies could represent a feasible and valuable option for antiretroviral treatment optimization in selected individuals. So here we review clinical evidence about efficacy of short-cycle therapy in suppressed HIV-infected patients.

Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in paediatrics: Real-life experience from a French cohort (2019-2023)

OBJECTIVES

Although widely recommended, data on bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) efficacy in HIV-1-infected children/adolescents are mainly extrapolated from studies in adults and one paediatric trial in which subjects have good treatment adherence. This study aimed to provide data about the risk of virological failure (VF) and acquired genotypic resistance in children and adolescents receiving BIC/FTC/TAF in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study included 74 paediatric patients who received BIC/FTC/TAF during ≥6 months in 2019-2023. VF was defined as not achieving a plasma viral load <50 copies/mL within 6 months of BIC/FTC/TAF initiation or as experiencing virological rebound ≥50 copies/mL.

RESULTS

Most patients were antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced (93.2%), previously exposed to integrase inhibitors (85.1%) and displayed viral suppression at baseline (67.6%). Their median age was 11.2 years [interquartile range (IQR): 8.8-15.2]. BIC/FTC/TAF introduction reduced treatment burden in most ART-experienced subjects. Genotypic susceptibility score of BIC/FTC/TAF was ≥2 in all cases. Median follow-up was 40 months (IQR: 21-46). VF occurred in 28 people (37.8%), more frequently in the case of VF versus viral suppression at baseline (68% vs. 26%, P = 0.02). BIC/FTC/TAF was interrupted for suspected intolerance in only one case (1.4%). Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutation (T69D/N) emerged in one patient (3.6% of VF) after 47 months of continuous detectable viraemia while on ART. No acquisition of mutations in the integrase gene was observed.

CONCLUSION

Because of its high genetic barrier to resistance, BIC/FTC/TAF could be especially useful in the paediatric population, in which the risk of poor treatment adherence and VF is high.

Treatment-emergent reverse transcriptase resistance during antiretroviral therapy with bictegravir, tenofovir alafenamide, and emtricitabine: A case series

OBJECTIVES

Bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (BIC/TAF/FTC) is a complete regimen for the treatment of HIV with a high barrier to resistance and few reported cases of treatment failure. We present three cases of treatment-emergent resistance to nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in patients with suboptimal treatment adherence and assess whether the resistance-associated mutations were present before BIC/TAF/FTC initiation or emerged during therapy.

METHODS

We used genotypic drug resistance testing by Sanger sequencing to identify emergent resistance mutations in plasma viral load specimens collected after combination antiretroviral therapy initiation in all participants. Additionally, we performed ultra-deep sequencing by Illumina MiSeq on the earliest available plasma HIV-1 viral load specimen and on any available specimens closest in time to the initiation of BIC/TAF/FTC therapy to identify low-abundance resistance mutations present in the viral quasispecies.

RESULTS

All three participants developed NRTI resistance after prolonged exposure and incomplete adherence to BIC/TAF/FTC. The T69N, K70E, M184I, and/or T215I mutations identified in clinical samples at the time of virological failure were not present on deep sequencing of either baseline samples or samples collected before BIC/TAF/FTC initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a generally high genetic barrier to resistance, NRTI resistance-associated mutations may emerge during therapy with BIC/TAF/FTC in the setting of suboptimal adherence.