1
|
Newett L, McWhirter R, Eckstein L, Warren V, Nicol D. Australian Attitudes Towards Waivers of Consent Within the Context of Genomic Data Sharing. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2024; 19:113-123. [PMID: 39096208 PMCID: PMC11298119 DOI: 10.1177/15562646241261848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
This research identifies the circumstances in which Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) are trusted by Australians to approve the use of genomic data - without express consent - and considers the impact of genomic data sharing settings, and respondent attributes, on public trust. Survey results (N = 3013) show some circumstances are more conducive to public trust than others, with waivers endorsed when future research is beneficial and when privacy is protected, but receiving less support in other instances. Still, results imply attitudes are influenced by more than these specific circumstances, with different data sharing settings, and participant attributes, affecting views. Ultimately, this research raises questions and concerns in relation to the criteria HRECs use when authorising waivers of consent in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsay Newett
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
- Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Rebekah McWhirter
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
- Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Heide I, Francke AL, Döpp C, Heins M, van Hout HPJ, Verheij RA, Joling KJ. Lessons learned from the development of a national registry on dementia care and support based on linked national health and administrative data. Learn Health Syst 2024; 8:e10392. [PMID: 38633020 PMCID: PMC11019384 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction This paper provides insight into the development of the Dutch Dementia Care and Support Registry and the lessons that can be learned from it. The aim of this Registry was to contribute to quality improvement in dementia care and support. Methods This paper describes how the Registry was set up in four stages, reflecting the four FAIR principles: the selection of data sources (Findability); obtaining access to the selected data sources (Accessibility); data linkage (Interoperability); and the reuse of data (Reusability). Results The linkage of 16 different data sources, including national routine health and administrative data appeared to be technically and legally feasible. The linked data in the Registry offers rich information about (the use of) care for persons with dementia across various healthcare settings, including but not limited to primary care, secondary care, long-term care and medication use, that cannot be obtained from single data sources. Conclusions A key lesson learned is that in order to reuse the data for quality improvement in practice, it is essential to involve healthcare professionals in setting up the Registry and to guide them in the interpretation of the data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris van der Heide
- Department Healthcare from the Perspective of Patients, Clients and CitizensNivel, Netherlands Institute of Health Services ResearchUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Anneke L. Francke
- Department Healthcare from the Perspective of Patients, Clients and CitizensNivel, Netherlands Institute of Health Services ResearchUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMCVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Carola Döpp
- Rehabilitation DepartmentRadboudumcNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Marianne Heins
- Department Healthcare from the Perspective of Patients, Clients and CitizensNivel, Netherlands Institute of Health Services ResearchUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Hein P. J. van Hout
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMCVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Robert A. Verheij
- Department Healthcare from the Perspective of Patients, Clients and CitizensNivel, Netherlands Institute of Health Services ResearchUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral SciencesTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
| | - Karlijn J. Joling
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMCVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cervera de la Cruz P, Shabani M. Conceptualizing fairness in the secondary use of health data for research: A scoping review. Account Res 2023:1-30. [PMID: 37851101 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2271394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
With the introduction of the European Health Data Space (EHDS), the secondary use of health data for research purposes is attracting more attention. Secondary health data processing promises to address novel research questions, inform the design of future research and improve healthcare delivery generally. To comply with the existing data protection regulations, the secondary data use must be fair, among other things. However, there is no clear understanding of what fairness means in the context of secondary use of health data for scientific research purposes. In response, we conducted a scoping review of argument-based literature to explore how fairness in the secondary use of health data has been conceptualized. A total of 35 publications were included in the final synthesis after abstract and full-text screening. Using an inductive approach and a thematic analysis, our review has revealed that balancing individual and public interests, reducing power asymmetries, setting conditions for commercial involvement, and implementing benefit sharing are essential to guarantee fair secondary use research. The findings of this review can inform current and future research practices and policy development to adequately address concerns about fairness in the secondary use of health data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mahsa Shabani
- Metamedica, Faculty of Law and Criminology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Law Centre for Health and Life, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Man Y, Wieland-Jorna Y, Torensma B, de Wit K, Francke AL, Oosterveld-Vlug MG, Verheij RA. Opt-In and Opt-Out Consent Procedures for the Reuse of Routinely Recorded Health Data in Scientific Research and Their Consequences for Consent Rate and Consent Bias: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e42131. [PMID: 36853745 PMCID: PMC10015347 DOI: 10.2196/42131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scientific researchers who wish to reuse health data pertaining to individuals can obtain consent through an opt-in procedure or opt-out procedure. The choice of procedure may have consequences for the consent rate and representativeness of the study sample and the quality of the research, but these consequences are not well known. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to provide insight into the consequences for the consent rate and consent bias of the study sample of opt-in procedures versus opt-out procedures for the reuse of routinely recorded health data for scientific research purposes. METHODS A systematic review was performed based on searches in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently included studies based on predefined eligibility criteria and assessed whether the statistical methods used in the reviewed literature were appropriate for describing the differences between consenters and nonconsenters. Statistical pooling was conducted, and a description of the results was provided. RESULTS A total of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Of the 15 studies, 13 (87%) implemented an opt-in procedure, 1 (7%) implemented an opt-out procedure, and 1 (7%) implemented both the procedures. The average weighted consent rate was 84% (60,800/72,418 among the studies that used an opt-in procedure and 96.8% (2384/2463) in the single study that used an opt-out procedure. In the single study that described both procedures, the consent rate was 21% in the opt-in group and 95.6% in the opt-out group. Opt-in procedures resulted in more consent bias compared with opt-out procedures. In studies with an opt-in procedure, consenting individuals were more likely to be males, had a higher level of education, higher income, and higher socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS Consent rates are generally lower when using an opt-in procedure compared with using an opt-out procedure. Furthermore, in studies with an opt-in procedure, participants are less representative of the study population. However, both the study populations and the way in which opt-in or opt-out procedures were organized varied widely between the studies, which makes it difficult to draw general conclusions regarding the desired balance between patient control over data and learning from health data. The reuse of routinely recorded health data for scientific research purposes may be hampered by administrative burdens and the risk of bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne de Man
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Wieland-Jorna
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bart Torensma
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Koos de Wit
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anneke L Francke
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Public and Occupational Health, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Robert A Verheij
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Tranzo, School of Social Sciences and Behavioural Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lech S, O'Sullivan JL, Wellmann L, Supplieth J, Döpfmer S, Gellert P, Kuhlmey A, Nordheim J. Recruiting general practitioners and patients with dementia into a cluster randomised controlled trial: strategies, barriers and facilitators. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:61. [PMID: 33784967 PMCID: PMC8008594 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01253-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recruitment of general practitioners (GPs) and their patients is reported as one of the most challenging steps when undertaking primary care research. The present paper describes the recruitment process of a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) aiming to improve dementia care in the primary care setting. Methods Recruitment data was analysed descriptively using frequency tables to investigate comparisons of recruitment rates and results of different recruitment strategies as well as reasons for participation and non-participation of GPs, patients with dementia (PwD) and their caregivers. Results Over a period of 23 months, N = 28 GPs were successfully included in the cRCT. This represents an overall recruitment rate of 4.6%. The most efficient strategy in terms of high response and low labour-intensity involved the dissemination of calls for participation in a GP research network. Most frequently reported reasons for GP’s participation were Improvement of patient’s well-being (n = 22, 79%) followed by Interest in dementia research (n = 18, 64%). The most common reasons for non-participation were Lack of time (n = 71, 34%) followed by Not interested in participation (n = 63, 30%). On a patient level, N = 102 PwD were successfully recruited. On average, each GP referred about n = 7 PwD (range: 1–17; mdn = 6; IQR = 3.5) and successfully recruited about n = 4 PwD (range: 1–11; mdn = 3; IQR = 3.5). Conclusion First, our findings propose GP research networks as a promising strategy to promote recruitment and participation of GPs and their patients in research. Second, present findings highlight the importance of including GPs and their interests in specific research topics in early stages of research in order to ensure a successful recruitment. Finally, results do not support cold calls as a successful strategy in the recruitment of GPs. Trial registration The trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry (Trial registration number: ISRCTN15854413). Registered 01 April 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Lech
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Julie L O'Sullivan
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Leonard Wellmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Juliana Supplieth
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Döpfmer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of General Practice, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Gellert
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Adelheid Kuhlmey
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johanna Nordheim
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kayes ASM, Kalaria R, Sarker IH, Islam MS, Watters PA, Ng A, Hammoudeh M, Badsha S, Kumara I. A Survey of Context-Aware Access Control Mechanisms for Cloud and Fog Networks: Taxonomy and Open Research Issues. SENSORS 2020; 20:s20092464. [PMID: 32349242 PMCID: PMC7249653 DOI: 10.3390/s20092464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 04/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Over the last few decades, the proliferation of the Internet of Things (IoT) has produced an overwhelming flow of data and services, which has shifted the access control paradigm from a fixed desktop environment to dynamic cloud environments. Fog computing is associated with a new access control paradigm to reduce the overhead costs by moving the execution of application logic from the centre of the cloud data sources to the periphery of the IoT-oriented sensor networks. Indeed, accessing information and data resources from a variety of IoT sources has been plagued with inherent problems such as data heterogeneity, privacy, security and computational overheads. This paper presents an extensive survey of security, privacy and access control research, while highlighting several specific concerns in a wide range of contextual conditions (e.g., spatial, temporal and environmental contexts) which are gaining a lot of momentum in the area of industrial sensor and cloud networks. We present different taxonomies, such as contextual conditions and authorization models, based on the key issues in this area and discuss the existing context-sensitive access control approaches to tackle the aforementioned issues. With the aim of reducing administrative and computational overheads in the IoT sensor networks, we propose a new generation of Fog-Based Context-Aware Access Control (FB-CAAC) framework, combining the benefits of the cloud, IoT and context-aware computing; and ensuring proper access control and security at the edge of the end-devices. Our goal is not only to control context-sensitive access to data resources in the cloud, but also to move the execution of an application logic from the cloud-level to an intermediary-level where necessary, through adding computational nodes at the edge of the IoT sensor network. A discussion of some open research issues pertaining to context-sensitive access control to data resources is provided, including several real-world case studies. We conclude the paper with an in-depth analysis of the research challenges that have not been adequately addressed in the literature and highlight directions for future work that has not been well aligned with currently available research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. S. M. Kayes
- Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia; (R.K.); (P.A.W.); (A.N.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-3-9479-5772
| | - Rudri Kalaria
- Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia; (R.K.); (P.A.W.); (A.N.)
| | - Iqbal H. Sarker
- Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia;
| | | | - Paul A. Watters
- Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia; (R.K.); (P.A.W.); (A.N.)
| | - Alex Ng
- Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia; (R.K.); (P.A.W.); (A.N.)
| | | | | | - Indika Kumara
- Jheronimus Academy of Data Science, Sint Janssingel 92, 5211 DA’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|