Using Telemedicine to Monitor the Patient with Chronic Respiratory Failure

Life Experiences in Neuromuscular Tracheotomized Patients in Times of Covid-19

BACKGROUND

The management of tracheotomy at home can be very complex, affecting the patient's quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

This case series study aimed to explore the experiences of patients affected by neuromuscular diseases (NMD) concerning tracheostomy and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV) management at home during the COVID-19 health emergency in Italy.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews and the following instruments were used: Connor and Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25); Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II); State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI); Langer Mindfulness Scale (LMS). Descriptive analyses, correlations, and qualitative analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

22 patients [50% female, mean age = 50.2 (SD = 21.2)] participated in the study. Participants who showed high levels of dispositional mindfulness in terms of novelty-seeking (r = 0.736, p = 0.013) and novelty production (r = 0.644, p = 0.033) were those with higher resilience. The main emotion that emerged was the fear of contagion (19 patients, 86.36%), due to the previous fragile condition, leading to a significant sense of abandonment. The tracheostomy's perception is seen in extremes as a lifesaver or a condemnation. The relationship with the health professionals moves from satisfaction to a feeling of abandonment with a lack of preparation.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between resilience, flexibility, state anxiety and dispositional mindfulness offers ways to reinforce tracheostomy management at home, even in critical periods when going to the hospital may be difficult.

Caregivers of Neuromuscular Patients Living with Tracheostomy during COVID-19 Pandemic: Their Experience

Background: During a pandemic, tracheostomy management in neuromuscular disease (NMD) patients can be complex. Methods: Using a multicentre, multiple case study approach, we sought perspectives through semi-structured interviews via hybrid quali-quantitative analysis. The qualitative analysis involved a semi-structured interview and the quantitative analysis the completion of a battery of questionnaires. Aim: To investigate the caregivers’ experiences, burden and beliefs regarding tracheostomy during the Italian COVID-19 pandemic. The following instruments were administered: Connor and Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25); Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II); State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI); Langer Mindfulness Scale (LMS); Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Results: Fifty-three caregivers (62.3% female, mean age 52.2 (SD = 18.2)) participated in the study. The more resilient the carers, the more they were psychologically flexible (r = 0.380, p = 0.014) and able to cope adaptively with the emergency (r = 0.378, p < 0.006). Similarly, perceived control was higher the more resilient they were (r = 0.897, p < 0.001). The main emotions emerging were isolation and loneliness (15; 34.88%). The perception of tracheostomy meant that it could be seen as a lifesaver or as a condemnation. Similarly, the relationship with health professionals moves from satisfaction to a feeling of abandonment over the course of the pandemic. Conclusions: These findings offer a unique opportunity to understand the point of view of caregivers of NMD patients living with tracheotomy during the COVID-19 pandemic, when going to the hospital may have been hampered.

Telemedicine as a Means to an End, Not an End in Itself

Telemedicine (TM)—the management of disease at a distance—has potential usefulness for patients with advanced respiratory disease. Underscoring this potential is the dramatic expansion of its applications in clinical medicine. However, since clinical studies testing this intervention often provide heterogeneous results, its role in the medical management of respiratory disorders remains inconclusive. A major problem in establishing TM’s effectiveness is that it is not a single intervention; rather, it includes a number of divergent diagnostic and therapeutic modalities—and each must be tested separately. Reflecting the discord between the need for further documentation of its approaches and effectiveness and its rapid utilization without this needed information, a major challenge is the lack of international guidelines for its integration, regulation, operational plans, and guidance for professionals. Tailored TM, with increased flexibility to address differing healthcare contexts, has the potential to improve access to and quality of services while reducing costs and direct input by health professionals. We should view TM as a tool to aid healthcare professionals in managing their patients with respiratory diseases rather than as a stand-alone substitute to traditional medical care. As such, TM is a means rather than an end.