The Clinical Effect of Steroid Therapy on Preserving Residual Hearing after Cochlear Implantation with the Advanced Bionics HiRes Ultra 3D Cochlear Implant System

The Role of Steroids in the Preservation of Hearing and Vestibular Function in Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implant surgery is guided by principles of atraumatic insertion as to protect the inner ear. Previous studies suggest the potential benefit of steroids in patients undergoing cochlear implantation (CI), although the optimal route of administration has yet to be determined. We aim to systematically review the human studies of hearing and vestibular function preservation in patients undergoing CI receiving perioperative steroids and to discuss their role.

DATA SOURCES

Search performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases in December 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies comparing several methods of steroid delivery and conventional management for patients undergoing CI were identified. Primary outcomes included hearing and vestibular function preservation. Secondary outcomes included reported adverse events, routes of steroid administration, and the presence of a control group without steroid administration.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies (N = 659) met inclusion criteria. Methodology, doses, route of steroid administration, and follow-up duration differed between most studies. Audiometric, vestibular, and hearing preservation (HP) results were inconsistent. In 12 studies, perioperative steroids were associated with either increased HP or vestibular function preservation. Only two studies reported adverse events related to oral corticosteroid therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a tendency for perioperative steroids to have a positive impact, at least in the short term, on hearing and vestibular function preservation in CI. Topical corticosteroid therapy appears to have a superior risk-benefit profile. There is a need for future carefully designed randomized controlled trials to determine the ideal route of steroid administration and its real impact in the long term. Laryngoscope, 134:3458-3465, 2024.

Optimization of pharmacological interventions in the guinea pig animal model-a new approach to calculate the perilymph volume of the scala tympani

Objective

The guinea pig serves as a well-established animal model for inner ear research, offering valuable insights into the anatomy, physiology, and therapeutic interventions of the auditory system. However, the heterogeneity of results observed in both in-vivo experiments and clinical studies poses challenges in understanding and optimizing pharmacotherapy outcomes. This heterogeneity may be due to individual differences in the size of the guinea pig cochlea and thus in the volume of the scala tympani (ST), which can lead to different drug concentrations in the ST, a fact that has been largely overlooked thus far. To address this issue, we aimed to develop an approach for calculating the individual volume of perilymph within the ST before and after cochlear implant insertion.

Method

In this study, high-resolution μCT images of a total of n = 42 guinea pig temporal bones were used to determine the volume of the ST. We compared fresh, frozen, and fixed tissues from both colored and albino strains to evaluate the potential influence of tissue condition and strain on the results.

Results

Our findings demonstrate a variability in mean ST volume with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 14.7%, comparable to studies conducted with humans (range RSD: 5 to 20%). This indicates that the guinea pig cochlea exhibits similar variability to that of the human cochlea. Consequently, it is crucial to consider this variability when designing and conducting studies utilizing the guinea pig as an animal model. Furthermore, we successfully developed a tool capable of estimating ST volume without the need for manual segmentation, employing two geometric parameters, basal diameter (A) and width (B) of the cochlea, corresponding to the cochlear footprint. The tool is available for free download and use on our website.

Conclusion

This novel approach provides researchers with a valuable tool to calculate individual ST volume in guinea pigs, enabling more precise dosing strategies and optimization of drug concentrations for pharmacotherapy studies. Moreover, our study underscores the importance of acknowledging and accounting for inter-individual variability in animal models to enhance the translational relevance and applicability of research outcomes in the field of inner ear investigations.

Noise-induced hearing disorders: Clinical and investigational tools

A series of articles discussing advanced diagnostics that can be used to assess noise injury and associated noise-induced hearing disorders (NIHD) was developed under the umbrella of the United States Department of Defense Hearing Center of Excellence Pharmaceutical Interventions for Hearing Loss working group. The overarching goals of the current series were to provide insight into (1) well-established and more recently developed metrics that are sensitive for detection of cochlear pathology or diagnosis of NIHD, and (2) the tools that are available for characterizing individual noise hazard as personal exposure will vary based on distance to the sound source and placement of hearing protection devices. In addition to discussing the utility of advanced diagnostics in patient care settings, the current articles discuss the selection of outcomes and end points that can be considered for use in clinical trials investigating hearing loss prevention and hearing rehabilitation.

The Effect of Pluronic-Coated Gold Nanoparticles in Hearing Preservation Following Cochlear Implantation-Pilot Study

Introduction: During cochlear implantation, electrode insertion can cause cochlear damage, inflammation, and apoptosis, which can affect the residual hearing. Nanoparticles are increasingly studied as a way to increase the availability of inner ear protective factors. We studied the effect on rats of Pluronic-coated gold nanoparticles (Plu-AuNPs) containing dexamethasone, which were applied locally in the rat’s middle ear following the implant procedure. Methods: Seven rats were used in the study. The right ear served as a model for the Dex-Plu-AuNP group. Following the intracochlear dummy electrode insertion through the round window, Dex-Plu-AuNPs were placed in the round window niche. In the right ear, following the same insertion procedure, free dexamethasone (Dex) was placed in the same manner. Auditory brainstem response thresholds (click stimulus, pure tones at 8 kHz, 16 kHz, 24 kHz, and 32 kHz) were measured before and one week after the procedure. A two-tailed T-test was used for the variables. Statistical significance was set as p < 0.05. Results: In the Dex-Plu-AuNP group, the threshold shift was less than that in the free dexamethasone group, but no statistical significance was noted between the groups. When compared individually, only the 8 kHz frequency showed statistically significant, better results after one week, in favor of the Dex-Plu-AuNP group. The mean postoperative 8 kHz threshold in the Dex-Plu-AuNPs was significantly lower than that of the control group (p = 0.048, t-test). For the other frequencies, statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the mean threshold shifts of the two cohorts. Conclusions: The local application of Plu-AuNPs containing dexamethasone following cochlear implantation may better protect the residual hearing than dexamethasone alone, but a larger sample size is needed to reach a possible statistical significance. Dex-Plu-AuNPs do not seem to cause ototoxicity and may be used as a carrier for other agents. In a clinical setting, Dex-Plu-AuNPs may have the effect of protecting lower frequencies in patients with partial deafness who are candidates for electric acoustic stimulation (EAS). If we consider this tendency, Dex-Plu-AuNPs may also be beneficial for patients with Ménière’s disease.