Relationship between Implant Length and Implant Stability of Single-Implant Restorations: A 12-Month Follow-Up Clinical Study

Comparing Implant Macrodesigns and Their Impact on Stability: A Year-Long Clinical Study

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to clinically evaluate the primary and secondary stability of dental implants with different macrodesigns using resonance frequency analysis and to determine whether implant design and length influence implant stability. Materials and methods: This study included 48 healthy patients receiving dental implants, and a pre-implant planning protocol was used, which involved detailed bone analysis, clinical examinations, and Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis. The implants were of various types and dimensions (Alpha-Bio Tec (Israel), DFI, SPI, and NEO), and the surgical procedures were performed using standard methods. Implant stability was measured using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) immediately after placement and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The total number of implants placed in all patients was 96. Results: The average primary stability value for 10 mm SPI implants placed in the maxilla was 68.2 ± 1.7 Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) units, while for 10 mm NEO implants, it was 74.0 ± 0.9. The average primary stability value for a 10 mm DFI implant placed in the mandible was 72.8 ± 1.2 ISQ, while for a 10 mm NEO implant placed in the mandible, it was 76.3 ± 0.8 ISQ. Based on the Friedman ANOVA test, the differences in the stability measurements for the 10 mm and 11.5 mm SPI implants and for the 10 mm and 11.5 mm NEO implants in the maxilla on day 0 and after 3, 6, and 12 months were significant at p < 0.05. Similarly, based on the Friedman ANOVA test, the differences in the stability measurements for the 10 mm and 11.5 mm DFI implants and for the 10 mm and 11.5 mm NEO implants in the mandible on day 0 and after 3, 6, and 12 months were significant at p < 0.05 (p = 0.00000). Conclusions: Universal tapered implants of the NEO type stood out as the optimal choice, as they provided statistically significantly higher primary stability in both soft and hard bone types compared to other implants. The implant length did not significantly affect this stability.

Comparison of stress distribution in fully porous and dense-core porous scaffolds in dental implantation

The aim of this study is to compare the stress distribution in porous scaffolds with different structures with similar geometric parameters to study a new approach in dental implantation. Three-dimensional finite element models of the fully porous and dense-core porous scaffolds with defined porosity parameters including space diameter and thickness with two porosity patterns were embedded in the jaw bone model with cortical and cancellous bone. The cylindrical shape was considered as the main shape of the scaffolds. To evaluate the mechanical performance, the Von Mises stress was compared in the models under static and dynamic masticatory loading. Incidentally, to validate the modeling results, experimental strain gauge tests were performed on four specimens fabricated from Ti6Al4V. Finally, the stress distribution in the models was compared with the results of previous studies on commercial implants. The results of the finite element analysis show that there are considerable differences in the magnitude of the equivalent stress in the models in static and dynamic phases. Also, changes in the defined geometric parameters have significant effects on the stress distribution in terms of Von Mises stress in the overall models. The experimental results indicated good agreement with those of the modeling. It can be concluded that some porous structures with optimal geometries can be proposed as a new structure for dental implants. However, considering the physiology of bone when confronted with porous structures, further studies such as in vivo experiments are needed in this field.

A resonance frequency analysis to investigate the impact of implant size on primary and secondary stability

Objective

Recent years have seen a rise in the usage of dental implants to restore lost teeth. The stability of a dental implant is the main factor in determining its success. Implant stability is influenced by various factors. Several approaches have been employed clinically to evaluate stability at different time intervals. One non-invasive way to assess implant stability is by resonance frequency analysis. Utilizing the resonance frequency analysis method, this study seeks to understand how implant length and diameter affect primary and secondary stability.

Methods

The current prospective study was conducted in the Prosthodontics Department of Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College. The duration of the study was six months. A total of 90 implants of sizes 4.5 x 8.5 mm and 4 x 10mm were placed. Resonance frequency measurements were recorded using Osstell™ AB device for primary stability at implant insertion and at 12 weeks for secondary stability. All the measurements were carried out by only one of the researchers to minimize inter-observer bias.

Results

The average primary stability was 70.33±6.60, and the average secondary stability was 71.43±5.44. The data was stratified for age, gender, and implant site, and the mean primary and secondary stability of both sizes didn't show any statistically significant differences.

Conclusion

Without forfeiting implant stability, both implant sizes (4 x 10mm and 4.5 x 8.5mm) can be used interchangeably, depending on available space and anatomical constraints.

Resonance Frequency Analysis Mapping During Implant Healing Using a Nanostructured Hydroxyapatite Surface

Aim

Stability measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is an important factor to be considered in the success of dental implant treatments, which can be evaluated from the implant stability quotient (ISQ). The aim of the present case series was to map the RFA during healing of implants with nanostructured hydroxyapatite surface to describe the behavior of ISQ values related to individual factors.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-three implants were placed in eight patients by conventional surgical protocol, and ISQ values were monitored from the day of implant placement until week 20. To obtain the ISQ values, an Osstell device was used and the placed implants were grouped in proportional amounts to describe the ISQ behavior considering the length (≤10 or >10 mm), the diameter (3.5 or 4.3 mm), the insertion torque (<40 N-cm or ≥40 N-cm), and the placement area (maxilla or mandible).

Results

All the implants assessed decreased their values in the first 3 weeks after placement. Subsequently, the ISQ values increased by amounts similar to those obtained at the time of the placement and even more. Implants with length >10 mm, diameter 4.3 mm, and insertion torque ≥40 N-cm showed the highest ISQ values.

Conclusions

A decrease in the ISQ values of dental implants with nanostructured hydroxyapatite surface was evidenced between weeks 2 and 3 considering length, diameter, insertion torque, and maxillary or mandibular placement site.