Urine Metabolites Enable Fast Detection of COVID-19 Using Mass Spectrometry

Diagnosis, Severity, and Prognosis from Potential Biomarkers of COVID-19 in Urine: A Review of Clinical and Omics Results

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has spurred an extraordinary scientific effort to better understand the disease's pathophysiology and develop diagnostic and prognostic tools to guide more precise and effective clinical management. Among the biological samples analyzed for biomarker identification, urine stands out due to its low risk of infection, non-invasive collection, and suitability for frequent, large-volume sampling. Integrating data from omics studies with standard biochemical analyses offers a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of COVID-19. This review aims to provide a detailed summary of studies published to date that have applied omics and clinical analyses on urine samples to identify potential biomarkers for COVID-19. In July 2024, an advanced search was conducted in Web of Science using the query: "covid* (Topic) AND urine (Topic) AND metabol* (Topic)". The search included results published up to 14 October 2024. The studies retrieved from this digital search were evaluated through a two-step screening process: first by reviewing titles and abstracts for eligibility, and then by retrieving and assessing the full texts of articles that met the specific criteria. The initial search retrieved 913 studies, of which 45 articles were ultimately included in this review. The most robust biomarkers identified include kynurenine, neopterin, total proteins, red blood cells, ACE2, citric acid, ketone bodies, hypoxanthine, amino acids, and glucose. The biological causes underlying these alterations reflect the multisystemic impact of COVID-19, highlighting key processes such as systemic inflammation, renal dysfunction, critical hypoxia, and metabolic stress.

Data Acquisition and Intraoperative Tissue Analysis on a Mobile, Battery-Operated, Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer

Mass spectrometry has been increasingly explored in intraoperative studies as a potential technology to help guide surgical decision making. Yet, intraoperative experiments using high-performance mass spectrometry instrumentation present a unique set of operational challenges. For example, standard operating rooms are often not equipped with the electrical requirements to power a commercial mass spectrometer and are not designed to accommodate their permanent installation. These obstacles can impact progress and patient enrollment in intraoperative clinical studies because implementation of MS instrumentation becomes limited to specific operating rooms that have the required electrical connections and space. To expand our intraoperative clinical studies using the MasSpec Pen technology, we explored the feasibility of transporting and acquiring data on Orbitrap mass spectrometers operating on battery power in hospital buildings. We evaluated the effect of instrument movement including acceleration and rotational speeds on signal stability and mass accuracy by acquiring data using direct infusion electrospray ionization. Data were acquired while rolling the systems in/out of operating rooms and while descending/ascending a freight elevator. Despite these movements and operating the instrument on battery power, the relative standard deviation of the total ion current was <5% and the magnitude of the mass error relative to the internal calibrant never exceeded 5.06 ppm. We further evaluated the feasibility of performing intraoperative MasSpec Pen analysis while operating the Orbitrap mass spectrometer on battery power during an ovarian cancer surgery. We observed that the rich and tissue-specific molecular profile commonly detected from ovarian tissues was conserved when running on battery power. Together, these results demonstrate that Orbitrap mass spectrometers can be operated and acquire data on battery power while in motion and in rotation without losses in signal stability or mass accuracy. Furthermore, Orbitrap mass spectrometers can be used in conjunction to the MasSpec Pen while on battery power for intraoperative tissue analysis.

Desorption Separation Ionization Mass Spectrometry (DSI-MS) for Rapid Analysis of COVID-19

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has witnessed over 772 million confirmed cases and over 6 million deaths globally, the outbreak of COVID-19 has emerged as a significant medical challenge affecting both affluent and impoverished nations. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore the disease mechanism and to implement rapid detection methods. To address this, we employed the desorption separation ionization (DSI) device in conjunction with a mass spectrometer for the efficient detection and screening of COVID-19 urine samples. The study encompassed patients with COVID-19, healthy controls (HC), and patients with other types of pneumonia (OP) to evaluate their urine metabolomic profiles. Subsequently, we identified the differentially expressed metabolites in the COVID-19 patients and recognized amino acid metabolism as the predominant metabolic pathway involved. Furthermore, multiple established machine learning algorithms validated the exceptional performance of the metabolites in discriminating the COVID-19 group from healthy subjects, with an area under the curve of 0.932 in the blind test set. This study collectively suggests that the small-molecule metabolites detected from urine using the DSI device allow for rapid screening of COVID-19, taking just three minutes per sample. This approach has the potential to expand our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of COVID-19 and offers a way to rapidly screen patients with COVID-19 through the utilization of machine learning algorithms.

Urine Parameters in Patients with COVID-19 Infection

A urine test permits the measure of several urinary markers. This is a non-invasive method for early monitoring of potential kidney damage. In COVID-19 patients, alterations of urinary markers were observed. This review aims to evaluate the utility of urinalysis in predicting the severity of COVID-19. A total of 68 articles obtained from PubMed studies reported that (i) the severity of disease was related to haematuria and proteinuria and that (ii) typical alterations of the urinary sediment were noticed in COVID-19-associated AKI patients. This review emphasizes that urinalysis and microscopic examination support clinicians in diagnosing and predicting COVID-19 severity.

Diagnostic, Prognostic and Mechanistic Biomarkers of COVID-19 Identified by Mass Spectrometric Metabolomics

A number of studies have assessed the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity on the metabolome of exhaled air, saliva, plasma, and urine to identify diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. In spite of the richness of the literature, there is no consensus about the utility of metabolomic analyses for the management of COVID-19, calling for a critical assessment of the literature. We identified mass spectrometric metabolomic studies on specimens from SARS-CoV2-infected patients and subjected them to a cross-study comparison. We compared the clinical design, technical aspects, and statistical analyses of published studies with the purpose to identify the most relevant biomarkers. Several among the metabolites that are under- or overrepresented in the plasma from patients with COVID-19 may directly contribute to excessive inflammatory reactions and deficient immune control of SARS-CoV2, hence unraveling important mechanistic connections between whole-body metabolism and the course of the disease. Altogether, it appears that mass spectrometric approaches have a high potential for biomarker discovery, especially if they are subjected to methodological standardization.