Changes in Etiology and Clinical Outcomes of Pleural empyema during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Changes in the incidence, clinical features and outcomes of tuberculosis during COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted tuberculosis (TB) services in many countries, but the impacts on sites of involvement, drug susceptibility, smear positivity and clinical outcomes, and clinical outcomes of co-infection with influenza and COVID-19 remain unclear.

METHODS

Descriptive epidemiological study using episode-based and patient unique data of tuberculosis from Hospital Authority's territory-wide electronic medical record database, comparing baseline (January 2015-December 2019) and COVID-19 period (January 2020-December 2022), followed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Effects of co-infection with influenza and COVID-19 were investigated.

RESULTS

The study included 10,473 episodes of laboratory-confirmed TB, with 6818 in baseline period and 3655 during COVID-19 period. During COVID-19 period, TB patients had a lower proportion of smear positivity (49.2 % vs 54.7 %, P < 0.001), and fewer cases of extrapulmonary TB (7.0 % vs 8.0 %, P = 0.078) and multidrug resistant TB (1.0 % vs 1.6 %, P = 0.020). Mortality was higher in TB patients with COVID-19 coinfection (OR 1.7, P = 0.003) and influenza coinfection (OR 2.6, P = 0.004). During COVID-19 period, there were higher rates of treatment delay (20.5 % vs 15.5 %, P < 0.001) and episodic death (15.1 % vs 13.3 %, P = 0.006). Factors associated with higher mortality included age ≥ 70 years (OR 7.24), treatment delay (OR 2.16), extrapulmonary TB (OR 2.13). smear positivity (OR 1.71) and Charlson comorbidity index score ≥ 3 (OR 1.37). Higher mortality was observed with co-infection by influenza (OR 1.18) and COVID-19 (OR 1.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The epidemiology and outcomes of TB were changed during COVID-19 period. Mortality was higher during COVID-19 period and with co-infection by influenza and COVID-19.

Thoracic empyema: aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to review current key points in the aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of empyema thoracis. Early postpandemic trends have seen an increasing global incidence and evolution in the aetiology of empyema. Due to varied aetiology and typically lengthy treatment, empyema will be disproportionately affected by the rising tide of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), thus warranting attention and further research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple novel biomarkers (e.g. IL-36γ) are under investigation to aid diagnosis, while oral health assessment tools are now available for prognosticating and risk-stratifying patients with thoracic empyema. There exists an ongoing lack of evidence-based guidance surrounding antibiotic treatment duration, surgical intervention indication, and prognostic scoring utility.

SUMMARY

Understanding aetiologies in different global regions and settings is pivotal for guiding empirical treatment. Antimicrobial resistance will make thoracic empyema increasingly challenging to treat and should prompt increased awareness of prescribing practices. Novel biomarkers are under investigation which may speed up differentiation of pleural effusion types, allowing faster cohorting of patients.Although newly identified predictors of morbidity and mortality have been suggested to be beneficial for incorporation into clinical practice, further work is required to prognosticate, risk-stratify, and standardize treatment.

A comparative analysis between next-generation sequencing and conventional culture method to detect empyema-associated microorganisms: A systematic review

Empyema poses a significant global health concern, yet identifying responsible bacteria remains elusive. Recent studies question the efficacy of conventional pleural fluid culture in accurately identifying empyema-causing bacteria. The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic capabilities of next-generation sequencing (NGS) with conventional pleural fluid culture in identifying empyema-causing bacteria. Five databases (Google Scholar, Science Direct, Cochrane, Research Gate, and PubMed) were used to search studies comparing conventional pleural fluid culture with NGS for identifying empyema-causing bacteria using keywords. Positive results identified through conventional pleural fluid culture and NGS were extracted. In addition, bacterial profiles identified by NGS were also documented. Joanna-Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool was employed to assess quality of included studies. Descriptive analysis was employed to present outcome of interests. From five databases, three studies, with 354 patients, were included. Findings from three studies showed that NGS outperformed conventional pleural fluid culture in detecting empyema-causing bacteria even in culture-negative samples. Moreover, dominant bacterial profiles identified through NGS included Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and anaerobic bacteria. In conclusion, NGS outperforms conventional pleural fluid culture in detection empyema-causing bacteria, yet further studies with larger samples and broader bacterial profiles are needed to increase confidence and urgency in its adoption over conventional pleural fluid culture.