Comparison of Campylobacter jejuni Slaughterhouse and Surface-Water Isolates Indicates Better Adaptation of Slaughterhouse Isolates to the Chicken Host Environment

Comparative Assessment of the Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Actions of Benzalkonium Chloride, Erythromycin, and L(+)-Lactic Acid against Raw Chicken Meat Campylobacter spp. Isolates

Campylobacter spp. are significant zoonotic agents, which cause annually millions of human cases of foodborne gastroenteritis worldwide. Their inclusion in biofilms on abiotic surfaces seems to play a pivotal role in their survival outside of the host, growth, and spread. To successfully mitigate the risks that arise with these bacteria, it is crucial to decrease their prevalence within the food production chain (from farm to the table), alongside the successful treatment of the resulting illness, known as campylobacteriosis. For this, the use of various antimicrobial agents remains actively in the foreground. A general-purpose biocide and cationic surfactant (benzalkonium chloride; BAC), a widely used macrolide antibiotic (erythromycin; ERY), and a naturally occurring organic acid (L(+)-lactic acid; LA) were comparatively evaluated in this work for their potential to inhibit both the planktonic and biofilm growth of 12 selected Campylobacter spp. (of which, seven were C. jejuni and five were C. coli) raw chicken meat isolates, all grown in vitro as monocultures. The inhibitory action of LA was also studied against four mixed-culture Campylobacter biofilms (each composed of three different isolates). The results showed that the individual effectiveness of the agents varied significantly depending on the isolate, growth mode (planktonic, biofilm), intercellular interactions (monocultures, mixed cultures), and the growth medium used (with special focus on blood presence). Thus, BAC exhibited minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs), and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBICs) that ranged from 0.5 to 16 μg/mL. Interestingly enough, these values varied widely from 0.25 to 1024 μg/mL for ERY. Concerning LA, the MICs, MBCs, and MBICs varied from 1024 to 4096 μg/mL, with mixed-culture biofilm formation always being more difficult to suppress when compared to biofilm monocultures. In addition, it was evident that intercellular interactions encountered within mixed-culture Campylobacter biofilms significantly influenced both the population dynamics and the tolerance of each consortium member to acid exposure. Overall, the findings of this study provide useful information on the comparative effectiveness of three well-known antimicrobial agents for the control of Campylobacter spp. under various growth modes (i.e., planktonic, biofilm, monocultures, mixed cultures) that could potentially be encountered in food production and clinical settings.

New Insights into Foodborne Bacteria-Host Interactions: Evolving Research and Discoveries

Given the growing concern about foodborne diseases, intensive research and the development of new approaches are crucial [...].

Positive biofilms to guide surface microbial ecology in livestock buildings

The increase in human consumption of animal proteins implies changes in the management of meat production. This is followed by increasingly restrictive regulations on antimicrobial products such as chemical biocides and antibiotics, used in particular to control pathogens that can spread zoonotic diseases. Aligned with the One Health concept, alternative biological solutions are under development and are starting to be used in animal production. Beneficial bacteria able to form positive biofilms and guide surface microbial ecology to limit microbial pathogen settlement are promising tools that could complement existing biosecurity practices to maintain the hygiene of livestock buildings. Although the benefits of positive biofilms have already been documented, the associated fundamental mechanisms and the rationale of the microbial composition of these new products are still sparce. This review provides an overview of the envisioned modes of action of positive biofilms used on livestock building surfaces and the resulting criteria for the selection of the appropriate microorganisms for this specific application. Limits and advantages of this biosecurity approach are discussed as well as the impact of such practices along the food chain, from farm to fork.