1
|
Marasli C, Katifelis H, Gazouli M, Lagopati N. Nano-Based Approaches in Surface Modifications of Dental Implants: A Literature Review. Molecules 2024; 29:3061. [PMID: 38999015 PMCID: PMC11243276 DOI: 10.3390/molecules29133061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Rehabilitation of fully or partially edentulous patients with dental implants represents one of the most frequently used surgical procedures. The work of Branemark, who observed that a piece of titanium embedded in rabbit bone became firmly attached and difficult to remove, introduced the concept of osseointegration and revolutionized modern dentistry. Since then, an ever-growing need for improved implant materials towards enhanced material-tissue integration has emerged. There is a strong belief that nanoscale materials will produce a superior generation of implants with high efficiency, low cost, and high volume. The aim of this review is to explore the contribution of nanomaterials in implantology. A variety of nanomaterials have been proposed as potential candidates for implant surface customization. They can have inherent antibacterial properties, provide enhanced conditions for osseointegration, or act as reservoirs for biomolecules and drugs. Titania nanotubes alone or in combination with biological agents or drugs are used for enhanced tissue integration in dental implants. Regarding immunomodulation and in order to avoid implant rejection, titania nanotubes, graphene, and biopolymers have successfully been utilized, sometimes loaded with anti-inflammatory agents and extracellular vesicles. Peri-implantitis prevention can be achieved through the inherent antibacterial properties of metal nanoparticles and chitosan or hybrid coatings bearing antibiotic substances. For improved corrosion resistance various materials have been explored. However, even though these modifications have shown promising results, future research is necessary to assess their clinical behavior in humans and proceed to widespread commercialization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chrysa Marasli
- Laboratory of Biology, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece (M.G.)
| | - Hector Katifelis
- Laboratory of Biology, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece (M.G.)
| | - Maria Gazouli
- Laboratory of Biology, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece (M.G.)
- School of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patra, Greece
| | - Nefeli Lagopati
- Laboratory of Biology, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece (M.G.)
- Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Z, Chen X, Yan L, Wang W, Zheng P, Mohammadreza A, Liu Q. Antimicrobial peptides in bone regeneration: mechanism and potential. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024; 24:285-304. [PMID: 38567503 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2337239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are small-molecule peptides with a unique antimicrobial mechanism. Other notable biological activities of AMPs, including anti-inflammatory, angiogenesis, and bone formation effects, have recently received widespread attention. These remarkable bioactivities, combined with the unique antimicrobial mechanism of action of AMPs, have led to their increasingly important role in bone regeneration. AREAS COVERED In this review, on the one hand, we aimed to summarize information about the AMPs that are currently used for bone regeneration by reviewing published literature in the PubMed database. On the other hand, we also highlight some AMPs with potential roles in bone regeneration and their possible mechanisms of action. EXPERT OPINION The translation of AMPs to the clinic still faces many problems, but their unique antimicrobial mechanisms and other conspicuous biological activities suggest great potential. An in-depth understanding of the structure and mechanism of action of AMPs will help us to subsequently combine AMPs with different carrier systems and perform structural modifications to reduce toxicity and achieve stable release, which may be a key strategy for facilitating the translation of AMPs to the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ZhiCheng Wang
- Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - XiaoMan Chen
- Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liang Yan
- Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - WenJie Wang
- Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - PeiJia Zheng
- Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Atashbahar Mohammadreza
- Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- School of International Education, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liang Z, Chen Z, Zhu Z, Zhang Y, Niu W, Tan S, Wong HM, Li X, Li Q, Qiu H. Colloidal Phenol-Amine Coating on Implants for Improved Anti-Inflammation and Osteogenesis. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2024; 10:365-376. [PMID: 38118128 DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
Phenol-amine coatings have attracted significant attention in recent years owing to their adjustable composition and multifaceted biological functionalities. The current preparation of phenol-amine coatings, however, involves a chemical reaction within the solution or interface, resulting in lengthy preparation times and necessitating specific reaction conditions, such as alkaline environments and oxygen presence. The facile, rapid, and eco-friendly preparation of phenol-amine coatings under mild conditions continues to pose a challenge. In this study, we use a macromolecular phenol-amine, Tanfloc, to form a stable colloid under neutral conditions, which was then rapidly adsorbed on the titanium surface by electrostatic action and then spread and fused to form a continuous coating within several minutes. This nonchemical preparation process was rapid, mild, and free of chemical additives. The in vitro and in vivo results showed that the Tanfloc colloid fusion coating inhibited destructive inflammation, promoted osteogenesis, and enhanced osteointegration. These remarkable advantages of the colloidal phenol-amine fusion coating highlight the suitability of its future application in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ZhaoJia Liang
- Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, College & Hospital of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
| | - ZiRui Chen
- Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, College & Hospital of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
| | - ZhongQing Zhu
- Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, College & Hospital of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
| | - YaBing Zhang
- Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, College & Hospital of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
| | - WeiRui Niu
- Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, College & Hospital of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
| | - Shuang Tan
- Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, College & Hospital of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
| | - Hai Ming Wong
- Faculty of Dentistry, The Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - XiangYang Li
- Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, College & Hospital of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
| | - QuanLi Li
- Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, College & Hospital of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
- Department of Stomatology, Longgang Otorhinolaryngology Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518172, China
| | - Hua Qiu
- Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, College & Hospital of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
| |
Collapse
|