Vitamin D Vitamers Affect Vitamin D Status Differently in Young Healthy Males

Impact of BMI on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D with calcifediol supplementation in young adults: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

High body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for vitamin D deficiency. The rise in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations following cholecalciferol supplementation is suboptimal, owing to adipose tissue sequestration and/or volumetric dilution. Calcifediol is a proven potent oral alternative for vitamin D supplementation, but whether BMI adversely affects its efficacy in raising 25(OH)D concentrations, is not well known.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Adults with serum concentrations of 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL were recruited and stratified as normal, overweight, or obese using WHO criteria. Baseline evaluation included 25(OH)D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and total 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] based on BMI category (n = 883). A subset of participants was supplemented with 50 µg calcifediol (n = 193) and assessed for the rise in serum concentrations of 25(OH)D at 3- and 6-months following supplementation.

RESULTS

Participants were stratified as obese (11.2%), overweight (32.1%), or normal weight (56.7%). There were no significant baseline differences in serum concentrations of 25(OH)D among the groups (13.1 ± 6.4 vs 12.8 ± 6.8 vs 11.6 ± 6.6 ng/mL, p = 0.62). Similarly, PTH or 1,25(OH)2D concentrations were not different among the groups. On follow-up, 25(OH)D concentrations increased in all three groups at 3 and 6 months from baseline. The increase in 25(OH)D was 74.4 ng/mL (IQR 35.3-115.3) in obese, followed by overweight 62.2 ng/mL (18.1-98.7) and normal weight groups 47.1 ng/mL (17.5-89.7) at 3 months. 1,25(OH)2D also increased in all groups, without any significant intergroup differences (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

BMI does not impede the rise in 25(OH)D concentrations following supplementation with calcifediol in young adults with vitamin D deficiency.

Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin D, including the derivation of a conversion factor for calcidiol monohydrate

Following two requests from the European Commission (EC), the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the revision of the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for vitamin D and to propose a conversion factor (CF) for calcidiol monohydrate into vitamin D3 for labelling purposes. Vitamin D refers to ergocalciferol (vitamin D2), cholecalciferol (vitamin D3), and calcidiol monohydrate. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted to assess the relative bioavailability of calcidiol monohydrate versus vitamin D3 on serum 25(OH)D concentrations, and for priority adverse health effects of excess vitamin D intake, namely persistent hypercalcaemia/hypercalciuria and endpoints related to musculoskeletal health (i.e. falls, bone fractures, bone mass/density and indices thereof). Based on the available evidence, the Panel proposes a CF for calcidiol monohydrates of 2.5 for labelling purposes. Persistent hypercalciuria, which may be an earlier sign of excess vitamin D than persistent hypercalcaemia, is selected as the critical endpoint on which to base the UL for vitamin D. A lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) of 250 μg/day is identified from two randomised controlled trials in humans, to which an uncertainty factor of 2.5 is applied to account for the absence of a no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL). A UL of 100 μg vitamin D equivalents (VDE)/day is established for adults (including pregnant and lactating women) and for adolescents aged 11-17 years, as there is no reason to believe that adolescents in the phase of rapid bone formation and growth have a lower tolerance for vitamin D compared to adults. For children aged 1-10 years, a UL of 50 μg VDE/day is established by considering their smaller body size. Based on available intake data, European populations are unlikely to exceed the UL, except for regular users of food supplements containing high doses of vitamin D.

Calcifediol: a review of its pharmacological characteristics and clinical use in correcting vitamin D deficiency

BACKGROUND

In addition to the role of vitamin D in bone mineralization, calcium and phosphate homeostasis, and skeletal health, evidence suggests an association between vitamin D deficiency and a wide range of chronic conditions. This is of clinical concern given the substantial global prevalence of vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D deficiency has traditionally been treated with vitamin D₃ (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D₂ (ergocalciferol). Calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D₃) has recently become available more widely.

METHODS

By means of targeted literature searches of PubMed, this narrative review overviews the physiological functions and metabolic pathways of vitamin D, examines the differences between calcifediol and vitamin D₃, and highlights clinical trials conducted with calcifediol in patients with bone disease or other conditions.

RESULTS

For supplemental use in the healthy population, calcifediol can be used at doses of up to 10 µg per day for children ≥ 11 years and adults and up to 5 µg/day in children 3-10 years. For therapeutic use of calcifediol under medical supervision, the dose, frequency and duration of treatment is determined according to serum 25(OH)D concentrations, condition, type of patient and comorbidities. Calcifediol differs pharmacokinetically from vitamin D₃ in several ways. It is independent of hepatic 25-hydroxylation and thus is one step closer in the metabolic pathway to active vitamin D. At comparable doses to vitamin D₃, calcifediol achieves target serum 25(OH)D concentrations more rapidly and in contrast to vitamin D₃, it has a predictable and linear dose-response curve irrespective of baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations. The intestinal absorption of calcifediol is relatively preserved in patients with fat malabsorption and it is more hydrophilic than vitamin D₃ and thus is less prone to sequestration in adipose tissue.

CONCLUSION

Calcifediol is suitable for use in all patients with vitamin D deficiency and may be preferable to vitamin D₃ for patients with obesity, liver disease, malabsorption and those who require a rapid increase in 25(OH)D concentrations.

A Single Oral Vitamin D3 Bolus Reduces Inflammatory Markers in Healthy Saudi Males

Vitamin D deficiency has increased in the general population and is a public health issue. Vitamin D plays an important role in regulating the immune system, e.g., by modulating the production of inflammatory cytokines. In most countries, the recommended maximal daily dose of vitamin D₃ is 4000 IU (100 µg) per day. In this study, we investigated whether a single vitamin D₃ bolus can reduce the levels of the inflammatory markers interleukin (IL) 6, IL8 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) within one month. Fifty healthy Saudi males were recruited from the local community in Jeddah city and were orally supplemented with a single dose of 80,000 IU vitamin D₃. Serum samples were collected at time points 0, 1 and 30 days, and serum levels of IL6, IL8 and TNF, parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ (25(OH)D₃), triglycerides, cholesterol, calcium (Ca²⁺) and phosphate (PO_4-) were determined. On average, the vitamin D₃ bolus resulted in a significant increase in vitamin D status as well as in a significant decrease in the levels of inflammatory cytokines even one month after supplementation without changing serum Ca²⁺, PO_4- or lipid levels. In conclusion, single high-dose vitamin D₃ supplementation is safe for reducing inflammation markers and may lead to an update of current recommendations for vitamin D intake, in order to prevent critical health problems.

Vitamin D: Skin, sunshine, and beyond

Vitamin D is a steroid hormone of importance to the field of dermatology. Skin is unique in that it is the site of vitamin D synthesis upon sun exposure and a target organ for its activity. We explore the physiology and metabolic mechanism of action of vitamin D, as well as its effects on the skin. We also discuss the current evidence of the efficacy and safety of oral and topical vitamin D analogues on skin conditions such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, sunburn, actinic keratosis, and fibrosing skin disorders. Based on currently available scientific evidence, the National Academy of Medicine's recommended dietary allowance for vitamin D ranges from 400 IU to 800 IU daily based on age categories.

The effects of cardiovascular and orthopaedic surgery on vitamin concentrations: a narrative review of the literature and mechanisms of action

Given the rise in worldwide chronic diseases, supplemented by an aging population, the volume of global major surgeries, encompassing cardiac and orthopedic procedures is anticipated to surge significantly. Surgical trauma can be accompanied by numerous postoperative complications and metabolic changes. The present review summarized the results from studies assessing the effects of orthopedic and cardiovascular surgery on vitamin concentrations, in addition to exploring the possible mechanisms associated with changes in concentrations. Studies have revealed a potentially severe depletion in plasma/serum concentrations of numerous vitamins following these surgeries acutely. Vitamins C, D and B1 appear particularly vulnerable to significant depletions, with vitamin C and D depletions consistently transpiring into inadequate and deficient concentrations, respectively. The possible multifactorial mechanisms impacting postoperative vitamin concentrations include changes in hemodilution and vitamin utilization, redistribution, circulatory transport and absorption. For a majority of vitamins, there has been a lack of investigation into the effects of both, cardiac and orthopedic surgery. Additionally, studies were predominantly restricted to short-term postoperative investigations, primarily performed within the first postoperative week of surgery. Overall, results indicated that further examination is necessary to determine the severity and clinical significance of the possible depletions in vitamin concentrations that ensue cardiovascular and orthopedic surgery.

Vitamin D Incorporation in Foods: Formulation Strategies, Stability, and Bioaccessibility as Affected by the Food Matrix

Inadequate intake of vitamin D is a global health issue related to severe diseases, mainly involving subjects with dark skin pigmentation, patients affected by malnutrition, malabsorption syndromes, or obesity, and elderly people. Some foods fortified with vitamin D have been tested in vivo, but fortification strategies with a global outreach are still lacking. This review is focused on food fortification with vitamin D, with the aim to collect information on (a) formulation strategies; (b) stability during processing and storage; and (c) in vitro bioaccessibility. Approaches to add vitamin D to various foods were analyzed, including the use of free vitamin D, vitamin D loaded in simple and double nanoemulsions, liposomes, casein micelles, and protein nanocapsules. Numerous studies were reviewed to elucidate the impact of food technologies on vitamin D’s stability, and mechanisms that lead to degradation were identified—namely, acid-catalyzed isomerization, radical-induced oxidation, and photo-oxidation. There is, however, a lack of kinetic data that allow for the prediction of vitamin D’s stability under industrial processing conditions. The roles that lipids, proteins, fibers, and antioxidants play in vitamin bioaccessibility have been clarified in various studies, while future needs include the design of specific food matrices that simultaneously achieve a balance between the long-term stability, bioaccessibility and, ultimately, in vivo functionality of vitamin D.

The future is bright: Biofortification of common foods can improve vitamin D status

Vitamin D deficiency is a global concern, linked to suboptimal musculoskeletal health and immune function, with status inadequacies owing to variations in UV dependent cutaneous synthesis and limited natural dietary sources. Endogenous biofortification, alongside traditional fortification and supplement usage is urgently needed to address this deficit. Evidence reviewed in the current article clearly demonstrates that feed modification and UV radiation, either independently or used in combination, effectively increases vitamin D content of primary produce or ingredients, albeit in the limited range of food vehicles tested to date (beef/pork/chicken/eggs/fish/bread/mushrooms). Fewer human trials have confirmed that consumption of these biofortified foods can increase circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations (n = 10), which is of particular importance to avoid vitamin D status declining to nadir during wintertime. Meat is an unexplored yet plausible food vehicle for vitamin D biofortification, owing, at least in part, to its ubiquitous consumption pattern. Consumption of PUFA-enriched meat in human trials demonstrates efficacy (n = 4), lighting the way for exploration of vitamin D-biofortified meats to enhance consumer vitamin D status. Response to vitamin D-biofortified foods varies by food matrix, with vitamin D₃-enriched animal-based foods observing the greatest effect in maintaining or elevating 25(OH)D concentrations. Generally, the efficacy of biofortification appears to vary dependent upon vitamer selected for animal feed supplementation (vitamin D₂ or D₃, or 25(OH)D), baseline participant status and the bioaccessibility from the food matrix. Further research in the form of robust human clinical trials are required to explore the contribution of biofortified foods to vitamin D status.

Differential effects of vitamin D3 vs vitamin D2 on cellular uptake, tissue distribution and activation of vitamin D in mice and cells

To combat vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D₃ and vitamin D₂ are commonly used as a supplement or to fortify food sources. Human data show that the response of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) to supplementation with vitamin D₃ is higher than to vitamin D₂. To elucidate the metabolic route of both vitamers, we conducted a study with vitamin D-depleted mice, which were allotted into three groups (n = 12) and received equal doses of either deuterated vitamin D₃, deuterated vitamin D₂ or both for 4 weeks. To further investigate the hepatic uptake and hydroxylation of both D-vitamers to 25(OH)D, we conducted cell culture experiments with murine and human hepatoma cells (Hepa1-6 and HepG2). The vitamin D metabolite concentrations in serum, tissues and cells were analyzed by LC-MS/MS or ELISA. In mice, vitamin D₂ resulted in lower serum and tissue concentrations of vitamin D (P < 0.001) than vitamin D₃, while the group which received both D-vitamers showed values in between. Interestingly, vitamin D₂ fed mice had 1.9-times and 2.9-times higher serum concentrations of total and free 25(OH)D (P < 0.001) than mice fed vitamin D₃, while the concentration of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)₂D) was 1.8-times lower (P < 0.001). The gene and protein expression of enzymes, involved in the hydroxylation and renal uptake of vitamin D remained largely unaffected by the D-vitamer. In contrast to the mice data, hepatoma cells preferred vitamin D₃ for 25-hydroxylation over vitamin D₂ (P < 0.001). In general, the formation of 25(OH)D was much more pronounced in human than in murine hepatoma cells (P < 0.001). To conclude, in contrast to humans, vitamin D₂ was more efficient in increasing 25(OH)D than vitamin D₃ in mice, although this difference was not caused by a preferential hydroxylation of vitamin D₂ in the liver. The metabolic routes of D₃ and D₂ in mice differ, showing lower circulating 1,25(OH)₂D and tissue vitamin D concentrations in D₂- than in D₃-fed mice.

Challenges to Quantify Total Vitamin Activity: How to Combine the Contribution of Diverse Vitamers?

This state-of-the-art review aims to highlight the challenges in quantifying vitamin activity in foods that contain several vitamers of a group, using as examples the fat-soluble vitamins A and D as well as the water-soluble folate. The absorption, metabolism, and physiology of these examples are described along with the current analytical methodology, with an emphasis on approaches to standardization. Moreover, the major food sources for the vitamins are numerated. The article focuses particularly on outlining the so-called SLAMENGHI factors influencing a vitamer's' ability to act as a vitamin, that is, molecular species, linkage, amount, matrix, effectors of absorption, nutrition status, genetics, host-related factors, and the interaction of these. After summarizing the current approaches to estimating the total content of each vitamin group, the review concludes by outlining the research gaps and future perspectives in vitamin analysis. There are no standardized methods for the quantification of the vitamers of vitamin A, vitamin D, and folate in foods. For folate and β-carotene, a difference in vitamer activity between foods and supplements has been confirmed, whereas no difference has been observed for vitamin D. For differences in vitamer activity between provitamin A carotenoids and retinol, and between 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D, international consensus is lacking. The challenges facing each of the specific vitamin communities are the gaps in knowledge about bioaccessibility and bioavailability for each of the various vitamers. The differences between the vitamins make it difficult to formulate a common strategy for assessing the quantitative differences between the vitamers. In the future, optimized stationary digestive models and the more advanced dynamic digestive models combined with in vitro models for bioavailability could more closely resemble in vivo results. New knowledge will enable us to transfer nutrient recommendations into improved dietary advice to increase public health throughout the human life cycle.

Vitamin D in Wild and Farmed Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar)-What Do We Know?

Salmon have been widely publicized as a good dietary source of vitamin D, but recent data points to large variation in vitamin D content and differences between wild and farmed salmon. We aimed to: (1) investigate the content of vitamin D in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in wild species caught in two different waters, (2) perform a 12-week feeding trial in farmed Salmo salar with 270-1440 µg vitamin D3/kg feed (4-20 times maximum level in the EU) and (3) conduct a review for the published data on the content of vitamin D in salmonids. Content of vitamin D3 in the fillet from wild salmon caught in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea was significantly different (p < 0.05), being 18.5 ± 4.6 µg/100 g and 9.4 ± 1.9 µg/100 g, respectively. In the farmed salmon the content ranged from 2.9 ± 0.7 µg vitamin D3/100 g to 9.5 ± 0.7 µg vitamin D3/100 g. Data from 2018 shows that farmed salmon contained 2.3-7.3 µg vitamin D3/100 g. Information on the content of vitamin D in wild and farmed salmonids is very limited, which calls for further research to ensure a sustainable production of salmon with adequate vitamin D.