Psychosocial Factors and the Need for Multidisciplinary Support in Nutrition Counselling for Cancer Chemotherapy Patients

Assessment of Prognostic Indicators and Survival-Based Impact of Holistic Approach in Oral Cancer Patients: An Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Oral cancer is recognized as the sixth most common type of cancer globally. Instances have been recorded demonstrating an increase in its incidence, particularly in the territories of southern Asia, with a significant emphasis on India. Thus, the objectives of this investigation were to assess the efficacy of a holistic approach on the life expectancies of patients diagnosed with oral cancer, and to assess the prognostic indicators in such patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on medical records of 60 clinically and histopathologically confirmed cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) who received complete surgical intervention or radiation therapy or a combination of both modalities depending on stage of OSCC from January 2015 to December 2016. After completion of their treatment, 30 patients underwent Cancer Care program of Annabhai Chudamani Patil Memorial Medical College which consisted of yoga sessions, meditation, psychological counselling, nutritional counselling, emotional and social support (embracing a holistic approach, group 1) and 30 patients did not enroll in the Cancer Care initiative (not opting for holistic approach, group 2). The program was conducted for 21 days every six months for two years. Data pertaining to demographic characteristics, stage of OSCC, modalities of treatment administered, histopathological characteristics of the neoplasm, as well as the clinical outcome (Survival/Deceased) post a five-year duration subsequent to the primary diagnosis were extracted from the medical records to assess the role of holistic approach and various factors on the overall survival (OS) of the patients in both the groups. The data collected was subsequently subjected to a thorough statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 44.33±8.66 years (95% CI: 39.53-49.13) in group 1, and 51.20±9.99 years (95% CI: 39.53-49.13) in group 2. The mean survival time for group 1 was 81.60±5.02 months (95% CI: 78.817-84.383), and 66.00±20.29 months (95% CI: 54.761-77.239) in group 2 with statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.007). Group 2 showed a 1.31 relative risk of mortality to group 1. The probability of death in group 2 was 1.39 times more than in group 1. Cox regression analysis revealed group 2 was significantly associated with the risk of OSCC in this analysis. Other variables were not significantly associated with the risk of the OSCC in this analysis.

CONCLUSION

The current research indicated that employing a holistic strategy proves to be a successful approach in increasing the OS of patients with OSCC.

Factors associated with multimodal care practices for cancer cachexia among registered dietitians

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine factors associated with multimodal care practices for cancer cachexia among registered dietitians (RDs) working in cancer care.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was performed using RDs' data. Data on knowledge, skills, and confidence in multimodal care were obtained. Nine items regarding multimodal care practices were evaluated. Subjects were divided into two groups based on their answers associated with the nine items. Comparisons were obtained using the Mann-Whitney U test or chi-squared test. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the critical factors involved in practicing multimodal care by determining the variables with significant differences between the two groups.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-two RDs were included in this study. Significant differences were observed in their primary area of practice (p = 0.023), the number of clinical guidelines used (p < 0.001), the number of items used in cancer cachexia assessment (p = 0.002), the number of symptoms used in cancer cachexia assessment (p = 0.039), training for cancer cachexia (p < 0.001), knowledge of cancer cachexia (p < 0.001), and confidence in cancer cachexia management (p < 0.001). The number of symptoms used in cancer cachexia assessment (B = 0.42, p = 0.019), knowledge of cancer cachexia (B = 6.60, p < 0.001), and confidence in cancer cachexia management (B = 4.31, p = 0.010) were identified as critical factors according to the multiple regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The RDs' knowledge and confidence in cancer cachexia management were associated with their multimodal care practices.