1
|
Søgaard KK, Hinic V, Goldenberger D, Gensch A, Schweitzer M, Bättig V, Siegemund M, Bassetti S, Bingisser R, Tamm M, Battegay M, Weisser M, Stolz D, Khanna N, Egli A. Evaluation of the clinical relevance of the Biofire © FilmArray pneumonia panel among hospitalized patients. Infection 2024; 52:173-181. [PMID: 37572241 PMCID: PMC10810975 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-023-02080-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Panel PCR tests provide rapid pathogen identification. However, their diagnostic performance is unclear. We assessed the performance of the Biofire© FilmArray pneumonia (PN)-panel against standard culture in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) samples. METHODS Setting: University Hospital Basel (February 2019 to July 2020), including hospitalized patients with a BAL (± pneumonia). We determined sensitivity and specificity of the PN-panel against standard culture. Using univariate logistic regression, we calculated odds ratios (OR) for pneumonia according to PN-panel and culture status, stratifying by chronic pulmonary disease. We calculated ORs for pneumonia for different pathogens to estimate the clinical relevance. RESULTS We included 840 adult patients, 60% were males, median age was 68 years, 35% had chronic pulmonary disease, 21% had pneumonia, and 36% had recent antibiotic use. In 1078 BAL samples, bacterial pathogens were detected in 36% and 16% with PN-panel and culture, respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the PN-panel was high, whereas the positive predictive value was low. The OR of pneumonia was 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.6) for PN-panel-positive only; 2.6 (95% CI 1.3-5.3) for culture-positive only, and 1.6 (95% CI 1.0-2.4) for PN-panel and culture-positive. The detection rate of Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Moraxella catarrhalis in the PN-panel was high but not associated with pneumonia. CONCLUSION While sensitivity and specificity of PN-panel are high compared to culture, pathogen detection did not correlate well with a pneumonia diagnosis. Patients with culture-positive BAL had the highest OR for pneumonia-thus the impact of the PN-panel on clinical management needs further evaluation in randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirstine K Søgaard
- Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedicine, Applied Microbiology Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Vladimira Hinic
- Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Gloriastrasse 28/30 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Goldenberger
- Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Gensch
- Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedicine, Applied Microbiology Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Schweitzer
- Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedicine, Applied Microbiology Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Veronika Bättig
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martin Siegemund
- Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Bassetti
- Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Roland Bingisser
- Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Tamm
- Pneumology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Battegay
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maja Weisser
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daiana Stolz
- Pneumology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nina Khanna
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Egli
- Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
- Department of Biomedicine, Applied Microbiology Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Gloriastrasse 28/30 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ozturk A, Bozok T, Erdogan M, Ibrahim BMS, Bozok TS. COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA): identification of Aspergillus species and determination of antifungal susceptibility profiles. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2023; 68:951-959. [PMID: 37294497 PMCID: PMC10250855 DOI: 10.1007/s12223-023-01069-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Among the co-infectious agents in COVID-19 patients, Aspergillus species cause invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). IPA is difficult to diagnose and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study is aimed at identifying Aspergillus spp. from sputum and tracheal aspirate (TA) samples of COVID-19 patients and at determining their antifungal susceptibility profiles. A total of 50 patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in their intensive care units (ICU) were included in the study. Identification of Aspergillus isolates was performed by phenotypic and molecular methods. ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria were used for IPA case definitions. The antifungal susceptibility profiles of isolates were determined by the microdilution method. Aspergillus spp. was detected in 35 (70%) of the clinical samples. Among the Aspergillus spp., 20 (57.1%) A. fumigatus, six (17.1%) A. flavus, four (11.4%) A. niger, three (8.6%) A. terreus, and two (5.7%) A. welwitschiae were identified. In general, Aspergillus isolates were susceptible to the tested antifungal agents. In the study, nine patients were diagnosed with possible IPA, 11 patients were diagnosed with probable IPA, and 15 patients were diagnosed with Aspergillus colonization according to the used algorithms. Serum galactomannan antigen positivity was found in 11 of the patients diagnosed with IPA. Our results provide data on the incidence of IPA, identification of Aspergillus spp., and its susceptibility profiles in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Prospective studies are needed for a faster diagnosis or antifungal prophylaxis to manage the poor prognosis of IPA and reduce the risk of mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ozturk
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Nigde, Turkey
| | - Taylan Bozok
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Merve Erdogan
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Sanko University, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Bashar MS. Ibrahim
- Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
| | - Tugce Simsek Bozok
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Mersin University Hospital, Mersin, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang K, Espinosa V, Rivera A. Commander-in-chief: monocytes rally the troops for defense against aspergillosis. Curr Opin Immunol 2023; 84:102371. [PMID: 37523967 DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2023.102371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
The detrimental impact of fungal infections to human health has steadily increased over the past decades. In October of 2022, the World Health Organization published the first ever fungal-pathogen priority list highlighting increased awareness of this problem, and the need for more research in this area. There were four distinct fungal pathogens identified as critical priority groups with Aspergillus fumigatus (Af) being the only mold. Af is a common environmental fungus responsible for over 90% of invasive aspergillosis cases worldwide. Pulmonary protection against Af is critically dependent on innate effector cells with essential roles played by neutrophils and monocytes. In this review, we will summarize our current understanding of how monocytes help orchestrate antifungal defense against Af.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keyi Wang
- Center for Immunity and Inflammation, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA; School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Vanessa Espinosa
- Center for Immunity and Inflammation, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Amariliz Rivera
- Center for Immunity and Inflammation, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cocio TA, Siqueira LPM, Riciluca KCT, Gimenes VMF, de Andrade TS, Benard G, Martínez R, Bollela VR. Significance of Aspergillus spp. isolation in defining cases of COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis - CAPA. Braz J Infect Dis 2023; 27:102793. [PMID: 37507102 PMCID: PMC10407263 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2023.102793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA) is a relatively common complication in patients with severe forms of the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Diagnosing and confirming CAPA is challenging. In this study, Aspergillus spp. isolation in respiratory specimens from patients with COVID-19 was evaluated for identifying cases of CAPA. In 2020‒2021, 17 Aspergillus spp. were isolated from 15 COVID-19 patients admitted to a university hospital in Brazil. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed to obtain clinical-epidemiological data and other markers of Aspergillus spp. infection and then compared with the ECMM/ISHAM criteria for defining CAPA. Probable CAPA was defined in 5/10 patients, who had Aspergillus spp. isolated from Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) or a positive galactomannan blood test. Additionally, anti-Aspergillus antibodies were detected in two of these patients, during active or follow-up phases of CAPA. In another seven patients with Aspergillus spp. isolated from tracheobronchial aspirate or sputum, CAPA was presumed, mainly due to deterioration of clinical conditions and new lung imaging suggestive of fungal infection. Antifungal agents to control CAPA, particularly voriconazole, were used in 9/15 cases. In cases of probable CAPA and remaining patients, clinical conditions and comorbidities were similar, with lethality being high, at 60% and 71%, respectively. The number of CAPA cases defined by scientific criteria was lower than that assumed in the clinical context. This was largely due to the lack of BAL collection for fungal culture and the non-intensive use of other markers of invasive aspergillosis. The isolation of Aspergillus spp. in different respiratory specimens should alert clinicians to the diagnosis of CAPA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago Alexandre Cocio
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Laboratório de Investigação Médica (LIM53), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | - Lumena Pereira Machado Siqueira
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Laboratório de Investigação Médica (LIM53), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Viviane Mazo Favero Gimenes
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Laboratório de Investigação Médica (LIM53), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Diagnostico Bucal, Radiologia Odontológica e Imagiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Gil Benard
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Laboratório de Investigação Médica (LIM53), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Roberto Martínez
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Valdes Roberto Bollela
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|