Effects of Verapamil and Diltiazem on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Rivaroxaban

Pharmacokinetic Boosting of Calcineurin Inhibitors in Transplantation: Pros, Cons, and Perspectives

ABSTRACT

The concept of pharmacokinetic (PK) boosting of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) emerged after the FDA approval of cyclosporine-A. Several studies followed, and the proof of concept was well established by the late 1990s. This also continued for the next blockbuster immunosuppressant, tacrolimus. The driver for such research was an endeavor to save costs, as both drugs were expensive due to patent protection. Two CYP inhibitors, ketoconazole and diltiazem, have been extensively studied in this context and continue to be prescribed off-label along with the CNI. It has been observed that using ketoconazole reduces the dose requirement of tacrolimus by about 50% and 30% with diltiazem, which is in conformity with their pharmacological actions. Off-label co-prescription of these drugs with CNI is often encountered in low and middle-income countries. The foremost reason cited is economic. This article collates the evidence from the clinical studies that evaluate the PK-boosting effects of CNI and also reviews the gaps in the current evidence base. The current knowledge prevents the transplant community from making meaningful inferences about the risks and benefits of such strategies. Although the PK-boosting strategy can lead to serious adverse events, emerging evidence suggests that it may be advantageous for individuals with high CNI dose requirements. Hence, PK boosting may be an unmet need in the therapeutics of CNI. Nevertheless, there are several unanswered questions surrounding such use, and therefore, this merits testing in well-designed clinical studies. Moreover, drugs with better safer profiles and a history of successful PK boosting may be considered for evaluation with CNI.

Tailoring oral anticoagulant treatment in the era of multi-drug therapies for PAH and CTEPH

The use of oral anticoagulants in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) presents distinct therapeutic challenges and benefits. In PAH, the benefits of oral anticoagulation are uncertain, with studies yielding mixed results on their efficacy and safety. Conversely, oral anticoagulants are a cornerstone in the treatment of CTEPH, where their use is consistently recommended to prevent recurrent thromboembolic events. The choice between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a significant clinical question, as each type presents advantages and potential drawbacks. Furthermore, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with concomitant PAH and CTEPH treatments complicate anticoagulant management, necessitating careful consideration of individual patient regimens. This review examines the current evidence on oral anticoagulant use in PAH and CTEPH and discusses the implications of DDIs within a context of multi-drug treatments, including targeted drugs in PAH.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interaction of Finerenone with Diltiazem, Fluconazole, and Ritonavir in Rats

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Finerenone, a novel selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, has been indicated in chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Considering the potential complications of diabetes, finerenone can be co-administered with various drugs, including fluconazole, diltiazem, and ritonavir. Given that finerenone is a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, the concurrent administration of finerenone with CYP3A4 inhibitors (diltiazem or fluconazole or ritonavir) could potentially lead to drug interactions, which may cause adverse events such as hyperkalemia. No studies have investigated interactions between finerenone and diltiazem or fluconazole or ritonavir. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction of finerenone with diltiazem or fluconazole or ritonavir and to evaluate the impact of fluconazole on the pharmacodynamics of finerenone.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetic study included four rat groups (n = 8 rats/group), including a control group (finerenone alone) and test groups (finerenone pretreated with diltiazem or fluconazole or ritonavir) using both non-compartment analysis (NCA) and population pharmacokinetic (pop-PK) modeling. The pop-PK model was developed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling in NONMEM® (version 7.5.0). In the pharmacodynamic study, serum potassium (K+) levels were measured to assess the effects of fluconazole on finerenone-induced hyperkalemia.

RESULTS

The NCA results indicated that the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of finerenone increased by 1.86- and 1.95-fold when coadministered with fluconazole and ritonavir, respectively. In contrast, diltiazem did not affect the pharmacokinetics of finerenone. The pharmacokinetic profiles of finerenone were best described by a one-compartment disposition with first-order elimination and dual first-order absorption kinetics. The pop-PK modeling results demonstrated that the apparent clearance of finerenone decreased by 50.3% and 49.2% owing to the effects of fluconazole and ritonavir, respectively. Additionally, the slow absorption rate, which represents the absorption in the distal intestinal tract of finerenone, increased by 55.7% due to the effect of ritonavir. Simultaneously, a pharmacodynamic study revealed that finerenone in the presence of fluconazole caused a significant increase in K+ levels compared with finerenone alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of finerenone with fluconazole or ritonavir increased finerenone exposure in rats. Additionally, the administration of finerenone in the presence of fluconazole resulted in elevated K+ levels in rats. Further clinical studies are required to validate these findings.

Mechanism-based inactivation of cytochromes P450: implications in drug interactions and pharmacotherapy

Cytochrome P40 (CYP) enzymes dominate the metabolism of numerous endogenous and xenobiotic substances. While it is commonly believed that CYP-catalysed reactions result in the detoxication of foreign substances, these reactions can also yield reactive intermediates that can bind to cellular macromolecules to cause cytotoxicity or irreversibly inactivate CYPs that create them.Mechanism-based inactivation (MBI) produces either irreversible or quasi-irreversible inactivation and is commonly caused by CYP metabolic bioactivation to an electrophilic reactive intermediate. Many drugs that have been known to cause MBI in CYPs have been discovered as perpetrators in drug-drug interactions throughout the last 20-30 years.This review will highlight the key findings from the recent literature about the mechanisms of CYP enzyme inhibition, with a focus on the broad mechanistic elements of MBI for widely used drugs linked to the phenomenon. There will also be a brief discussion of the clinical or pharmacokinetic consequences of CYP inactivation with regard to drug interaction and toxicity risk.Gaining knowledge about the selective inactivation of CYPs by common therapeutic drugs helps with the assessment of factors that affect the systemic clearance of co-administered drugs and improves comprehension of anticipated interactions with other drugs or xenobiotics.

In vivo evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interactions between almonertinib and rivaroxaban, almonertinib and apixaban

Background: Almonertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), is commonly used as a first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR T790M mutations. Rivaroxaban and apixaban are a selective, direct factor Xa inhibitor used to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is a frequent complication of NSCLC. Rivaroxaban and apixaban are substrates of CYP3A4, P-gp and BCRP, whereas almonertinib is an inhibitor of P-gp and BCRP. Rivaroxaban or apixaban are often prescribed together with almonertinib in NSCLC patients, but clear information on pharmacokinetic drug interaction is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to unravel the extent of interactions between almonertinib-rivaroxaban and almonertinib apixaban in rats, and whether the pharmacokinetic interaction can be mitigated by rivaroxaban and apixaban dose adjustment. Methods: Rats were divided into ten groups (n = 6) that received rivaroxaban (2 mg/kg) (group 1), apixaban (0.5 mg/kg) (group 2), almonertinib (15 mg/kg) (group 3, group 4), almonertinib with rivaroxaban (2 mg/kg) (group 5), almonertinib with rivaroxaban (1 mg/kg) (group 6), almonertinib with apixaban (0.5 mg/kg) (group 7), almonertinib with apixaban (0.25 mg/kg) (group 8), rivaroxaban (2 mg/kg) with almonertinib (group 9), apixaban (0.5 mg/kg) with almonertinib (group 10). The concentrations of drugs were determined by an ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The levels of messenger RNA were determined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Results and Discussion: The results indicate that almonertinib increased the Cmax and AUC0-t of 2 mg/kg rivaroxaban by 3.30 and 3.60-fold, 1 mg/kg rivaroxaban by 1.28 and 1.90-fold. Almonertinib increased the Cmax and AUC0-t of 0.5 mg/kg apixaban by 2.69 and 2.87-fold, 0.25 mg/kg apixaban by 2.19 and 2.06-fold. In addition, rivaroxaban also increased systemic exposure to almonertinib. The results of qRT-PCR showed that almonertinib reduced the expression of Cyp3a1 in liver and intestine, and Abcb1a, Abcg2 in intestine and kidney. The pharmacokinetic results suggest that it is important to take special care of the interactions of these drugs in clinical applications.

Concomitant Use of Diltiazem With Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Bleeding Risk in Atrial Fibrillation

Background Diltiazem, a moderate cytochrome P450 3A4 isozyme/P-glycoprotein inhibitor, may potentiate the bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) through pharmacokinetic interactions. We evaluated the association between concomitant use of diltiazem with DOACs and bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation, across varying degrees of kidney function. Methods and Results We identified 4544 patients with atrial fibrillation who were initiated on rivaroxaban (n=1583), apixaban (n=2373), or dabigatran (n=588), between 2010 and 2019 in Geisinger Health, with a mean age of 72 years and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 70 mL/min per 1.73 m2. At the time of DOAC initiation, 15% patients were taking diltiazem and an additional 5% were initiated on diltiazem during follow-up. Among DOAC users, using diltiazem concurrently (versus DOAC alone) was associated with an increased risk of any bleeding-related hospitalization (unadjusted risk difference, 2.4; 95% CI, 0.6-4.2 events per 100 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.56, 95% CI, 1.15-2.12), as well as major bleeding (unadjusted risk difference, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.1-2.6 events per 100 person-years]; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.18-2.85]). Increased risk of any/major bleeding with diltiazem was observed in both patients with and without CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) (P for interaction=0.524 and 0.629, respectively). Among 13 179 warfarin users (the negative control), concomitant diltiazem use was not associated with bleeding. Conclusions Concomitant use of diltiazem with DOACs was associated with a higher bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation, consistently in both subgroups of chronic kidney disease and non-chronic kidney disease. For DOAC users, concomitant diltiazem should be prescribed only when the benefit outweighs the risk, with close monitoring for signs of bleeding.

Clinically Significant Drug Interactions for Direct Oral Anticoagulants: State of the Art

The article is devoted to modern ideas about the role of drug interactions as a factor affecting the efficacy and safety of the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in clinical practice. Data on drug interactions of apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran with the drugs most frequently used in patients with cardiovascular diseases are given. Drug interactions for DOACs, depending on concomitant use of drugs that are inhibitors or inducers of the CYP3A4 enzyme or P-glycoprotein enzymes, are determined by most of the drug interactions of DOACs are considered. The results of studies in which drug interactions of DOACs were assessed by changes in indicators such as the area under the concentration-time curve and the maximum or minimum concentration of drugs in the blood are discussed. The data presented in the article may be useful for accounting for drug interactions in the treatment of patients with DOACs in clinical practice, despite the current lack of reasonable dose adjustment rules depending on the majority of such interactions. The data presented in the article suggest that apixaban has the fewest number of clinically significant interactions among the DOACs available in Russia.

Pharmacokinetics of panduratin A following oral administration of a Boesenbergia pandurata extract to rats

Boesenbergia pandurata and its major active ingredient, panduratin A (PAN), exhibit antibacterial, anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-obesity effects. We explored the time course of the plasma and tissue (in the major organs, gums and skin) concentrations of PAN after oral administration of a B. pandurata extract to rats. Model-dependent analysis was used to quantify the skin distribution of PAN after systemic exposure. The PAN level peaked at 1.12 ± 0.22 μg/mL after 3 h, and then biexponentially decayed with a terminal half-life of 9 h. The mean clearance (Cl/F) was 2.33 ± 0.68 L/h/kg. The PAN levels in organs were in the following order (highest first): skin, lung, heart, gum, liver, spleen, kidney, and brain. For the first time, the time course of PAN levels in plasma and organs was investigated after oral administration of a BPE. This study helps to explain the pharmacological activities of PAN in the skin and gums. The pharmacokinetic model provided data in the plasma and skin concentrations of PAN, which are of fundamental importance to evaluate its efficacy.

Association Between Use of Pharmacokinetic-Interacting Drugs and Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants: Nested Case-Control Study

Concomitant use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and medications with inhibition/induction effect on P-gp/CYP3A might increase risk of bleeding/treatment failure, respectively. We designed a nested case-control study within a Clalit cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a cohort of patients with venous thromboembolism, new users of a DOAC (January 1, 2010 to August 24, 2020). Propensity scores were constructed from demographic/clinical characteristics, and medications at cohort entry. Each case of: (i) serious bleeding event; (ii) stroke/systemic emboli (SE) in patients with AF; (iii) recurrent thromboembolism in patients with thromboembolism, was matched by age, sex, length of follow-up, year of cohort entry, DOAC type, and DOAC indication, to up to 20 controls. Within 89,284 patients with AF and venous thromboembolism and 126,302 patient-years of follow-up, there were 1,587 serious bleeding events. Risk of serious bleeding increased in association with concurrent prescription of P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors. Specifically, higher bleeding risk was associated with dabigatran-verapamil, rivaroxaban-verapamil, and rivaroxaban-amiodarone concurrent prescriptions: adjusted odds ratios (ORs) 2.29 (1.13-4.60), 2.18 (1.07-4.40), and 1.68 (1.14-2.49), respectively. There were 1,116 events of stroke/SE, in 79,302 DOAC-treated patients with AF and 118,124 patient-years of follow-up. Concomitant use of phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, or levetiracetam was associated with risk for stroke/SE: adjusted OR 2.18 (1.55-3.10). Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism could not be assessed due to the low number of cases. Concurrent prescriptions of dabigatran or rivaroxaban with verapamil, and of rivaroxaban with amiodarone, are associated with increased risk for serious bleeding. Higher risk for stroke/SE in patients with AF is associated with concurrent prescriptions of DOACs with phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, or levetiracetam.

The Development and Optimization of Hot-Melt Extruded Amorphous Solid Dispersions Containing Rivaroxaban in Combination with Polymers

Rivaroxaban (RXB), a novel oral anticoagulant that directly inhibits factor Xa, is a poorly soluble drug belonging to Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class II. In this study, a hot-melt extruded amorphous solid dispersion (HME-ASD) containing RXB is prepared by changing the drug:polymer ratio (Polyvinylpyrrolidione-vinyl acetate 64, 1:1–1:4) and barrel temperature (200–240 °C), fixed at 20% of Cremophor^® RH 40 and 15 rpm of the screw speed, using the hot-melt extruding technique. This study evaluates the solubility, dissolution behavior, and bioavailability for application to oral drug delivery and optimizes the formulation of rivaroxaban amorphous solid dispersion (RXB-ASD). Based on a central composite design, optimized RXB-ASD (PVP VA 64 ratio 1:4.1, barrel temperature 216.1 °C, Cremophor^® RH 40 20%, screw speed 15 rpm) showed satisfactory results for dependent variables. An in vitro drug dissolution study exhibited relatively high dissolution in four media and achieved around an 80% cumulative drug release in 120 min. Optimized RXB-ASD was stable under the accelerated condition for three months without a change in crystallinity and the dissolution rate. A pharmacokinetic study of RXB-ASD in rats showed that the absorption was markedly increased in terms of rate and amount, i.e., the systemic exposure values, compared to raw RXB powder. These results showed the application of quality by design (QbD) in the formulation development of hot-melt extruded RXB-ASD, which can be used as an oral drug delivery system by increasing the dissolution rate and bioavailability.

Select Drug-Drug Interactions With Direct Oral Anticoagulants: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Millions of individuals in the United States require long-term treatment with an oral anticoagulant. For decades, vitamin K antagonists were the only oral option available; however, they have a number of well-known limitations. Introduction of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has long been considered a major therapeutic advance, largely because they lack the need for therapeutic monitoring. Despite this, DOACs, like vitamin K antagonists, can still cause major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, even when used appropriately. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving the DOACs represent an important contributor to increased bleeding risk. Awareness of these DDIs and how best to address them is of critical importance in optimizing management while mitigating bleeding risk. This review provides an overview of DOAC metabolism, the most common drugs likely to contribute to DOAC DDIs, their underlying mechanisms, and how best to address them.

Rivaroxaban improves vascular response in LPS-induced acute inflammation in experimental models

Rivaroxaban (RVX) was suggested to possess anti-inflammatory and vascular tone modulatory effects. The goal of this study was to investigate whether RVX impacts lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute vascular inflammatory response. Male rats were treated with 5 mg/kg RVX (oral gavage) followed by 10 mg/kg LPS i.p injection. Circulating levels of IL-6, MCP-1, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1 were measured in plasma 6 and 24 hours after LPS injection, while isolated aorta was used for gene expression analysis, immunohistochemistry, and vascular tone evaluation. RVX pre-treatment significantly reduced LPS mediated increase after 6h and 24h for IL-6 (4.4±2.2 and 2.8±1.7 fold), MCP-1 (1.4±1.5 and 1.3±1.4 fold) VCAM-1 (1.8±2.0 and 1.7±2.1 fold). A similar trend was observed in the aorta for iNOS (5.5±3.3 and 3.3±1.9 folds reduction, P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively), VCAM-1 (1.3±1.2 and 1.4±1.3 fold reduction, P<0.05), and MCP-1 (3.9±2.2 and 1.9±1.6 fold reduction, P<0.01). Moreover, RVX pre-treatment, improved LPS-induced PE contractile dysfunction in aortic rings (Control vs LPS, Emax reduction = 35.4 and 31.19%, P<0.001; Control vs LPS+RVX, Emax reduction = 10.83 and 11.48%, P>0.05, respectively), resulting in 24.5% and 19.7% change in maximal constriction in LPS and LPS+RVX respectively. These data indicate that RVX pre-treatment attenuates LPS-induced acute vascular inflammation and contractile dysfunction.

Effects of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in rats

CONTEXT

Rivaroxaban and ticagrelor are two common drugs for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome. However, the drug-drug interaction between them is still unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in rats both in vivo and in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A sensitive and reliable UPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the determination of rivaroxaban in rat plasma. Ten Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into ticagrelor pre-treated group (10 mg/kg/day for 14 days) and control group. The pharmacokinetics of orally administered rivaroxaban (10 mg/kg, single dose) with or without ticagrelor pre-treatment was investigated with developed UPLC-MS/MS method. Additionally, Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes were also used to investigate the drug-drug interaction between these two drugs in vitro.

RESULTS

The C _max (221.34 ± 53.33 vs. 691.18 ± 238.31 ng/mL) and the AUC_(0-t) (1060.97 ± 291.21 vs. 3483.03 ± 753.83 μg·h/L) of rivaroxaban increased significantly (p < 0.05) with ticagrelor pre-treatment. The MRT_(0-∞) of rivaroxaban increased from 4.41 ± 0.79 to 5.97 ± 1.11 h, while the intrinsic clearance decreased from 9.93 ± 2.55 to 2.89 ± 0.63 L/h/kg (both p < 0.05) after pre-treated with ticagrelor. Enzyme kinetic study indicated that ticagrelor decreased rivaroxaban metabolic clearance with the IC₅₀ value of 14.04 μmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Our in vivo and in vitro results demonstrated that there is a drug-drug interaction between ticagrelor and rivaroxaban in rats. Further studies need to be carried out to verify whether similar interactions truly apply in humans and whether these interactions have clinical significance.

Diltiazem potentiates the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells through inhibition of P-glycoprotein

AIM

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most aggressive tumors with dismal survival and a high death rate due to chemotherapeutic failure. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) plays a pivotal role in PC response to gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Diltiazem, a calcium channel blocker, is a P-gp inhibitor. In the current study, we investigated the hypothesis that targeting of P-gp by diltiazem can enhance the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine and 5-FU against human pancreatic cancer cells.

MAIN METHODS

The cytotoxic effect of diltiazem, gemcitabine, and 5-FU in single and combined forms against PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cells were assayed by MTT. Flow cytometric analysis was used for the determination of cell cycle, apoptosis, and stemness markers in PC cells. Besides, immunoblotting was used for assessment of Bax, caspase 3, cyclin D1, and P-gp expressions.

KEY FINDINGS

Diltiazem co-treatment, either with gemcitabine or 5-FU, synergistically reduced cell viability, induced apoptosis, and caused cell cycle arrest. In addition, diltiazem co-treatment decreased the expressions of stem cell markers CD24 and CD44, increased the expressions of Bax and cleaved caspase 3, enhanced DNA fragmentation, and attenuated cyclin D1 and P-gp expressions as compared to cells treated with either gemcitabine or 5-FU alone.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings suggest that diltiazem may be potential neoadjuvant therapy to enhance the response of PC to gemcitabine or 5-FU treatment.

Drug-drug interaction of rivaroxaban and calcium channel blockers in patients aged 80 years and older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Objectives For revealing the peculiarities of the drug-drug interaction of rivaroxaban (substrate CYP3A4 and P-gp) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (verapamil - inhibitor CYP3A4 and P-gp and amlodipine - substrate CYP3A4) in patients 80 years and older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NAF) we studied 128 patients. Methods All patients were divided into groups depending on the therapy taken: the 1st - rivaroxaban + amlodipine (n=51), the 2nd - rivaroxaban + verapamil (n=30), the control group - rivaroxaban without CCBs (n=47). A trough steady-state plasma concentration (C min,ss) of rivaroxaban, prothrombin time (PT) in the blood plasma and the event of clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding were assessed for each patient. Results Patient in group 2 had higher C min,ss of rivaroxaban, PT and CRNM than subjects in the control group (Me 73.8 [50.6-108.8] ng/mL vs. 40.5 [25.6-74.3] ng/mL; Me 14.8 [13.4-17.3] s vs. 13.8 [12.6-14.4] s; 34% vs. 13%, respectively, p<0.05 for all). When compared, the PT and complication rate in group 1 with the control group C min,ss of rivaroxaban were practically the same (p>0.05 for all). Conclusions In patients ≥80 years with NAF, the use of rivaroxaban in combination with verapamil may not be safe and can lead to CRNM bleeding.

Drug-drug interaction of rivaroxaban and calcium channel blockers in patients aged 80 years and older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Objectives For revealing the peculiarities of the drug-drug interaction of rivaroxaban (substrate CYP3A4 and P-gp) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (verapamil - inhibitor CYP3A4 and P-gp and amlodipine - substrate CYP3A4) in patients 80 years and older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NAF) we studied 128 patients. Methods All patients were divided into groups depending on the therapy taken: the 1st - rivaroxaban + amlodipine (n=51), the 2nd - rivaroxaban + verapamil (n=30), the control group - rivaroxaban without CCBs (n=47). A trough steady-state plasma concentration (C min,ss) of rivaroxaban, prothrombin time (PT) in the blood plasma and the event of clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding were assessed for each patient. Results Patient in group 2 had higher C min,ss of rivaroxaban, PT and CRNM than subjects in the control group (Me 73.8 [50.6-108.8] ng/mL vs. 40.5 [25.6-74.3] ng/mL; Me 14.8 [13.4-17.3] s vs. 13.8 [12.6-14.4] s; 34% vs. 13%, respectively, p<0.05 for all). When compared, the PT and complication rate in group 1 with the control group C min,ss of rivaroxaban were practically the same (p>0.05 for all). Conclusions In patients ≥80 years with NAF, the use of rivaroxaban in combination with verapamil may not be safe and can lead to CRNM bleeding.