Population Pharmacokinetics of Cis-, Trans-, and Total Cefprozil in Healthy Male Koreans

Binding characteristics of the doxepin E/Z-isomers to the histamine H1 receptor revealed by receptor-bound ligand analysis and molecular dynamics study

Doxepin is an antihistamine and tricyclic antidepressant that binds to the histamine H1 receptor (H1R) with high affinity. Doxepin is an 85:15 mixture of the E- and Z-isomers. The Z-isomer is well known to be more effective than the E-isomer, whereas based on the crystal structure of the H1R/doxepin complex, the hydroxyl group of Thr1123.37 is close enough to form a hydrogen bond with the oxygen atom of the E-isomer. The detailed binding characteristics and reasons for the differences remain unclear. In this study, we analyzed doxepin isomers bound to the receptor following extraction from a purified H1R protein complexed with doxepin. The ratio of the E- and Z-isomers bound to wild-type (WT) H1R was 55:45, indicating that the Z-isomer was bound to WT H1R with an approximately 5.2-fold higher affinity than the E-isomer. For the T1123.37V mutant, the E/Z ratio was 89:11, indicating that both isomers have similar affinities. Free energy calculations using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations also reproduced the experimental results of the relative binding free energy differences between the isomers for WT and T1123.37V. Furthermore, MD simulations revealed that the hydroxyl group of T1123.37 did not form hydrogen bonds with the E-isomer, but with the adjacent residues in the binding pocket. Analysis of the receptor-bound doxepin and MD simulations suggested that the hydroxyl group of T1123.37 contributes to the formation of a chemical environment in the binding pocket, which is slightly more favorable for the Z-isomer without hydrogen bonding with doxepin.

Structure-Based Analysis of Cefaclor Pharmacokinetic Diversity According to Human Peptide Transporter-1 Genetic Polymorphism

Cefaclor is a substrate of human-peptide-transporter-1 (PEPT1), and the impact of inter-individual pharmacokinetic variation due to genetic polymorphisms of solute-carrier-family-15-member-1 (SLC15A1) has been a topic of great debate. The main objective of this study was to analyze and interpret cefaclor pharmacokinetic variations according to genetic polymorphisms in SLC15A1 exons 5 and 16. The previous cefaclor bioequivalence results were integrated with additional SLC15A1 exons 5 and 16 genotyping results. An analysis of the structure-based functional impact of SLC15A1 exons 5 and 16 genetic polymorphisms was recently performed using a PEPT1 molecular modeling approach. In cefaclor pharmacokinetic analysis results according to SLC15A1 exons 5 and 16 genetic polymorphisms, no significant differences were identified between genotype groups. Furthermore, in the population pharmacokinetic modeling, genetic polymorphisms in SLC15A1 exons 5 and 16 were not established as effective covariates. PEPT1 molecular modeling results also confirmed that SLC15A1 exons 5 and 16 genetic polymorphisms did not have a significant effect on substrate interaction with cefaclor and did not have a major effect in terms of structural stability. This was determined by comprehensively considering the insignificant change in energy values related to cefaclor docking due to point mutations in SLC15A1 exons 5 and 16, the structural change in conformations confirmed to be less than 0.05 Å, and the relative stabilization of molecular dynamic simulation energy values. As a result, molecular structure-based analysis recently suggested that SLC15A1 exons 5 and 16 genetic polymorphisms of PEPT1 were limited to being the main focus in interpreting the pharmacokinetic diversity of cefaclor.

Population Pharmacokinetic (Pop-PK) Analysis of Torsemide in Healthy Korean Males Considering CYP2C9 and OATP1B1 Genetic Polymorphisms

Torsemide is a diuretic drug used for several cardiovascular and chronic diseases. With regard to the clinical application of torsemide, studies on individualized pharmacotherapy and modeling that take variability in pharmacokinetics (PKs) within a population into account have been rarely reported. Thus, the objective of this study was to perform population pharmacokinetic (Pop-PK) modeling and to identify effective covariates that could explain the inter-individual variability (IIV) of torsemide PK. Pop-PK modeling for torsemide was performed based on serum concentration data obtained from 112 healthy Korean males and analysis of various genetic and physicochemical parameters. Modeling was performed with nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) using Phoenix NLME. The finally developed model was fully verified. The model was also reconfirmed using NONMEM software. As a basic model, the PKs of torsemide within the population were well described by a two-compartment model reflecting the lag-time on oral absorption. According to the genetic polymorphisms of OATP1B1 and CYP2C9, significant associations were found in the V/F, CL/F, and CL₂/F of torsemide. These were reflected as effective covariates in the final Pop-PK model of torsemide, resulting in an approximately 5–10% improvement in the model parameter IIV values. Considering that torsemide is a substrate for CYP2C9 and OATP1B1, it was important to search for genetic polymorphisms in CYP2C9 and OATP1B1 as covariates to explain the PK diversity of torsemide between individuals. The differences in CL/F and CL₂/F between the phenotypes of CYP2C9 were approximately 36.5–51%. The difference in V/F between the phenotypes of OATP1B1 was approximately 41–64.6%. These results suggested that the phenotypes of CYP2C9 and OATP1B1 produced significant differences in torsemide PKs. Considering that CYP2C9 and OATP1B1 phenotypes as covariates affected different PK parameters of torsemide, it could be inferred that torsemide’s cell membrane permeation process by OATP1B1 and the metabolic process by CYP2C9 could independently affect each other in vivo without interplay. There was no significant difference in the parameter estimates between modeling software (Phoenix NLME vs. NONMEM). In this study, the torsemide PK variability between individuals was largely explained. In the future, individualized effective drug therapy of torsemide taking individual patient’s genotypes into account might become possible.

Pharmacokinetic Comparison between Methotrexate-Loaded Nanoparticles and Nanoemulsions as Hard- and Soft-Type Nanoformulations: A Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling Approach

The purpose of this study was to identify and explore the differences in pharmacokinetics between different nanoformulations. This was done by comparing the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate-loaded nanoparticles [poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); size of 163.70 ± 10.25 nm] and nanoemulsions (olive oil and Labrasol; size of 173.77 ± 5.76 nm), which represent hard- and soft-type nanoformulations, respectively. In addition, the population pharmacokinetic modeling approach as a useful tool for the comparison of pharmacokinetics between nanoformulations was newly proposed through this study. Significant pharmacokinetic differences were identified between nanoformulations through the new population pharmacokinetic modeling approach. As a result, the formulation type was explored as a significant covariate. The clearance and bioavailability of methotrexate-loaded nanoemulsions tended to decrease by 99% and increase by 19%, respectively, compared to those of the nanoparticles. The exploration of significant pharmacokinetic differences between drug formulations and their correlations presented in this study provide new perspectives on the development of nanoformulations.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Cefaclor in Healthy Korean Subjects

The aims of this study were: (1) to perform population pharmacokinetic analysis of cefaclor in healthy Korean subjects, and (2) to investigate possible effects of various covariates on pharmacokinetic parameters of cefaclor. Although cefaclor belongs to the cephalosporin family antibiotic that has been used in various indications, there have been very few population studies on factors affecting its pharmacokinetics. Therefore, this study is very important in that effective therapy could be possible through a population pharmacokinetic study that explores effective covariates related to cefaclor pharmacokinetic diversity between individuals. Pharmacokinetic results of 48 subjects with physical and biochemical parameters were used for the population pharmacokinetic analysis of cefaclor. A one-compartment with lag-time and first-order absorption/elimination was constructed as a base model and extended to include covariates that could influence between-subject variability. Creatinine clearance and body weight significantly influenced systemic clearance and distribution volume of cefaclor. Cefaclor’s final population pharmacokinetic model was validated and some of the population’s pharmacokinetic diversity could be explained. Herein, we first describe the establishment of a population pharmacokinetic model of cefaclor for healthy Koreans that might be useful for customizing cefaclor or exploring additional covariates in patients.

Pharmacokinetic comparison with different assays for simultaneous determination of cis-, trans-cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma

The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters obtained using two newly developed assays, HPLC-UV and UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Selection of assay and results obtained therefrom are very important in PK studies and can have a major impact on the PK-based clinical dose and usage settings. For this study, we developed two new methods that are most commonly used in biosample analysis and focused on PK parameters obtained from them. By HPLC-UV equipped with a Luna-C₈ column using UV detector, cefprozil diastereomers were separated using water containing 2% (V/V) acetic acid and acetonitrile as a mobile phase. By UPLC-ESI-MS/MS equipped with a HALO-C₁₈column, cefprozil diastereomers were separated using 0.5% (V/V) aqueous formic acid containing 5 mM ammonium-formate buffer and methanol as a mobile phase. Chromatograms showed high resolution, sensitivity, and selectivity without interference by plasma constituents. Both intra- and inter-day precisions (CV, %) were within 8.88% for HPLC-UV and UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Accuracy of both methods was 95.67%–107.50%. These two analytical methods satisfied the criteria of international guidance and could be successfully applied to PK study. Comparison of PK parameters between two assays confirmed that there is a difference in the predicted minimum plasma concentrations at steady state, which may affect clinical dose and usage settings. Furthermore, we confirmed possible correlation between PK parameters and various biochemical parameters after oral administration of 1000 mg cefprozil to humans.

•

Development of UPLC-ESI-MS/MS and HPLC-UV methods for cefprozil diastereomers.

•

Comparison of PK parameters obtained using two newly developed assays.

•

Possible correlation between PK parameters and various biochemical parameters.