A Validated IVRT Method to Assess Topical Creams Containing Metronidazole Using a Novel Approach

Formulation and optimisation of Ozenoxacin topical nano-emulgel including a comprehensive methodology to qualify and validate the critical parameters of an in-vitro release test method and ex-vivo permeation test

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to formulate, optimize Ozenoxacin topical nano-emulsion using factorial design followed by to prepare and evaluate nano-emulgel using validated in-vitro release testing (IVRT) technique for determination of Ozenoxacin release rate along with ex-vivo permeation testing (EVPT).Significance: Nano-emulgel is a proven delivery system for poorly soluble substances works by enhancing the solubility and bioavailability. Factorial design provides a systematic and efficient means to study the effect of multiple factors on responses. IVRT is an USP compendia technique utilized for performance analysis of semi-solid formulations.

METHODS

Nano-emulsion formulation optimization was done with factorial design, evaluated for globule size and % entrapment efficiency (EE). Nano-emulgels were characterized for assay, organic impurities, rheological behavior, IVRT, EVPT, and skin retention studies. IVRT validation was executed using vertical diffusion cells (VDCs).

RESULTS

Ozenoxacin nano-emulsion was optimized with 1:1 ratio of Oil: Smix, 3:1 ratio of Surfactant:Co-Surfactant, and 15000 RPM of homogenization speed which resulted 414.6 ± 5.2 nm globule size and 92.8 ± 2.1% entrapment efficiency. Results confirmed that IVRT and Reversed Phase - High Performance Liquid Chromatographic techniques were validated as per regulatory guidelines. In-vitro, ex-vivo drug release, and skin retention from the optimized nano-emulgel formulation was comparatively higher (∼1.5 times) than that from the innovator (OZANEXTM) formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, Ozenoxacin nano-emulgel can be considered an effective alternative and was found to be stable at 40 °C/75% RH and 30 °C/75% RH storage condition for 6 months.

Update on the advances and challenges in bioequivalence testing methods for complex topical generic products

Most of the government regulatory agencies, including the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency, demand that the generic complex topical products prove pharmaceutical and bioequivalence. The evaluation of bioequivalence for complex topical dermatological formulations is a challenging task that requires careful consideration of several factors. Although comparative clinical studies are still considered the gold standard approach for establishing bioequivalence in most formulations, these studies can be costly and insensitive to detect formulation differences. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to develop and validate alternative approaches that demonstrate bioequivalence and expedite the availability of high-quality generic topical dermatological products. This article reviews the current methods for determining the bioequivalence of topical formulations in humans, with particular emphasis on recent advances in these methodologies. Most of the alternative methods are sensitive and reproducible, with the capability to ease the financial burden of comparative clinical studies within a short delivery time. The limitations associated with each technique are reviewed in detail.

Impact of Formulation and Microneedle Length on Transdermal Metronidazole Permeation through Microneedle-Treated Skin

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the impact of formulation (gel vs cream) and microneedle characteristics (length, number) on permeation of metronidazole through excised microneedle-treated skin. The long-term goal is to apply these results towards a pharmacokinetic study in human subjects with diverse skin types, using in vitro flux data to determine dosing conditions and ultimately establish in vitro-in vivo correlations.

METHODS

Metronidazole release from 0.75% gel and cream was quantified with flow-through diffusion cells, using a cellulose membrane. Excised porcine skin was treated with stainless steel microneedles (500 or 800 μm length), to create 50 or 100 micropores. Metronidazole gel or cream was applied to microneedle-treated skin and replaced every 48 h for up to 7 days. Metronidazole permeation was quantified using HPLC. Intact skin (no microneedle treatment) served as controls.

RESULTS

Metronidazole release was faster from the gel vs cream. At 7 days there was no difference between gel vs cream in total metronidazole permeated through intact skin. For both formulations, metronidazole permeation was significantly higher (vs intact skin) following microneedle application, regardless of microneedle length or micropore number. Increasing microneedle length and micropore number enhanced MTZ permeation multiple fold for both gel and cream. The greatest enhancement in total permeation for both formulations was achieved with the 800 μm MN, 100 micropore condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Formulation and microneedle conditions both impacted metronidazole permeation. These data will be used to estimate in vivo serum concentrations after applying metronidazole to microneedle-treated skin in humans.

A comprehensively validated IVRT method reliably discriminates sameness and differences between several topical clotrimazole creams

In vitro release testing (IVRT) has gained increasing acceptance for use as a biowaiver for topical products intended for local action. Whereas the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) has issued product specific guidances (PSGs) recommending IVRT for several products, the PSG for clotrimazole cream does not include an IVRT option. However, an important requirement to include supplemental selectivity in the validation process as described in the recent FDA draft guidance on IVRT studies for topical drug products has generally been conspicuously absent in the published literature describing the application of IVRT as a biowaiver. Supplemental selectivity involves the comparison of a reference product and altered formulations containing the same strength of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). In order to demonstrate supplemental selectivity, cream formulation containing the same API (clotrimazole), at the same strength (1 %) and in the same dosage form (cream) but manufactured using different excipients were used. This will help assess the impact that excipients may have on the release rate of clotrimazole and whether the method is capable of identifying differences in the microstructure and arrangement of matter (Q3) as an important performance parameter. In addition, products containing <30 % or >40 % clotrimazole to serve as negative controls were also included for the discriminatory power assessment. Hence, the primary objective was to develop and validate a simple, reliable, reproducible, and cost-effective in vitro technique in accordance with the recent draft FDA guidance to assess the "sameness" of topical creams containing 1 % clotrimazole. An in vitro release testing (IVRT) system was used and an IVRT method was developed and accordingly validated. The validated IVRT method showed the potential to accurately measure the release from 1 % clotrimazole creams and demonstrated supplemental selectivity and appropriate discriminatory power to identify "sameness" and/ or differences.

Rheology of Complex Topical Formulations: An Analytical Quality by Design Approach to Method Optimization and Validation

Analytical method validation ensures that a method provides trustworthy information about a particular sample when applied in accordance with the predefined protocol. According to regulatory standards, the rheological characteristics of topically applied semisolid formulations are one of the key elements involved in microstructure equivalence documentation. Therefore, for generic drug product manufacturers, it is a dire need to take a step forward in rheology method development and validation procedures. This paper aims to apply Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) principles towards the development and validation of rheology methods for topical creams, as complex semisolid formulations. Risk assessment was carried out through an Ishikawa diagram and an estimate failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA). Sample application, peltier temperature control, and sample rest time were identified as critical method variables (CMVs), and a 2³ full factorial design was applied to understand their impact on rotational, creep recovery and, oscillatory measurements. The development of the method was carried out as per the ICH Q8-Q10, and Q14 guidelines and validated according to ICH Q2 (R2) guideline. The method demonstrated adequate precision (RSD < 15%), as well as selectivity. AQbD provided a comprehensive framework for developing a reliable and effective rheology method for this type of formulation.

Drilling down the bioequivalence assessment of topical antifungal products: Microstructure and release

In recent years, the regulatory mechanisms for topical generic product bioequivalence (BE) assessment have been subjected to noteworthy changes, with the FDA issuing product specific guidances, and the EMA adopting a more universal approach with the quality and equivalence of topical products draft guideline. The agencies advise on a modular strategy for BE documentation. Nevertheless, their scope, data analysis and criteria are rather distinct. This study aims to tackle bioequivalence assessment issues of complex topical formulations starting by statistical implications of the EMA/FDA approaches concerning the documentation of qualitative (Q1), quantitative (Q2), microstructure (Q3) and performance requirements (Q4). As a model drug product, a bifonazole 10 mg/g cream formulation was selected. For this specific formulation, the commercially available Reference Product (RP) was compared with two comparator products, also commercially available, referred to as comparator product A (CPA) and comparator product B (CPB). The former displays Q1 sameness and Q2 differences, whilst CPB is categorically considered as Q1/Q2 different. Furthermore, intending to establish a regulatory rationale for the submission of a generic product according to the updated regulatory requirements, the RP was likewise compared with a Test Product (TP). This formulation was designed to display equal Q1/Q2 profile to that of the RP. Validated rheology and in vitro release test (IVRT) methods were used to infer on Q3/Q4 characteristics. During rheology studies, statistically significant RP batch to batch differences were observed. Therefore, in an attempt to surpass this heterogeneity, the initial pool of RP batches was expanded to include RP product batches at different lifecycle stages. Despite this effort, it was not possible to classify the RP/TP, RP/CPA or RP/CPB as rheologically equivalent products. Nevertheless, product performance results, retrieved from IVRT, were able to sustain equivalence between the RP and the formulations exhibiting Q1 sameness (TP and CPA). It should however be mentioned, that for some RP batch combinations, the IVRT results failed to demonstrate equivalence according to the EMA requirements. Enlarging the RP batch pool was then a critical step in further understanding an optimum statistical approach for establishing equivalence in product performance. This study highlights the need to that a 'one-fits-all approach' may not be an optimum path way for establishing the regulatory strategy and requirements to support generic product bioequivalence.

In Vitro-In Vivo Correlations (IVIVC) for Predicting the Clinical Performance of Metronidazole Topical Creams Intended for Local Action

The safety and efficacy of a generic medicine can be confirmed by demonstrating bioequivalence (BE) between the generic product and its reference listed drug (RLD) by measuring drug concentrations in the blood following administration. However, for topical dermatological products that are not absorbed into the systemic circulation, clinical trials in patients are required. The objective of this investigation was to use an in vitro method to predict in vivo performance by correlating in vitro release testing (IVRT) data with tape stripping (TS) data following the application of metronidazole (MTZ) creams to the skin of healthy human participants. Whereas IVRT is generally used to characterize the release of a drug from topical products across a synthetic membrane into a suitable receptor medium, TS involves the sequential removal of layers of stratum corneum (SC) with an adhesive tape to determine the amount of the drug in the skin. The resulting IVRT and TS data were correlated using the IVRT parameter of the apparent release constant (ARC), which is the slope obtained from the release rate profile, with the TS parameter of the area under the curve (AUC) obtained from a plot of the amount of drug per tape strip vs. the relative SC depth. A rank order relationship for these parameters was established for the reference and test products. A graph of AUC vs. ARC was plotted to establish a Level C in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC). Although the ARC for T₁ was slightly lower than that for the reference, the rank order was essentially consistent. A linear relationship was observed between the AUCs and ARCs. The equation derived was used to predict the AUCs for all the tested products based on their respective ARCs. The predicted AUC values based on the observed ARCs were similar to the observed AUCs. The lower and upper limits for the in vitro and in vivo parameters for BE were computed based on regulatory acceptance criteria. In order to predict BE from the IVRT studies, the values of the ARC should be between 30.50 and 47.67 when comparing test and reference cream products containing MTZ.

Phenytoin-loaded bioactive nanoparticles for the treatment of diabetic pressure ulcers: formulation and in vitro/in vivo evaluation

Drug repurposing offers the chance to explore the full potential of existing drugs while reducing drug development time and costs. For instance, the anticonvulsant drug phenytoin (PHT) has been investigated for its wound healing properties. However, its poor solubility and variability of doses used topically limit its use. Hence, the aim of this study was to improve the properties and wound healing efficacy of PHT for the treatment of diabetic bedsores. PHT was encapsulated, using a modified ionic gelation method, in either positively or negatively charged chitosan-alginate nanoparticles (NPs), which possess previously demonstrated wound healing potential. These NPs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. PHT-loaded NPs were evaluated in vivo for their pressure ulcers' healing potential using diabetic rats. The prepared NPs, especially the positively charged particles, exhibited superior wound healing efficacy compared to PHT suspension, with respect to healing rates, granulation tissue formation, tissue maturation, and collagen content. The positively charged NPs resulted in a 56.54% wound closure at day 7, compared to 37% for PHT suspension. Moreover, skin treated with these NPs showed a mature dermis structure with skin appendages, which were absent in all other groups, in addition to the highest collagen content of 63.65%. In conclusion, the use of a bioactive carrier enhanced the healing properties of PHT and allowed the use of relatively low doses of the drug. Our findings suggest that the prepared NPs offer an effective antibiotic-free delivery system for diabetic wound healing applications.

Analysis of docosanol using GC/MS: Method development, validation, and application to ex vivo human skin permeation studies

Docosanol is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved over-the-counter topical product for treating recurrent oral-facial herpes simplex labialis. Validated analytical methods for docosanol are required to demonstrate the bioequivalence of docosanol topical products. A gas chromatography/selected ion monitoring mode mass spectrometry (GC/SIM-MS) method was developed and validated for docosanol determination in biological samples. Docosanol and isopropyl palmitate (internal standard) were separated on a high-polarity GC capillary column with (88% cyanopropy)aryl-polysiloxane employed as the stationary phase. The ions of m/z 83 and 256 were selected to monitor docosanol and isopropyl palmitate, respectively; the total run time was 20 min. The GC/SIM-MS method was validated in accordance with US FDA guidelines, and the results met the US FDA acceptance criteria. The docosanol calibration standards were linear in the 100–10000 ng/mL concentration range (R²>0.994). The recoveries for docosanol from the receptor fluid and skin homogenates were >93.2% and >95.8%, respectively. The validated method was successfully applied to analyze ex vivo human cadaver skin permeation samples. On applying Abreva® cream tube and Abreva® cream pump, the amount of docosanol that penetrated human cadaver skin at 48 h was 21.5 ± 7.01 and 24.0 ± 6.95 ng/mg, respectively. Accordingly, we concluded that the validated GC/SIM-MS was sensitive, specific, and suitable for quantifying docosanol as a quality control tool. This method can be used for routine analysis as a cost-effective alternative to other techniques.

•

Docosanol is used to treat recurrent oral-facial herpes simplex labialis.

•

Analytical methods are required to demonstrate docosanol product bioequivalence.

•

A GC/SIM-MS docosanol method was developed and validated as per USFDA.

•

The GC/SIM-MS docosanol analytical method was sensitive, specific, and reproducible.

•

The method was employed to quantify docosanol human skin permeation samples.

The Implications of Regulatory Framework for Topical Semisolid Drug Products: From Critical Quality and Performance Attributes towards Establishing Bioequivalence

Due to complex interdependent relationships affecting their microstructure, topical semisolid drug formulations face unique obstacles to the development of generics compared to other drug products. Traditionally, establishing bioequivalence is based on comparative clinical trials, which are expensive and often associated with high degrees of variability and low sensitivity in detecting formulation differences. To address this issue, leading regulatory agencies have aimed to advance guidelines relevant to topical generics, ultimately accepting different non-clinical, in vitro/in vivo surrogate methods for topical bioequivalence assessment. Unfortunately, according to both industry and academia stakeholders, these efforts are far from flawless, and often upsurge the potential for result variability and a number of other failure modes. This paper offers a comprehensive review of the literature focused on amending regulatory positions concerning the demonstration of (i) extended pharmaceutical equivalence and (ii) equivalence with respect to the efficacy of topical semisolids. The proposed corrective measures are disclosed and critically discussed, as they span from mere demands to widen the acceptance range (e.g., from ±10% to ±20%/±25% for rheology and in vitro release parameters highly prone to batch-to-batch variability) or reassess the optimal number of samples required to reach the desired statistical power, but also rely on specific data modeling or novel statistical approaches.

Physicochemical properties and formulation development of a novel compound inhibiting Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation

The emergence of antibiotic resistance over the past several decades has given urgency to new antibacterial strategies that apply less selective pressure. A new class of anti-virulence compounds were developed that are active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), by inhibiting bacterial virulence without hindering their growth to reduce the selective pressure for resistance development. One of the compounds CCG-211790 has demonstrated potent anti-biofilm activity against MRSA. This new class of anti-virulence compounds inhibited the gene expression of virulence factors involved in biofilm formation and disrupted the biofilm structures. In this study, the physicochemical properties of CCG-211790, including morphology, solubility in pure water or in water containing sodium dodecyl sulfate, solubility in organic solvents, and stability with respect to pH were investigated for the first time. Furthermore, a topical formulation was developed to enhance the therapeutic potential of the compound. The formulation demonstrated acceptable properties for drug release, viscosity, pH, cosmetic elegance and stability of over nine months.

Rheology by Design: A Regulatory Tutorial for Analytical Method Validation

The increasing demand for product and process understanding as an active pursuit in the quality guideline Q8 and, more recently, on the draft guideline on quality and equivalence of topical products, has unveiled the tremendous potential of rheology methods as a tool for microstructure characterization of topical semisolid dosage forms. Accordingly, procedure standardization is a dire need. This work aimed at developing and validating a methodology tutorial for rheology analysis. A 1% hydrocortisone cream was used as model cream formulation. Through a risk assessment analysis, the impact of selected critical method variables (geometry, temperature and application mode) was estimated in a broad range of rheological critical analytical attributes-zero-shear viscosity, upper-shear thinning viscosity, lower-shear thinning viscosity, infinite-shear viscosity, rotational yield point, thixotropic relative area, linear viscoelastic region, oscillatory yield point, storage modulus, loss modulus, and loss tangent. The proposed validation of the approach included the rheometer qualification, followed by the validation of numerous operational critical parameters regarding a rheology profile acquisition. The thixotropic relative area, oscillatory yield point, flow point and viscosity related endpoints proved to be highly sensitive and discriminatory parameters. This rationale provided a standard framework for the development of a reliable and robust rheology profile acquisition.