Interaction of Hydroxychloroquine with Pharmacokinetically Important Drug Transporters

Use of a Double-Transfected System to Predict hOCT2/hMATE1-Mediated Renal Drug-Drug Interactions

Accurate predictions of renal drug-drug interactions (DDIs) mediated by the human organic cation transporter 2 (hOCT2) and multidrug and toxin extrusion proteins (hMATEs) remain challenging. Current DDI evaluation using plasma maximal unbound inhibitor concentrations (Imax,u) and IC50 values determined in single transporter-transfected cells frequently leads to false or overprediction especially for hMATE1. Emerging evidence suggests intracellular unbound inhibitor concentration may be more relevant for hMATE1 inhibition in vivo. However, determination of intrarenal inhibitor concentrations is impractical. Here, we explored the use of hOCT2/hMATE1 double-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells as a new in vitro tool for DDI risk assessment. Our results showed that potent in vitro hMATE1 inhibitors (hydroxychloroquine, brigatinib, and famotidine) failed to inhibit metformin B-to-A flux in the double-transfected system. On the other side, the classic hOCT2/hMATE1 inhibitors, pyrimethamine and cimetidine, dose-dependently inhibited metformin apparent B-to-A permeability (Papp). The different behaviors of these hMATE1 inhibitors in the double-transfected system can be explained by their different ability to gain intracellular access either via passive diffusion or transporter-mediated uptake. A new parameter (IC50,flux) was proposed reflecting the inhibitor's potency on overall hOCT2/hMATE1-mediated tubular secretion. The IC50,flux values significantly differ from the IC50 values determined in single transporter-transfected cells. Importantly, the IC50,flux accurately predicted in vivo DDIs (within 2-fold) when used in a static model. Our data demonstrated that the IC50,flux approach circumvents the need to measure intracellular inhibitor concentrations and more accurately predicted hOCT2/hMATE1-mediated renal DDIs. This system represents a new approach that could be used for improved DDI assessment during drug development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study demonstrated that flux studies in double-transfected MDCK cells and the IC50,flux represents a better approach to assess in vivo DDI potential for the renal organic cation secretion system. This study highlights the importance of inhibitor intracellular accessibility for accurate prediction of hMATE1-mediated renal DDIs. This approach has the potential to identify in vitro hMATE1 inhibitors that are unlikely to result in in vivo DDIs, thus reducing the burden of unnecessary and costly clinical DDI investigations.

Structural and molecular characterization of lopinavir and ivermectin as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) inhibitors

A current clinical challenge in cancer is multidrug resistance (MDR) mediated by ABC transporters. Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) or ABCG2 transporter is one of the most important ABC transporters implicated in MDR and the use of inhibitors is a promising approach to overcome the resistance in cancer. This study aimed to characterize the molecular mechanism of ABCG2 inhibitors identified by a repurposing drug strategy using antiviral, anti-inflammatory and antiparasitic agents. Lopinavir and ivermectin can be considered as pan-inhibitors of ABC transporters, since both compounds inhibited ABCG2, P-glycoprotein and MRP1. They inhibited ABCG2 activity showing IC50 values of 25.5 and 23.4 µM, respectively. These drugs were highly cytotoxic and not transported by ABCG2. Additionally, these drugs increased the 5D3 antibody binding and did not affect the mRNA and protein expression levels. Cell-based analysis of the type of inhibition suggested a non-competitive inhibition, which was further corroborated by in silico approaches of molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. These results showed an overlap of the lopinavir and ivermectin binding sites on ABCG2, mainly interacting with E446 residue. However, the substrate mitoxantrone occupies a different site, binding to the F436 region, closer to the L554/L555 plug. In conclusion, these results revealed the mechanistic basis of lopinavir and ivermectin interaction with ABCG2. See also the Graphical abstract(Fig. 1).

Hydroxychloroquine is Metabolized by Cytochrome P450 2D6, 3A4, and 2C8, and Inhibits Cytochrome P450 2D6, while its Metabolites also Inhibit Cytochrome P450 3A in vitro

This study aimed to explore the cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolic and inhibitory profile of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Hydroxychloroquine metabolism was studied using human liver microsomes (HLMs) and recombinant CYP enzymes. The inhibitory effects of HCQ and its metabolites on nine CYPs were also determined in HLMs, using an automated substrate cocktail method. Our metabolism data indicated that CYP3A4, CYP2D6, and CYP2C8 are the key enzymes involved in HCQ metabolism. All three CYPs formed the primary metabolites desethylchloroquine (DCQ) and desethylhydroxychloroquine (DHCQ) to various degrees. Although the intrinsic clearance (CL_int) value of HCQ depletion by recombinant CYP2D6 was > 10-fold higher than that by CYP3A4 (0.87 versus 0.075 µl/min/pmol), scaling of recombinant CYP CL_int to HLM level resulted in almost equal HLM CL_int values for CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 (11 and 14 µl/min/mg, respectively). The scaled HLM CL_int of CYP2C8 was 5.7 µl/min/mg. Data from HLM experiments with CYP-selective inhibitors also suggested relatively equal roles for CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 in HCQ metabolism, with a smaller contribution by CYP2C8. In CYP inhibition experiments, HCQ, DCQ, DHCQ, and the secondary metabolite didesethylchloroquine were direct CYP2D6 inhibitors, with 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values between 18 and 135 µM. HCQ did not inhibit other CYPs. Furthermore, all metabolites were time-dependent CYP3A inhibitors (IC₅₀ shift 2.2-3.4). To conclude, HCQ is metabolized by CYP3A4, CYP2D6, and CYP2C8 in vitro. HCQ and its metabolites are reversible CYP2D6 inhibitors, and HCQ metabolites are time-dependent CYP3A inhibitors. These data can be used to improve physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models and update drug-drug interaction risk estimations for HCQ. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: While CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP2C8 have been shown to mediate chloroquine biotransformation, it appears that the role of CYP enzymes in hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) metabolism has not been studied. In addition, little is known about the CYP inhibitory effects of HCQ. Here, we demonstrate that CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP2C8 are the key enzymes involved in HCQ metabolism. Furthermore, our findings show that HCQ and its metabolites are inhibitors of CYP2D6, which likely explains the previously observed interaction between HCQ and metoprolol.

Predicting In Vitro and In Vivo Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Activities of Antivirals by Intracellular Bioavailability and Biochemical Activity

Cellular drug response (concentration required for obtaining 50% of a maximum cellular effect, EC₅₀) can be predicted by the intracellular bioavailability (F _ic) and biochemical activity (half-maximal inhibitory concentration, IC₅₀) of drugs. In an ideal model, the cellular negative log of EC₅₀ (pEC₅₀) equals the sum of log F _ic and the negative log of IC₅₀ (pIC₅₀). Here, we measured F _ic's of remdesivir, favipiravir, and hydroxychloroquine in various cells and calculated their anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC₅₀'s. The predicted EC₅₀'s are close to the observed EC₅₀'s in vitro. When the lung concentrations of antiviral drugs are higher than the predicted EC₅₀'s in alveolar type 2 cells, the antiviral drugs inhibit virus replication in vivo, and vice versa. Overall, our results indicate that both in vitro and in vivo antiviral activities of drugs can be predicted by their intracellular bioavailability and biochemical activity without using virus. This virus-free strategy can help medicinal chemists and pharmacologists to screen antivirals during early drug discovery, especially for researchers who are not able to work in the high-level biosafety lab.

Drug-induced liver injury in COVID-19 treatment: Incidence, mechanisms and clinical management

The COVID-19 outbreak triggered a serious and potentially lethal pandemic, resulting in massive health and economic losses worldwide. The most common clinical manifestations of COVID-19 patients are pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome, with a variety of complications. Multiple organ failure and damage, ultimately leading to patient death, are possible as a result of medication combinations, and this is exemplified by DILI. We hope to summarize DILI caused by the antiviral drugs favipiravir, remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients in this review. The incidence of liver injury in the treatment of COVID-19 patients was searched on PubMed to investigate DILI cases. The cumulative prevalence of acute liver injury was 23.7% (16.1%-33.1%). We discuss the frequency of these events, potential mechanisms, and new insights into surveillance strategies. Furthermore, we also describe medication recommendations aimed at preserving DILI caused by treatment in COVID-19 patients.

Pulmonary Delivery of Aerosolized Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine to Treat COVID-19: In Vitro Experimentation to Human Dosing Predictions

In vitro screening for pharmacological activity of existing drugs showed chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine to be effective against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Oral administration of these compounds to obtain desired pulmonary exposures resulted in dose-limiting systemic toxicity in humans. However, pulmonary drug delivery enables direct and rapid administration to obtain higher local tissue concentrations in target tissue. In this work, inhalable formulations for thermal aerosolization of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine were developed, and their physicochemical properties were characterized. Thermal aerosolization of 40 mg/mL chloroquine and 100 mg/mL hydroxychloroquine formulations delivered respirable aerosol particle sizes with 0.15 and 0.33 mg per 55 mL puff, respectively. In vitro toxicity was evaluated by exposing primary human bronchial epithelial cells to aerosol generated from Vitrocell. An in vitro exposure to 7.24 μg of chloroquine or 7.99 μg hydroxychloroquine showed no significant changes in cilia beating, transepithelial electrical resistance, and cell viability. The pharmacokinetics of inhaled aerosols was predicted by developing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model that included a detailed species-specific respiratory tract physiology and lysosomal trapping. Based on the model predictions, inhaling emitted doses comprising 1.5 mg of chloroquine or 3.3 mg hydroxychloroquine three times a day may yield therapeutically effective concentrations in the lung. Inhalation of higher doses further increased effective concentrations in the lung while maintaining lower systemic concentrations. Given the theoretically favorable risk/benefit ratio, the clinical significance for pulmonary delivery of aerosolized chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 needs to be established in rigorous safety and efficacy studies.

Effect of Pantoprazole on the Absorption of Hydroxychloroquinea A Randomized Drug-Drug Interaction Trial in Healthy Adults

Hydroxychloroquine as a weak basic compound with two amines is strongly enriched in cell compartments with low pH, suggesting that modification of gastric pH by coadministered proton pump inhibitors might reduce its solubility and absorption and thus its efficacy in patients. We addressed this question in a single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel drug-drug interaction trial in healthy adults (EudraCT No. 2020-001470-30). All participants received a single oral dose of 400-mg hydroxychloroquine, and one group additionally received 40 mg of pantoprazole once daily for 9 days dosed to steady state. Whole-blood samples were collected for 72 hours, and hydroxychloroquine was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Primary endpoints were whole-blood hydroxychloroquine areas under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUC_0-72h ) and peak concentrations (C_max ). Unpaired 2-sided t-tests of the log transformed pharmacokinetic parameters were performed to compare both groups. Twenty-four participants (12 per group) were included. Hydroxychloroquine AUC_0-72h and C_max did not differ between groups without and with pantoprazole (arithmetic mean; AUC_0-72h , 7649 ng/ml • h, and 8429 ng/ml • h, P = .50; C_max , 448 ng/mL and 451.5 ng/mL, P = .96, respectively). Pantoprazole did not alter hydroxychloroquine absorption, indicating that proton pump inhibitors do not affect its bioavailability.

Disease-drug and drug-drug interaction in COVID-19: Risk and assessment

COVID-19 is announced as a global pandemic in 2020. Its mortality and morbidity rate are rapidly increasing, with limited medications. The emergent outbreak of COVID-19 prompted by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) keeps spreading. In this infection, a patient's immune response plays pivotal role in the pathogenesis. This inflammatory factor was shown by its mediators that, in severe cases, reach the cytokine at peaks. Hyperinflammatory state may sparks significant imbalances in transporters and drug metabolic machinery, and subsequent alteration of drug pharmacokinetics may result in unexpected therapeutic response. The present scenario has accounted for the requirement for therapeutic opportunities to relive and overcome this pandemic. Despite the diminishing developments of COVID-19, there is no drug still approved to have significant effects with no side effect on the treatment for COVID-19 patients. Based on the evidence, many antiviral and anti-inflammatory drugs have been authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat the COVID-19 patients even though not knowing the possible drug-drug interactions (DDI). Remdesivir, favipiravir, and molnupiravir are deemed the most hopeful antiviral agents by improving infected patient’s health. Dexamethasone is the first known steroid medicine that saved the lives of seriously ill patients. Some oligopeptides and proteins have also been using. The current review summarizes medication updates to treat COVID-19 patients in an inflammatory state and their interaction with drug transporters and drug-metabolizing enzymes. It gives an opinion on the potential DDI that may permit the individualization of these drugs, thereby enhancing the safety and efficacy.

Drugs in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: Predicting Transporter-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions Using In Vitro Assays and Real-World Data

Numerous drugs are currently under accelerated clinical investigation for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19); however, well‐established safety and efficacy data for these drugs are limited. The goal of this study was to predict the potential of 25 small molecule drugs in clinical trials for COVID‐19 to cause clinically relevant drug‐drug interactions (DDIs), which could lead to potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) with the use of concomitant medications. We focused on 11 transporters, which are targets for DDIs. In vitro potency studies in membrane vesicles or HEK293 cells expressing the transporters coupled with DDI risk assessment methods revealed that 20 of the 25 drugs met the criteria from regulatory authorities to trigger consideration of a DDI clinical trial. Analyses of real‐world data from electronic health records, including a database representing nearly 120,000 patients with COVID‐19, were consistent with several of the drugs causing transporter‐mediated DDIs (e.g., sildenafil, chloroquine, and hydroxychloroquine). This study suggests that patients with COVID‐19, who are often older and on various concomitant medications, should be carefully monitored for ADRs. Future clinical studies are needed to determine whether the drugs that are predicted to inhibit transporters at clinically relevant concentrations, actually result in DDIs.