Toward Mechanistic Design of Surrogate Buffers for Dissolution Testing of pH-Dependent Drug Delivery Systems

Exploring biorelevant conditions and release profiles of ritonavir from HPMCAS-based amorphous solid dispersions

Development of a release test for amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) that is in vivo predictive is essential to identify optimally performing formulations early in development. For ASDs containing an enteric polymer, consideration of buffer properties is essential. Herein, release rates of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS) and ritonavir from ASDs with a 20% drug loading were compared in phosphate and bicarbonate buffers with different molarities, at pH 6.5. The bioaccessibility of ritonavir from the ASD in the tiny-TIM apparatus was also evaluated and compared to that of the crystalline drug. The surface pH at the dissolving solid: solution interface was evaluated using a pH-sensitive fluorescence probe for HPMCAS and ASD compacts in phosphate and bicarbonate buffers. Drug and polymer were found to release congruently in all buffer systems, indicating that the polymer controlled the drug release. Release was slowest in 10 mM bicarbonate buffer, and much faster in phosphate buffers with molarities typically used in release testing (20-50 mM). Release from the 10 mM bicarbonate buffer was matched in a 5 mM phosphate buffer. The surface pH of HPMCAS and HPMCAS:ritonavir ASDs was found to be lower than the bulk solution pH, where surface pH differences largely explained release rate differences seen in the different buffer systems. Ritonavir was highly bioaccessible from the ASD, as assessed by the tiny-TIM system, and much less bioaccessible when crystalline drug was used. The observations highlight the need for continued development of biorelevant assays tailored for ASD formulation assessment.

Modeling and Simulations in Latin-American Generic Markets: Perspectives from Chilean Local Industry, Regulatory Agency, and Academia

In the last 20 years, modeling and simulations (M&S) have gained increased attention in pharmaceutical sciences. International industry and world-reference agencies have used M&S to make cost-efficient decisions through the model-informed drug development (MIDD) framework. Modeling tools include biopredictive dissolution models, physiologically based pharmacokinetic models (PBPK), biopharmaceutic models (PBBM), and virtual bioequivalence, among many others. Regulatorily, health agencies are becoming more and more open to accept the use of M&S to support regulatory applications, including setting dissolution specifications, quality-by-design (QbD), postapproval changes (SUPAC), etc. Nonetheless, the potential of M&S has been only barely explored in Latin America (Latam) across different actors: industry, regulatory agencies, and even academia. In this manuscript, we discuss the challenges and opportunities for implementing M&S approaches in Latam. Perspectives of regional experts were shared in a workshop. Attendance (professionals from industry, regulator, academia, and clinicians) also shared their views via survey. The rational development of bioequivalent generics was considered the main opportunity for M&S in regional market, particularly the use of PBPK and PBBM. Nonetheless, a critical mass of modeling scientists is needed before Latin American industry and regulators can actually benefit from M&S. Collaborations (e.g., Academia-Industry and Academia-Regulatory) may be a path to develop applied research projects and train the future modelers. Reaching that critical mass, scientists from industry may apply modeling across generic drug development process and life cycle, while regulatory scientists may issue guidelines in local language to support regional industry. Only at that stage could the full potential of MIDD be reached in Latin American generic markets.

Solubility vs Dissolution in Physiological Bicarbonate Buffer

BACKGROUND

Phosphate buffer is often used as a replacement for the physiological bicarbonate buffer in pharmaceutical dissolution testing, although there are some discrepancies in their properties making it complicated to extrapolate dissolution results in phosphate to the in vivo situation. This study aims to characterize these discrepancies regarding solubility and dissolution behavior of ionizable compounds.

METHODS

The dissolution of an ibuprofen powder with a known particle size distribution was simulated in silico and verified experimentally in vitro at two different doses and in two different buffers (5 mM pH 6.8 bicarbonate and phosphate).

RESULTS

The results showed that there is a solubility vs. dissolution mismatch in the two buffers. This was accurately predicted by the in-house simulations based on the reversible non-equilibrium (RNE) and the Mooney models.

CONCLUSIONS

The results can be explained by the existence of a relatively large gap between the initial surface pH of the drug and the bulk pH at saturation in bicarbonate but not in phosphate, which is caused by not all the interfacial reactions reaching equilibrium in bicarbonate prior to bulk saturation. This means that slurry pH measurements, while providing surface pH estimates for buffers like phosphate, are poor indicators of surface pH in the intestinal bicarbonate buffer. In addition, it showcases the importance of accounting for the H2CO3-CO2 interconversion kinetics to achieve good predictions of intestinal drug dissolution.

Does Media Choice Matter When Evaluating the Performance of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Acetate Succinate-Based Amorphous Solid Dispersions?

Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS) is a weakly acidic polymer that is widely used in the formulation of amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs). While the pH-dependent solubility of HPMCAS is widely recognized, the role of other solution properties, including buffer capacity, is less well understood in the context of ASD dissolution. The goal of this study was to elucidate the rate-limiting steps for drug and HPMCAS release from ASDs formulated with two poorly water soluble model drugs, indomethacin and indomethacin methyl ester. The surface area normalized release rate of the drug and/or polymer in a variety of media was determined. The HPMCAS gel layer apparent pH was determined by incorporating pH sensitive dyes into the polymer matrix. Water uptake extent and rate into the ASDs were measured gravimetrically. For neat HPMCAS, the rate-limiting step for polymer dissolution was observed to be the polymer solubility at the polymer-solution interface. This, in turn, was impacted by the gel layer pH which was found to be substantially lower than the bulk solution pH, varying with medium buffer capacity. For the ASDs, the HPMCAS release rate was found to control the drug release rate. However, both drugs reduced the polymer release rate with indomethacin methyl ester having a larger impact. In low buffer capacity media, the presence of the drug had less impact on release rates when compared to observations in higher strength buffers, suggesting changes in the rate-limiting steps for HPMCAS dissolution. The observations made in this study can contribute to the fundamental understanding of acidic polymer dissolution in the presence and absence of a molecularly dispersed lipophilic drug and will help aid in the design of more in vivo relevant release testing experiments.

Dissolution Profiles of Poorly Soluble Drug Salts in Bicarbonate Buffer

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of buffer species on the dissolution profiles of poorly soluble drug salts, focusing on bicarbonate buffer (BCB).

METHODS

Pioglitazone HCl (PIO HCl) and dantrolene sodium (DNT Na) were used as model drugs. Non-sink dissolution tests were performed using phosphate buffer (PB) and BCB (pH 6.5, buffer capacity: 4.4 mM/pH, ionic strength: 0.14 M, with/ without bile micelles). The pH value of BCB was maintained using a floating lid that avoided the loss of CO₂. The particles collected at the early stage of dissolution (< 5 min) were analyzed by powder X-ray diffraction, polarized light microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. A bulk-phase pH shift precipitation test was also performed.

RESULTS

The dissolution of PIO HCl was slower in BCB than in PB, whereas that of DNT Na was faster in BCB than in PB. The same trend was observed in the presence of bile micelles. Free-form precipitation on the surface of salt particles was observed early in their dissolution in both BCB and PB. However, the surface textures in BCB and PB were different. The bulk-phase precipitation of PIO was little affected by buffer species, whereas that of DNT was affected, but oppositely to the dissolution profile.

CONCLUSION

The dissolution profiles of PIO HCl and DNT Na in BCB were markedly different from those in PB. Free-form precipitation on the particle surface, rather than in the bulk phase, was affected by buffer species in the dissolution test.

In Vitro Methodologies for Evaluating Colon-Targeted Pharmaceutical Products and Industry Perspectives for Their Applications

Several locally acting colon-targeted products to treat colonic diseases have been recently developed and marketed, taking advantage of gastrointestinal physiology to target delivery. Main mechanisms involve pH-dependent, time-controlled and/or enzymatic-triggered release. With site of action located before systemic circulation and troublesome colonic sampling, there is room for the introduction of meaningful in vitro methods for development, quality control (QC) and regulatory applications of these formulations. A one-size-fits-all method seems unrealistic, as the selection of experimental conditions should resemble the physiological features exploited to trigger the release. This article reviews the state of the art for bio-predictive dissolution testing of colon-targeted products. Compendial methods overlook physiological aspects, such as buffer molarity and fluid composition. These are critical for pH-dependent products and time-controlled systems containing ionizable drugs. Moreover, meaningful methods for enzymatic-triggered products including either bacteria or enzymes are completely ignored by pharmacopeias. Bio-predictive testing may accelerate the development of successful products, although this may require complex methodologies. However, for high-throughput routine testing (e.g., QC), simplified methods can be used where balance is struck between simplicity, robustness and transferability on one side and bio-predictivity on the other. Ultimately, bio-predictive methods can occupy a special niche in terms of supplementing plasma concentration data for regulatory approval.