The Positive and Negative Outcome of Morphine and Disulfiram Subacute Co-Administration in Rats in the Absence of Ethanol Challenge

Inhibition of GSDMD-dependent pyroptosis decreased methamphetamine self-administration in rats

It is widely believed that the activation of the central dopamine (DA) system is crucial to the rewarding effects of methamphetamine (METH) and to the behavioral outcomes of METH use disorder. It was reported that METH exposure induced gasdermin D (GSDMD)-dependent pyroptosis in rats. The membrane pore formation caused by METH-induced pyroptosis may also contribute to the overflow of DA into the extracellular space and subsequently increase the DA levels in the brain. The present study firstly investigated whether the membrane pore information induced by GSDMD-dependent pyroptosis was associated with the increased DA levels in the ventral tegmental area (VAT) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) of rats self-administering METH and SY-SH5Y cells treated by METH. Subsequently, the effect of pore formation blockade or genetic inhibition of GSDMD on the reinforcing and motivational effect of METH was determined in rats, using the animal model of METH self-administration (SA). METH exposure significantly increased the activity of NLRP1/Cas-1/GSDMD pathway and the presence of pyroptosis, accompanied by the significantly increased DA levels in VTA and NAc. Moreover, intraperitoneal injections of disulfiram (DSF) or microinjection of rAAV-shGSDMD into VTA/NAc significantly reduced the reinforcing and motivational effect of METH, accompanied by the decreased level of DA in VTA and NAc. The results provided novel evidence that METH-induced pyroptosis could increase DA release in VTA and NAc via the NLRP1/Cas-1/GSDMD pathway. Additionally, membrane pores or GSDMD blockade could significantly reduce the reinforcing and motivational effect of METH. In conclusion, blocking GSDMD and membrane pore formation could be a promising potential target for the development of agents to treat METH use disorder.

Drug repurposing for cancer

In the dynamic landscape of cancer therapeutics, the innovative strategy of drug repurposing emerges as a transformative paradigm, heralding a new era in the fight against malignancies. This book chapter aims to embark on the comprehension of the strategic deployment of approved drugs for repurposing and the meticulous journey of drug repurposing from earlier times to the current era. Moreover, the chapter underscores the multifaceted and complex nature of cancer biology, and the evolving field of cancer drug therapeutics while emphasizing the mandate of drug repurposing to advance cancer therapeutics. Importantly, the narrative explores the latest tools, technologies, and cutting-edge methodologies including high-throughput screening, omics technologies, and artificial intelligence-driven approaches, for shaping and accelerating the pace of drug repurposing to uncover novel cancer therapeutic avenues. The chapter critically assesses the breakthroughs, expanding the repertoire of repurposing drug candidates in cancer, and their major categories. Another focal point of this book chapter is that it addresses the emergence of combination therapies involving repurposed drugs, reflecting a shift towards personalized and synergistic treatment approaches. The expert analysis delves into the intricacies of combinatorial regimens, elucidating their potential to target heterogeneous cancer populations and overcome resistance mechanisms, thereby enhancing treatment efficacy. Therefore, this chapter provides in-depth insights into the potential of repurposing towards bringing the much-needed big leap in the field of cancer therapeutics.

Treatment with dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH) inhibitors prevents morphine use and relapse-like behavior in rats

Background

Opioid use disorders are serious contributors to the harms associated with the drug use. Unfortunately, therapeutic interventions for opioid addicts after detoxification have been limited and not sufficiently effective. Recently, several studies have led to promising results with disulfiram (DSF), a dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH) inhibitor, showing that it is a potent agent against not only alcohol but also addiction to various drugs.

Materials and methods

This study was designed to examine whether DSF and nepicastat (NEP; another DBH inhibitor) modify morphine intake and reinstatement of seeking-behavior using the rat model of intravenous morphine self-administration. Additionally, we intended to estimate the effects of both inhibitors on the locomotor activity as well as on extracellular dopamine and its metabolite levels in the nucleus accumbens using microdialysis in naive rats.

Results

We demonstrated that both DBH inhibitors reduced responding to morphine self-administration. Moreover, DSF and NEP administered acutely before reinstatement test sessions consistently attenuated the reinforcing effects of morphine and a morphine-associated conditioned cue. The observed effects for lower doses (6.25–25 mg/kg; ip) of both DBH inhibitors seem to be independent of locomotor activity reduction and dopamine level in the nucleus accumbens. Neither DSF nor NEP administered daily during morphine abstinence with extinction training sessions had any effect on active lever-responding and changed the reinstatement induced by morphine priming doses. Reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior induced by a conditioned cue previously associated with morphine delivery was attenuated following repeated administration of DSF or NEP during the abstinence period.

Conclusion

These results seem to point to the significance  of DBH inhibition as a potential pharmacotherapy against morphine use disorders.

Graphic abstract

Advantages and disadvantages of disulfiram coadministered with popular addictive substances

Disulfiram (DSF) is a well-known anti-alcohol agent that inhibits aldehyde dehydrogenase and results in extreme 'hangover' symptoms when consumed with alcohol. This drug, however, has been suggested as useful in other forms of drug addiction due to its beneficial potential in both drug abuse reduction and withdrawal. However, among other drugs used in alcohol dependence, it carries the greatest risk of pharmacological interactions. Concomitant use of DSF and central nervous system stimulants usually leads to harmful, undesirable effects. To date, there is still limited data regarding the detailed safety profile of DSF as a concomitant drug. In this review article, we outline the current state of knowledge about DSF, its broad pharmacological action, as well as therapeutic effects, with a particular emphasis on the molecular understanding of its potential pharmacodynamic interactions with common addictive substances (e.g., alcohol, cocaine, cannabinoids, opioids) supported by relevant examples.

Disulfiram Abrogates Morphine Tolerance-A Possible Role of µ-Opioid Receptor-Related G-Protein Activation in the Striatum

One of the key strategies for effective pain management involves delaying analgesic tolerance. Early clinical reports indicate an extraordinary effectiveness of off-label disulfiram-an agent designed for alcohol use disorder-in potentiating opioid analgesia and abrogation of tolerance. Our study aimed to determine whether sustained µ-opioid signaling upon disulfiram exposure contributes to these phenomena. Wistar rats were exposed to acute and chronic disulfiram and morphine cotreatment. Nociceptive thresholds were assessed with the mechanical Randal-Selitto and thermal tail-flick tests. µ-opioid receptor activation in brain structures important for pain processing was carried out with the [35S]GTPγS assay. The results suggest that disulfiram (12.5-50 mg/kg i.g.) augmented morphine antinociception and diminished morphine (25 mg/kg, i.g.) tolerance in a supraspinal, opioid-dependent manner. Disulfiram (25 mg/kg, i.g.) induced a transient enhancement of µ-opioid receptor activation in the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), hypothalamus, prefrontal cortex and the dorsal striatum at day 1 of morphine treatment. Disulfiram rescued µ-opioid receptor signaling in the nucleus accumbens and caudate-putamen 14 days following morphine and disulfiram cotreatment. The results of this study suggest that striatal µ-opioid receptors may contribute to the abolition of morphine tolerance following concomitant treatment with disulfiram.