Floral Homeotic Factors: A Question of Specificity

Uncoupling FRUITFULL's functions through modification of a protein motif identified by co-ortholog analysis

Many plant transcription factors (TFs) are multifunctional and regulate growth and development in more than one tissue. These TFs can generally associate with different protein partners depending on the tissue type, thereby regulating tissue-specific target gene sets. However, how interaction specificity is ensured is still largely unclear. Here, we examine protein-protein interaction specificity using subfunctionalized co-orthologs of the FRUITFULL (FUL) subfamily of MADS-domain TFs. In Arabidopsis, FUL is multifunctional, playing important roles in flowering and fruiting, whereas these functions have partially been divided in the tomato co-orthologs FUL1 and FUL2. By linking protein sequence and function, we discovered a key amino acid motif that determines interaction specificity of MADS-domain TFs, which in Arabidopsis FUL determines the interaction with AGAMOUS and SEPALLATA proteins, linked to the regulation of a subset of targets. This insight offers great opportunities to dissect the biological functions of multifunctional MADS TFs.

'Organ'ising Floral Organ Development

Flowers are plant structures characteristic of the phylum Angiosperms composed of organs thought to have emerged from homologous structures to leaves in order to specialize in a distinctive function: reproduction. Symmetric shapes, colours, and scents all play important functional roles in flower biology. The evolution of flower symmetry and the morphology of individual flower parts (sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels) has significantly contributed to the diversity of reproductive strategies across flowering plant species. This diversity facilitates attractiveness for pollination, protection of gametes, efficient fertilization, and seed production. Symmetry, the establishment of body axes, and fate determination are tightly linked. The complex genetic networks underlying the establishment of organ, tissue, and cellular identity, as well as the growth regulators acting across the body axes, are steadily being elucidated in the field. In this review, we summarise the wealth of research already at our fingertips to begin weaving together how separate processes involved in specifying organ identity within the flower may interact, providing a functional perspective on how identity determination and axial regulation may be coordinated to inform symmetrical floral organ structures.

Reflections on the ABC model of flower development

The formulation of the ABC model by a handful of pioneer plant developmental geneticists was a seminal event in the quest to answer a seemingly simple question: how are flowers formed? Fast forward 30 years and this elegant model has generated a vibrant and diverse community, capturing the imagination of developmental and evolutionary biologists, structuralists, biochemists and molecular biologists alike. Together they have managed to solve many floral mysteries, uncovering the regulatory processes that generate the characteristic spatio-temporal expression patterns of floral homeotic genes, elucidating some of the mechanisms allowing ABC genes to specify distinct organ identities, revealing how evolution tinkers with the ABC to generate morphological diversity, and even shining a light on the origins of the floral gene regulatory network itself. Here we retrace the history of the ABC model, from its genesis to its current form, highlighting specific milestones along the way before drawing attention to some of the unsolved riddles still hidden in the floral alphabet.

Perenniality: From model plants to applications in agriculture

To compensate for their sessile nature, plants have evolved sophisticated mechanisms enabling them to adapt to ever-changing environments. One such prominent feature is the evolution of diverse life history strategies, particularly such that annuals reproduce once followed by seasonal death, while perennials live longer by cycling growth seasonally. This intrinsic phenology is primarily genetic and can be altered by environmental factors. Although evolutionary transitions between annual and perennial life history strategies are common, perennials account for most species in nature because they survive well under year-round stresses. This proportion, however, is reversed in agriculture. Hence, perennial crops promise to likewise protect and enhance the resilience of agricultural ecosystems in response to climate change. Despite significant endeavors that have been made to generate perennial crops, progress is slow because of barriers in studying perennials, and many developed species await further improvement. Recent findings in model species have illustrated that simply rewiring existing genetic networks can lead to lifestyle variation. This implies that engineering plant life history strategy can be achieved by manipulating only a few key genes. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of genetic basis of perenniality and discuss major questions and challenges that remain to be addressed.

Old school, new rules: floral meristem development revealed by 3D gene expression atlases and high-resolution transcription factor-chromatin dynamics

The intricate morphology of the flower is primarily established within floral meristems in which floral organs will be defined and from where the developing flower will emerge. Floral meristem development involves multiscale-level regulation, including lineage and positional mechanisms for establishing cell-type identity, and transcriptional regulation mediated by changes in the chromatin environment. However, many key aspects of floral meristem development remain to be determined, such as: 1) the exact role of cellular location in connecting transcriptional inputs to morphological outcomes, and 2) the precise interactions between transcription factors and chromatin regulators underlying the transcriptional networks that regulate the transition from cell proliferation to differentiation during floral meristem development. Here, we highlight recent studies addressing these points through newly developed spatial reconstruction techniques and high-resolution transcription factor-chromatin environment interactions in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Specifically, we feature studies that reconstructed 3D gene expression atlases of the floral meristem. We also discuss how the precise timing of floral meristem specification, floral organ patterning, and floral meristem termination is determined through temporally defined epigenetic dynamics for fine-tuning of gene expression. These studies offer fresh insights into the well-established principles of floral meristem development and outline the potential for further advances in this field in an age of integrated, powerful, multiscale resolution approaches.

What a tangled web it weaves: auxin coordination of stem cell maintenance and flower production

Robust agricultural yields require consistent flower production throughout fluctuating environmental conditions. Floral primordia are produced in the inflorescence meristem, which contains a pool of continuously dividing stem cells. Daughter cells of these divisions either retain stem cell identity or are pushed to the SAM periphery, where they become competent to develop into floral primordia after receiving the appropriate signal. Thus, flower production is inherently linked to regulation of the stem cell pool. The plant hormone auxin promotes flower development throughout its early phases and has been shown to interact with the molecular pathways regulating stem cell maintenance. Here, we will summarize how auxin signaling contributes to stem cell maintenance and promotes flower development through the early phases of initiation, outgrowth, and floral fate establishment. Recent advances in this area suggest that auxin may serve as a signal that integrates stem cell maintenance and new flower production.

Cracking the Floral Quartet Code: How Do Multimers of MIKCC-Type MADS-Domain Transcription Factors Recognize Their Target Genes?

MADS-domain transcription factors (MTFs) are involved in the control of many important processes in eukaryotes. They are defined by the presence of a unique and highly conserved DNA-binding domain, the MADS domain. MTFs bind to double-stranded DNA as dimers and recognize specific sequences termed CArG boxes (such as 5'-CC(A/T)6GG-3') and similar sequences that occur hundreds of thousands of times in a typical flowering plant genome. The number of MTF-encoding genes increased by around two orders of magnitude during land plant evolution, resulting in roughly 100 genes in flowering plant genomes. This raises the question as to how dozens of different but highly similar MTFs accurately recognize the cis-regulatory elements of diverse target genes when the core binding sequence (CArG box) occurs at such a high frequency. Besides the usual processes, such as the base and shape readout of individual DNA sequences by dimers of MTFs, an important sublineage of MTFs in plants, termed MIKCC-type MTFs (MC-MTFs), has evolved an additional mechanism to increase the accurate recognition of target genes: the formation of heterotetramers of closely related proteins that bind to two CArG boxes on the same DNA strand involving DNA looping. MC-MTFs control important developmental processes in flowering plants, ranging from root and shoot to flower, fruit and seed development. The way in which MC-MTFs bind to DNA and select their target genes is hence not only of high biological interest, but also of great agronomic and economic importance. In this article, we review the interplay of the different mechanisms of target gene recognition, from the ordinary (base readout) via the extravagant (shape readout) to the idiosyncratic (recognition of the distance and orientation of two CArG boxes by heterotetramers of MC-MTFs). A special focus of our review is on the structural prerequisites of MC-MTFs that enable the specific recognition of target genes.