1
|
Andrade G, AboHamza E, Elsantil Y, Ayoub A, Bedewy D. Moral approval of xenotransplantation in Egypt: associations with religion, attitudes towards animals and demographic factors. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:19. [PMID: 38373945 PMCID: PMC10877808 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01013-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Xenotransplantation has great potential as an alternative to alleviate the shortage of organs for donation. However, given that the animal most suited for xenotransplantation is the pig, there are concerns that people in Muslim countries may be more hesitant to morally approve of these procedures. In this study, the moral approval of xenotransplantation was assessed in a group of 895 participants in Egypt. The results showed that religiosity itself does not predict moral approval of xenotransplantation, but religious identity does, as Muslims are less likely to approve of xenotransplantation than Christians. However, the strongest predictor of moral approval of xenotransplantation was gender, with women displaying less approval. A partial mediating factor in this association was concern for animal welfare. Based on these results, some implications for public policy are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eid AboHamza
- Al Ain University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
- Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | | | - AlaaEldin Ayoub
- Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain
- Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt
| | - Dalia Bedewy
- Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
- Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Safadi R. The liver in Greco-Arabic and Islamic medicine. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2024; 23:e0137. [PMID: 38576470 PMCID: PMC10994509 DOI: 10.1097/cld.0000000000000137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
|
3
|
Walton P, Pérez-Blanco A, Beed S, Glazier A, Ferreira Salomao Pontes D, Kingdon J, Jordison K, Weiss MJ. Organ and Tissue Donation Consent Model and Intent to Donate Registries: Recommendations From an International Consensus Forum. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1416. [PMID: 37138558 PMCID: PMC10150845 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Consent model and intent to donate registries are often the most public facing aspects of an organ and tissue donation and transplantation (OTDT) system. This article describes the output of an international consensus forum designed to give guidance to stakeholders considering reform of these aspects of their system. Methods This Forum was initiated by Transplant Québec and cohosted by the Canadian Donation and Transplantation Program partnered with multiple national and international donation and transplantation organizations. This article describes the output of the consent and registries domain working group, which is 1 of 7 domains from this Forum. The domain working group members included administrative, clinical, and academic experts in deceased donation consent models in addition to 2 patient, family, and donor partners. Topic identification and recommendation consensus was completed over a series of virtual meetings from March to September 2021. Consensus was achieved by applying the nominal group technique informed by literature reviews performed by working group members. Results Eleven recommendations were generated and divided into 3 topic groupings: consent model, intent to donate registry structure, and consent model change management. The recommendations emphasized the need to adapt all 3 elements to the legal, societal, and economic realities of the jurisdiction of the OTDT system. The recommendations stress the importance of consistency within the system to ensure that societal values such as autonomy and social cohesion are applied through all levels of the consent process. Conclusions We did not recommend one consent model as universally superior to others, although considerations of factors that contribute to the successful deployment of consent models were discussed in detail. We also include recommendations on how to navigate changes in the consent model in a way that preserves an OTDT system's most valuable resource: public trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phil Walton
- Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation, NHS Blood and Transplant, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Jennifer Kingdon
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Kim Jordison
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Matthew J. Weiss
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Transplant Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Mère-Enfant Soleil du CHU de Québec, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sáenz RH. An Interpretive Approach to Religious Ambiguities around Medical Innovations: The Spanish Catholic Church on Organ Donation and Transplantation (1954-2014). QUALITATIVE SOCIOLOGY 2022; 46:77-108. [PMID: 36530796 PMCID: PMC9734823 DOI: 10.1007/s11133-022-09525-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
How do institutionalized religions solve moral ambiguities around controversial medical innovations and public health issues? Most religions have moral guidelines about what can and cannot be done to people's bodies, but these guidelines are not always straightforward and, when faced with certain scientific advances, can come into contradiction with other doctrinal principles. I address this theoretical puzzle through the empirical case of the Spanish Catholic Church's discourse on organ donation and transplantation during the second half of the twentieth century. Drawing on an interpretive analysis of official statements by the Spanish Catholic Church, and of the media coverage of the religious debate over organ donation and transplantation in Spain from 1954 onwards, I show that the first experiments in organ transplantation faced the Church with a contradiction between its altruistic teachings and its beliefs in the sacredness of human life. Faced with an interpretive dilemma, the Church produced a context-specific version of its official doctrine friendly to organ donation and transplantation. It did so by activating its altruistic elements and suppressing sacralized meanings of the body, thus aligning organ donation with Catholic values of generosity and fraternal love. My study theorizes this moral alignment as a semantic overlap realized through historically situated institutional discourse. Additionally, it incorporates 24 primary and secondary sources on comparative cases to propose three facilitating factors that enabled and encouraged the Spanish Catholic Church to embrace a controversial medical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebeca Herrero Sáenz
- Molloy University, 312 Kellenberg Hall 1000 Hempstead Avenue, NY 11570 Rockville Centre, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Padela AI, Titi M, Keval A, Abdelrahim MT. Muslims, Islam, and Organ Donation: Righting Social Narratives and Designing Ethically Balanced Educational Interventions. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2022; 20:885-894. [DOI: 10.6002/ect.2022.0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
6
|
Siraj MS. How a compensated kidney donation program facilitates the sale of human organs in a regulated market: the implications of Islam on organ donation and sale. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2022; 17:10. [PMID: 35897010 PMCID: PMC9331153 DOI: 10.1186/s13010-022-00122-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advocates for a regulated system to facilitate kidney donation between unrelated donor-recipient pairs argue that monetary compensation encourages people to donate vital organs that save the lives of patients with end-stage organ failure. Scholars support compensating donors as a form of reciprocity. This study aims to assess the compensation system for the unrelated kidney donation program in the Islamic Republic of Iran, with a particular focus on the implications of Islam on organ donation and organ sales. METHODS This study reviews secondary documents for philosophical argumentation and ethical analysis of human organ donation and sale for transplantation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION According to Islamic law, organ donation is an act of sadaqatul jariyah, and individuals are permitted to donate organs with the intention of saving lives. The commercialization of humans as organ sellers and buyers is contrary to the Islamic legal maxim eethaar, undermining donors of 'selfless' or 'altruistic' motivations. Such an act should be considered immoral, and the practice should not be introduced into other countries for the sake of protecting human dignity, integrity, solidarity, and respect. I, therefore, argue that Iran's unrelated kidney donation program not only disregards the position of the Islamic religion with respect to the provision or receipt of monetary benefits for human kidneys for transplantation but that it also misinterprets the Islamic legal proscription of the sale of human organs. I also argue that the implementation of Iran's unrelated kidney donor transplantation program is unethical and immoral in that potential donors and recipients engage in a bargaining process akin to that which sellers and buyers regularly face in regulated commodity exchange markets. Conversely, I suggest that a modest fixed monetary remuneration as a gift be provided to a donor as a reward for their altruistic organ donation, which is permissible by Islamic scholars. This may remove the need to bargain for increased or decreased values of payment in exchange for the organ, as well as the transactional nature of 'buyer and seller', ensuring the philosophy of 'donor and recipient' is maintained. CONCLUSIONS Offering a fixed modest monetary incentive to organ donors would serve to increase organ supply while protecting donors' health and reducing human suffering without legalizing the human organ trade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md Sanwar Siraj
- Department of Government and Politics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Introduction to Special Issue: Organ Transplantation in Islam: Perspectives and Challenges. RELIGIONS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/rel13030200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
It has been suggested that tissue and organ transplantation, as a surgical procedure to restore lost or mutilated body parts, is a centuries-old practice confirmed in an ancient Sanskrit text on medicine and surgery called the Sushruta Samhita in circa 600 B [...]
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
From a medical perspective, as well as an ordinary human perspective, organ transplantation is often understood as a process through which health is restored to sick humans and, consequently, their quality of life improved. Organ transplantation is a medical surgical procedure carried out by an expert or a team of experts who remove a failing or diseased organ or organs from the human body and replace it or them with a functioning organ or organs. With such positive portrayal of the process, organ transplantation is highly recommended and encouraged in modern medicine. However, in Islam, the Qur’an and hadiths—the two great texts of the religion—are silent on the subject. In other words, there is no discussion of the subject in the texts and, therefore, it is not clear whether organ transplantation is permissible or not in Islam. Thus, is organ transplantation an accepted modality of treatment that eliminates the patient’s agony from end-stage organ failure, remains an open-ended question. Whilst some Muslim scholars and jurists argue in favour of organ donation and transplantation, there are others who reject the practice as a breach of shari’ah. This paper posits that the subject of organ donation and transplantation in Islam is an unresolved matter without a ubiquitous consensus. The purpose of the paper is to educate the readers about the two key perspectives on the subject, and highlight that more research and a robust academic and sociological debate are needed to resolve the question of organ donation and transplantation in Islam.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rodger D. Why we should stop using animal-derived products on patients without their consent. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2021; 48:medethics-2021-107371. [PMID: 34103364 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Medicines and medical devices containing animal-derived ingredients are frequently used on patients without their informed consent, despite a significant proportion of patients wanting to know if an animal-derived product is going to be used in their care. Here, I outline three arguments for why this practice is wrong. First, I argue that using animal-derived medical products on patients without their informed consent undermines respect for their autonomy. Second, it risks causing nontrivial psychological harm. Third, it is morally inconsistent to respect patients' dietary preferences and then use animal-derived medicines or medical devices on them without their informed consent. I then address several anticipated objections and conclude that the continued failure to address this issue is an ethical blind spot that warrants applying the principles of respect for autonomy and informed consent consistently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Rodger
- Institute of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, School of Allied and Community Health, London SE1 0AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Etheredge HR. Assessing Global Organ Donation Policies: Opt-In vs Opt-Out. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2021; 14:1985-1998. [PMID: 34012308 PMCID: PMC8128443 DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s270234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper argues that there is little difference between opt-in and opt-out organ donation systems for increasing donor numbers when used in isolation. Independently diverting to an opt-out system confers no obvious advantage and can harm efforts to bolster donations. Rather, it is essential to address barriers to organ donation on several levels along with a switch in system. Moreover, for many countries, it may be more beneficial to adequately capacitate the donation system already in place, rather than entertain a significant change with its attendant resource requirements. For decades, the international transplant community has been involved in vigorous debate as to the merits of moving from default opt-in systems to opt-out policies to grow organ donor numbers and better meet the ever-increasing demand for lifesaving transplants. Opt-out is certainly en vogue, with Wales, England and Nova Scotia recently switching over, Scotland due to become opt-out in March 2021 and Northern Ireland and Canada seriously considering a similar move. Thanks to several countries making the switch from opt-in to opt-out over the last 20-30 years, there are sets of robust longitudinal data that aid in analysing the efficacy of donation systems. However, these data are often contradictory and largely inconclusive, suggesting other factors may be in play. This paper reviews some emerging trends in opt-in versus opt-out organ donation policies and considers recent data that elucidates some of the main contentions across each. Ethical frameworks underpinning donation systems, such as informed consent, trust and transparency, are discussed in detail. Substantial time is also devoted to opt-in vs opt-out systems in developing countries, which tend to be excluded from many analyses, and where the challenges faced are magnified by socio-economic constraints. This constitutes a major gap in recently published literature, as developing countries often lag far behind their developed counterparts in donor and transplant numbers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet Rosanne Etheredge
- Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Steve Biko Centre for Bioethics, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Padela AI, Duivenbode R, Quinn M, Saunders MR. Informing American Muslims about living donation through tailored health education: A randomized controlled crossover trial evaluating increase in biomedical and religious knowledge. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1227-1237. [PMID: 32772460 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Biomedical and religious knowledge affects organ donation attitudes among Muslims. We tested the effectiveness of mosque-based, religiously tailored, ethically balanced education on organ donation among Muslim Americans. Our randomized, controlled, crossover trial took place at 4 mosques randomized to an early arm where organ donation education preceded a control educational workshop or a late arm with the order reversed. Primary outcomes were changes in biomedical (Rotterdam Renal Replacement Knowledge Test living donation subscale, R3KT) and religious (Islamic Knowledge of Living Organ Donation, IK-LOD) living kidney donation knowledge. Statistical analysis employed a 2 (Treatment Arm) X 3 (Time of Assessment) mixed-method analysis of variance. Of 158 participants, 59 were in the early arm and 99 in the late arm. A between group t test comparison at Period 1 (Time 1 - Time 2), demonstrated that the early arm had a significantly higher mean IK-LOD (7.11 v 5.19, P < .05) and R3KT scores (7.65 v 4.90, P < .05) when compared to the late arm. Late arm participants also had significant increases in mean IK-LOD (5.19 v 7.16, P < .05) and R3KT scores (4.90 v. 6.81, P < .05) postintervention (Time 2-Time 3). Our novel program thus yielded significant kidney donation-related knowledge gains among Muslim Americans (NCT04443114 Clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aasim I Padela
- Initiative on Islam and Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rosie Duivenbode
- Initiative on Islam and Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Quinn
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Milda R Saunders
- MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
British Muslims Caught Amidst FOGs—A Discourse Analysis of Religious Advice and Authority. RELIGIONS 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/rel12020140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This paper discusses the symbolic capital found within Islamic documents that were circulated in the UK during the COVID-19 outbreak. Specifically, the work explores “fatwas” and “other” similar documents as well as “guidance” documents (referred to as FOGs) that were disseminated in March–April 2020 on the internet and social media platforms for British Muslim consumption. We confine our materials to FOGs produced only in English. Our study takes its cue from the notion that the existence of a variety of documents created a sense of foggy ambiguity for British Muslims in matters of religious practice. From a linguistic angle, the study seeks to identify (a) the underlying reasons behind the titling of the documents; and (b) the construction of discourses in the documents. Our corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis (CA-CDA) found noticeable patterns that hold symbolic capital in the fatwa register. We also found that producers of “other” documents imitate the fatwa register in an attempt to strengthen the symbolic capital of their documents. Accordingly, fatwas act as the most authoritative documents in religious matters and are written by senior religious representatives of the Muslim community, whereas guidance documents were found to be most authoritative in health matters. The findings raise questions regarding the manner in which religious instruction may be disseminated in emergency situations. Based on this study, a call for the standardisation and unification of these diverse and sometimes contradicting religious publications may be worth considering.
Collapse
|
13
|
Metwally AM, Abdel-Latif GA, Eletreby L, Aboulghate A, Mohsen A, Amer HA, Saleh RM, Elmosalami DM, Salama HI, Abd El Hady SI, Alam RR, Mohamed HA, Badran HM, Eltokhy HE, Elhariri H, Rabah T, Abdelrahman M, Ibrahim NA, Chami N. Egyptians' social acceptance and consenting options for posthumous organ donation; a cross sectional study. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:49. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00490-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Organ donation has become one of the most effective ways to save lives and improve the quality of life for patients with end-stage organ failure. No previous studies have investigated the preferences for the different consenting options for organ donation in Egypt. This study aims to assess Egyptians’ preferences regarding consenting options for posthumous organ donation, and measure their awareness and acceptance of the Egyptian law articles regulating organ donation.
Methods
A cross sectional study was conducted among 2743 participants over two years. Each participant was required to rank eleven consenting options from 1 (most preferred) to 11 (least preferred), and to report his awareness and acceptance of the seven articles of the Egyptian law of organ donation.
Results
47% of the participants expressed willingness to donate their organs after death. This percentage increased to 78% when consenting options were explained to participants. “Informed consent by donor only” was the most preferred type of consent for one third of respondents. Awareness of the law articles regulating organ donation was relatively low ranging from 56% to 23%.
Conclusion
Currently, around half of the Egyptian population agree to posthumous organ donation. This percentage could be increased significantly by raising the awareness about how the process of donation could be regulated and how the patient’s right of decision could be protected.
Collapse
|
14
|
Padela AI, Duivenbode R, Saunders MR, Quinn M, Koh E. The impact of religiously tailored and ethically balanced education on intention for living organ donation among Muslim Americans. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14111. [PMID: 33063912 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
We tested the efficacy of religiously tailored and ethically balanced education upon living kidney organ donation intent among Muslim Americans. Pre-post changes in participant stage of change, preparedness, and likelihood judged efficacy. Among 137 participants, mean stage of change toward donation appeared to improve (0.59; SD ± 1.07, P < .0001), as did the group's preparedness to make a donation decision (0.55; SD ± 0.86, P < .0001), and likelihood to donate a kidney (0.39; SD ± 0.85, P < .0001). Mean change in likelihood to encourage a loved one, a co-worker, or a mosque community member with ESRD to seek a living donor also increased (0.22; SD ± 0.84, P = .0035, 0.23; SD ± 0.82, P = .0021, 0.33; SD ± 0.79, P < .0001 respectively). Multivariate ordered logistic regression models revealed that gains in biomedical knowledge regarding organ donation increased odds for positive change in preparedness (OR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.01-1.41, P = .03), while increasing age associated with lower odds of positive change in stage of change (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.998, P = .03), and prior registration as an organ donor lowered odds for an increase in likelihood to donate a kidney (OR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.08-0.60, P = .003). Our intervention appears to enhance living kidney donation-related intent among Muslim Americans [Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT04443114].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aasim I Padela
- Initiative on Islam and Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rosie Duivenbode
- Initiative on Islam and Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Milda R Saunders
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael Quinn
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Elizabeth Koh
- Initiative on Islam and Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Padela AI, Duivenbode R, Quinn M. The Development and Validation of the Islamic Knowledge of Living Organ Donation Knowledge Scale for Measuring Organ Donation Knowledge Among Muslim Communities. Prog Transplant 2020; 30:315-321. [DOI: 10.1177/1526924820958119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Studies around the world demonstrate that Muslim attitudes toward organ donation are closely tied to religion, but also that Muslim publics suffer from a lack of detailed knowledge about the Islamic perspectives on organ donation. Consequently, organ donation professionals and stakeholders are increasingly addressing knowledge gaps in the Muslim community through educational interventions. Yet, a measurement of Islamic knowledge of organ donation, and thereby the efficacy of such education, is not available. Research Question: To present the development and psychometric evaluation of the Islamic Knowledge of Living Organ Donation scale, designed to measure knowledge of the Islamic ethicolegal stances, and their underlying rationale, regarding living organ donation. Methods: Items were developed based on a review of Islamic juridical perspectives on organ donation, addressed knowledge gaps pervading Muslim communities, and pilot tested. The scale was statistically validated and psychometrically analyzed with a sample of 158 mosque-going Muslims in the United States. Results: The 9-item Islamic Knowledge of Living Organ Donation scale was found to be reliable (Cronbach α: 0.86), unidimensional, independent of religiosity, and predictive of social attitudes toward organ donation. Discussion: The survey can be used to validly assess Islamic knowledge of living organ donation among Muslim communities in research, educational, and clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aasim I. Padela
- Initiative on Islam and Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Rosie Duivenbode
- Initiative on Islam and Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Michael Quinn
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Islamic Bioethical Positions on Organ Donation and Transplantation: Stressing Rigor and Caution in Fatwa Reviews. Transplant Direct 2020; 6:e586. [PMID: 32766434 PMCID: PMC7371036 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
|
17
|
Metwally AM, Abdel-Latif GA, Eletreby L, Aboulghate A, Mohsen A, Amer HA, Saleh RM, Elmosalami DM, Salama HI, Abd El Hady SI, Alam RR, Mohamed HA, Badran HM, Eltokhy HE, Elhariri H, Rabah T, Abdelrahman M, Ibrahim NA, Chami N. Egyptians' social acceptance and consenting options for posthumous organ donation; a cross sectional study. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:49. [PMID: 32539704 PMCID: PMC7296756 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00490-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Organ donation has become one of the most effective ways to save lives and improve the quality of life for patients with end-stage organ failure. No previous studies have investigated the preferences for the different consenting options for organ donation in Egypt. This study aims to assess Egyptians’ preferences regarding consenting options for posthumous organ donation, and measure their awareness and acceptance of the Egyptian law articles regulating organ donation. Methods A cross sectional study was conducted among 2743 participants over two years. Each participant was required to rank eleven consenting options from 1 (most preferred) to 11 (least preferred), and to report his awareness and acceptance of the seven articles of the Egyptian law of organ donation. Results 47% of the participants expressed willingness to donate their organs after death. This percentage increased to 78% when consenting options were explained to participants. “Informed consent by donor only” was the most preferred type of consent for one third of respondents. Awareness of the law articles regulating organ donation was relatively low ranging from 56% to 23%. Conclusion Currently, around half of the Egyptian population agree to posthumous organ donation. This percentage could be increased significantly by raising the awareness about how the process of donation could be regulated and how the patient’s right of decision could be protected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammal M Metwally
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt.
| | - Ghada A Abdel-Latif
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Lobna Eletreby
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Aboulghate
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Amira Mohsen
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Hala A Amer
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt.,Infection Control Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rehan M Saleh
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Dalia M Elmosalami
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Hend I Salama
- Egyptian Liver Research Institute And Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Raefa R Alam
- Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Hanan M Badran
- Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Hazem Elhariri
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Thanaa Rabah
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Abdelrahman
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Nihad A Ibrahim
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Nada Chami
- Community Medicine Research Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre (ID:60014618), P.O.12622, Doki, Giza, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|