1
|
Massman C, Rivedal HM, Dorman SJ, Tanner KC, Fredrickson C, Temple TN, Fisk S, Helgerson L, Hayes PM. Yellow Dwarf Virus Resistance in Barley: Phenotyping, Remote Imagery, and Virus-Vector Characterization. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2024; 114:2084-2095. [PMID: 38916923 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-10-23-0394-kc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Yellow dwarf viruses (YDVs) spread by aphids are some of the most economically important barley (Hordeum vulgare) virus-vector complexes worldwide. Detection and control of these viruses are critical components in the production of barley, wheat, and numerous other grasses of agricultural importance. Genetic control of plant diseases is often preferable to chemical control to reduce the environmental and economic cost of foliar insecticides. Accordingly, the objectives of this work were to (i) screen a barley population for resistance to YDVs under natural infection using phenotypic assessment of disease symptoms, (ii) implement drone imagery to further assess resistance and test its utility as a disease screening tool, (iii) identify the prevailing virus and vector types in the experimental environment, and (iv) perform a genome-wide association study to identify genomic regions associated with measured traits. Significant genetic differences were found in a population of 192 barley inbred lines regarding their YDV symptom severity, and symptoms were moderately to highly correlated with grain yield. The YDV severity measured with aerial imaging was highly correlated with on-the-ground estimates (r = 0.65). Three aphid species vectoring three YDV species were identified with no apparent genotypic influence on their distribution. A quantitative trait locus impacting YDV resistance was detected on chromosome 2H, albeit undetected using aerial imaging. However, quantitative trait loci for canopy cover and mean normalized difference vegetation index were successfully mapped using the drone. This work provides a framework for utilizing drone imagery in future resistance breeding efforts for YDVs in cereals and grasses, as well as in other virus-vector disease complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Massman
- Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Hannah M Rivedal
- U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Seth J Dorman
- U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - K Christy Tanner
- Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Chance Fredrickson
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Todd N Temple
- U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Scott Fisk
- Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Laura Helgerson
- Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Patrick M Hayes
- Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ganeva D, Roumenina E, Dimitrov P, Gikov A, Jelev G, Dyulgenova B, Valcheva D, Bozhanova V. Remotely Sensed Phenotypic Traits for Heritability Estimates and Grain Yield Prediction of Barley Using Multispectral Imaging from UAVs. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:s23115008. [PMID: 37299735 DOI: 10.3390/s23115008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This study tested the potential of parametric and nonparametric regression modeling utilizing multispectral data from two different unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) as a tool for the prediction of and indirect selection of grain yield (GY) in barley breeding experiments. The coefficient of determination (R2) of the nonparametric models for GY prediction ranged between 0.33 and 0.61 depending on the UAV and flight date, where the highest value was achieved with the DJI Phantom 4 Multispectral (P4M) image from 26 May (milk ripening). The parametric models performed worse than the nonparametric ones for GY prediction. Independent of the retrieval method and UAV, GY retrieval was more accurate in milk ripening than dough ripening. The leaf area index (LAI), fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fAPAR), fraction vegetation cover (fCover), and leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) were modeled at milk ripening using nonparametric models with the P4M images. A significant effect of the genotype was found for the estimated biophysical variables, which was referred to as remotely sensed phenotypic traits (RSPTs). Measured GY heritability was lower, with a few exceptions, compared to the RSPTs, indicating that GY was more environmentally influenced than the RSPTs. The moderate to strong genetic correlation of the RSPTs to GY in the present study indicated their potential utility as an indirect selection approach to identify high-yield genotypes of winter barley.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dessislava Ganeva
- Space Research and Technology Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Eugenia Roumenina
- Space Research and Technology Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Petar Dimitrov
- Space Research and Technology Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Alexander Gikov
- Space Research and Technology Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Georgi Jelev
- Space Research and Technology Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - Darina Valcheva
- Institute of Agriculture, Agriculture Academy, 8400 Karnobat, Bulgaria
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prey L, Ramgraber L, Seidl-Schulz J, Hanemann A, Noack PO. The Transferability of Spectral Grain Yield Prediction in Wheat Breeding across Years and Trial Locations. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:4177. [PMID: 37112518 PMCID: PMC10145428 DOI: 10.3390/s23084177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Grain yield (GY) prediction based on non-destructive UAV-based spectral sensing could make screening of large field trials more efficient and objective. However, the transfer of models remains challenging, and is affected by location, year-dependent weather conditions and measurement dates. Therefore, this study evaluates GY modelling across years and locations, considering the effect of measurement dates within years. Based on a previous study, we used a normalized difference red edge (NDRE1) index with PLS (partial least squares) regression, trained and tested with the data of individual dates and date combinations, respectively. While strong differences in model performance were observed between test datasets, i.e., different trials, as well as between measurement dates, the effect of the train datasets was comparably small. Generally, within-trials models achieved better predictions (max. R2 = 0.27-0.81), but R2-values for the best across-trials models were lower only by 0.03-0.13. Within train and test datasets, measurement dates had a strong influence on model performance. While measurements during flowering and early milk ripeness were confirmed for within- and across-trials models, later dates were less useful for across-trials models. For most test sets, multi-date models revealed to improve predictions compared to individual-date models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Prey
- Hochschule Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, Markgrafenstrasse 16, 91746 Weidenbach, Germany
| | - Ludwig Ramgraber
- Saatzucht Josef Breun GmbH & Co. KG, Amselweg 1, 91074 Herzogenaurach, Germany
| | | | - Anja Hanemann
- Saatzucht Josef Breun GmbH & Co. KG, Amselweg 1, 91074 Herzogenaurach, Germany
| | - Patrick Ole Noack
- Hochschule Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, Markgrafenstrasse 16, 91746 Weidenbach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun Z, Li Q, Jin S, Song Y, Xu S, Wang X, Cai J, Zhou Q, Ge Y, Zhang R, Zang J, Jiang D. Simultaneous Prediction of Wheat Yield and Grain Protein Content Using Multitask Deep Learning from Time-Series Proximal Sensing. PLANT PHENOMICS 2022; 2022:9757948. [PMID: 35441150 PMCID: PMC8988204 DOI: 10.34133/2022/9757948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Wheat yield and grain protein content (GPC) are two main optimization targets for breeding and cultivation. Remote sensing provides nondestructive and early predictions of yield and GPC, respectively. However, whether it is possible to simultaneously predict yield and GPC in one model and the accuracy and influencing factors are still unclear. In this study, we made a systematic comparison of different deep learning models in terms of data fusion, time-series feature extraction, and multitask learning. The results showed that time-series data fusion significantly improved yield and GPC prediction accuracy with R2 values of 0.817 and 0.809. Multitask learning achieved simultaneous prediction of yield and GPC with comparable accuracy to the single-task model. We further proposed a two-to-two model that combines data fusion (two kinds of data sources for input) and multitask learning (two outputs) and compared different feature extraction layers, including RNN (recurrent neural network), LSTM (long short-term memory), CNN (convolutional neural network), and attention module. The two-to-two model with the attention module achieved the best prediction accuracy for yield (R2 = 0.833) and GPC (R2 = 0.846). The temporal distribution of feature importance was visualized based on the attention feature values. Although the temporal patterns of structural traits and spectral traits were inconsistent, the overall importance of both structural traits and spectral traits at the postanthesis stage was more important than that at the preanthesis stage. This study provides new insights into the simultaneous prediction of yield and GPC using deep learning from time-series proximal sensing, which may contribute to the accurate and efficient predictions of agricultural production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuangzhuang Sun
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Qing Li
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Shichao Jin
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, International Institute for Earth System Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China
| | - Yunlin Song
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Shan Xu
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Jian Cai
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Qin Zhou
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Yan Ge
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Ruinan Zhang
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Jingrong Zang
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Dong Jiang
- Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grieco M, Schmidt M, Warnemünde S, Backhaus A, Klück HC, Garibay A, Tandrón Moya YA, Jozefowicz AM, Mock HP, Seiffert U, Maurer A, Pillen K. Dynamics and genetic regulation of leaf nutrient concentration in barley based on hyperspectral imaging and machine learning. PLANT SCIENCE : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PLANT BIOLOGY 2022; 315:111123. [PMID: 35067296 DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.111123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Biofortification, the enrichment of nutrients in crop plants, is of increasing importance to improve human health. The wild barley nested association mapping (NAM) population HEB-25 was developed to improve agronomic traits including nutrient concentration. Here, we evaluated the potential of high-throughput hyperspectral imaging in HEB-25 to predict leaf concentration of 15 mineral nutrients, sampled from two field experiments and four developmental stages. Particularly accurate predictions were obtained by partial least squares regression (PLS) modeling of leaf concentrations for N, P and K reaching coefficients of determination of 0.90, 0.75 and 0.89, respectively. We recognized nutrient-specific patterns of variation of leaf nutrient concentration between developmental stages. A number of quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with the simultaneous expression of leaf nutrients were detected, indicating their potential co-regulation in barley. For example, the wild barley allele of QTL-4H-1 simultaneously increased leaf concentration of N, P, K and Cu. Similar effects of the same QTL were previously reported for nutrient concentrations in grains, supporting a potential parallel regulation of N, P, K and Cu in leaves and grains of HEB-25. Our study provides a new approach for nutrient assessment in large-scale field experiments to ultimately select genes and genotypes supporting plant biofortification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Grieco
- Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Chair of Plant Breeding, Betty-Heimann-Str. 3, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Maria Schmidt
- Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Chair of Plant Breeding, Betty-Heimann-Str. 3, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Sebastian Warnemünde
- Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation (IFF), Sandtorstraße 22, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Backhaus
- Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation (IFF), Sandtorstraße 22, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Christian Klück
- Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation (IFF), Sandtorstraße 22, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Adriana Garibay
- Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Seeland OT, Gatersleben, Germany
| | - Yudelsy Antonia Tandrón Moya
- Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Seeland OT, Gatersleben, Germany
| | - Anna Maria Jozefowicz
- Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Seeland OT, Gatersleben, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Mock
- Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Seeland OT, Gatersleben, Germany
| | - Udo Seiffert
- Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation (IFF), Sandtorstraße 22, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Maurer
- Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Chair of Plant Breeding, Betty-Heimann-Str. 3, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Klaus Pillen
- Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Chair of Plant Breeding, Betty-Heimann-Str. 3, 06120, Halle, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
High-Throughput Legume Seed Phenotyping Using a Handheld 3D Laser Scanner. REMOTE SENSING 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/rs14020431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
High-throughput phenotyping involves many samples and diverse trait types. For the goal of automatic measurement and batch data processing, a novel method for high-throughput legume seed phenotyping is proposed. A pipeline of automatic data acquisition and processing, including point cloud acquisition, single-seed extraction, pose normalization, three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, and trait estimation, is proposed. First, a handheld laser scanner is used to obtain the legume seed point clouds in batches. Second, a combined segmentation method using the RANSAC method, the Euclidean segmentation method, and the dimensionality of the features is proposed to conduct single-seed extraction. Third, a coordinate rotation method based on PCA and the table normal is proposed to conduct pose normalization. Fourth, a fast symmetry-based 3D reconstruction method is built to reconstruct a 3D model of the single seed, and the Poisson surface reconstruction method is used for surface reconstruction. Finally, 34 traits, including 11 morphological traits, 11 scale factors, and 12 shape factors, are automatically calculated. A total of 2500 samples of five kinds of legume seeds are measured. Experimental results show that the average accuracies of scanning and segmentation are 99.52% and 100%, respectively. The overall average reconstruction error is 0.014 mm. The average morphological trait measurement accuracy is submillimeter, and the average relative percentage error is within 3%. The proposed method provides a feasible method of batch data acquisition and processing, which will facilitate the automation in high-throughput legume seed phenotyping.
Collapse
|