1
|
Consales G, Cappellini I, Freschi B, Campiglia L, Parise M, Zamidei L. Sevoflurane sedation in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: an observational study with a propensity score matching model. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1267691. [PMID: 37780555 PMCID: PMC10540812 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1267691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The management of severe COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS) often involves deep sedation. This study evaluated the efficacy of sevoflurane, a volatile anesthetic, as an alternative to traditional intravenous sedation in this patient population. Methods This single-center, retrospective cohort study enrolled 112 patients with C-ARDS requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. A propensity score matching model was utilized to pair 56 patients receiving sevoflurane sedation with 56 patients receiving intravenous sedation. The primary outcome was mortality, with secondary outcomes being changes in oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio), pulmonary compliance, and levels of D-Dimer, CRP, and creatinine. Results The use of sevoflurane was associated with a statistically significant reduction in mortality (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.87, beta = -0.9, p = 0.02). In terms of secondary outcomes, an increase in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and pulmonary static compliance was observed, although the results were not statistically significant. No significant differences were noted in the levels of D-Dimer, CRP, and creatinine between the two groups. Conclusion Our findings suggest an association between the use of sevoflurane and improved outcomes in C-ARDS patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. However, due to the single-center, retrospective design of the study, caution should be taken in interpreting these results, and further research is needed to corroborate these findings. The study offers promising insights into potential alternative sedation strategies in the management of severe C-ARDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guglielmo Consales
- Department of Critical Care, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santo Stefano, Prato, Italy
| | - Iacopo Cappellini
- Department of Critical Care, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santo Stefano, Prato, Italy
| | - Benedetta Freschi
- Department of Critical Care, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santo Stefano, Prato, Italy
| | - Laura Campiglia
- Department of Critical Care, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santo Stefano, Prato, Italy
| | - Maddalena Parise
- Anesthesia Unit, Castellanza Hospital, Multimedica Group, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucia Zamidei
- Department of Critical Care, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santo Stefano, Prato, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rahman MA, Amin MA, Yeasmin MN, Islam MZ. Molecular Biomarker Identification Using a Network-Based Bioinformatics Approach That Links COVID-19 With Smoking. Bioinform Biol Insights 2023; 17:11779322231186481. [PMID: 37461741 PMCID: PMC10350588 DOI: 10.1177/11779322231186481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 coronavirus, which primarily affects the lungs, is the source of the disease known as SARS-CoV-2. According to "Smoking and COVID-19: a scoping review," about 32% of smokers had a severe case of COVID-19 pneumonia at their admission time and 15% of non-smokers had this case of COVID-19 pneumonia. We were able to determine which genes were expressed differently in each group by comparing the expression of gene transcriptomic datasets of COVID-19 patients, smokers, and healthy controls. In all, 37 dysregulated genes are common in COVID-19 patients and smokers, according to our analysis. We have applied all important methods namely protein-protein interaction, hub-protein interaction, drug-protein interaction, tf-gene interaction, and gene-MiRNA interaction of bioinformatics to analyze to understand deeply the connection between both smoking and COVID-19 severity. We have also analyzed Pathways and Gene Ontology where 5 significant signaling pathways were validated with previous literature. Also, we verified 7 hub-proteins, and finally, we validated a total of 7 drugs with the previous study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Md Al Amin
- Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Prime University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Most Nilufa Yeasmin
- Department of Information & Communication Technology, Islamic University, Kushtia, Bangladesh
| | - Md Zahidul Islam
- Department of Information & Communication Technology, Islamic University, Kushtia, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martínez-Castro S, Monleón B, Puig J, Ferrer Gomez C, Quesada M, Pestaña D, Balvis A, Maseda E, de la Rica AS, Feijoo AM, Badenes R. Sedation with Sevoflurane versus Propofol in COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pers Med 2023; 13:925. [PMID: 37373914 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13060925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) led to intensive care units (ICUs) collapse. Amalgams of sedative agents (including volatile anesthetics) were used due to the clinical shortage of intravenous drugs (mainly propofol and midazolam). METHODS A multicenter, randomized 1:1, controlled clinical trial was designed to compare sedation using propofol and sevoflurane in patients with ARDS associated with COVID-19 infection in terms of oxygenation and mortality. RESULTS Data from a total of 17 patients (10 in the propofol arm and 7 in the sevoflurane arm) showed a trend toward PaO2/FiO2 improvement and the sevoflurane arm's superiority in decreasing the likelihood of death (no statistical significance was found). CONCLUSIONS Intravenous agents are the most-used sedative agents in Spain, even though volatile anesthetics, such as sevoflurane and isoflurane, have shown beneficial effects in many clinical conditions. Growing evidence demonstrates the safety and potential benefits of using volatile anesthetics in critical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Martínez-Castro
- Department Anesthesiology, Surgical-Trauma Intensive Care and Pain Clinic, Hospital Clínic Universitari, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Berta Monleón
- Department Anesthesiology, Surgical-Trauma Intensive Care and Pain Clinic, Hospital Clínic Universitari, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaume Puig
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, 46014 Valencia, Spain
| | - Carolina Ferrer Gomez
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, 46014 Valencia, Spain
| | - Marta Quesada
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, 46014 Valencia, Spain
| | - David Pestaña
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Balvis
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Maseda
- Surgical Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Suárez de la Rica
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitario De La Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Monero Feijoo
- Surgical Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Rafael Badenes
- Department Anesthesiology, Surgical-Trauma Intensive Care and Pain Clinic, Hospital Clínic Universitari, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soukup J, Michel P, Christel A, Schittek GA, Wagner NM, Kellner P. Prolonged sedation with sevoflurane in comparison to intravenous sedation in critically ill patients - A randomized controlled trial. J Crit Care 2023; 74:154251. [PMID: 36640476 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Volatile anesthetics are used more commonly for sedation in the intensive-care-unit (ICU). However, evidence for long-term use remains low. We therefore conducted a randomized-controlled trial comparing sevoflurane with intravenous sedation with particular focus on efficacy and safety. METHODS In this prospective, randomized-controlled phase-IIb monocentric clinical-trial ICU patients requiring at least 48 h of sedation were randomized to receive sevoflurane (S) or propofol/midazolam (P). Sedation quality was monitored using the Richmond-Agitation-Sedation-Scale. Following termination of sedation, the time to spontaneous breathing and extubation, opioid consumption, hemodynamics, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS 79 patients were eligible to randomization. Sedation quality was comparable between sevoflurane (n = 39) and propofol (n = 40). However, the use of sevoflurane lead to a reduction in time to spontaneous breathing (26 min vs. 375 min, P < 0.001). Patients sedated with propofol had lower opioid requirements (remifentanil:400 μg/h vs. 500 μg/h, P = 0.007; sufentanil:40 μg/h vs. 30 μg/h, P = 0.007) while hemodynamics, LOS or the occurrence of adverse events did not differ. CONCLUSION ICU patients sedated with sevoflurane >48 h may return to spontaneous breathing faster, while the quality of sedation is comparable to a propofol-based sedation regime. Sevoflurane might be considered to be safe for long-term sedation in this patient population, while being non-inferior compared to propofol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Soukup
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Palliative Care Medicine, Carl-Thiem-Hospital, Cottbus, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Peter Michel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Annett Christel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Gregor Alexander Schittek
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Special Anesthesiology, Pain and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nana-Maria Wagner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Patrick Kellner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Inhaled Sedation with Volatile Anesthetics for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12031069. [PMID: 36769718 PMCID: PMC9918250 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Inhaled sedation was recently approved in Europe as an alternative to intravenous sedative drugs for intensive care unit (ICU) sedation. The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the available data from the literature published between 2005 and 2023 in terms of the efficacy, safety, and potential clinical benefits of inhaled sedation for ICU mechanically ventilated patients. The results indicated that inhaled sedation reduces the time to extubation and weaning from mechanical ventilation and reduces opioid and muscle relaxant consumption, thereby possibly enhancing recovery. Several researchers have reported its potential cardio-protective, anti-inflammatory or bronchodilator properties, alongside its minimal metabolism by the liver and kidney. The reflection devices used with inhaled sedation may increase the instrumental dead space volume and could lead to hypercapnia if the ventilator settings are not optimal and the end tidal carbon dioxide is not monitored. The risk of air pollution can be prevented by the adequate scavenging of the expired gases. Minimizing atmospheric pollution can be achieved through the judicious use of the inhalation sedation for selected groups of ICU patients, where the benefits are maximized compared to intravenous sedation. Very rarely, inhaled sedation can induce malignant hyperthermia, which prompts urgent diagnosis and treatment by the ICU staff. Overall, there is growing evidence to support the benefits of inhaled sedation as an alternative for intravenous sedation in ICU mechanically ventilated patients. The indication and management of any side effects should be clearly set and protocolized by each ICU. More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still required to investigate whether inhaled sedation should be prioritized over the current practice of intravenous sedation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Landoni G, Belloni O, Russo G, Bonaccorso A, Carà G, Jabaudon M. Inhaled Sedation for Invasively Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092500. [PMID: 35566625 PMCID: PMC9105857 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Volatile anesthetics were used as sedative agents in COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) invasively ventilated patients for their potentially beneficial pharmacological effects and due to the temporary shortages of intravenous agents during the pandemic crisis. Methods: Online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial) and the “clinicaltrials.gov” website were searched for studies reporting the use of isoflurane, sevoflurane or desflurane. Results: We identified three manuscripts describing the beneficial effects of isoflurane on 41 COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in Germany (n = 2) and in the USA (n = 1), in terms of reduction in the use of opioids and other sedatives. We also found a case report of two patients with transient nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, which started after 6 and 8 days of sevoflurane sedation. We identified two randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 92 patients overall), two observational studies (238 patients) on the use of volatile anesthetics in COVID-19 patients that were completed but not yet published, and one RCT interrupted for a low recruitment ratio (19 patients) and thus not published. We also identified five ongoing RCTs on the use of inhaled sedation in ARDS, which are also likely to be recruiting COVID-19 patients and which have currently enrolled a total of >1643 patients. Conclusion: Isoflurane was the most frequently used volatile agent in COVID-19 patients and allowed a reduction in the use of other sedative and analgesic drugs. Randomized evidence is building up and will be useful to confirm or challenge these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Landoni
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (G.R.); (A.B.); (G.C.)
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Olivia Belloni
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (G.R.); (A.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Giada Russo
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (G.R.); (A.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Alessandra Bonaccorso
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (G.R.); (A.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Gianmarco Carà
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (G.R.); (A.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Matthieu Jabaudon
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
- GReD, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, INSERM, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cuninghame S, Gorsky K, Francoeur C, Withington D, Burry L, Jerath A, Slessarev M. Effect of sedation with inhaled anaesthetics on cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in critically ill adults: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e052893. [PMID: 35131825 PMCID: PMC8822506 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has renewed interest in the use of inhaled anaesthetics for sedation of ventilated critically ill patients. Preliminary data show that inhaled anaesthetics reduce lung inflammation, time to extubation and intensive care unit length of stay compared with intravenous sedatives. However, the impact of inhaled anaesthetics on cognitive and psychiatric outcomes is not well described in this setting. Randomised controlled trials are underway to establish if inhaled anaesthetics affect these and other patient and health system outcomes. Our aim is to summarise the known effects of inhaled sedatives on cognitive and psychiatric outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In this systematic review, we will use MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO to identify studies from 1970 to 2021 that assessed cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in critically ill adult patients sedated with inhaled anaesthetics. We will include case series, observational and cohort studies and randomised controlled trials. We will exclude case studies due to the heterogeneity of reporting in these studies. For randomised controlled trials comparing inhaled to intravenous sedation, we will report cognitive and psychiatric outcomes for both study arms. Studies will be selected based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Data will be extracted using a standardised data extraction tool by two independent reviewers. Studies will be assessed for bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials, or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies. Findings will be reported according to outcome and descriptive statistics will be used to illustrate findings in a narrative fashion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The systematic review uses published data and therefore does not require ethics approval. Results will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at conferences related to the field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021236455.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Cuninghame
- Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin Gorsky
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temetry Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Conall Francoeur
- Department of Pediatrics, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Davinia Withington
- Department of Anesthesiology, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lisa Burry
- Departments of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Jerath
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temetry Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Mangement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marat Slessarev
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bellgardt M, Özcelik D, Breuer-Kaiser AFC, Steinfort C, Breuer TGK, Weber TP, Herzog-Niescery J. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and inhaled sedation in coronavirus disease 2019-related acute respiratory distress syndrome. World J Crit Care Med 2021; 10:323-333. [PMID: 34888158 PMCID: PMC8613718 DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i6.323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe complication of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and the primary cause of death in the current pandemic. Critically ill patients often undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy as the last resort over an extended period. ECMO therapy requires sedation of the patient, which is usually achieved by intravenous administration of sedatives. The shortage of intravenous sedative drugs due to the ongoing pandemic, and attempts to improve treatment outcome for COVID-19 patients, drove the application of inhaled sedation as a promising alternative for sedation during ECMO therapy. Administration of volatile anesthetics requires an appropriate delivery. Commercially available ones are the anesthetic gas reflection systems AnaConDa® and MIRUSTM, and each should be combined with a gas scavenging system. In this review, we describe respiratory management in COVID-19 patients and the procedures for inhaled sedation during ECMO therapy of COVID-19 related ARDS. We focus particularly on the technical details of administration of volatile anesthetics. Furthermore, we describe the advantages of inhaled sedation and volatile anesthetics, and we discuss the limitations as well as the requirements for safe application in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Bellgardt
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum 44791, Germany
| | - Dennis Özcelik
- Chemistry | Biology | Pharmacy Information Center, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8093, Switzerland
| | | | - Claudia Steinfort
- General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum 44791, Germany
| | - Thomas Georg Karl Breuer
- Internal Medicine/Intensive Care, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum 44791, Germany
| | - Thomas Peter Weber
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum 44791, Germany
| | - Jennifer Herzog-Niescery
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum 44791, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alqassieh R, Suleiman A, Abu-Halaweh S, Santarisi A, Shatnawi O, Shdaifat L, Tarifi A, Al-Tamimi M, Al-Shudifat AE, Alsmadi H, Al Sharqawi A, Alnawaiseh H, Anasweh Y, Domaidah FA, Jaber HA, Al-Zarir MR, Bsisu I. Pfizer-BioNTech and Sinopharm: A Comparative Study on Post-Vaccination Antibody Titers. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:1223. [PMID: 34835153 PMCID: PMC8620087 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9111223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) vaccines induce immunity through different mechanisms. The aim of this study is to compare the titers of specific antibodies in subjects vaccinated with either the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine or the Sinopharm vaccine. This prospective observational cohort included Jordanian adults vaccinated with two doses, 21 days apart, of either of the two aforementioned vaccines. Titers were collected 6 weeks after the administration of the second dose. Overall, 288 participants were included, of which 141 were administered the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, while 147 were administered the Sinopharm vaccine. Remarkably, 140 (99.3%) of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine recipients had positive IgG titers, while 126 (85.7%) of Sinopharm recipients had positive IgG (p < 0.001). The mean titer for IgG among Pfizer-BioNTech recipients was 515.5 ± 1143.5 BAU/mL, compared to 170.0 ± 230.0 BAU/mL among Sinopharm subjects (p < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine positively correlated with positive IgG titers (OR: 25.25; 95% CI: 3.25-196.15; p = 0.002), compared with a negative effect of cardiovascular diseases (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.11-0.99; p = 0.48) on IgG titers. In conclusion, fully vaccinated recipients of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine had superior quantitative efficiency compared to Sinopharm recipients. A booster dose is supported for Sinopharm recipients, or those with chronic immunosuppressive diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami Alqassieh
- Department of General and Specialized Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan; (R.A.); (A.T.)
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA;
| | - Sami Abu-Halaweh
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; (S.A.-H.); (H.A.); (A.A.S.); (H.A.); (Y.A.); (F.A.D.); (H.A.J.); (M.R.A.-Z.)
| | - Abeer Santarisi
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Accidents, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan;
| | - Omar Shatnawi
- Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA;
| | - Lara Shdaifat
- School of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak 61710, Jordan;
| | - Amjed Tarifi
- Department of General and Specialized Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan; (R.A.); (A.T.)
| | - Mohammad Al-Tamimi
- Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan; (M.A.-T.); (A.-E.A.-S.)
| | | | - Heba Alsmadi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; (S.A.-H.); (H.A.); (A.A.S.); (H.A.); (Y.A.); (F.A.D.); (H.A.J.); (M.R.A.-Z.)
| | - Ahmed Al Sharqawi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; (S.A.-H.); (H.A.); (A.A.S.); (H.A.); (Y.A.); (F.A.D.); (H.A.J.); (M.R.A.-Z.)
| | - Hadeel Alnawaiseh
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; (S.A.-H.); (H.A.); (A.A.S.); (H.A.); (Y.A.); (F.A.D.); (H.A.J.); (M.R.A.-Z.)
| | - Yara Anasweh
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; (S.A.-H.); (H.A.); (A.A.S.); (H.A.); (Y.A.); (F.A.D.); (H.A.J.); (M.R.A.-Z.)
| | - Farah Abo Domaidah
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; (S.A.-H.); (H.A.); (A.A.S.); (H.A.); (Y.A.); (F.A.D.); (H.A.J.); (M.R.A.-Z.)
| | - Haneen Abu Jaber
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; (S.A.-H.); (H.A.); (A.A.S.); (H.A.); (Y.A.); (F.A.D.); (H.A.J.); (M.R.A.-Z.)
| | - Mohammad Rashid Al-Zarir
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; (S.A.-H.); (H.A.); (A.A.S.); (H.A.); (Y.A.); (F.A.D.); (H.A.J.); (M.R.A.-Z.)
| | - Isam Bsisu
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; (S.A.-H.); (H.A.); (A.A.S.); (H.A.); (Y.A.); (F.A.D.); (H.A.J.); (M.R.A.-Z.)
| |
Collapse
|