Monoclonal antibody therapy and renal transplantation: focus on adverse effects

Solid organ transplantation and gut microbiota: a review of the potential immunomodulatory properties of short-chain fatty acids in graft maintenance

Transplantation is the treatment of choice for several end-stage organ defects: it considerably improves patient survival and quality of life. However, post-transplant recipients may experience episodes of rejection that can favor or ultimately lead to graft loss. Graft maintenance requires a complex and life-long immunosuppressive treatment. Different immunosuppressive drugs (i.e., calcineurin inhibitors, glucocorticoids, biological immunosuppressive agents, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and antiproliferative or antimetabolic agents) are used in combination to mitigate the immune response against the allograft. Unfortunately, the use of these antirejection agents may lead to opportunistic infections, metabolic (e.g., post-transplant diabetes mellitus) or cardiovascular (e.g., arterial hypertension) disorders, cancer (e.g., non-Hodgkin lymphoma) and other adverse effects. Lately, immunosuppressive drugs have also been associated with gut microbiome alterations, known as dysbiosis, and were shown to affect gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) production. SCFA play a key immunomodulatory role in physiological conditions, and their impairment in transplant patients could partly counterbalance the effect of immunosuppressive drugs leading to the activation of deleterious pathways and graft rejection. In this review, we will first present an overview of the mechanisms of graft rejection that are prevented by the immunosuppressive protocol. Next, we will explain the dynamic changes of the gut microbiota during transplantation, focusing on SCFA. Finally, we will describe the known functions of SCFA in regulating immune-inflammatory reactions and discuss the impact of SCFA impairment in immunosuppressive drug treated patients.

Cytopenias in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: preceding factors and clinical consequences

BACKGROUND

Kidney trans plantation is associated with secondary complications, including the risk of developing posttransplant cytopenias. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics, identify predictors, and assess the management and consequences of cytopenias in the pediatric kidney transplant population.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 89 pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Possible factors preceding cytopenias were compared with the goal of recognizing predictors for posttransplant cytopenias. Posttransplant neutropenias were analyzed for the total study period and separately for the period beyond 6 months posttransplant (late neutropenias), to rule out confounding influences of induction and initial intensive therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (67%) developed at least one episode of posttransplant cytopenia. All episodes of posttransplant thrombocytopenias were mild or moderate. Posttransplant infections and graft rejection were found to be significant predictors for thrombocytopenia (HR 6.06, 95% CI 1.6-22.9, and HR 5.82, 95% CI 1.27-26.6, respectively). A total of 30% of posttransplant neutropenias were severe (ANC ≤ 500). Pretransplant dialysis and posttransplant infections were significant predictors for late neutropenias (HR 11.2, 95% CI 1.45-86.4, and HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.46-7.57, respectively). Graft rejection occurred in 10% of patients with cytopenia, all following neutropenia, within 3 months from cytopenia appearance. In all such cases, mycophenolate mofetil dosing had been held or reduced prior to rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant infections are substantial contributors to developing posttransplant cytopenias. Preemptive transplantation appears to reduce risk of late neutropenia, the accompanying reduction in immunosuppressive therapy, and the ensuing risk of graft rejection. An alternative response to neutropenia, possibly using granulocyte colony stimulating factor, may diminish graft rejection. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Management of drug-induced neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia after solid organ transplantation: A comprehensive review

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Advances in the development of more effective immunosuppressive drugs have increased graft survival and drug induced adverse effects. Haematological complications including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia are common side effects that affect the grafts' and patients' outcomes. Several studies have stated the important role of various medications in haematological complications after transplantation. They have reported the incidence and different mechanisms of drug induced cytopenia, as well as an overview of possible treatment modalities. However, there is no comprehensive protocol for the management of these complications following transplantation. This narrative review was performed to develop a comprehensive practical approach for management of drug induced haematological complications following solid organ transplantation.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Google scholar databases were searched without time limitations until March, 2021. In addition, some valid drug information data bases (Uptodate and Micromedex) were searched for detailed information until October, 2021.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Several immunosuppressive and antimicrobial medications may induce neutropenia, thrombocytopenia or anaemia following transplantation. Most of these agents cause dose-related cytopenia, which resolves with dose reduction or drug withdrawal. However, any change in medications may result in negative consequences such as severe infections, bleeding, cardiovascular complications, acute allograft rejection, and graft or patient loss. Thus, cautious evaluation of the patient's condition and the pharmacological properties of the culprit medication are required.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Three algorithms are presented to guide healthcare providers in the stepwise management of drug-induced neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia after solid organ transplantation.

Comparison of CD3e Antibody and CD3e-sZAP Immunotoxin Treatment in Mice Identifies sZAP as the Main Driver of Vascular Leakage

Anti-CD3-epsilon (CD3e) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and CD3e immunotoxins (ITs) are promising targeted therapy options for various T-cell disorders. Despite significant advances in mAb and IT engineering, vascular leakage syndrome (VLS) remains a major dose-limiting toxicity for ITs and has been poorly characterized for recent "engineered" mAbs. This study undertakes a direct comparison of non-mitogenic CD3e-mAb (145-2C11 with Fc-silentTM murine IgG1: S-CD3e-mAb) and a new murine-version CD3e-IT (saporin-streptavidin (sZAP) conjugated with S-CD3e-mAb: S-CD3e-IT) and identifies their distinct toxicity profiles in mice. As expected, the two agents showed different modes of action on T cells, with S-CD3e-mAb inducing nearly complete modulation of CD3e on the cell surface, while S-CD3e-IT depleted the cells. S-CD3e-IT significantly increased the infiltration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) into the tissue parenchyma of the spleen and lungs, a sign of increased vascular permeability. By contrast, S-CD3e-mAbs-treated mice showed no notable signs of vascular leakage. Treatment with control ITs (sZAP conjugated with Fc-silent isotype antibodies) induced significant vascular leakage without causing T-cell deaths. These results demonstrate that the toxin portion of S-CD3e-IT, not the CD3e-binding portion (S-CD3e-mAb), is the main driver of vascular leakage, thus clarifying the molecular target for improving safety profiles in CD3e-IT therapy.

Risk Factors of Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Narrative Review

Multiple factors influence graft rejection after kidney transplantation. Pre-operative factors affecting graft function and survival include donor and recipient characteristics such as age, gender, race, and immunologic compatibility. In addition, several peri- and post-operative parameters affect graft function and rejection, such as cold and warm ischemia times, and post-operative immunosuppressive treatment. Exposure to non-self-human leucocyte antigens (HLAs) prior to transplantation up-regulates the recipient’s immune system. A higher rate of acute rejection is observed in transplant recipients with a history of pregnancies or significant exposure to blood products because these patients have higher panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels. Identifying these risk factors will help physicians to reduce the risk of allograft rejection, thereby promoting graft survival. In the current review, we summarize the existing literature on donor- and recipient-related risk factors of graft rejection and graft loss following kidney transplantation.

Effect of donor-to-recipient HLA matching in low-immunological risk kidney transplant recipients without induction therapy on acute rejection, graft survival, infections, and surgical complications at 3 years: The road towards new recommendations

BACKGROUND

Donor-to-recipient human leukocyte antigen mismatching is considered one of the strongest determinants for graft and patient survival in kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study discusses the impact of HLA matching as low immunological risk KTR without induction therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Records of 80 adult kidney transplant patients were reviewed with three years of the follow-up. All patients had panel reactive antibodies (PRA) < 20%, absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and did not receive the induction therapy. These patients were divided into two groups according to their HLA matching between donor and recipient: 55 patients with ≥ 3 HLA matches (Group I; low immunogenicity) were compared to 25 patients with <3 HLA matches (Group II; high immunogenicity). The primary endpoints included the rate and severity of acute rejection (AR) episodes, graft function (creatinine level), and survival at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 36 months. Secondary endpoints include the rate and type of infections at one-year, surgical complications at one-year, and patient survival at 1, 6, 12, and 36 months after kidney transplantation. Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups except for recipient age, donor gender, and pre-transplant dialysis time.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference observed between two groups at one-year in infection rate, the length of hospital stay, AR severity, the rate of cytomegalovirus infection, and the occurrence of delayed graft function. However, the rate of AR, the graft function upon discharge, and the rate and type of surgical complications at one-year were significantly higher in Group II (high immunogenicity). The patient and graft survival at three years, the death-censored graft survival, and the serum creatinine levels at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 36 months were similar between two groups. Two deaths occurred in each group (NS).

CONCLUSION

In our center, the donor-to-recipient HLA mismatch is not considered an immunological risk factor in low-risk kidney transplant recipients (PRA < 20% and absence of DSA).

Siplizumab, an Anti-CD2 Monoclonal Antibody, Induces a Unique Set of Immune Modulatory Effects Compared to Alemtuzumab and Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin In Vitro

Antibodies are commonly used in organ transplant induction therapy and to treat autoimmune disorders. The effects of some biologics on the human immune system remain incompletely characterized and a deeper understanding of their mechanisms of action may provide useful insights for their clinical application. The goal of this study was to contrast the mechanistic properties of siplizumab with Alemtuzumab and rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (rATG). Mechanistic assay systems investigating antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cell phagocytosis and complement-dependent cytotoxicity were used to characterize siplizumab. Further, functional effects of siplizumab, Alemtuzumab, and rATG were investigated in allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction. Changes in T cell activation, T cell proliferation and frequency of naïve T cells, memory T cells and regulatory T cells induced by siplizumab, Alemtuzumab and rATG in allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction were assessed via flow cytometry. Siplizumab depleted T cells, decreased T cell activation, inhibited T cell proliferation and enriched naïve and bona fide regulatory T cells. Neither Alemtuzumab nor rATG induced the same combination of functional effects. The results presented in this study should be used for further in vitro and in vivo investigations that guide the clinical use of immune modulatory biologics.

Improving the expression of anti-IL-2Rα monoclonal antibody in the CHO cells through optimization of the expression vector and translation efficiency

The growing need for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) necessitates the development of novel and efficient production approaches. Regulatory elements like ubiquitous chromatin-opening elements (UCOEs) have been employed for improvement of the mAb expression in the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. SINEUPs are a class of long non-coding RNAs, which can improve the translation of partly overlapping mRNAs. A combination of these two elements might lead to higher production of mAbs. Therefore, the current study was conducted to investigate the effects of SINEUPs and A2UCOE on the expression of an IgG1 in the CHO-K1 cells. Hence, after constructing the mAb, mAb-SINEUP, and mAb-UCOE vectors, four stable cell pools were generated through combining the above vectors. According to the expression analysis, antibody yields were higher in the mAb-SINEUP and mAb-UCOE cell pools compared to the mAb cells. In addition, the cells possessing both SINEUP and UCOE elements provided the best expression. Persistent mAb expression was observed for over 2 months in these cells, whilst the expression was decreased in the mAb pool. SINEUP and UCOE positively influenced the stable mAb expression. It can be concluded that the SINEUP and UCOE enhance the antibody stability and expression level separately and their combination improves the mAb production in the CHO cells.

Pancreatic islet transplantation: toward definitive treatment for diabetes mellitus

Since the late 20th century, advances in pancreatic islet transplantation have targeted improved glycemic control and fewer hypoglycemic events in patients with type 1 diabetes, and some important milestones have been reached. Following the Edmonton group's success in achieving insulin independence in all transplanted patients with type 1 diabetes, clinical islet transplantation is now performed worldwide. β cell replacement therapy for type 1 diabetes was established based on the favorable outcomes of a phase 3, prospective, open-label, single-arm, clinical study conducted at 8 centers in North America, in which 42 of 48 patients who underwent islet transplantation from 2008 to 2011 achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at day 365, which was maintained at 2 years in 34 patients. In Japan, a phase 2 multicenter clinical trial of islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes patients is currently ongoing and will end soon, but the interim results have already led to positive changes, with allogeneic islet transplantation being covered by the national health insurance system since April 2020. Current efforts are being made to solve the problem of donor shortage by studying alternative donor sources, such as porcine islets and pancreatic progenitor cells derived from pluripotent stem cells. The results of clinical trials in this area are eagerly awaited. It is hoped that they will contribute to establishing alternative sources for insulin-producing β cells in the near future.

Tocilizumab in transplantation

PURPOSE

Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the IL-6 receptor, might block detrimental effects of IL-6 on transplantation. IL-6 plays a considerable role in cytokine storm after stem cell transplantation as well as graft versus host disease, and it has also been shown to be involved in solid organ allograft rejection; therefore, tocilizumab is expected to promote graft survival. Nonetheless, due to the small number of studies and disparate methods of drug administration and outcome evaluation, for which types of transplantation, at which stages, and to what extent tocilizumab could be applied remains to be defined.

METHODS

The Pubmed, SCOPUS and Google Scholar search engines were used to collect data. The keywords were determined by Pubmed MeSH. No time limitation was set and all types of articles were allowed.  RESULTS: According to the potential of Tocilozumab in controlling both cellular and humoral immunity it could be considered as a promising agent in tolerance induction; however, blocking IL-6 signaling might result in augmented infection rate in recipients.

CONCLUSION

The need for providing effective and safe immunosuppressive agents to protect transplanted cells and organs against allo-reactivity urges the collection and discussion of all available findings about inhibition of determining immune components including cytokines; herein, we have summarized the clinical consequences of blocking IL-6 by tocilizumab in stem cell and solid organ transplantations.

The use of ruxolitinib for acute graft-versus-host disease developing after solid organ transplantation

Development of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a rare complication after transfusions or solid organ transplantation. Patients typically present with a skin rash, diarrhea, liver failure, and bone marrow aplasia. A diagnosis of transfusion/transplantation associated-GvHD is made based on the clinical and histologic evidence, yet it is often delayed due to the nonspecific symptoms attributed to the patient's underlying illness. Several therapeutic approaches are being used including both increasing and withdrawing immunosuppression, and the use of cellular therapies. Unfortunately, the success rate of these approaches is low and the mortality of this complication is very high. New approaches are needed. We report on three cases of GvHD developing after solid organ transplantation treated with ruxolitinib.

Antibody therapeutics and immunoregulation in cancer and autoimmune disease

Cancer and autoimmune disease are closely related, and many therapeutic antibodies are widely used in clinics for the treatment of both diseases. Among them, the anti-CD20 antibody has proven to be effective against both lymphoid malignancy and autoimmune disease. Moreover, immune checkpoint blockade using the anti-PD1/PD-L1/CTLA4 antibody has improved the prognosis of patients with refractory solid tumors. At the same time, however, over-enhancement of immunoreaction can induce autoimmune reaction. Although anti-TNF antibody therapies represent a breakthrough in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, optimal management is required to control the serious associated issues, including development and progression of cancer, and it is becoming more and more important to control the immunoreaction. In addition, next-generation antibody therapeutics such as antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies, are anticipated to treat uncontrolled cancer and autoimmune disease. IL-7R signaling plays an important role in the development and progression of both lymphoid malignancy and autoimmune disease. In addition, abnormal homing activity and steroid resistance caused by IL-7R signaling may worsen prognosis. Therefore, anti-IL-7R targeting antibody therapies that enable suppression of such pathophysiological status have the potential to be beneficial for the treatment of both diseases. In this review, we discuss current antibody therapeutics in cancer and autoimmune disease, and describe a new therapeutic strategy for immunoregulation including IL-7R targeting antibodies.

Nocardiosis in Kidney Disease Patients under Immunosuppressive Therapy: Case Report and Literature Review

The increased use of novel and powerful immunosuppressive drugs in kidney diseases may concomitantly expose the patients to higher risk of opportunistic infections, some of which still remain underdiagnosed thus mishandled. As such, we recently had a less prepared encounter of pulmonary nocardial infection in an ANCA-associated renal vasculitis patient under steroid therapy. Despite the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials including micafungin, the infection was still unbridled and eventually culminated in lethal brain abscess. We thus chose to renew the knowledge of the clinical features, imaging manifestations, differential diagnosis, specific laboratory tests and unique treatment about this rare infection in kidney diseases patients under immunosuppressive therapy. In addition, CT images of easily confused pulmonary lesions superimposed on kidney diseases were also retrieved from our depository. Moreover, impaired renal function as a risk factor for infection and pharmacological options for the treatment were also focused. By sharing our hard-learnt experience and reviewing the literatures, our report may contribute to the awareness among the clinicians in general and nephrologists in particular of this rare disease in susceptible patients and facilitate a swift thus life-saving treatment.

Effect of Immunosuppressive Therapy on the Occurrence of Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in Renal Transplant Recipients

Background

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), a rare thrombotic microangiopathy, is characterized by hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal failure. Caused by genetic mutations in the alternative complement cascade, aHUS often will culminate in end-stage renal disease and occasionally death. Renal transplantation in aHUS patients has been contraindicated in the past due to the recurrence risk, with certain immunosuppressive regimens being commonly attributed. In this study, we analyzed the association between aHUS and immunosuppressive agents so as to offer evidence for the use of certain immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplant recipients.

Material/Methods

Our study is a retrospective analysis using data from the United States Renal Data System from 2004 to 2012. A cohort of renal transplantation patients diagnosed with aHUS were identified to include in the study. The primary endpoint was the determination of aHUS incidence in renal transplant recipients due to various immunosuppressive agents. The secondary endpoints were to check the relationship between the drug type as well as the demographic variables that increase the risk for aHUS.

Results

It was found that there was a higher usage of sirolimus (P=0.015) and corticosteroids (P=0.030) in the aHUS patients compared to patients in other diagnoses group.

Conclusions

There was a higher usage of sirolimus and corticosteroids in renal transplantation patients diagnosed with aHUS. Unfortunately, due to the rarity of this disease, the sample size was small (n=14). Despite the small sample size, this data analysis throws light on the relationship between aHUS and immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients, although we still have much to learn.

Immunosuppression following organ transplantation. Part 1: mechanisms and immunosuppressive agents

Solid organ transplantation has revolutionised medical care by providing a definitive cure for a wide spectrum of end-stage medical conditions. This treatment, however, does not come without complications and poses the risks of rejection, life-threatening infection, malignancies and recurrent organ failure, with significant impacts on patient outcomes. One of the major challenges involved in optimising post-transplant outcomes is managing the immune system's response to the transplanted graft and preventing organ rejection. This is mainly accomplished through the use of immunosuppressant agents, which have become a mainstay of treatment for a majority of post-transplant patients. This article, the first of two parts, discusses the concept of immunosuppression and its importance in the care of patients who have received an organ transplant. It focuses on the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in transplant rejection and discusses the pharmacologic aspects of immunosuppression and its implications for patient care.

Comparative efficacy of anti-CD40 antibody-mediated costimulation blockade on long-term survival of full-thickness porcine corneal grafts in nonhuman primates

Porcine corneas may be good substitutes for human corneas in donor shortage. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of an anti-CD40 antibody-based regimen compared with an anti-CD20 antibody-based regimen on the survival of full-thickness corneas in pig-to-rhesus xenotransplant. Thirteen Chinese rhesuses underwent full-thickness corneal xenotransplant. Six were administered anti-CD40 antibody, and the others were administered anti-CD20 antibody, basiliximab, and tacrolimus. Graft survival and changes in lymphocyte, donor-specific and anti-Galα1,3Galβ1,4GlcNAc-R (αGal) antibody, and aqueous complement levels were evaluated. Treatment with the anti-CD40 antibody (>511, >422, >273, >203, >196, 41 days) and anti-CD20 antibody (>470, 297, >260, >210, >184, 134, >97 days) resulted in long-term survival of grafts. In the anti-CD20 group, the number of activated B cells was significantly lower than that in the anti-CD40 group, and the level of aqueous complements at 6 months was significantly higher than the preoperative level. There were no differences in the levels of T cells or donor-specific and anti-αGal antibodies between the 2 groups. In the anti-CD20 group, 3 primates had adverse reactions. In conclusion, both the anti-CD40 antibody- and the anti-CD20 antibody-based protocols were effective for the long-term survival of full-thickness corneal xenografts, but the anti-CD40 antibody-based treatment had fewer adverse effects.

Drug-Induced Hematological Cytopenia in Kidney Transplantation and the Challenges It Poses for Kidney Transplant Physicians

Drug-induced hematological cytopenia is common in kidney transplantation. Various cytopenia including leucopenia (neutropenia), thrombocytopenia, and anemia can occur in kidney transplant recipients. Persistent severe leucopenia or neutropenia can lead to opportunistic infections of various etiologies. On the contrary, reducing or stopping immunosuppressive medications in these events can provoke a rejection. Transplant clinicians are often faced with the delicate dilemma of balancing cytopenia and rejection from adjustments of immunosuppressive regimen. Differentials of drug-induced cytopenia are wide. Identification of culprit medication and subsequent modification is also challenging. In this review, we will discuss individual drug implicated in causing cytopenia and correlate it with corresponding literature evidence.

LCK as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Acute Rejection after Kidney Transplantation: A Bioinformatics Clue

Objectives

We aim to identify the key biomarker of acute rejection (AR) after kidney transplantation via bioinformatics methods.

Methods

The gene expression data GSE75693 of 30 samples with stable kidney transplantation recipients and 15 AR samples were downloaded and analyzed by the limma package to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Then, Gene Ontology (GO) functional enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were done to explore the biological functions and potential important pathways of DEGs. Finally, protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and literature mining were applied to construct the cocitation network and to select the hub protein.

Results

A total of 437 upregulated genes and 353 downregulated genes were selected according to P < 0.01 and |log₂(fold change)| > 1.0. DEGs of AR are mainly located on membranes and impact the activation of receptors in immune responses. In the PPI network, Src kinase, lymphocyte kinase (LCK), CD3G, B2M, interferon-γ, CD3D, tumor necrosis factor, VAV1, and CD3E in the T cell receptor signaling pathway were selected as important factors, and LCK was identified as the hub protein.

Conclusion

LCK, via acting on T-cell receptor, might be a potential therapeutic target for AR after kidney transplantation.

Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for treating acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Registry data shows that the incidence of acute rejection has been steadily falling. Approximately 10% to 35% of kidney recipients will undergo treatment for at least one episode of acute rejection within the first post-transplant year. Treatment options include pulsed steroid therapy, the use of an antibody preparation, the alteration of background immunosuppression, or combinations of these options. Over recent years, new treatment strategies have evolved, and in many parts of the world there has been an increase in use of tacrolimus and mycophenolate and a reduction in the use of cyclosporin and azathioprine use as baseline immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection. There are also global variations in use of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to treat acute rejection. This is an update of a review published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to: (1) to evaluate the relative and absolute effects of different classes of antibody preparation in preventing graft loss and resolving cellular or humoral rejection episodes when used as a treatment for first episode of rejection in kidney transplant recipients; (2) evaluate the relative and absolute effects of different classes of antibody preparation in preventing graft loss and resolving cellular or humoral rejection episodes when used as a treatment for steroid-resistant rejection in kidney transplant recipients; (3) determine how the benefits and adverse events vary for each type of antibody preparation; and (4) determine how the benefits and harms vary for different formulations of antibody within each type.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 18 April 2017 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages comparing all mono- and polyclonal antibody preparations, given in combination with any other immunosuppressive agents, for the treatment of cellular or humoral graft rejection, when compared to any other treatment for acute rejection were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias of the included studies and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 new studies (18 reports, 346 participants) in this update, bring the total number of included studies to 31 (76 reports, 1680 participants). Studies were generally small, incompletely reported, especially for potential harms, and did not define outcome measures adequately. The risk of bias was inadequate or unclear risk for random sequence generation (81%), allocation concealment (87%) and other bias (87%). There were, however, a predominance of low risk of bias for blinding (75%) and incomplete outcome data (80%) across all the studies. Selective reporting had a mixture of low (58%), high (29%), and unclear (13%) risk of bias.Seventeen studies (1005 participants) compared therapies for first acute cellular rejection episodes. Antibody therapy was probably better than steroid in reversing acute cellular rejection (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.82; moderate certainty) and preventing subsequent rejection (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.99; moderate certainty), may be better for preventing graft loss (death censored: (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.12; low certainty) but there was little or no difference in death at one year. Adverse effects of treatment (including fever, chills and malaise following drug administration) were probably reduced with steroid therapy (RR 23.88, 95% CI 5.10 to 111.86; I2 = 16%; moderate certainty).Twelve studies (576 patients) investigated antibody treatment for steroid-resistant rejection. There was little or no benefit of muromonab-CD3 over ATG or ALG in reversing rejection, preventing subsequent rejection, or preventing graft loss or death. Two studies compared the use of rituximab for treatment of acute humoral rejection (58 patients). Muromonab-CD3 treated patients suffered three times more than those receiving either ATG or T10B9, from a syndrome of fever, chills and malaise following drug administration (RR 3.12, 95% CI 1.87 to 5.21; I2 = 31%), and experienced more neurological side effects (RR 13.10 95% CI 1.43 to 120.05; I2 = 36%) (low certainty evidence).There was no evidence of additional benefit from rituximab in terms of either reversal of rejection (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.64), or graft loss or death 12 months (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.23 to 4.35). Rituximab plus steroids probably increases the risk of urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis (RR 5.73, 95% CI 1.80 to 18.21).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In reversing first acute cellular rejection and preventing graft loss, any antibody is probably better than steroid, but there is little or no difference in subsequent rejection and patient survival. In reversing steroid-resistant rejection there was little or no difference between different antibodies over a period of 12 months, with limited data beyond that time frame. In treating acute humoral rejection, there was no evidence that the use of antibody therapy conferred additional benefit in terms of reversal of rejection, or death or graft loss.Although this is an updated review, the majority of newer included studies provide additional evidence from the cyclosporin/azathioprine era of kidney transplantation and therefore conclusions cannot necessarily be extrapolated to patients treated with more contemporary immunosuppressive regimens which include tacrolimus/mycophenolate or sirolimus. However, many kidney transplant centres around the world continue to use older immunosuppressive regimes and the findings of this review remain strongly relevant to their clinical practice.Larger studies with standardised reproducible outcome criteria are needed to investigate the outcomes and risks of antibody treatments for acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients receiving contemporary immunosuppressive regimes.

Aptamers for CD Antigens: From Cell Profiling to Activity Modulation

Nucleic acid-based aptamers are considered to be a promising alternative to antibodies because of their strong and specific binding to diverse targets, fast and inexpensive chemical synthesis, and easy labeling with a fluorescent dye or therapeutic agent. Cluster of differentiation (CD) proteins are among the most popular antigens for aptamers on the cell surface. These anti-CD aptamers could be used in cell biology and biomedicine, from simple cell phenotyping by flow cytometry or fluorescent microscopy to diagnosis and treatment of HIV/AIDS to cancer and immune therapies. The unique feature of aptamers is that they can act simultaneously as an agonist and antagonist of CD receptors depending on a degree of aptamer oligomerization. Aptamers can also deliver small interfering RNA to silence vital genes in CD-positive cells. In this review, we summarize nucleic acid sequences of anti-CD aptamers and their use, which have been validated in multiple studies.

Novel surgical techniques, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering and innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

On the 60th anniversary of the first successfully performed renal transplantation, we summarize the historical, current and potential future status of kidney transplantation. We discuss three different aspects with a potential significant influence on kidney transplantation progress: the development of surgical techniques, the influence of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering, and changes in immunosuppression. We evaluate the standard open surgical procedures with modern techniques and compare them to less invasive videoscopic as well as robotic techniques. The role of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine as a potential method for future kidney regeneration or replacement and the interesting search for novel solutions in the field of immunosuppression will be discussed. After 60 years since the first successfully performed kidney transplantation, we can conclude that the greatest achievements are associated with the development of surgical techniques and with planned systemic immunosuppression.

Glypican-3 Targeting Immunotoxins for the Treatment of Liver Cancer

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer, yet no effective therapeutics exist. This review provides an overview of the recent development of recombinant immunotoxins for the treatment of glypican-3 (GPC3) expressing HCC. GPC3 is a cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan that is overexpressed in HCC, but is absent from normal adult human tissues. Treatment of HCC with anti-GPC3 immunotoxins represents a new therapeutic option. Using phage display and hybridoma technologies, three high affinity antibodies (HN3, HS20 and YP7) have been generated against GPC3. Two of these antibodies (HN3 and HS20) have demonstrated the ability to inhibit Wnt/Yap signaling, leading to a reduction in liver cancer cell proliferation. By combining the HN3 antibody capable of inhibiting Wnt/Yap signaling with the protein synthesis inhibitory domain of the Pseudomonas exotoxin, a recombinant immunotoxin that exhibits a dual inhibitory mechanism was generated. This immunotoxin was found to be highly effective in the treatment of human HCCs in mouse xenograft models. Engineering of the toxin fragment to reduce the level of immunogenicity is currently being explored. The development of immunotoxins provides opportunities for novel liver cancer therapies.

Usefulness of Tacrolimus without Basiliximab in Well-Matched Living-Donor Renal Transplant Recipients in Korea

OBJECTIVES

Basiliximab is used alongside tacrolimus-based immunosuppression for routine induction therapy, even for well-matched living-donor renal transplant recipients. Because tacrolimus is a different drug from cyclosporine, this study examined the utility of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression without basiliximab for well-matched living-donor renal transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study evaluated 36 patients who underwent 1 to 3 human leukocyte antigens mismatched living-donor renal transplants without basiliximab induction therapy between April 2012 and March 2015 (group 1). All transplants were ABO compatible and T-flow negative and were followed until April 2015. Tacrolimus-based triple therapy was used for maintenance immunosuppression. The control group comprised 72 age- and sex-matched patients who underwent 1 to 3 human leukocyte antigens mismatched living-donor renal transplants with basiliximab induction therapy during the same period (group 2).

RESULTS

Two patients in group 1 and 12 patients in group 2 had infection,with cytomegalovirus infection and Pneumocystis pneumonia infection occurring only in group 2 and BK virus and urinary tract infection reported in both groups, with a similar incidence. One patient from group 2 had sepsis. Although the incidence of infection tended to be lower in group 1 than in group 2 (5.6% vs 16.7%), the overall incidence of infection was not significantly different (P=.135). In addition, there were no significant differences in incidence of acute rejection between groups 1 and 2 (2.8% vs 4.2%; P=.699). All patients showed stable renal function after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus-based triple drug maintenance immunosuppression without basiliximab might be an optimal treatment choice for individuals undergoing well-matched living-donor renal transplant.

Eculizumab use in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Eculizumab suppresses the effector functions of the complement system and represents a therapeutic breakthrough for patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria or atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Safety monitoring is ongoing; so far, most notable is the expected increase in infection risk with encapsulated organisms. Despite potential applicability in multiple complement-mediated disorders, the off-label use of eculizumab has been limited, mainly by its prohibitive cost. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current data relevant to the use of eculizumab in kidney transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

In aHUS, prone to high rates of recurrence and allograft loss, eculizumab has made the most notable therapeutic impact. Further clarification of complement defects may help predict therapeutic responses and hopefully guide treatment duration. In C3 glomerulopathies, the clinical response to eculizumab appears more heterogeneous and less effective in processes mediated by upstream to C5 complement deregulation. A large clinical trial of eculizumab for prevention of delayed graft function is ongoing. In antibody-mediated rejection, the role of eculizumab is unclear as its use has been limited to very complex, mostly presensitized, patients in mixed combinations of therapeutic modalities.

SUMMARY

Overall, eculizumab has raised awareness of complement-mediated disorders as an exciting, new therapeutic option with multiple potential applications in kidney transplantation. Further research is needed to develop a better understanding of eculizumab applicability, efficacy, and treatment monitoring and beyond, to future therapeutic tools targeting the complement.

Toll-like receptor 4 plays significant roles during allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis is a nasal hypersensitivity and allergic disease which leads to inflammation of nasal mucosa. Previous investigations revealed that innate immune receptors play a key role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases including allergic diseases. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which are important innate immune receptors, play crucial roles in the recognition of foreign antigens, including allergens, and subsequently for the induction of immune responses such as inflammation. There are several controversial reports regarding the roles of TLR4 in the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis. This review presents current information regarding the roles of TLR4 in the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis and the plausible mechanisms which lead to the expression and function of TLR4 in this disease.

Blood disorders typically associated with renal transplantation

Renal transplantation has become one of the most common surgical procedures performed to replace a diseased kidney with a healthy kidney from a donor. It can help patients with kidney failure live decades longer. However, renal transplantation also faces a risk of developing various blood disorders. The blood disorders typically associated with renal transplantation can be divided into two main categories: (1) Common disorders including post-transplant anemia (PTA), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), post-transplant erythrocytosis (PTE), and post-transplant cytopenias (PTC, leukopenia/neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and pancytopenia); and (2) Uncommon but serious disorders including hemophagocytic syndrome (HPS), thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), therapy-related myelodysplasia (t-MDS), and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML). Although many etiological factors involve the development of post-transplant blood disorders, immunosuppressive agents, and viral infections could be the two major contributors to most blood disorders and cause hematological abnormalities and immunodeficiency by suppressing hematopoietic function of bone marrow. Hematological abnormalities and immunodeficiency will result in severe clinical outcomes in renal transplant recipients. Understanding how blood disorders develop will help cure these life-threatening complications. A potential therapeutic strategy against post-transplant blood disorders should focus on tapering immunosuppression or replacing myelotoxic immunosuppressive drugs with lower toxic alternatives, recognizing and treating promptly the etiological virus, bacteria, or protozoan, restoring both hematopoietic function of bone marrow and normal blood counts, and improving kidney graft survival.

Personalization of the immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplant recipients: the great challenge in "omics" medicine

Renal transplantation represents the most favorable treatment for patients with advanced renal failure and it is followed, in most cases, by a significant enhancement in patients’ quality of life. Significant improvements in one-year renal allograft and patients’ survival rates have been achieved over the last 10 years primarily as a result of newer immunosuppressive regimens. Despite these notable achievements in the short-term outcome, long-term graft function and survival rates remain less than optimal. Death with a functioning graft and chronic allograft dysfunction result in an annual rate of 3%–5%. In this context, drug toxicity and long-term chronic adverse effects of immunosuppressive medications have a pivotal role. Unfortunately, at the moment, except for the evaluation of trough drug levels, no clinically useful tools are available to correctly manage immunosuppressive therapy. The proper use of these drugs could potentiate therapeutic effects minimizing adverse drug reactions. For this purpose, in the future, “omics” techniques could represent powerful tools that may be employed in clinical practice to routinely aid the personalization of drug treatment according to each patient’s genetic makeup. However, it is unquestionable that additional studies and technological advances are needed to standardize and simplify these methodologies.