1
|
Bonnamy M, Brousse A, Pirolles E, Michalakis Y, Blanc S. The genome formula of a multipartite virus is regulated both at the individual segment and the segment group levels. PLoS Pathog 2024; 20:e1011973. [PMID: 38271470 PMCID: PMC10846721 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Differential accumulation of the distinct genome segments is a common feature of viruses with segmented genomes. The reproducible and specific pattern of genome segment accumulation within the host is referred to as the "genome formula". There is speculation and some experimental support for a functional role of the genome formula by modulating gene expression through copy number variations. However, the mechanisms of genome formula regulation have not yet been identified. In this study, we investigated whether the genome formula of the octopartite nanovirus faba bean necrotic stunt virus (FBNSV) is regulated by processes acting at the individual segment vs. viral population levels. We used a leaf infiltration system to show that the two most accumulated genome segments of the FBNSV possess a greater intrinsic accumulation capacity in Vicia faba tissues than the other segments. Nevertheless, processes acting at the individual segment level are insufficient to generate the genome formula, suggesting the involvement of additional mechanisms acting at the supra-segment level. Indeed, the absence of segments with important functions during systemic infection strongly modifies the relative frequency of the others, indicating that the genome formula is a property of the segment group. Together, these results demonstrate that the FBNSV genome formula is shaped by a complex process acting at both the individual segment and the segment group levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mélia Bonnamy
- PHIM, Univ Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
- MIVEGEC, CNRS, IRD, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Andy Brousse
- PHIM, Univ Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
- MIVEGEC, CNRS, IRD, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Elodie Pirolles
- PHIM, Univ Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Stéphane Blanc
- PHIM, Univ Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The rising threat of geminiviruses: molecular insights into the disease mechanism and mitigation strategies. Mol Biol Rep 2023; 50:3835-3848. [PMID: 36701042 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-023-08266-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Geminiviruses are among the most threatening emerging plant viruses, accountable for a huge loss to agricultural production worldwide. These viruses have been responsible for some serious outbreaks during the last few decades across different parts of the world. Sincere efforts have been made to regulate the disease incidence by incorporating a multi-dimensional approach, and this process has been facilitated greatly by the advent of molecular techniques. But, the mixed infection due to the polyphagous nature of vectors results in viral recombination followed by the emergence of novel viral strains which thus renders the existing mitigation strategies ineffective. Hence, a multifaceted insight into the molecular mechanism of the disease is really needed to understand the regulatory points; much has been done in this direction during the last few years. The present review aims to explore all the latest developments made so far and to organize the information in a comprehensive manner so that some novel hypotheses for controlling the disease may be generated. METHODS AND RESULTS Starting with the background information, diverse genera of geminiviruses are listed along with their pathological and economic impacts. A comprehensive and detailed mechanism of infection is elaborated to study the interactions between vector, host, and virus at different stages in the life cycle of geminiviruses. Finally, an effort isalso made to analyze the progress made at the molecular level for the development of various mitigation strategies and suggest more effective and better approaches for controlling the disease. CONCLUSION The study has provided a thorough understanding of molecular mechanism of geminivirus infection.
Collapse
|
3
|
A New Perspective on the Co-Transmission of Plant Pathogens by Hemipterans. Microorganisms 2023; 11:microorganisms11010156. [PMID: 36677448 PMCID: PMC9865879 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11010156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Co-infection of plants by pathogens is common in nature, and the interaction of the pathogens can affect the infection outcome. There are diverse ways in which viruses and bacteria are transmitted from infected to healthy plants, but insects are common vectors. The present review aims to highlight key findings of studies evaluating the co-transmission of plant pathogens by insects and identify challenges encountered in these studies. In this review, we evaluated whether similar pathogens might compete during co-transmission; whether the changes in the pathogen titer in the host, in particular associated with the co-infection, could influence its transmission; and finally, we discussed the pros and cons of the different approaches used to study co-transmission. At the end of the review, we highlighted areas of study that need to be addressed. This review shows that despite the recent development of techniques and methods to study the interactions between pathogens and their insect vectors, there are still gaps in the knowledge of pathogen transmission. Additional laboratory and field studies using different pathosystems will help elucidate the role of host co-infection and pathogen co-transmission in the ecology and evolution of infectious diseases.
Collapse
|
4
|
Vector acquisition and co-inoculation of two plant viruses influences transmission, infection, and replication in new hosts. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20355. [PMID: 36437281 PMCID: PMC9701672 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24880-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
This study investigated the role of vector acquisition and transmission on the propagation of single and co-infections of tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV,) and tomato mottle virus (ToMoV) (Family: Geminiviridae, Genus: Begomovirus) by the whitefly vector Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 (Gennadius) in tomato. The aim of this research was to determine if the manner in which viruses are co-acquired and co-transmitted changes the probability of acquisition, transmission and new host infections. Whiteflies acquired virus by feeding on singly infected plants, co-infected plants, or by sequential feeding on singly infected plants. Viral titers were also quantified by qPCR in vector cohorts, in artificial diet, and plants after exposure to viruliferous vectors. Differences in transmission, infection status of plants, and titers of TYLCV and ToMoV were observed among treatments. All vector cohorts acquired both viruses, but co-acquisition/co-inoculation generally reduced transmission of both viruses as single and mixed infections. Co-inoculation of viruses by the vector also altered virus accumulation in plants regardless of whether one or both viruses were propagated in new hosts. These findings highlight the complex nature of vector-virus-plant interactions that influence the spread and replication of viruses as single and co-infections.
Collapse
|
5
|
Epidemiology of Yam Viruses in Guadeloupe: Role of Cropping Practices and Seed-Tuber Supply. Viruses 2022; 14:v14112366. [PMID: 36366464 PMCID: PMC9692558 DOI: 10.3390/v14112366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The epidemiology of yam viruses remains largely unexplored. We present a large-scale epidemiological study of yam viruses in Guadeloupe based on the analysis of 1124 leaf samples collected from yams and weeds. We addressed the prevalence of cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Cordyline virus 1 (CoV1), Dioscorea mosaic associated virus (DMaV), yam asymptomatic virus 1 (YaV1), yam mosaic virus (YMV), yam mild mosaic virus (YMMV), badnaviruses, macluraviruses and potexviruses, and the key epidemiological drivers of these viruses. We provide evidence that several weeds are reservoirs of YMMV and that YMMV isolates infecting weeds cluster together with those infecting yams, pointing to the role of weeds in the epidemiology of YMMV. We report the occurrence of yam chlorotic necrosis virus (YCNV) in Guadeloupe, the introduction of YMMV isolates through the importation of yam tubers, and the absence of vertical transmission of YaV1. We identified specific effects on some cropping practices, such as weed management and the use of chemical pesticides, on the occurrence of a few viruses, but no crop-related factor had a strong or general effect on the overall epidemiology of the targeted viruses. Overall, our work provides insights into the epidemiology of yam viruses that will help design more efficient control strategies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Nonconcomitant host-to-host transmission of multipartite virus genome segments may lead to complete genome reconstitution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2201453119. [PMID: 35914138 PMCID: PMC9371732 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2201453119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Because multipartite viruses package their genome segments in different viral particles, they face a potentially huge cost if the entire genomic information, i.e., all genome segments, needs to be present concomitantly for the infection to function. Previous work with the octapartite faba bean necrotic stunt virus (FBNSV; family Nanoviridae, genus Nanovirus) showed that this issue can be resolved at the within-host level through a supracellular functioning; all viral segments do not need to be present within the same host cell but may complement each other through intercellular trafficking of their products (protein or messenger RNA [mRNA]). Here, we report on whether FBNSV can as well decrease the genomic integrity cost during between-host transmission. Using viable infections lacking nonessential virus segments, we show that full-genome infections can be reconstituted and function through separate acquisition and/or inoculation of complementary sets of genome segments in recipient hosts. This separate acquisition/inoculation can occur either through the transmission of different segment sets by different individual aphid vectors or by the sequential acquisition by the same aphid of complementary sets of segments from different hosts. The possibility of a separate between-host transmission of different genome segments thus offers a way to at least partially resolve the genomic maintenance problem faced by multipartite viruses.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ryckebusch F, Peterschmitt M, Granier M, Sauvion N. Alfalfa leaf curl virus is efficiently acquired by its aphid vector Aphis craccivora but inefficiently transmitted. J Gen Virol 2021; 102:001516. [PMID: 33210990 PMCID: PMC8116941 DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.001516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Alfalfa leaf curl virus (ALCV) is the first geminivirus for which aphid transmission was reported. Transmission by Aphis craccivora was determined previously to be highly specific and circulative. Using various complementary techniques, the transmission journey of ALCV was monitored from its uptake from infected plant tissues up to the head of its vector. ALCV was shown to be restricted to phloem tissues using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and electropenetrography (EPG) monitoring of virus acquisition. Furthermore, the virus is heterogeneously distributed in phloem tissues, as revealed by FISH and quantitative PCR of viral DNA acquired by EPG-monitored aphids. Despite the efficient ingestion of viral DNA, about 106 viral DNA copies per insect in a 15 h feeding period on ALCV-infected plants, the individual maximum transmission rate was 12 %. Transmission success was related to a critical viral accumulation, around 1.6×107 viral DNA copies per insect, a threshold that generally needed more than 48 h to be reached. Moreover, whereas the amount of acquired virus did not decrease over time in the whole aphid body, it declined in the haemolymph and heads. ALCV was not detected in progenies of viruliferous aphids and did not affect aphid fitness. Compared to geminiviruses transmitted by whiteflies or leafhoppers, or to luteoviruses transmitted by aphids, the transmission efficiency of ALCV by A. craccivora is low. This result is discussed in relation to the aphid vector of this geminivirus and the agroecological features of alfalfa, a hardy perennial host plant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faustine Ryckebusch
- CIRAD, UMR BGPI, Montpellier, France
- BGPI, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France
- Global Health Institute, School of Life Science, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michel Peterschmitt
- CIRAD, UMR BGPI, Montpellier, France
- BGPI, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France
| | - Martine Granier
- CIRAD, UMR BGPI, Montpellier, France
- BGPI, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France
| | - Nicolas Sauvion
- BGPI, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Of the approximately 1,200 plant virus species that have been described to date, nearly one-third are single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) viruses, and all are transmitted by insect vectors. However, most studies of vector transmission of plant viruses have focused on RNA viruses. All known plant ssDNA viruses belong to two economically important families, Geminiviridae and Nanoviridae, and in recent years, there have been increased efforts to understand whether they have evolved similar relationships with their respective insect vectors. This review describes the current understanding of ssDNA virus-vector interactions, including how these viruses cross insect vector cellular barriers, the responses of vectors to virus circulation, the possible existence of viral replication within insect vectors, and the three-way virus-vector-plant interactions. Despite recent breakthroughs in our understanding of these viruses, many aspects of plant ssDNA virus transmission remain elusive. More effort is needed to identify insect proteins that mediate the transmission of plant ssDNA viruses and to understand the complex virus-insect-plant three-way interactions in the field during natural infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Wei Wang
- Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
| | - Stéphane Blanc
- Plant Health Institute of Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France;
| |
Collapse
|