DOLAVI Real-Life Study of Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine in Naive HIV-1 Patients (48 Weeks)

Efficacy and Safety of Dolutegravir/Lamivudine in Antiretroviral Therapy-Naive People Living With HIV-1 and With High-Level Viremia

BACKGROUND

Dual regimen dolutegravir/lamivudine (DOL/3TC) showed potent efficacy and favorable safety in both antiretroviral therapy-naive and therapy-experienced patients, but data from real life about naive people with high-level viremia are still lacking.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of people living with HIV who were naive to antiretroviral therapy, had baseline HIV-1 RNA ranging from 100,000 to 500,000 copies/mL, and initiated DOL/3TC. Virologic efficacy and changes in immunologic parameters after 12 months of treatment were evaluated and compared with highly viremic people living with HIV who started a triple antiretroviral combination.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were met by 58 patients with median age of 43.4 years. At baseline, mean HIV RNA was 5.4 log 10 and mean CD4 T lymphocyte count was 488 cells/mm 3 . HIV RNA <50 copies/mL was obtained in 45 patients (77.6% in the intention-to-treat analysis) after 6 months and in 53 patients (91.4%) after 12 months. Reasons for treatment failure were virologic failure in 2 cases and adverse events in 3 cases. No significant changes in median value of lipids were reported, while there was a not significant increase in body weight (+1.18 kg). Virologic and immunologic response at month 12 in patients on DOL/3TC was comparable with that observed in 50 naive patients with high-level viremia and starting a triple antiretroviral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-life cohort of naive patients with high-level viremia, DOL/3TC was associated with high virologic efficacy and good tolerability after 12 months, supporting use of this dual regimen also in persons with high initial viremia.

Long-term effectiveness and tolerability of dolutegravir/lamivudine in treatment-naive people with HIV: an analysis of a multicentre cohort at 96 weeks

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term effectiveness, persistence and tolerability of dolutegravir (DTG)/lamivudine (3TC), compared with the most frequently prescribed first-line treatment regimens, among antiretroviral-naive people with HIV from CoRIS, a multicentre cohort in Spain, in 2018-23.

METHODS

We used multivariable regression models to compare viral suppression (VS) (HIV RNA viral load <50 copies/mL), change in CD4 cell counts, persistence and treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), at 96 (±24) weeks after treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Of 2359 participants, DTG/3TC was prescribed in 472 (20.0%), bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/emtricitabine (FTC) in 1134 (48.1%), DTG + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/FTC in 300 (12.7%), DTG/abacavir/3TC in 273 (11.6%) and darunavir/cobicistat/TAF/FTC in 180 (7.6%). At 96 weeks from treatment initiation, 94.0% of participants initiating with DTG/3TC achieved VS, and the mean increase in CD4 cell counts was 295.5 cells/μL (95% CI: 269.9-321.1). During the first 96 weeks after DTG/3TC initiation, 9.8% and 1.3% discontinued their initial regimen, overall and due to AEs, respectively. In multivariable analyses, we did not find significant differences in VS or increase in CD4 cell counts among participants initiating with DTG/3TC compared with other regimens. Initiating ART with a regimen other than DTG/3TC was associated with a higher risk of treatment discontinuation, overall and due to AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Among treatment-naive people with HIV from this large multicentre cohort, DTG/3TC had similar effectiveness and better persistence and tolerability than those of the most frequently prescribed first-line regimens at 96 weeks.

Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Dolutegravir and Lamivudine 2-Drug Regimen in People Living with HIV: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Dolutegravir (DTG) + lamivudine (3TC) demonstrated high rates of virologic suppression (VS) and low rates of virologic failure (VF), discontinuation, and drug resistance in randomized trials. Real-world evidence can support treatment effectiveness, safety, and tolerability in clinical practice and aid in treatment decisions.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify studies using DTG + 3TC (January 2013-March 2024). Studies were screened to include observational studies reporting 48- or 96-week on-treatment VS, VF, or discontinuation outcomes; proportions of individuals with each outcome at each time point were estimated using random- and common-effects models.

RESULTS

Of 249 SLR-identified publications, 43 reported consistently defined outcomes of interest at comparable time points, representing 1480 individuals naive to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and 12,234 individuals with prior ART experience. At weeks 48 and 96, respectively, estimated proportions (95% CIs; random-effects model) with on-treatment VS were high (naive to ART, 0.964 [0.945-0.979] and 0.902 [0.816-0.966]; prior ART, 0.966 [0.950-0.980] and 0.971 [0.946-0.990]), with low estimated proportions experiencing VF (naive to ART, 0.001 [0.000-0.013] and 0.001 [0.000-0.008]; prior ART, 0.009 [0.005-0.015] and 0.015 [0.007-0.024]) and discontinuations for any reason (naive to ART, 0.052 [0.019-0.097] and 0.130 [0.084-0.183]; prior ART, 0.067 [0.042-0.098] and 0.084 [0.047-0.130]). Across identified studies (> 44,000 unique individuals), those reporting resistance outcomes at VF/blip (regardless of emergence) detected integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) mutations in 0 of 2346 individuals naive to ART and 0.02% (4/20,060) of individuals with prior ART experience (S147G, R263K, G118R + E138K, T66A + G118R + E138K); additionally, N155H was reported in an individual using DTG + 3TC with unknown baseline ART status.

CONCLUSION

Overall treatment outcomes in real-world settings confirm the efficacy, tolerability, and high barrier to resistance seen in phase 3 trials across diverse populations, including those naive to ART or with prior ART experience.

Efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in treatment-naive people living with HIV without baseline drug-resistance testing available (D2ARLING): 48-week results of a phase 4, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Dolutegravir plus lamivudine has emerged as a preferred treatment for HIV; however, initiating this regimen without baseline resistance testing raises concerns about the potential presence of pretreatment lamivudine resistance. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in the absence of information on baseline resistance testing in treatment-naive people with HIV.

METHODS

We did an open-label, non-inferiority, single-centre, phase 4, randomised controlled study (D2ARLING), designed to assess the efficacy and safety of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in treatment-naive people with HIV with no available baseline resistance testing. We included participants aged 18 years or older with HIV-1 diagnosis who were naive to antiretroviral therapy and had no baseline genotypic resistance testing result available. We randomly assigned (1:1) participants to receive dolutegravir 50 mg plus lamivudine 300 mg or a three-drug regimen including dolutegravir 50 mg plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg and either emtricitabine 200 mg or lamivudine 300 mg. Randomisation was stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA (≤100 000 vs >100 000 copies per mL) and CD4 cell count (<200 vs ≥200 cells per μL). Per protocol, we performed genotypic drug-resistance testing on day 1 and it remained double-masked throughout the study, simulating a scenario of inaccessibility of baseline resistance testing. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 (intention-to-treat exposed analysis via the Snapshot algorithm) with prespecified non-inferiority margin of 10%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04549467).

FINDINGS

Between Nov 17, 2020, and Aug 31, 2022, 214 participants were randomly assigned to and treated with dolutegravir plus lamivudine (n=106) or dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and either emtricitabine or lamivudine (n=108). Median age of participants was 31 years (IQR 26-39) and 49 (23%) were female. At baseline, 66 (31%) of participants had an HIV-1 RNA viral load of more than 100 000 copies per mL, and 44 (21%) had a CD4 T-cell count of less than 200 cells per μL. At week 48, 97 (92%) of 106 participants in the dolutegravir plus lamivudine group and 96 (89%) of 108 participants in the dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with either emtricitabine or lamivudine group had HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL (difference 2·62%; 95% CI -5·3 to 10·6), showing non-inferiority of dolutegravir plus lamivudine to the three-drug regimen. None of the participants in the dolutegravir plus lamivudine group and two in the control group had protocol-defined virological failure, and none developed treatment-emergent resistance mutations to any of the study drugs. Overall adverse event rates were similar between arms. Less than 1% of participants in both groups were discontinued due to adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

This study provides evidence supporting the non-inferiority of dolutegravir plus lamivudine compared with a preferred three-drug regimen in treatment-naive individuals without baseline resistance testing. These findings suggest that baseline resistance testing might not be a requirement for initiating treatment with dolutegravir plus lamivudine in settings with low frequency or suspicion of transmitted drug resistance to these drugs.

FUNDING

ViiV Healthcare.

Efficacy and Tollerability of INI-Based 2-Drug Regimen in Virosuppressed Persons Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this meta-analysis was to synthesize the available evidence from the literature on the efficacy and safety of integrase inhibitor-based two drug regimens compared to triple drug regimens in virosuppressed people living with HIV (PLWH) in a long-term follow-up (at 96 weeks).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and adverse drug reactions leading to discontinuation of two drug regimens compared to triple drug regimens in virosuppressed PLWH patients at 96 weeks of follow-up. We searched MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library up to March 15, 2024, and studies were selected for eligibility based on predefined criteria. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated as the measure of association between therapy and incidence of events.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in the analysis, both clinical trials and observational studies. The two drug regimens included cabotegravir/rilpivirine, dolutegravir/lamivudine, and dolutegravir/rilpivirine. No significant differences were observed in treatment failure (RR, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-1.13; P=0.182), virological failure (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48-1.29; P=0.341), adverse drug reactions leading to discontinuation (RR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.73-4.17; P=0.215), or appearance of mutation (RR, 2.48; 95% CI, 0.33-18.68; P=0.379) between two drug regimen and triple drug regimen groups at 96 weeks of follow up.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis provide an overview of the available evidence and supports the use of two drug regimens as an option for simplifying treatment and improving clinical outcomes in virosuppressed PLWH.

Effectiveness, Weight Changes, and Metabolic Outcomes on Switch to Generic Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Among People with HIV in Western India: An Observational Study

We assessed the effectiveness and safety of switching to generic dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) among People living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PWH) in Western India. In this single-center, retrospective observational study, PWH, who switched to DTG/3TC, were followed for virologic, immunologic, and clinical effectiveness, and safety, including weight changes, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to predict average change in weight adjusted for age, sex, duration of previous antiretroviral (ARV) regimens, and baseline weight. From May 2017 to July 2022, out of 434 PWH switched to DTG/3TC, 304 with at least 1 follow-up visit were included. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] age was 54 (IQR 49-61) years and 70.1% were male. Prevalence of baseline comorbidities was 57.9% (hypertension-41.5%, chronic kidney disease-40.9%, and diabetes mellitus-18.8%). Reasons for switch were affordability (47.4%), desire for simplification (41.8%), ARV toxicities (19.1%), and concern about potential toxicities (10.2%). Median (IQR) duration of follow-up on DTG/3TC was 40 (IQR 31-49) weeks. No virologic failure was observed. Rates of virologic suppression [viral load (VL) ≤20 copies/mL or target not detected (TND)] at 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 weeks were 95.2%, 95.9%, 90%, 100%, 81.3%, and 88.4%, respectively. Only 9 (3%) PWH permanently discontinued DTG/3TC. Predicted adjusted mean weight gain of +3.3 kg was observed at 96 weeks. Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine or lamivudine (XTC)/non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and duration on DTG/3TC were significantly associated with weight gain. Apart from trend in worsening hyperglycemia (nine PWH with new onset diabetes), no clinically significant change in lipids and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was documented. Switching to DTG/3TC is an effective and safe option among virologically suppressed PWH with high comorbidity burden in India. In view of the several advantages of DTG/3TC, it may be considered for potential scale-up in the right population, both in private and public health care settings in India.

Real-World Effectiveness of Dolutegravir/Lamivudine in People With HIV-1 in Test-and-Treat Settings or With High Baseline Viral Loads: TANDEM Study Subgroup Analyses

INTRODUCTION

Dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 for the treatment of antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive people with HIV-1 based on results from the pivotal GEMINI-1/GEMINI-2 trials. Around that time, immediate initiation of treatment upon diagnosis was recommended in the US Department of Health and Human Services guidelines. Here we report results from 126 treatment-naive people with HIV-1 who initiated DTG/3TC as part of a test-and-treat strategy (n = 61) or with high baseline viral loads (HIV-1 RNA ≥ 100,000 copies/ml; n = 16) from the TANDEM study.

METHODS

TANDEM was a US-based, retrospective chart review study that included a cohort of 126 individuals aged ≥ 18 years with no prior history of ART who initiated DTG/3TC before September 30, 2020, and had ≥ 6 months of follow-up. Test-and-treat was defined as ART initiation shortly after diagnosis without available viral load, CD4 + cell count, or HIV-1 resistance data. Outcomes included virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml; overall and by baseline viral load) and discontinuations. Analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

Among 61 individuals who initiated DTG/3TC in a test-and-treat setting (median [interquartile range (IQR)] treatment duration, 1.3 [0.9-1.7] years), 57 (93%) achieved virologic suppression, and 51 (84%) remained suppressed; 1 (< 1%) individual discontinued DTG/3TC due to persistent low-level viremia. The most common healthcare provider (HCP)-reported reason for initiating DTG/3TC was avoidance of long-term toxicities among individuals in the test-and-treat subgroup. Of 16 treatment-naive individuals with high baseline viral loads (median [IQR] treatment duration, 100,000-250,000 copies/ml: 1.2 [0.8-1.8] years; > 250,000 copies/ml: 1.0 [0.7-1.1] years), 14 (88%) achieved virologic suppression, 13 (81%) remained suppressed, and none discontinued DTG/3TC. Patient preference was the most common HCP-reported reason for initiating DTG/3TC in this subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrate real-world effectiveness of DTG/3TC, with few discontinuations, in people with HIV-1 in test-and-treat settings or with high baseline viral loads.

Two-Drug Regimens Dolutegravir/Lamivudine and Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Are Effective with Few Discontinuations in US Real-World Settings: Results from the TANDEM Study

INTRODUCTION

Dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) and dolutegravir/rilpivirine (DTG/RPV) are fixed-dose, complete, single-tablet, two-drug regimens (2DRs) indicated for HIV-1. DTG/3TC is approved for antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive people with HIV-1 and virologically suppressed individuals to replace current ART; DTG/RPV is indicated for virologically suppressed individuals as a switch option. Virologic efficacy and effectiveness of these DTG-based 2DRs have been demonstrated in phase 3 clinical trials and real-world cohorts, primarily from Europe. This study characterized real-world use of DTG-based 2DRs for HIV-1 treatment in the USA.

METHODS

TANDEM was a retrospective medical chart review across 24 US sites. Individuals aged ≥ 18 years who initiated DTG/3TC or DTG/RPV before September 30, 2020, with ≥ 6 months of follow-up were included. One cohort included ART-naive people who initiated DTG/3TC (n = 126), and two other cohorts included virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) people on stable ART regimens for ≥ 3 months before switch to either DTG/3TC (n = 192) or DTG/RPV (n = 151). Clinical characteristics, treatment history, and outcomes are described.

RESULTS

Virologically suppressed individuals were older than those who were ART-naive, and the ART-naive cohort had higher proportions of individuals assigned male at birth and of Hispanic ethnicity. The most common healthcare provider-reported reason for choosing a DTG-based 2DR was avoidance of long-term toxicities (25-33% across cohorts), followed by simplification/streamlining of treatment. Among ART-naive people on DTG/3TC, 94% achieved virologic suppression after initiation, and 83% maintained suppression at last follow-up; discontinuation rate was < 1%. Among cohorts who switched to DTG-based 2DRs, 96% maintained virologic suppression on DTG/3TC and 93% on DTG/RPV; 2% on DTG/3TC and 3% on DTG/RPV discontinued.

CONCLUSION

Motivation for selecting DTG-based 2DRs was primarily driven by a desire to avoid or manage toxicities and simplify treatment. Results demonstrate that DTG/3TC and DTG/RPV are effective in real-world settings, with few discontinuations, reflecting data from clinical trials.

Prevalence of Emergent Dolutegravir Resistance Mutations in People Living with HIV: A Rapid Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Dolutegravir (DTG) is a cornerstone of global antiretroviral (ARV) therapy (ART) due to its high efficacy and favorable tolerability. However, limited data exist regarding the risk of emergent integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) drug-resistance mutations (DRMs) in individuals receiving DTG-containing ART.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search using the term "Dolutegravir", last updated 18 December 2023, to estimate the prevalence of VF with emergent INSTI DRMs in people living with HIV (PLWH) without previous VF on an INSTI who received DTG-containing ART.

RESULTS

Of 2131 retrieved records, 43 clinical trials, 39 cohorts, and 6 cross-sectional studies provided data across 6 clinical scenarios based on ART history, virological status, and co-administered ARVs: (1) ART-naïve PLWH receiving DTG plus two NRTIs; (2) ART-naïve PLWH receiving DTG plus lamivudine; (3) ART-experienced PLWH with VF on a previous regimen receiving DTG plus two NRTIs; (4) ART-experienced PLWH with virological suppression receiving DTG plus two NRTIs; (5) ART-experienced PLWH with virological suppression receiving DTG and a second ARV; and (6) ART-experienced PLWH with virological suppression receiving DTG monotherapy. The median proportion of PLWH in clinical trials with emergent INSTI DRMs was 1.5% for scenario 3 and 3.4% for scenario 6. In the remaining four trial scenarios, VF prevalence with emergent INSTI DRMs was ≤0.1%. Data from cohort studies minimally influenced prevalence estimates from clinical trials, whereas cross-sectional studies yielded prevalence data lacking denominator details.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical trials, the prevalence of VF with emergent INSTI DRMs in PLWH receiving DTG-containing regimens has been low. Novel approaches are required to assess VF prevalence with emergent INSTI DRMs in PLWH receiving DTG in real-world settings.

Effectiveness, durability and safety of dolutegravir and lamivudine versus bictegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide in a real-world cohort of HIV-infected adults

OBJECTIVE

Dolutegravir plus lamivudine (2-DR) is suggested as an initial and switch option in HIV-1 treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness, durability, and safety of 2-DR compared to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (3-DR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an observational, ambispective study that included all treatment-naïve (TN) and treatment-experienced (TE) people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH), who started 2-DR or 3-DR between 01 July 2018, and 31 January 2022. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority, at 24 and 48 weeks, of 2-DR vs 3-DR regarding the percentage of PLWH with viral load (VL)<50 and 200 copies/mL in TN (12% margin) and VL≥50 and 200 copies/mL in TE (4% margin). Durability of response and safety were also measured.

RESULTS

292 PLWH were included (39 TN and 253 TE). In TN PLWH, non-inferiority was not achieved at 24 weeks (17; 95% CI -17 to 51 p = 0.348). By week 48, all PLWH on 3-DR maintained VL<50 copies/mL compared to 70% of PLWH on 2-DR although without reaching statistical significance (-33; 95% CI -60 to -10 p = 0.289). Non-inferiority was not achieved in TE PLWH either at 24 (0.4; 95% CI -9 to 10 p = 1) or at 48 weeks (4.5; 95% CI -0.5 to 9 p = 0.132). In TN, the risk of treatment discontinuation was similar between groups (HR: 0.31, p = 0.07); similar rates were also found in TE (HR: 1.3, p = 0.38). TE PLWH on 2-DR showed a better safety profile compared to 3-DR (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Our results did not show non-inferiority in terms of virological effectiveness. Additionally, durability and safety of 2-DR were confirmed to be similar to 3-DR.

Clinical use and effectiveness of dolutegravir and lamivudine: a long-term, real-world, retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The use of dolutegravir/lamivudine is based on solid clinical trials; however, real-world data remain limited.

OBJECTIVES

To provide data on the clinical use and effectiveness of dolutegravir/lamivudine in persons with HIV in a real-world scenario.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective, single-centre and observational study. We included all adults starting dolutegravir/lamivudine since November 2014. We reported all demographic, virological and immunological variables at baseline and assessed effectiveness [on treatment (OT), modified ITT (mITT) and ITT in those persons who reached 6 and 12 month follow-ups (M6 and M12).

RESULTS

Of the 1058 persons, 9 were treatment-naive; the final analysis included 1049 treatment-experienced people with HIV. Median (IQR) follow-up was 1 (0.3-1.6) years, with 81% and 63% persons reaching M6 and M12, respectively. The longest use of dolutegravir/lamivudine was 7.4 years. Per OT, mITT and ITT, HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL was 97%, 92% and 81% (M6) and 98%, 90% and 80% (M12), respectively. Females [adjusted risk ratio, aRR (95% CI): 1.69 (1.19-2.40)]; immediate, previous PI-based regimen [aRR (95% CI): 1.67 (1.09-2.56)]; and viral load (VL) ≥ 50 copies/mL at dolutegravir/lamivudine initiation [aRR (95% CI): 3.36 (2.32-4.88)] were independently associated with lack of effectiveness at M12; other demographic, immunological and virological variables like previous M184V/I substitutions or virological failure, were unrelated. Of the total, 944 (90%) continued dolutegravir/lamivudine. The most frequent known reason for discontinuation was toxicity [48 (46%) cases].

CONCLUSIONS

In our real-world experience, virological suppression rates were high for treatment-experienced persons on dolutegravir/lamivudine; however, we identified subgroups with a higher risk of lack of effectiveness at M12, who may benefit from closer follow-ups.

Dynamics of Rilpivirine Resistance-Associated Mutation: E138 in Reverse Transcriptase among Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-1-Infected Individuals in Turkey

Rilpivirine, one of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors class anti-HIV agents, is used as an alternative drug to treat HIV-1-positive individuals according to current antiretroviral therapy (ART) guidelines. Mutation in the position E138 in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) leads to resistance to rilpivirine, alone reducing its susceptibility two to threefolds. The main aim of this study was to determine the dynamics of E138 mutation in the RT domain of the HIV-1 pol gene; in 6398 newly diagnosed and treatment-naive individuals in Turkey from 2013 to 2021. Rilpivirine-associated mutations were found among 424 (6.6%) out of 6398. Individuals with the E138 mutation had significantly higher HIV-1 RNA load than individuals without the E138 mutation (p = .044). The E138 mutation was mainly observed in the B subtype (40%) of HIV-1 compared to the non-B subtypes (26.9%) and the circulating recombinant forms (33.1%) (p < .001). Most E138 mutations were E138A (80%), followed by E138G (16.5%). This study uncovered the dynamics of rilpivirine-associated mutations over a long period and a large patient population. Before administering ART regimens consisting of rilpivirine, resistance monitoring is highly recommended for effective patient management in the treatment-of naive HIV-1-infected individuals.