Response to Vaccines in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Narrative Review

Suppressed IgG4 class switching in dupilumab- and TNF inhibitor-treated patients after mRNA vaccination

BACKGROUND

The noninflammatory immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) is linked to tolerance and is unique to humans. Although poorly understood, prolonged antigenic stimulation and IL-4-signaling along the T helper 2-axis may be instrumental in IgG4 class switching. Recently, repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination has been linked to IgG4 skewing. Although widely used immunosuppressive drugs have been shown to only moderately affect humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, the effect on IgG4 switching has not been investigated.

METHODS

Here we study the impact of such immunosuppressive drugs, including the IL-4 receptor-blocking antibody dupilumab, on IgG4 skewing upon repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Receptor-binding domain (RBD) specific antibody responses were longitudinally measured in 600 individuals, including patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated with a TNF inhibitor (TNFi) and/or methotrexate (MTX), dupilumab, and healthy/untreated controls, after repeated mRNA vaccination.

RESULTS

We observed a substantial increase in the proportion of RBD-specific IgG4 antibodies (median 21%) in healthy/untreated controls after third vaccination. This IgG4 skewing was profoundly reduced in dupilumab-treated patients (<1%). Unexpectedly, an equally strong suppression of IgG4 skewing was observed in TNFi-treated patients (<1%), whereas MTX caused a modest reduction (7%). RBD-specific total IgG levels were hardly affected by these immunosuppressive drugs. Minimal skewing was observed, when primary vaccination was adenoviral vector-based.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results imply a critical role for IL-4/IL-13 as well as TNF in vivo IgG4 class switching. These novel findings advance our understanding of IgG4 class switch dynamics, and may benefit humoral tolerance induction strategies, treatment of IgG4 pathologies and mRNA vaccine optimization.

Behçet's patients' response to COVID-19 vaccination

Immune hyperstimulation by SARS-CoV2 results in multi-system involvement with consequent organ damage not dissimilar to Behçet's Disease (BD). Management of BD includes immunosuppressive medication, which led to concerns that; firstly, SARS-CoV-2 would stimulate BD activity, thrombin, clotting times, TPO antibodies, and the effectiveness and duration of the COVID-19 vaccines' response in this potentially vulnerable group. The main objectives of this study were: to assess BD patients' immune response to the COVID-19 vaccines based on age, gender, disease activity, BD phenotype, and immunomodulatory medication compared to healthy control participants by measuring anti-spike IgG levels. Further to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 vaccines on T and B cells, immunoglobulins, thrombophilia, thyroid function and COVID-19 antibody production. Patients on immunosuppressive medication had a reduced immune response to COVID-19 vaccines. -Also, patients over 40 years and with the neurologic BD phenotype had lower responses. mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were more effective and had fewer side effects compared to conventional COVID-19 vaccines.

Vaccination in the Era of Immunosuppression

Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) are at increased risk for severe infections. Vaccine responses and safety profiles may differ between AIIRD patients and the general population. While patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) often experience diminished humoral responses and reduced vaccine efficacy, factors such as the type of immunosuppressant medications used and the specific vaccine employed contribute to these outcomes. Notably, individuals undergoing B cell depletion therapy tend to have poor vaccine immunogenicity. However, despite these considerations, vaccine responses are generally considered clinically sufficient. Ideally, immunosuppressed AIIRD patients should receive vaccinations at least two weeks before commencing immunosuppressive treatment. However, it is common for many patients to already be on immunosuppressants during the immunization process. Vaccination rarely triggers flares in AIIRDs; if flares occur, they are typically mild. Despite the heightened infection risk, including COVID-19, among AIIRD patients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, and other diseases on immunosuppressants, the vaccination rates remain suboptimal. The future directions of vaccination in the era of immunosuppression will likely involve customized vaccines with enhanced adjuvants and alternative delivery methods. By addressing the unique challenges faced by immunosuppressed individuals, we may improve vaccine efficacy, reduce the risk of infections, and ultimately enhance the health outcomes. Additionally, clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of temporarily discontinuing immunosuppressants during vaccination in various AIIRDs are crucial.

Diminished responses to mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis on immune-modifying therapies

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorder that causes debilitating swelling and destruction of the joints. People with RA are treated with drugs that actively suppress one or more parts of their immune system, and these may alter the response to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we analyzed blood samples from a cohort of patients with RA after receiving a 2-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine regimen. Our data show that individuals on the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4-Ig therapy abatacept had reduced levels of SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies after vaccination. At the cellular level, these patients showed reduced activation and class switching of SARS-CoV-2-specific B cells, as well as reduced numbers and impaired helper cytokine production by SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells. Individuals on methotrexate showed similar but less severe defects in vaccine response, whereas individuals on the B cell-depleting therapy rituximab had a near-total loss of antibody production after vaccination. These data define a specific cellular phenotype associated with impaired response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with RA on different immune-modifying therapies and help inform efforts to improve vaccination strategies in this vulnerable population.

Evaluation of the safety, efficacy, and mechanism of action of obexelimab for the treatment of patients with IgG4-related disease: an open-label, single-arm, single centre, phase 2 pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Obexelimab is a bifunctional, non-cytolytic, humanised monoclonal antibody that binds CD19 and Fc gamma receptor IIb to inhibit B cells, plasmablasts, and CD19-expressing plasma cells. We aimed to evaluate the safety, clinical efficacy, and pharmacodynamic effects of obexelimab in patients with active IgG4-related disease.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, single-arm, single centre, phase 2 pilot trial at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, MA, USA. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years and had active IgG4-related disease confirmed by an IgG4-related disease responder index score of 3 or more. Patients received 5 mg/kg of obexelimab intravenously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Patients on glucocorticoids at baseline were expected to discontinue usage within 2 months following enrolment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a decrease of 2 or more from baseline in the IgG4-related disease responder index at day 169 (ie, primary responders). Patients who achieved a decrease of 2 or more at any visit were designated as responders. Adverse events were graded on a scale of 1-5 (ie, mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening, or death) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading scale (version 4.3). Exploratory analyses were quantification of B-cell CD19 receptor occupancy, plasmablast, total B-cell and CD4+ cytotoxic T-cell count by flow cytometry, and immunoglobulin concentrations by nephelometry. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02725476.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 24, 2016, and Dec 21, 2016, we enrolled 15 patients. The median age was 63 years (IQR 52-65). Ten (67%) of 15 patients were male, five (33%) were female, and 12 (80%) were White. At baseline, 12 (80%) of 15 patients had an elevated median serum IgG4 concentration of 220 mg/dL (IQR 124-441), and the median IgG4-related disease responder index score was 12 (IQR 7-13). 12 (80%) of 15 patients achieved the primary endpoint (ie, primary responders), 14 (93%) were defined as responders. Reductions from baseline in serum B cells and plasmablasts were observed following treatment with obexelimab. However, in most patients with follow-up data, serum B cells recovered to 75% of baseline concentrations within 42 days of the final obexelimab dose. 13 (87%) of 15 patients reported adverse events, one of which (an infusion reaction) resulted in treatment discontinuation.

INTERPRETATION

All patients except for one had clinical responses to obexelimab treatment. Both reductions in circulating B cells without evidence of apoptosis during obexelimab treatment and their rapid rebound after treatment discontinuation suggest that obexelimab might lead to B-cell sequestration in lymphoid organs or the bone marrow. These results support the continued development of obexelimab for the treatment of IgG4-related disease.

FUNDING

Xencor, Zenas BioPharma, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

SARS-CoV-2 infection risk is higher in vaccinated patients with inflammatory autoimmune diseases or liver transplantation treated with mycophenolate due to an impaired antiviral immune response: results of the extended follow up of the RIVALSA prospective cohort

Background

A relevant proportion of immunocompromised patients did not reach a detectable seroconversion after a full primary vaccination cycle against SARS-CoV-2. The effect of different immunosuppressants and the potential risks for SARS-CoV-2 infection in these subjects is largely unknown.

Methods

Patients from the Rivalsa prospective, observational cohort study with planned anti SARS-CoV-2 third dose mRNA vaccination between October and December 2021 were asked to participate to this follow-up study. Patients were asked about eventual confirmed positivity to SARS-CoV-2 infection within 6 months from the third dose and to undergo a blood draw to evaluate seroconversion status after the additional vaccine shot.

Results

19 out of 114 patients taking part in the survey developed a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; we identified mycophenolate treatment as an independent predictor of an increased risk of infection even after the third vaccine dose (OR: 5.20, 95% CI: 1.70-20.00, p=0.0053). This result is in agreement with the in vitro evidence that MMF impairs both B and T lymphocytes driven immune responses (reduction both in memory B cells producing anti-spike antibodies and in proliferating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells).

Conclusions

Immunocompromised patients need an additional vaccine administration to reach a detectable seroconversion, thus fostering a more personalized approach to their clinical management. Moreover, patients undergoing mycophenolate treatment show a specific increased infection risk, with respect to other immunosuppressants thus supporting a closer monitoring of their health status.

Expert Consensus: Main Risk Factors for Poor Prognosis in COVID-19 and the Implications for Targeted Measures against SARS-CoV-2

The clinical evolution of patients infected with the Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) depends on the complex interplay between viral and host factors. The evolution to less aggressive but better-transmitted viral variants, and the presence of immune memory responses in a growing number of vaccinated and/or virus-exposed individuals, has caused the pandemic to slowly wane in virulence. However, there are still patients with risk factors or comorbidities that put them at risk of poor outcomes in the event of having the coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19). Among the different treatment options for patients with COVID-19, virus-targeted measures include antiviral drugs or monoclonal antibodies that may be provided in the early days of infection. The present expert consensus is based on a review of all the literature published between 1 July 2021 and 15 February 2022 that was carried out to establish the characteristics of patients, in terms of presence of risk factors or comorbidities, that may make them candidates for receiving any of the virus-targeted measures available in order to prevent a fatal outcome, such as severe disease or death. A total of 119 studies were included from the review of the literature and 159 were from the additional independent review carried out by the panelists a posteriori. Conditions found related to strong recommendation of the use of virus-targeted measures in the first days of COVID-19 were age above 80 years, or above 65 years with another risk factor; antineoplastic chemotherapy or active malignancy; HIV infection with CD4+ cell counts < 200/mm³; and treatment with anti-CD20 immunosuppressive drugs. There is also a strong recommendation against using the studied interventions in HIV-infected patients with a CD4+ nadir <200/mm³ or treatment with other immunosuppressants. Indications of therapies against SARS-CoV-2, regardless of vaccination status or history of infection, may still exist for some populations, even after COVID-19 has been declared to no longer be a global health emergency by the WHO.

Effectiveness of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and the need for alternative preventative approaches in immunocompromised individuals: a narrative review of systematic reviews

INTRODUCTION

Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), including administration of booster doses, continues to be the most effective method for controlling COVID-19-related complications including progression to severe illness and death.However, there is mounting evidence that more needs to be done to protect individuals with compromised immune function.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we review the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in immunocompromised patients, including those with primary immunodeficiencies, HIV, cancer (including hematological malignancies), solid organ transplant recipients and chronic kidney disease, as reported in systematic reviews/meta-analyses published over a 12-month period in PubMed. Given the varied responses to vaccination patients with compromised immune function, a major goal of this analysis was to try to identify specific risk-factors related to vaccine failure.

EXPERT OPINION

COVID-19 remains a global problem, with new variants of concern emerging at regular intervals. There is an ongoing need for optimal vaccine strategies to combat the pandemic. In addition, alternative treatment approaches are needed for immunocompromised patients who may not mount an adequate immune response to current COVID-19 vaccines. Identification of high-risk patients, and the introduction of newer antiviral approaches such as monoclonal antibodies, will offer physicians therapeutic options for such vulnerable individuals.

SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID19 vaccination across eight immune-mediated inflammatory disorders: A prospective, real-life Belgian cohort study - the BELCOMID study

Background

The risks and impact of COVID19 disease and vaccination in patients with Immune Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMID) remain incompletely understood. IMID patients and particularly patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment were excluded from the original, registrational phase-3 COVID19 vaccination efficacy and safety trials. Real-world observational data can help to fill this gap in knowledge. The BELCOMID study aims to explore the interaction between IMIDs, immune-modulating treatment modalities and SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in a real-life patient cohort.

Methods

A multidisciplinary, prospective, observational cohort study was set up. Consecutive patients with IMIDs of the gut, joints and skin followed at two high-volume referral centers were invited. Both patients under conventional treatment or targeted immune modulating therapies were included. Patient data and serological samples were collected at 3 predefined periods (before COVID19 vaccination, before booster vaccination, after booster vaccination). Primary endpoints were positive PCR-test and SARS-CoV-2 serology reflecting previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. Associations with IMID treatment modality and IMID disease activity were assessed. Results of the first two inclusion periods (before booster vaccination) are reported.

Results

At the first inclusion period data was assessed of 2165 IMID-patients before COVID19 vaccination. At the second inclusion period, data of 2065 patients was collected of whom 1547 had received complete baseline COVID19 vaccination and 222 were partially vaccinated. SARS-CoV-2 infection rate remained low in both groups. No significant increase in IMID flare-up rate was noted in patients with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Multiple logistic regression analyses did not show a significant influence of IMID-treatment modality or IMID activity on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (based on PCR positivity or N-serology). Patients treated with conventional immunomodulators, systemic steroids, and patients on advanced therapies such as biologics or small molecules, had reduced S-antibody seroconversion. S-antibody response was also lower in patients without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and in active smokers. A subset of patients (4.1%) had no S- nor N-antibody seroconversion following complete baseline vaccination.

Conclusion

The BELCOMID study results confirm the benign course of COVID19 infection and vaccination in a large real-life IMID-population. However, our results underscore the need for repeated vaccination and smoking cessation in patients with IMIDs treated with immune-modulating therapies or systemic steroids during the pandemic.

Use of biologics during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned from psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Given the increased infectious risk associated with biologics, particularly with TNFα inhibitors, concerns were raised over the safety of these agents in relation to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, the impact of biologics on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was questioned.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, studies conducted on patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis treated with biologics during the COVID-19 pandemic have been analyzed, including 1) the safety of biologics in psoriatic patients in terms of increased risk and/or worse outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection; and 2) whether biologic agents could affect the safety and response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in psoriatic patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Current evidence indicates that the use of biologics in psoriatic patients does not seem to be associated with an increased COVID-19 infection risk or worse outcome, with TNFα inhibitors being even protective of severe COVID-19 relative to other treatments or no treatment at all. Furthermore, biologic treatment does not seem to have a significant impact on the response and safety of vaccines in patients with psoriasis treated with biologics. However, uncertainty remains given the limitations of current studies which are often of short duration, limited sample sizes and do not stratify on specific biologic classes.

Higher Cell-Mediated Immune Responses in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Anti-TNF Therapy After COVID-19 Vaccination

BACKGROUND

Some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immunosuppressive therapies may have a blunted response to certain vaccines, including the messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. However, few studies have evaluated the cell-mediated immune response (CMIR), which is critical to host defense after COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral immune response and CMIR after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IBD.

METHODS

This prospective study (HERCULES [HumoRal and CellULar initial and Sustained immunogenicity in patients with IBD] study) evaluated humoral immune response and CMIR after completion of 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in 158 IBD patients and 20 healthy control (HC) subjects. The primary outcome was the CMIR to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IBD. The secondary outcomes were a comparison of (1) the CMIR in patients with IBD and HC subjects, (2) CMIR and humoral immune response in all participants, and (3) correlation between CMIR and humoral immune response.

RESULTS

The majority (89%) of patients with IBD developed a CMIR, which was not different vs HC subjects (94%) (P = .6667). There was no significant difference (P = .5488) in CMIR between immunocompetent (median 255 [interquartile range, 146-958] spike T cells per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells) and immunosuppressed patients (median 377 [interquartile range, 123-1440]). There was no correlation between humoral and cell-mediated immunity after vaccination (P = .5215). In univariable analysis, anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy was associated with a higher CMIRs (P = .02) and confirmed in a multivariable model (P = .02). No other variables were associated with CMIR.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with IBD achieved CMIR to a COVID-19 vaccine. Future studies are needed evaluating sustained CMIR and clinical outcomes.

SARS-CoV-2-Antikörper-Antwort auf die zweite COVID-19-Impfung bei neuromuskulären Patienten unter immunmodulierender Therapie

Einer erfolgreichen Impfung (adäquater Anstieg der Anti-S[Spike]-Protein-Antikörper) gegen SARS-CoV‑2 (engl. severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2) wird ein suffizienter Schutz gegen einen schweren Verlauf von COVID-19 (engl. coronavirus disease 2019) zugeschrieben. Bei Patient*innen mit chronisch-inflammatorischen Erkrankungen (engl. „chronic inflammatory diseases“ [CID]) und Immunsuppression ist der Impferfolg weiterhin im wissenschaftlichen Diskurs. Daher evaluierten wir bei Patient*innen mit einer neuromuskulären Erkrankung (NME), die zu regelmäßigen Infusionen von Immunglobulinen in unserer neurologischen Tagesklinik/Ambulanz vorstellig wurden, 2 Wochen nach vollständiger Immunisierung die Antikörpertiter gegen das S1 (S1-Untereinheit des Spike-Proteins) -Antigen von SARS-CoV‑2. Unsere Daten zeigen, dass Patient*innen mit einer chronischen autoimmunen NME und gleichzeitiger immunsuppressiver bzw. immunmodulierender Therapie nach einer Impfung sowohl mit einem mRNA- als auch mit einem Vektorimpfstoff eine Antikörperantwort aufwiesen. Im Vergleich zu gesunden Proband*innen zeigte sich eine vergleichbare Anzahl an Serokonversionen durch die Impfung. Eine Korrelation zwischen Immunglobulindosierung und Impfantwort sowie Infusionsintervall und Impfantwort ließ sich nicht feststellen. Demgegenüber zeigte jedoch insbesondere die Kombination aus Mycophenolatmofetil (MMF) und Prednisolon eine signifikante Reduktion der spezifischen Antikörpersynthese.