COVID-19 Disease in Under-5 Children: Current Status and Strategies for Prevention including Vaccination

How did we protect children against COVID-19 in Iran? Prevalence of COVID-19 and vaccination in the socio-economic context of COVID-19 epidemic

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant risks to children worldwide. This study aimed to assess the COVID-19 protection status of children and explored the relationship between household socio-economic status and COVID-19 morbidity and preventive measures, including vaccination and mask-wearing, in two cities in Iran.

METHOD

A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted from July to October 2022 among 7 to 18-year-old children and their families in Tehran and Karaj. A total of 3,022 samples were selected using stratified multistage cluster sampling. Data were collected through interviews with children and adults, using questionnaires and was analyzed with Stata software version 14.

RESULTS

The analysis focused on 2,878 children with a median age of 12. Over half (54%) reported that the pandemic negatively affected their family's financial status, with 45% describing its impact on children's needs as negative or very negative. Just under 50% of respondents consistently wore masks during the study period, and around 54% had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Reasons for not getting vaccinated included concerns about side effects, ineligibility for the target age group, and overcrowding at vaccination sites. The odds of not getting vaccinated were significantly lower for children aged 15-18, with boys more likely to refuse vaccination than girls.

CONCLUSION

The financial impact of the pandemic in Iran affected families' ability to meet their children's needs. Moreover, low vaccination acceptance rates increased children's vulnerability to health problems and contributed to COVID-19 infections. Efforts should be made to increase vaccination acceptance, particularly among immigrant populations.

Utility of the Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV Plus Kit: A Glance at RSV Infection in Adults and Coinfection Rate

Background

Viral infection is responsible for the majority of respiratory tract infections (RTI). This retrospective study evaluates the advantages of using the multiplex Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit in laboratory diagnosis of RTI caused by the most related viruses.

Materials and Methods

Data were obtained from medical records between November 2021 and May 2023 for any sample tested using either the Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV kit, Xpert Xpress Flu kit, Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 kit, and Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit.

Results

Influenza virus A was detected in 8.5% (55/649) of the samples using the Flu PCR kit and in 4.9% (123/2538) using CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit, while influenza virus B detection rates were 3.7% (24/649) using the Flu PCR kit and 1.7% (43/2538) using the CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit. However, the detection rates using the two kits were comparable when evaluated for the same time period of the year. SARS-CoV-2 infections were detected in 16.9% (1545/9153) and 10.5% (266/2538) of the cases using the SARS-CoV-2 kit and CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kits, respectively. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) was identified in 17.7% (66/372) of children using Flu/RSV kit; this number dropped significantly when age-targeted testing of RSV was performed due to involvements of adults. With the CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit, about 34% (35/103) of RSV infections detected were in patients aged >20 years; these cases would have previously been overlooked because adults are not routinely tested for RSV using the Flu/RSV kit. All coinfection cases (n = 16) were only detected with the CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit.

Conclusion

The use of Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit not only results in shorter turnaround times through accurate detection of all four viruses, but also provides information on RSV infection in adults and coinfection rates.

Caregiver use of MUAC tapes in South Sudan: a three-group prospective comparison

Introduction

Nutrition program modifications occurred globally in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Within community management of acute malnutrition (CMAM), community screenings for acute malnutrition were replaced by caregivers monitoring child mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), but questions remain about different MUAC tapes' performance and acceptability for caregiver use.

Methods

The study was conducted in Central Equatoria and Warrap States, South Sudan, between March 2022 and January 2023. A three-group prospective non-randomized design was used to compare the performance of three MUAC tapes (UNICEF 2009, UNICEF 2020, and GOAL MAMI) used by caregivers. The primary outcome was the false negative rate (i.e., the proportion of children not identified as wasted by the caregiver but classified as wasted by enumerators). Caregivers with children aged 5-53 months were assigned to and trained on the use of 1 of the 3 tapes and followed for 8 months, including three monitoring visits and baseline/endline surveys.

Results

Of the 2,893 enrolled children, 2,401 (83.0%) completed baseline, endline, and two or more monitoring visits. Only 3.7% of children were identified as wasted by caregivers and 3.8% by study team measurement. Cumulative measurement agreement between caregivers and enumerators was similar by tape. False negative and false positive rates were both <0.5% overall and similar among the tapes. There were differences in training needs and durability between the tapes, but all three were acceptable and performed equally well.

Discussion

Caregiver measurement of child MUAC is feasible in South Sudan. The three MUAC tapes were acceptable, and caregivers could measure accurately with minimal support. All tapes performed similarly and are appropriate for use in Family MUAC programs in South Sudan. There were indications that the UNICEF 2020 tape may be less durable; the GOAL MAMI tape has the added benefit of being suitable for assessments of infants <6 months of age.

Increasing Vaccine Uptake during Pregnancy by Using Prenatal Education Classes: An Effective Tool for Health Communication and Promotion

Childbirth education classes represent an antenatal tool for supporting pregnant women and couples in increasing knowledge on pregnancy, delivery, breastfeeding, and newborn care. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of an additional lesson during the prenatal course regarding the advantage of vaccination to mitigation of maternal anxiety. An observational study was designed that included participants in childbirth education classes and compared courses enhanced by the extra lesson on vaccination during pregnancy versus those who did not receive it. Assessment of the impact of prenatal educational on vaccination was measured by using validated questionnaires (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI; Perceived Stress Scale, PSS; World Health Organization- Five Well-Being Index, WHO-5). A total of 145 pregnant women participated to the investigation by answering to the online survey. Of them, 33 patients (22.8%) belonged to the course without a lesson on vaccine, while 112 (77.2%) participated to online prenatal education that included an additional meeting on the usefulness of getting vaccinated during pregnancy. No statistical differences were found between study groups in terms of demographics and perinatal outcomes. Participants in the enriched course reported lower basal anxiety levels than those without the vaccine lesson (STAI-State, normal score < 40, 30 vs. 19%, p-value 0.041; STAI-State, mild score 40-50, 78 vs. 67%, p-value 0.037). With reference to the prior two weeks, maternal wellbeing level was improved by the added class (score > 13 as measurement of wellbeing: 62% vs. 80%, p-value < 0.05). Moderate perceived stress assessed by PSS was found in those pregnant women without prenatal education on vaccination (64 vs. 50%, p-value 0.042). The introduction of a lesson regarding vaccination during pregnancy in the program of prenatal education courses improved maternal anxiety levels and wellbeing, in addition to reducing perceived stress.