Biological, Chemical, and Ecotoxicological Assessments Using Benthos Provide Different and Complementary Measures of Lake Ecological Status

Effects of Electronic and Electrical Waste-Contaminated Soils on Growth and Reproduction of Earthworm (Alma nilotica)

Informal recycling of electronic waste (e-waste) contaminates local environments with metals and other organic compounds. The adverse effects on native earthworm populations are poorly understood. The objective of the present study was to determine metal concentrations in soils from e-waste activity sites in Douala (Cameroon) and assess the effects of these soils on the growth and reproduction of the local earthworm, Alma nilotica. Concentrations of nine metals (arsenic [As], cadmium [Cd], cobalt [Co], chromium [Cr], copper [Cu], mercury [Hg], nickel [Ni], lead [Pb], and zinc [Zn]) were measured in soil samples collected from eight e-waste activity and two non-e-waste sites. Earthworms were then exposed to these soils in the laboratory following test guidelines of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Metal concentrations in the e-waste-contaminated soils were significantly higher than in the non-e-waste soils. The e-waste soils were found to have a different soil metal profile (Cu > Pb > Zn > Cr > Ni > Co > As > Cd > Hg) from that of the non-e-waste soils (Zn > Cr > Cu > Pb > Ni > As > Cd > Co > Hg). Earthworm growth and reproduction were significantly inhibited in organisms exposed to soils from e-waste sites. Reproduction was particularly affected, with a mean of 8 ± 5.6 offspring/10 worms in the e-waste-exposed worm groups compared with 90.5 ± 0.7 in non-e-waste soil worms. Notably, earthworm growth recovered during depuration in clean soil, indicating the possibility of remediation activities. The results demonstrate that soils at e-waste sites can affect the health of resident worm populations, which may be more sensitive than temperate species. They also highlight the potential of a bioassay-based approach in monitoring risks at e-waste sites. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:287-297. © 2021 SETAC.

The Benthic Quality Index to Assess Water Quality of Lakes May Be Affected by Confounding Environmental Features

To assess if environmental differences other than water quality may affect the outcome of the Benthic Quality Index, a comparison of the application of four different methods (Benthic Quality Index—BQIES, Lake Habitat Modification Score—LHMS, Lake Habitat Quality Assessment—LHQA and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development—OECD) used to classify the lake ecological and hydro-morphological status of 10 Italian lakes was performed. Five lakes were natural and five were reservoirs belonging to both Alpine and Mediterranean Ecoregions. The 10 lakes were sampled using the Water Framework Directive compliant standardized national protocol, which includes sampling soft sediment in the littoral, sublittoral and deep layers along transects with a grab of 225 cm2 during spring and autumn. The application of Generalised Linear Mixed Effect Models both at the lake level and at the single station of each lake highlighted that, at the lake level, no significant correlations existed between any couple of hydro-morphological, ecological and trophic status assessments, with each metric representing a different facet of human impact on the environment. At the single site level, we found significant effects of depth on the metrics of biodiversity. The best approximation of single-site macroinvertebrates diversity among the metrics of overall lake quality was with the LHMS, but not with the BQIES. Our hypotheses that lake macroinvertebrates assemblages depend also on other potential confounding variables of habitat degradation and intrinsic differences between lakes were confirmed, with depth playing a major role. Therefore, the assessment of lakes with different depths may produce different whole-lake BQIES values, only because of the effect of depth gradient and not because of differences in lake quality.