1
|
Merrill RM, Song D. Mental illness and sleep disorders among women with gynecological problems. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2024; 45:2354330. [PMID: 38823418 DOI: 10.1080/0167482x.2024.2354330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study identifies differences between rates of selected mental illnesses and sleep disorders according to eight gynecological problems. Analyses utilize medical claims data for adult employees of a large corporation during 2017-2021. Women with a gynecological problem (most notably pain, endometriosis, pelvic inflammation and bleeding) are significantly more likely to experience mental illness. Several gynecological problems are also significantly associated with sleep disorders. Women with a gynecological problem (vs. none) are 50% more likely to have a mental health problem and 44% more likely to have a sleep disorder after adjusting for age, marital status, dependent children and year. The largest differences between higher (%) mental illness and sleep disorders appear for hyperplasia (6% vs. 45%), cancer (11% vs. 68%), pelvic inflammation (46% vs. 79%) and pain (79% vs. 43%), respectively. On the other hand, the rate of having one or more gynecological problems ranges from 7.1% for women with no mental illness or sleep disorder to 20.6% for women with schizophrenia. Understanding the association between gynecological problems, mental illness and sleep disorders can help clinicians more effectively identify and treat patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ray M Merrill
- Department of Public Health, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Dajeong Song
- Department of Public Health, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hwong AR, Murphy KA, Vittinghoff E, Alonso-Fraire P, Crystal S, Walkup J, Hermida R, Olfson M, Cournos F, Sawaya GF, Mangurian C. Cervical Cancer Screening Among Female Medicaid Beneficiaries With and Without Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2024:sbae096. [PMID: 38842724 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbae096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS In the United States, women with schizophrenia face challenges in receiving gynecologic care, but little is known about how cervical cancer screening rates vary across time or states in a publicly insured population. We hypothesized that women Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia would be less likely to receive cervical cancer screening across the United States compared with a control population, and that women with schizophrenia and other markers of vulnerability would be least likely to receive screening. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective cohort study used US Medicaid administrative data from across 44 states between 2002 and 2012 and examined differences in cervical cancer screening test rates among 283 950 female Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia and a frequency-matched control group without serious mental illness, matched on age and race/ethnicity. Among women with schizophrenia, multivariable logistic regression estimated the odds of receiving cervical cancer screening using individual sociodemographics, comorbid conditions, and health care service utilization. STUDY RESULTS Compared to the control group, women with schizophrenia were less likely to receive cervical cancer screening (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.75-0.77). Among women with schizophrenia, nonwhite populations, younger women, urban dwellers, those with substance use disorders, anxiety, and depression and those connected to primary care were more likely to complete screening. CONCLUSIONS Cervical cancer screening rates among US women Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia were suboptimal. To address cervical cancer care disparities for this population, interventions are needed to prioritize women with schizophrenia who are less engaged with the health care system or who reside in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison R Hwong
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mental Health Service, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karly A Murphy
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Division of General Internal Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric Vittinghoff
- UCSF Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Paola Alonso-Fraire
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephen Crystal
- Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Jamie Walkup
- Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Richard Hermida
- Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Mark Olfson
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Francine Cournos
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - George F Sawaya
- UCSF Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christina Mangurian
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Casanovas F, Fonseca F, Mané A. Substance use Specificities in Women with Psychosis: A Critical Review. Curr Neuropharmacol 2023; 21:1953-1963. [PMID: 36453494 PMCID: PMC10514534 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x21666221129113942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders differ from male patients in many respects, including psychopathology, prognosis, disease course, and substance use comorbidities. Most studies performed to date to investigate the association between drug use and psychosis have not evaluated gender differences, although this has started to change in recent years. METHODS We briefly summarize the available evidence on gender differences in drug use and substance use disorders (SUD) in psychotic patients during the early phases of the psychotic illness and during the course of schizophrenia. RESULTS Substance use and SUD are both less prevalent in women, both in the general population and at all phases of the psychotic spectrum. Some studies suggest that SUD may be under diagnosed in female patients, in part due to their more vulnerable profile. Substance use, especially cannabis, may more negatively impact females, especially on the disease course and prognosis. The available data suggest that it may be more difficult to treat SUD in female patients with schizophrenia, which could negatively impact prognosis. CONCLUSION Women with concomitant psychotic illness and SUD comprise a highly vulnerable subgroup. This should be considered when selecting the treatment approach, especially in the early phases of the illness, to ensure better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesc Casanovas
- Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Adiccions (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francina Fonseca
- Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Adiccions (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences (MELIS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Mané
- Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Adiccions (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences (MELIS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Área de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
González-Rodríguez A, Monreal JA, Natividad M, Seeman MV. Collaboration between Psychiatrists and Other Allied Medical Specialists for the Treatment of Delusional Disorders. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10091729. [PMID: 36141341 PMCID: PMC9498439 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10091729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There is increasing evidence that individuals with psychosis are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and several other medical comorbidities. In delusional disorder (DD), this is particularly so because of the relatively late onset age. Aims: The aim of this narrative review is to synthesize the literature on the necessity for medical collaboration between psychiatrists and other specialists. Methods: A non-systematic narrative review was carried out of papers addressing referrals and cooperation among specialists in the care of DD patients. Results: Psychiatrists, the primary care providers for DD patients, depend on neurology to assess cognitive defects and rule out organic sources of delusions. Neurologists rely on psychiatry to help with patient adherence to treatment and the management of psychotropic drug side effects. Psychiatrists require ophthalmology/otolaryngology to treat sensory deficits that often precede delusions; reciprocally, psychiatric consults can help in instances of functional sensory impairment. Close collaboration with dermatologists is essential for treating delusional parasitosis and dysmorphophobia to ensure timely referrals to psychiatry. Conclusions: This review offers many other examples from the literature of the extent of overlap among medical specialties in the evaluation and effective treatment of DD. Optimal patient care requires close collaboration among specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre González-Rodríguez
- Department of Mental Health, Mutua Terrassa University Hospital, 5 Dr. Robert Square, 08221 Terrassa, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), University of Barcelona, 08221 Terrassa, Spain
| | - José Antonio Monreal
- Department of Mental Health, Mutua Terrassa University Hospital, 5 Dr. Robert Square, 08221 Terrassa, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), University of Barcelona, 08221 Terrassa, Spain
- Institut de Neurociències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08221 Terrassa, Spain
- Correspondence:
| | - Mentxu Natividad
- Department of Mental Health, Mutua Terrassa University Hospital, 5 Dr. Robert Square, 08221 Terrassa, Spain
| | - Mary V. Seeman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 605 260 Heath Street West, Toronto, ON M5P 3L6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|