Are there enough GPs in England to detect hypertension and maintain access? A cross-sectional study

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Primary Care Health Checks at Assessing Cardiovascular Risks among Ethnic Minorities in the UK: A Systematic Review

Background

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) affect around 7.6 million people in the UK, disproportionately affecting the minority ethnic community. In 2009, the UK's National Health Service (NHS) launched a Health Check (NHSHC) scheme to improve early diagnosis of various clinical conditions, including CVD, by screening patients for associated risk factors. This systematic review investigated the engagement of minority ethnic groups with these services.

Methods

Seven studies identified patient demographics of NHSHC attendees using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic And Meta Analysis-Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines and accessing Ovid (MEDLINE), PubMed and Web of Science databases.

Results

The screening was either by invitation or opportunistic at other appointments with their doctor. Engagement with the service was highest among the South Asian patients (21%-68%), but lowest amongst Chinese patients (12%-61%). Further, engagement was lower among those screened following a formal invitation than those seen opportunistically. However, a greater proportion of patients were screened opportunistically than by invitation.

Conclusions

Overall, we found that the NHSHC is not being utilised adequately for all patients at high risk of CVD, particularly White and Chinese patients. It highlights the critical role of primary care could play to improve patient engagement with the service.

Prevalence and demographic variation of cardiovascular, renal, metabolic, and mental health conditions in 12 million english primary care records

BACKGROUND

Primary care electronic health records (EHR) are widely used to study long-term conditions in epidemiological and health services research. Therefore, it is important to understand how well the recorded prevalence of these conditions in EHRs, compares to other reliable sources overall, and varies by socio-demographic characteristics. We aimed to describe the prevalence and socio-demographic variation of cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic (CRM) and mental health (MH) conditions in a large, nationally representative, English primary care database and compare with prevalence estimates from other population-based studies.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum primary care database. We calculated prevalence of 18 conditions and used logistic regression to assess how this varied by age, sex, ethnicity, and socio-economic status. We searched the literature for population prevalence estimates from other sources for comparison with the prevalences in CPRD Aurum.

RESULTS

Depression (16.0%, 95%CI 16.0-16.0%) and hypertension (15.3%, 95%CI 15.2-15.3%) were the most prevalent conditions among 12.4 million patients. Prevalence of most conditions increased with socio-economic deprivation and age. CRM conditions, schizophrenia and substance misuse were higher in men, whilst anxiety, depression, bipolar and eating disorders were more common in women. Cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension and diabetes) were more prevalent in black and Asian patients compared with white, but the trends in prevalence of cardiovascular diseases by ethnicity were more variable. The recorded prevalences of mental health conditions were typically twice as high in white patients compared with other ethnic groups. However, PTSD and schizophrenia were more prevalent in black patients. The prevalence of most conditions was similar or higher in the primary care database than diagnosed disease prevalence reported in national health surveys. However, screening studies typically reported higher prevalence estimates than primary care data, especially for PTSD, bipolar disorder and eating disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of many clinically diagnosed conditions in primary care records closely matched that of other sources. However, we found important variations by sex and ethnicity, which may reflect true variation in prevalence or systematic differences in clinical presentation and practice. Primary care data may underrepresent the prevalence of undiagnosed conditions, particularly in mental health.

Primary care institutional characteristics associated with hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in the China PEACE-Million Persons Project and primary health-care survey: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Since 2010, China has made vast financial investments and policy changes to the primary care system. We aimed to assess how hypertension awareness, treatment, and control might be used to assess quality of primary care systems, which reflect the outcomes of public health services and medical care.

METHODS

We used The China Patient-centred Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events Million Persons Project, a government-funded public health project that focuses on cardiovascular disease risk in China. We linked primary care institution characteristics that were captured in the survey between 2016 and 2017 to the participant-level data gathered in baseline visits between 2014 and 2021. Participants were included if they had hypertension and lived in the towns or streets that took part in the primary care survey. Participants were excluded if they had missing data for blood pressure measurement, history of hypertension, sex, or age. Primary care institutions were excluded if the catchment area had fewer than 100 participants with hypertension. Hypertension awareness was defined as the proportion of participants with hypertension who self-reported a hypertension diagnosis. Hypertension treatment was defined as the proportion of participants who currently use antihypertensive medications among those who were aware. Hypertension control was defined as the proportion of participants with an average systolic blood pressure less than 140 mm Hg and an average diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg over two readings among those who were treated during the study. All patients were included in the analysis. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02536456.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 15, 2014, and March 16, 2021, we assessed 503 township-level primary care institutions for eligibility. 70 institutions were excluded as they could not be linked with individual data or because their catchment area had fewer than 100 participants with hypertension. We analysed 433 township-level primary care institutions across all 31 provinces of mainland China, including 660 565 individuals with hypertension in their catchment areas. Across townships, age-sex standardised hypertension awareness varied from 8·2% to 81·0%, treatment varied from 2·6% to 96·5%, and control proportions varied from 0% to 62·4%. Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control were significantly associated with the following institutional characteristics: government funding through balance allocation (ie, institutions have their human resources funded by local government, but need to be self-supporting in other aspects; awareness odds ratio 0·88, 95% CI 0·78-0·99; p=0·027), having financial problems that interrupted routine service delivery (awareness 0·81, 0·72-0·92; p=0·0007, control 0·84; 0·75-0·94, p=0·0034), setting performance-based bonus (treatment 1·39, 1·07-1·80; p=0·013), basic salary defined by number of patient visits (control 0·85, 0·76-0·95; p=0·0053), using electronic referrals (treatment 1·41, 1·14-1·73; p=0·0012, control 1·17; 1·03-1·33, p=0·014), implementing family physician contract services (awareness 1·13, 1·00-1·28; p=0·045, control 1·30; 1·15-1·46, p<0·0001), and proportion of physicians who are formally licensed (awareness per 10% increase 1·04, 1·01-1·08; p=0·019, treatment 1·08; 1·02-1·14, p=0·0077; control per 10% increase 1·07, 1·03-1·10; p=0·0006).

INTERPRETATION

The role of primary care role in hypertension management might benefit from new strategies that promote best practices in institutional financing, performance appraisal, service delivery, and information technology.

FUNDING

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Science, and the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Inequalities in the distribution of the general practice workforce in England: a practice-level longitudinal analysis

Background

In England, demand for primary care services is increasing and GP shortages are widespread. Recently introduced primary care networks (PCNs) aim to expand the use of additional practice-based roles such as physician associates (PAs), pharmacists, paramedics, and others through financial incentives for recruitment of these roles. Inequalities in general practice, including additional roles, have not been examined in recent years, which is a meaningful gap in the literature. Previous research has found that workforce inequalities are associated with health outcome inequalities.

Aim

To examine recent trends in general practice workforce inequalities.

Design & setting

A longitudinal study using quarterly General Practice Workforce datasets from 2015–2020 in England.

Method

The slope indices of inequality (SIIs) for GPs, nurses, total direct patient care (DPC) staff, PAs, pharmacists, and paramedics per 10 000 patients were calculated quarterly, and plotted over time, with and without adjustment for patient need.

Results

Fewer GPs, total DPC staff, and paramedics per 10 000 patients were employed in more deprived areas. Conversely, more PAs and pharmacists per 10 000 patients were employed in more deprived areas. With the exception of total DPC staff, these observed inequalities widened over time. The unadjusted analysis showed more nurses per 10 000 patients employed in more deprived areas. These values were not significant after adjustment but approached a more equal or pro-poor distribution over time.

Conclusion

Significant workforce inequalities exist and are even increasing for several key general practice roles, with workforce shortages disproportionately affecting more deprived areas. Policy solutions are urgently needed to ensure an equitably distributed workforce and reduce health inequities.

Levels of detection of hypertension in primary medical care and interventions to improve detection: a systematic review of the evidence since 2000

OBJECTIVES

In England, many hypertensives are not detected by primary medical care. Higher detection is associated with lower premature mortality. We aimed to summarise recent evidence on detection and interventions to improve detection in order to inform policies to improve care.

DESIGN

Data sources: systematic review of articles published since 2000. Searches of Medline and Embase were undertaken. Eligibility criteria: published in English, any study design, the setting was general practice and studies included patients aged 18 or over.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

screening schemes, studies in primary care settings other than general practice, discussion or comment pieces.

PARTICIPANTS

adult patients of primary medical care services.

SYNTHESIS

study heterogeneity precluded a statistical synthesis, and papers were described in summary tables.

RESULTS

Seventeen quantitative and one qualitative studies were included. Detection rates varied by gender and ethnic group, but longitudinal studies indicated an improvement in detection over time. Patient socioeconomic factors did not influence detection, but living alone was associated with lower detection. Few health system factors were associated with detection, but in two studies higher numbers of general practitioners per 1000 population were associated with higher detection. Three studies investigated interventions to improve detection, but none showed evidence of effectiveness.

LIMITATIONS

The search was limited to studies published from 2000, in English. There were few studies of interventions to improve detection, and a meta-analysis was not possible.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Levels of detection of hypertension by general practices may be improving, but large numbers of people with hypertension remain undetected. Improvement in detection is therefore required, but guidance for primary medical care is not provided by the few studies of interventions included in this review. Primary care teams should continue to use low-cost, practical approaches to detecting hypertension until evidence from new studies of interventions to improve detection is available.

Accuracy of monitors used for blood pressure checks in English retail pharmacies: a cross-sectional observational study

BACKGROUND

Free blood pressure (BP) checks offered by community pharmacies provide a potentially useful opportunity to diagnose and/or manage hypertension, but the accuracy of the sphygmomanometers in use is currently unknown.

AIM

To assess the accuracy of validated automatic BP monitors used for BP checks in a UK retail pharmacy chain.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Cross-sectional, observational study in 52 pharmacies from one chain in a range of locations (inner city, suburban, and rural) in central England.

METHOD

Monitor accuracy was compared with a calibrated reference device (Omron PA-350), at 50 mmHg intervals across the range 0-300 mmHg (static pressure test), with a difference from the reference monitor of +/- 3 mmHg at any interval considered a failure. The results were analysed by usage rates and length of time in service.

RESULTS

Of 61 BP monitors tested, eight (13%) monitors failed (that is, were >3 mmHg from reference), all of which underestimated BP. Monitor failure rate from the reference monitor of +/- 3 mmHg at any testing interval varied by length of time in use (2/38, 5% <18 months; 4/14, 29% >18 months, P = 0.038) and to some extent, but non-significantly, by usage rates (4/22, 18% in monitors used more than once daily; 2/33, 6% in those used less frequently, P = 0.204).

CONCLUSION

BP monitors within a pharmacy setting fail at similar rates to those in general practice. Annual calibration checks for blood pressure monitors are needed, even for new monitors, as these data indicate declining performance from 18 months onwards.

Population characteristics, mechanisms of primary care and premature mortality in England: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Health systems with strong primary care tend to have better population outcomes, but in many countries demand for care is growing. We sought to identify mechanisms of primary care that influence premature mortality.

DESIGN

We developed a conceptual model of the mechanisms by which primary care influences premature mortality, and undertook a cross-sectional study in which population and primary care variables reflecting the model were used to explain variations in mortality of those aged under 75 years. The premature standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) for each practice, available from the Department of Health, had been calculated from numbers of deaths in the 5 years from 2006 to 2010. A regression model was undertaken with explanatory variables for the year 2009/2010, and repeated to check stability using data for 2008/2009 and 2010/2011.

SETTING

All general practices in England were eligible for inclusion and, of the total of 8290, complete data were available for 7858.

RESULTS

Population variables, particularly deprivation, were the most powerful predictors of premature mortality, but the mechanisms of primary care depicted in our model also affected mortality. The number of GPs/1000 population and detection of hypertension were negatively associated with mortality. In less deprived practices, continuity of care was also negatively associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater supply of primary care is associated with lower premature mortality even in a health system that has strong primary care (England). Health systems need to sustain the capacity of primary care to deliver effective care, and should assist primary care providers in identifying and meeting the needs of socioeconomically deprived groups.