1
|
Collaço N, Lippiett KA, Wright D, Brodie H, Winter J, Richardson A, Foster C. Barriers and facilitators to integrated cancer care between primary and secondary care: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:120. [PMID: 38252169 PMCID: PMC10803398 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08278-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This scoping review identifies and characterises reported barriers and facilitators to providing integrated cancer care reported in the international literature, and develops recommendations for clinical practice. METHODS This scoping review included literature published between 2009 and 2022 and describes the delivery of integrated cancer care between primary and secondary care sectors. Searches were conducted of an online database Ovid Medline and grey literature. RESULTS The review included thirty-two papers. Barriers and facilitators to integrated cancer care were identified in three core areas: (1) at an individual user level around patient-healthcare professional interactions, (2) at an organisational level, and (3) at a healthcare system level. The review findings identified a need for further training for primary care professionals on cancer care, clarity in the delineation of primary care and oncologist roles (i.e. who does what), effective communication and engagement between primary and secondary care, and the provision of protocols and guidelines for follow-up care in cancer. CONCLUSIONS Information sharing and communication between primary and secondary care must improve to meet the increasing demand for support for people living with and beyond cancer. Delivering integrated pathways between primary and secondary care will yield improvements in patient outcomes and health economic costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Collaço
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer (CentRIC+), School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England
| | - Kate A Lippiett
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
| | - David Wright
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer (CentRIC+), School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England
| | - Hazel Brodie
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
| | - Jane Winter
- Wessex Cancer Alliance, Oakley Road, Southampton, England
| | - Alison Richardson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England
| | - Claire Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer (CentRIC+), School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Golembiewski EH, Espinoza Suarez NR, Maraboto Escarria AP, Yang AX, Kunneman M, Hassett LC, Montori VM. Video-based observation research: A systematic review of studies in outpatient health care settings. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 106:42-67. [PMID: 36207219 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the use of video-based observation research in outpatient health care encounter research. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane and other databases from database inception to October 2020 for reports of studies that used video recording to investigate ambulatory patient-clinician interactions. Two authors independently reviewed all studies for eligibility and extracted information related to study setting and purpose, participant recruitment and consent processes, data collection procedures, method of analysis, and participant sample characteristics. RESULTS 175 articles were included. Most studies (65%) took place in a primary care or family practice setting. Study objectives were overwhelmingly focused on patient-clinician communication (81%). Reporting of key study elements was inconsistent across included studies. CONCLUSION Video recording has been used as a research method in outpatient health care in a limited number and scope of clinical contexts and research domains. In addition, reporting of study design, methodological characteristics, and ethical considerations needs improvement. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Video recording as a method has been relatively underutilized within many clinical and research contexts. This review will serve as a practical resource for health care researchers as they plan and execute future video-based studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nataly R Espinoza Suarez
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine Laval University Quebec, Canada.
| | - Andrea P Maraboto Escarria
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Angeles Lomas Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - Andrew X Yang
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Marleen Kunneman
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA; Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Leslie C Hassett
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition Department of Medicine Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Victor M Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA; Mayo Clinic Libraries Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhong F, Pengpeng L, Qianru Z. Grouping Together to Fight Cancer: The Role of WeChat Groups on the Social Support and Self-Efficacy. Front Public Health 2022; 10:792699. [PMID: 35359783 PMCID: PMC8963820 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.792699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
With the increasing number of cancer survivors, the question of how to coexist with cancer has become more and more pressing. This research uses a mutual help WeChat group organized by cancer patients as the research field to observe the daily interactions of cancer patients, so as to improve understanding of how social media technology can help cancer patients in the treatment and recovery process. The study found that the WeChat group is the main source of health knowledge for the participating cancer patients, and that when compared to traditional web-based patient mutual aid communities, the WeChat group is a more timely, popular, continuous, and accurate source of information. Patients in the group can listen and respond to each other's questions and worries, providing both an outlet for patients to vent their emotions and concerns and a source of recognition and encouragement. In addition, this study found that the WeChat mutual aid group improves patients' self-efficacy of disease on four levels: successful experience in curing patients, imitating patients' behavior, verbal persuasion, and emotional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangqi Zhong
- College of Communication, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li Pengpeng
- College of Communication, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nicolaisen A, Lauridsen GB, Haastrup P, Hansen DG, Jarbøl DE. Healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective: a scoping review. Scand J Prim Health Care 2022; 40:11-28. [PMID: 35254205 PMCID: PMC9090364 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2036421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE General practice plays an important role in cancer trajectories, and cancer patients request the continuous involvement of general practice. The objective of this scoping review was to identify healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS A scoping review of the literature published in Danish or English from 2010 to 2020 was conducted. Data was collected using identified keywords and indexed terms in several databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, and ProQuest), contacting key experts, searching through reference lists, and reports from selected health political, research- and interest organizations' websites. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We identified healthcare practices in cancer trajectories that increase quality care. Identified healthcare practices were grouped into four contextual domains and allocated to defined phases in the cancer trajectory. The results are presented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). RESULTS A total of 45 peer-reviewed and six non-peer-reviewed articles and reports were included. Quality of care increases in all phases of the cancer trajectory when GPs listen carefully to the full story and use action plans. After diagnosis, quality of care increases when GPs and practice staff have a proactive care approach, act as interpreters of diagnosis, treatment options, and its consequences, and engage in care coordination with specialists in secondary care involving the patient. CONCLUSION This scoping review identified healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective. The results support general practice in investigating own healthcare practices and identifying possibilities for quality improvement.KEY POINTSIdentified healthcare practices in general practice that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories:Listen carefully to the full storyUse action plans and time-out-consultationsPlan and provide proactive careAct as an interpreter of diagnosis, treatment options, and its consequences for the patientCoordinate care with specialists, patients, and caregivers with mutual respectIdentified barriers for quality of care in cancer trajectories are:Time constraints in consultationsLimited accessibility for patients and caregiversHealth practices to increase the quality of care should be effective, safe, people-centered, timely, equitable, integrated, and efficient. These distinctions of quality of care, support general practice in investigating and improving quality of care in cancer trajectories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Nicolaisen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
- CONTACT Anne Nicolaisen Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000Odense C, Denmark
| | - Gitte Bruun Lauridsen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Peter Haastrup
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Dorte Gilså Hansen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- The Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hansen DG, Trabjerg TB, Sisler JJ, Søndergaard J, Jensen LH. Cross-sectoral communication by bringing together patient with cancer, general practitioner and oncologist in a video-based consultation: a qualitative study of oncologists' and nurse specialists' perspectives. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e043038. [PMID: 33952540 PMCID: PMC8103367 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Shared care models in the field of cancer aim to improve care coordination, role clarification and patient satisfaction. Cross-sectoral communication is pivotal. Involvement of patients may add to intended mechanisms.A randomised controlled trial 'The Partnership Study' tested the effect of bringing together patient, general practitioner (GP) and oncologist for a consultation conducted by video. PURPOSE As part of the process evaluation, this study aimed to explore experiences, attitudes and perspectives of the oncological department on sharing patient consultations with GPs using video. METHODS Four semistructured interviews with five oncologists and four nurse specialists were conducted in February 2020. We focused on the informants' experiences and reflections on the potential of future implementation of the concept 'inviting the GP for a shared consultation by video'. The analyses were based on an inductive, open-minded, hermeneutic phenomenological approach. RESULTS A total of six overall themes were identified: structuring consultation and communication, perceptions of GP involvement in cancer care, stressors, making a difference, alternative ways of cross-sector communication and needs for redesigning the model. The concept made sense and was deemed useful, but solving the many technical and organisational problems is pivotal. Case-specific tasks and relational issues were targeted by pragmatically rethinking protocol expectations and the usual way of communication and structuring patient encounters. Case selection was discussed as one way of maturing the concept. CONCLUSION This Danish study adds new insight into understanding different aspects of the process, causal mechanisms as well as the potential of future implementation of video-based tripartite encounters. Beyond solving the technical problems, case selection and organisational issues are important. Acknowledging the disruption of the usual workflow, the introduction of new phases of the usual encounter and the variety of patient-GP relationships to be embraced may help to better understand and comply with barriers and facilitators of communication and sharing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02716168.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorte Gilså Hansen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebælt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Theis Bitz Trabjerg
- Research Unit for General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jeffrey James Sisler
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jens Søndergaard
- Research Unit for General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lars Henrik Jensen
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Lillebælt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Center of Clinical Excellence, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hopstaken JS, van Dalen D, van der Kolk BM, van Geenen EJM, Hermans JJ, Gootjes EC, Schers HJ, van Dulmen AM, van Laarhoven CJHM, Stommel MWJ. Continuity of care experienced by patients in a multi-institutional pancreatic care network: a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:416. [PMID: 33941181 PMCID: PMC8094517 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06431-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Over the past decades, health care services for pancreatic surgery were reorganized. Volume norms were applied with the result that only a limited number of expert centers perform pancreatic surgery. As a result of this centralization of pancreatic surgery, the patient journey of patients with pancreatic tumors has become multi-institutional. To illustrate, patients are referred to a center of expertise for pancreatic surgery whereas other parts of pancreatic care, such as chemotherapy, take place in local hospitals. This fragmentation of health care services could affect continuity of care (COC). The aim of this study was to assess COC perceived by patients in a pancreatic care network and investigate correlations with patient-and care-related characteristics. Methods This is a pilot study in which patients with (pre) malignant pancreatic tumors discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board in a Dutch tertiary hospital were asked to participate. Patients were asked to fill out the Nijmegen Continuity of Care-questionnaire (NCQ) (5-point Likert scale). Additionally, their patient-and care-related data were retrieved from medical records. Correlations of NCQ score and patient-and care-related characteristics were calculated with Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Results In total, 44 patients were included (92% response rate). Pancreatic cancer was the predominant diagnosis (32%). Forty percent received a repetition of diagnostic investigations in the tertiary hospital. Mean scores for personal continuity were 3.55 ± 0.74 for GP, 3.29 ± 0.91 for the specialist and 3.43 ± 0.65 for collaboration between GPs and specialists. Overall COC was scored with a mean 3.38 ± 0.72. No significant correlations were observed between NCQ score and certain patient-or care-related characteristics. Conclusion Continuity of care perceived by patients with pancreatic tumors was scored as moderate. This outcome supports the need to improve continuity of care within multi-institutional pancreatic care networks. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06431-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Hopstaken
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein 10 (route 618), 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - D van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein 10 (route 618), 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - B M van der Kolk
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein 10 (route 618), 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - E J M van Geenen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J J Hermans
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - E C Gootjes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - H J Schers
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - A M van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C J H M van Laarhoven
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein 10 (route 618), 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein 10 (route 618), 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cross-sectoral video consultation in cancer care: GPs' evaluation of a randomised controlled trial. BJGP Open 2020; 5:BJGPO.2020.0114. [PMID: 33293407 PMCID: PMC8170612 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2020.0114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Shared care models present an opportunity for patients to receive the benefits of specialist care combined with the continuity of care provided by a GP. Aim To test the effects on GP-perceived involvement in cancer care and their satisfaction with this cross-sectoral information after bringing the patient, GP, and oncologist together in a shared video consultation. Design & setting GPs from the Region of Southern Denmark evaluated a randomised controlled trial testing shared video consultations. Method This study describes secondary outcomes based on a 4 months' follow-up survey from GPs participating in The Partnership Project (PSP). Patient perception of coordination of care at 7 months' follow-up was the primary outcome of the PSP. A tripartite video consultation was conducted during cancer treatment to share tasks and roles between health professionals with the patient. Results The study included 281 patients, and 105 unique GPs returned 124 questionnaires. Video consultations were accomplished in 68% of scheduled cases. The study found an increased odds ratio (OR) of 3.03 for GP satisfaction with the distribution of tasks and roles, and they experienced more involvement in the cancer patients' trajectory. The study found an increased OR of 6.95 for the GP perception of more direct contact and dialogue with the Department of Oncology. There was a decreased OR of 0.88 for the GP to be engaged in handling anxiety and psychological concerns. Conclusion The study showed that involving the GP in one shared consultation increased the odds of the GP being satisfied with the distribution of tasks and roles, and feeling more involved in the cancer patient’s trajectory. However, recruitment and response rates from GPs were limiting factors.
Collapse
|