Impact of Risk and Volume on Procedural Traning of Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellows

Massive Hemoptysis Simulation Curriculum Improves Performance

BACKGROUND

Massive hemoptysis is a rare, high-acuity presentation, which requires the integration of both cognitive and procedural skills. Simulation has been recommended to improve preparation for high-acuity, low-occurrence procedures; however, the effect of a simulation curriculum for massive hemoptysis management has never been investigated.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does simulation for hemoptysis management improve competence?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Kern's six steps for medical education curriculum design were used iteratively to develop a simulation curriculum for the management of massive hemoptysis. Pulmonary and critical care medicine fellows from the University of Colorado participated in a local needs assessment and a massive hemoptysis simulation curriculum. Using a manikin-based massive hemoptysis simulator developed for this curriculum, the simulation session used repetitive practice, clinical variation, a range of difficulties, and directed feedback in a group practice setting. Time to management and performance were assessed for each management attempt; competence was assessed using a combined metric of management-related priorities and global entrustment.

RESULTS

During the needs assessment, fellows viewed massive hemoptysis management skills as important, while expressing their current confidence as low. Nineteen fellows participated in a 90-min case-based hemoptysis simulation during which each was exposed to five different cases and acted as the primary manager for two cases. There was significant improvement in performance from the first to final simulation attempts measured by time to successful management (14.24 vs 10.26 min, P = .0067) and entrustment (Global Assessment Scale, 1 [should not perform] to 5 [independent]; 4.11 vs 4.61; P = .015). Fellow self-assessed knowledge and confidence in hemoptysis management and endobronchial blocker placement improved significantly after the simulation.

INTERPRETATION

Hemoptysis simulation experience improves fellow confidence and skill for management of this high-acuity, low-occurrence presentation.

Creation and Validation of a Massive Hemoptysis Simulator

BACKGROUND

Simulation for the management of massive hemoptysis is limited by the absence of a commercially available simulator to practice procedural skills necessary for management.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is it feasible to create and validate a hemoptysis simulator with high functional task alignment?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) attending physicians from four academic institutions in the Denver, Colorado, area and internal medicine residents from the University of Colorado participated in this mixed-methods study. A hemoptysis simulator was constructed by connecting a 3-D-printed airway model to a manikin that may be intubated. Attending PCCM physicians evaluated the simulator through surveys and qualitative interviews. Attendings were surveyed to determine simulation content and appropriate assessment criteria for a hemoptysis simulation. Based on these criteria, expert and novice performance on the simulator was assessed.

RESULTS

The manikin-based hemoptysis simulator demonstrated adequate physical resemblance, high functional alignment, and strong affective fidelity. It was universally preferred over a virtual reality simulator by 10 PCCM attendings. Twenty-seven attendings provided input on assessment criteria and established that assessing management priorities (eg, airway protection) was preferred to a skills checklist for hemoptysis management. Three experts outperformed six novices in hemoptysis management on the manikin-based simulator in all management categories assessed, supporting construct validity of the simulation.

INTERPRETATION

Creation of a hemoptysis simulator with appropriate content, high functional task alignment, and strong affective fidelity was successful using 3-D-printed airway models and existing manikins. This approach can overcome barriers of cost and availability for simulation of high-acuity, low-occurrence procedures.

Keys to Successful Survey Research in Health Professions Education

Background

Survey research is well suited to measuring the knowledge, behavior, and attitudes of study participants and has been widely used in medical education and pulmonary and critical care medicine research. Although the ease of survey administration via electronic platforms has led to an increased volume of survey publications, improving the quality of this work remains an important challenge.

Objective

To provide an overview of key steps for rigorous survey design and conduct.

Methods

Narrative review.

Results

Conducting survey research begins with a clearly defined research question pertaining to a specified population that is accessible for sampling. Survey investigators may choose to adapt relevant preexisting survey instruments, an approach with the potential for conducting more valid, generalizable, and comparable studies. If a new survey tool is used, more extensive piloting and psychometric analysis of the survey instruments may be needed to assess if they accurately measure the concepts of interest. When administering the survey, the use of appropriate methods for sample recruitment maximizes the chances of a high response rate in a generalizable study population. Finally, when writing up and disseminating survey research, careful attention to reporting guidelines can increase the clarity of survey reports and assist readers in interpreting the results and conclusions.

Conclusion

With careful attention to study design and conduct, the quality of survey research can be improved and lead to higher impact and more generalizable studies in the fields of medical education and pulmonary and critical care medicine.

Factors Influencing the Implementation of Prone Positioning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study

Rationale: The adoption of prone positioning for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has historically been poor. However, in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) ARDS, proning has increased. Understanding the factors influencing this change is important for further expanding and sustaining the use of prone positioning in appropriate clinical settings. Objectives: To characterize factors influencing the implementation of prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with 40 intensive care unit (ICU) team members (physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, respiratory therapists, and physical therapists) working at two academic hospitals. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, a widely used implementation science framework outlining important features of implementation, to structure the interview guide and thematic analysis of interviews. Results: ICU clinicians reported that during the COVID-19 pandemic, proning was viewed as standard early therapy for COVID-19 ARDS rather than salvage therapy for refractory hypoxemia. By caring for large volumes of proned patients, clinicians gained increased comfort with proning and now view proning as a low-risk, high-benefit intervention. Within ICUs, adequate numbers of trained staff members, increased team agreement around proning, and the availability of specific equipment (e.g., to limit pressure injuries) facilitated greater proning use. Hospital-level supports included proning teams, centralized educational resources specific to the management of COVID-19 (including a recommendation for prone positioning), and an electronic medical record proning order. Important implementation processes included informal dissemination of best practices through on-the-job learning and team interactions during routine bedside care. Conclusions: The implementation of prone positioning for COVID-19 ARDS took place in the context of evolving clinician viewpoints and ICU team cultures. Proning was facilitated by hospital support and buy-in and leadership from bedside clinicians. The successful implementation of prone positioning during the COVID-19 pandemic may serve as a model for the implementation of other evidence-based therapies in critical care.

ABCDE Approach for Massive Hemoptysis: A Novel Cognitive Aid

Massive hemoptysis is a high-risk, low-frequency clinical scenario, and teaching the management of this emergency should extend beyond reliance on clinical exposure. Massive hemoptysis requires emergent intervention to avoid asphyxiation and death. Practitioners need both cognitive and procedural skills to intervene in a high-stress situation. Cognitive aids have demonstrated benefits in other emergency settings, but no such tool exists for massive hemoptysis. Using expert recommendations, we developed the ABCDE Approach for Massive Hemoptysis, a cognitively accessible, prioritized toolbox of interventions designed to assist learners in organizing an approach to these high-risk and time-sensitive patient cases. Herein we present the elements and use of the ABCDE approach. Providing a cognitive approach to massive hemoptysis is an important first step in improving education for this potentially fatal clinical scenario.

Growth in Thoracentesis and Paracentesis Performed by Radiology and Advanced Practice Providers: Medicare Volume and Reimbursement Trends From 2012 to 2018

PURPOSE

To study trends in volume and reimbursement for paracentesis and thoracentesis by physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) after the introduction of discreet Current Procedural Terminology codes for image-guidance.

METHODS

Medicare claims for 2012 to 2018 (paracentesis) and 2013 to 2018 (thoracentesis) were extracted using Current Procedural Terminology codes for blind and image-guided paracentesis and thoracentesis. Total volumes were analyzed by provider specialty. Nonfacility reimbursement and relative value units were compared.

RESULTS

For blind paracentesis, volume decreased from 17,393 to 12,226 procedures from 2012 to 2018. Conversely, volume of image-guided paracentesis increased from 171,631 to 253,834 procedures. Radiology performed the majority of image-guide paracentesis (83.9% in 2012 and 77.1% in 2018). Volume and relative share for APPs dramatically increased (from 10.2% to 15.8%). For blind thoracentesis, volume decreased from 26,716 to 15,075 procedures from 2013 to 2018. Conversely, volume of image-guided thoracentesis increased from 187,168 to 222,673 procedures. Radiology performed the majority of image-guided thoracentesis (73.6% in 2013 and 66.2% in 2018). Volume and relative share for APPs dramatically increased (from 7.7% to 12.9%). Although reimbursement for both image-guided paracentesis and thoracentesis decreased, their reimbursement remained higher than that of blind paracentesis and thoracentesis throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

A higher percentage of these procedures are being performed using image guidance; radiologists performed a growing number but declining percentage of image-guided paracentesis and thoracentesis. APPs are playing an increasing role, particularly using image-guidance. Given decreasing reimbursement for these procedures, APPs can provide a large cost advantage in procedural radiology practices.