1
|
Bindra J, Chopra I, Hayes K, Niewoehner J, Panaccio M, Wan GJ. Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 15:739-752. [PMID: 37868649 PMCID: PMC10590138 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s428466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Sarcoidosis is a multisystem, inflammatory, systemic granulomatous disease with unknown etiology. Despite the current standard of care (SoC), there is an unmet need for the treatment of advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of Acthar® Gel (repository corticotropin injection) versus SoC in patients with advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis from the United States (US) payer and societal perspectives over 2 and 3 years. Methods A probabilistic cohort-level state-transition approach was used for this cost-effectiveness analysis. Patients were monitored at the end of a 3-month cycle for the attainment of partial or complete response. Patients in the partial, complete, or no-response state were allowed to transition in each of these states at each 3-month cycle. Following the attainment of response, patients could have a durable response or relapse to a no-response state. Patients in a no-response state received treatment and could transition into a response or no-response state based on the probability of treatment success with the respective treatment. Clinical parameters and health utility data were sourced from the Acthar Gel in Participants with Pulmonary Sarcoidosis (PULSAR) trial (NCT03320070) and healthcare utilization, costs, and disutilities were sourced from the published literature. Base case analysis considered a payer perspective over 2 years. Results From a payer perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC results in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $134,796 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and $39,179 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. From a societal perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC results in an ICER of $117,622 per QALY and $21,967 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. Sensitivity analysis findings were consistent with the base case. Conclusion The results from this cost-effectiveness analysis indicate that Acthar Gel is a cost-effective, value-based treatment option for advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis compared to the SoC from the US payer and societal perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jas Bindra
- Falcon Research Group, North Potomac, MD, USA
| | | | - Kyle Hayes
- Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - George J Wan
- Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sweis JJG, Sweis NWG, Alnaimat F, Jansz J, Liao TWE, Alsakaty A, Azam A, Elmergawy H, Hanson HA, Ascoli C, Rubinstein I, Sweiss N. Immune-mediated lung diseases: A narrative review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1160755. [PMID: 37089604 PMCID: PMC10117988 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1160755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of immunity in the pathogenesis of various pulmonary diseases, particularly interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), is being increasingly appreciated as mechanistic discoveries advance our knowledge in the field. Immune-mediated lung diseases demonstrate clinical and immunological heterogeneity and can be etiologically categorized into connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated, exposure-related, idiopathic, and other miscellaneous lung diseases including sarcoidosis, and post-lung transplant ILD. The immunopathogenesis of many of these diseases remains poorly defined and possibly involves either immune dysregulation, abnormal healing, chronic inflammation, or a combination of these, often in a background of genetic susceptibility. The heterogeneity and complex immunopathogenesis of ILDs complicate management, and thus a collaborative treatment team should work toward an individualized approach to address the unique needs of each patient. Current management of immune-mediated lung diseases is challenging; the choice of therapy is etiology-driven and includes corticosteroids, immunomodulatory drugs such as methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, or other measures such as discontinuation or avoidance of the inciting agent in exposure-related ILDs. Antifibrotic therapy is approved for some of the ILDs (e.g., idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) and is being investigated for many others and has shown promising preliminary results. A dire need for advances in the management of immune-mediated lung disease persists in the absence of standardized management guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Fatima Alnaimat
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Jacqueline Jansz
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Ting-Wei Ernie Liao
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Alaa Alsakaty
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Abeera Azam
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX, United States
| | - Hesham Elmergawy
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Hali A. Hanson
- UIC College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Christian Ascoli
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Israel Rubinstein
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
- Research Service, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Nadera Sweiss
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gerke AK. Treatment of Sarcoidosis: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Front Immunol 2020; 11:545413. [PMID: 33329511 PMCID: PMC7732561 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.545413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown etiology defined by the presence of noncaseating granulomatous inflammation that can cause organ damage and diminished quality of life. Treatment is indicated to protect organ function and decrease symptomatic burden. Current treatment options focus on interruption of granuloma formation and propagation. Clinical trials guiding evidence for treatment are lacking due to the rarity of disease, heterogeneous clinical course, and lack of prognostic biomarkers, all of which contribute to difficulty in clinical trial design and implementation. In this review, a multidisciplinary treatment approach is summarized, addressing immunuosuppressive drugs, managing complications of chronic granulomatous inflammation, and assessing treatment toxicity. Discovery of new therapies will depend on research into pathogenesis of antigen presentation and granulomatous inflammation. Future treatment approaches may also include personalized decisions based on pharmacogenomics and sarcoidosis phenotype, as well as patient-centered approaches to manage immunosuppression, symptom control, and treatment of comorbid conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia K Gerke
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clinical Presentations, Pathogenesis, and Therapy of Sarcoidosis: State of the Art. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9082363. [PMID: 32722050 PMCID: PMC7465477 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown etiology characterized by the presence of noncaseating granulomas that can occur in any organ, most commonly the lungs. Early and accurate diagnosis of sarcoidosis remains challenging because initial presentations may vary, many patients are asymptomatic, and there is no single reliable diagnostic test. Prognosis is variable and depends on epidemiologic factors, mode of onset, initial clinical course, and specific organ involvement. From a pathobiological standpoint, sarcoidosis represents an immune paradox, where an excessive spread of both the innate and the adaptive immune arms of the immune system is accompanied by a state of partial immune anergy. For all these reasons, the optimal treatment for sarcoidosis remains unclear, with corticosteroid therapy being the current gold standard for those patients with significantly symptomatic or progressive pulmonary disease or serious extrapulmonary disease. This review is a state of the art of clinical presentations and immunological features of sarcoidosis, and the current therapeutic approaches used to treat the disease.
Collapse
|