1
|
Meliagros P, Chopski B, Garber A, Dow A, Forrest R. Procedural Decision Making by Hospitalists: The Need for a Team Approach. South Med J 2024; 117:347-349. [PMID: 38830591 DOI: 10.14423/smj.0000000000001690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Pete Meliagros
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, Richmond
| | - Benjamin Chopski
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, Richmond
| | - Adam Garber
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, Richmond
| | - Alan Dow
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, Richmond
| | - Rebecca Forrest
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, Richmond
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brownson KE, Flores-Huidobro Martinez A, Ganbayar J, Sorensen LM, Darelli-Anderson AM, Prathibha S, Hoven N, Nansalmaa E, Mahlow J, Pushkin B, Potter D, Tuttle T, Price RR. Development of an International Virtual Multidisciplinary Tumor Board for Breast Cancer in Mongolia. J Surg Res 2024; 295:776-782. [PMID: 38150869 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer among Mongolian women and mortality rates are high. We describe a virtual multi-institutional and multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) for breast cancer created to assist the National Cancer Center of Mongolia. MATERIALS AND METHODS A virtual MTB for breast cancer was conducted with participation of two United States and 1 Mongolian cancer centers. A standardized template for presentations was developed. Recommendations were summarized and shared with participants. Collected data included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, stage, imaging and treatments performed, and recommendations. Questions were categorized as treatment, diagnosis, or palliative questions. RESULTS Fifteen patients were evaluated. Median age was 39 y. 86.7% of breast cancers were invasive ductal cancers and 13.3% were metaplastic carcinomas. 53.3% were estrogen and progesterone receptor positive (ER+/PR+), 60% were HER2+, 13.3% were triple negative, and 26.7% were recurrent. 40% of patients were evaluated with mammography. 6% received positron emission tomography scans for metastatic evaluation. 66.7% of surgical patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Herceptin was administered to 55.6% of patients with Her2+ cancers. Modified radical mastectomy was most commonly performed and reconstruction was rare. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was not performed. 66.7% of ER+/PR+ patients received endocrine therapy. 6.7% of patients received radiation. 75% of MTB questions pertained to treatment. Recommendations were related to systemic therapy (40%), surgical management (33.3%), pathology (13.3%), and imaging (13.3%). CONCLUSIONS This study illustrates the development of an international, virtual, multi-institutional breast cancer MTB and provides insight into challenges and potential interventions to improve breast cancer care in Mongolia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirstyn E Brownson
- Center for Global Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| | | | | | - Leif M Sorensen
- Center for Global Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Saranya Prathibha
- Global Surgery and Disparities Program, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Noelle Hoven
- Global Surgery and Disparities Program, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Jonathon Mahlow
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - David Potter
- Global Surgery and Disparities Program, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Todd Tuttle
- Global Surgery and Disparities Program, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Raymond R Price
- Center for Global Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abuelgasim KA, Jazieh AR. Quality Measures for Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards and Their Role in Improving Cancer Care. GLOBAL JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND SAFETY IN HEALTHCARE 2024; 7:28-33. [PMID: 38406654 PMCID: PMC10887491 DOI: 10.36401/jqsh-23-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
While multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) are widely used in managing patients with cancer, their impact on patient care and outcome is not routinely measured in different settings. The authors conducted a literature review in Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science using the following keywords: cancer, multidisciplinary, tumor board, quality performance indicator, lung cancer, and lymphoma. Standards from various accreditation and professional organizations were reviewed to compile relevant standards for MTB. A list of quality performance indicators that can be used to improve MTBs' performance and impact was compiled. Specific examples for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and lung cancer MTBs were presented. Guidance was provided to help MTB team members select implement the appropriate quality measures. The functions and impact of MTBs should be monitored and evaluated by a set of measures that help guide MTBs to improve their performance and provide better care to their patients.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mäurer I, Drescher R, Hammersen J, Dieckmann N, Gremme Y, Sturm MJ, McLean AL, McLean ACL, Senft C, Wittig A, Klingner C, von Sass C, Mäurer M, Kamp MA. Development and implementation of a student tumor board as a teaching format for medical students. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:16087-16096. [PMID: 37698680 PMCID: PMC10620267 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05336-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor boards serve as established platforms for interdisciplinary expert discussions and therapeutic recommendations tailored to individual patient characteristics. Despite their significance, medical students often lack exposure to such interdisciplinary discussions as tumor boards are currently not integrated into medical curricula. To address this, we aimed to enhance future physicians' interdisciplinary communication skills and subject-specific knowledge by introducing an interactive series of five linked tumor board seminars within the domain of neuro-oncology. METHODS We developed a neuro-oncological student tumor board using a flipped-classroom format. The primary objectives of this case-centered approach included fostering an understanding of the tumor board process, active participation in multidisciplinary case discussions, honing appropriate communication strategies, and creating personalized therapy plans that consider inputs from all relevant disciplines, individual patient factors, and ethical considerations. To gauge the effectiveness of the seminar series, we administered structured pre- and post-course questionnaires. RESULTS Fourteen medical students in third to fifth year participated in the pilot series. Despite its organizational complexity, the interdisciplinary seminars were feasible. Students demonstrated significant growth in competence, aligned with predefined learning objectives. Notably, they appreciated the supportive learning environment and interactive teaching format, which kindled their interest in interdisciplinary oncology. CONCLUSION Active participation in a student tumor board can empower students to tackle the diverse challenges of caring for cancer patients within an interdisciplinary team during the early stages of their careers. The student tumor board represents an innovative, learner-centered approach to teach interdisciplinary cancer treatment, communication strategies, and ethical aspects of medical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Mäurer
- Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
- Neuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Advanced Clinician Scientist Program "AntiAge", Jena University Hospital, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Robert Drescher
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Jakob Hammersen
- Department for Haematology and Medical Oncology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Nora Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Jena, Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Yvonne Gremme
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Jena, Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Max-Johann Sturm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Jena, Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Aaron Lawson McLean
- Neuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Department for Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Anna C Lawson McLean
- Neuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Department for Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Christian Senft
- Neuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Department for Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Andrea Wittig
- Neuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Jena, Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Caroline Klingner
- Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Christiane von Sass
- Neuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Department for Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Centre for Palliative Care and Neuropalliative Care, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Campus Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Campus Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Matthias Mäurer
- Neuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Jena, Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
- Clinician Scientist Program "OrganAge", Jena University Hospital, 07747, Jena, Germany.
| | - Marcel A Kamp
- Neuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Department for Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Centre for Palliative Care and Neuropalliative Care, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Campus Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Campus Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mäurer M, Staudacher J, Meyer R, Mäurer I, Lazaridis L, Müther M, Huber T, Sommer NP, Fleischmann DF, Käsmann L, Ziegler S, Kropf-Sanchen C, Wikert J, Pietzner K, Holzgreve A, Nestler T, Siech C, Sturm MJ, Sulzer S, Heinrich K, Stahler A. Importance of interdisciplinarity in modern oncology: results of a national intergroup survey of the Young Oncologists United (YOU). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:10075-10084. [PMID: 37261525 PMCID: PMC10423150 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04937-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Modern, personalized treatment concepts in oncology require an interdisciplinary and multiprofessional collaboration. In addition to its relevance in patient care, interdisciplinary collaboration is also becoming increasingly important in clinical research as well as medical education and resident training in oncology. METHODS Between November 2021 and March 2022, an online survey was conducted among German early career research groups, represented by Young Oncologists United (YOU). The aim was to identify the status and need for interdisciplinarity at clinic, educational, and research levels. RESULTS A total of 294 participants completed the questionnaire in full. 90.7% of the respondents fully or predominantly agreed with the statement that interdisciplinary work plays a major role in their daily clinical work. 78.9% wished for more interdisciplinary collaboration. Of the 49.7% of participants who have never participated in an interdisciplinary research project, 80.1% said they would like to participate in such a study project in the future. Lack of time resources, too much organizational effort, and possible political conflicts between institutions were identified as factors that make practical implementation difficult. 74.1% declared their willingness to become active in an oncology early career research group. CONCLUSION Interdisciplinary collaboration has become increasingly important in oncology. Networks that span different disciplines could help to promote interdisciplinary research projects among young scientists and improve exchange in professional practice and education with the implication of improved patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Mäurer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
| | - Jonas Staudacher
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rheumatology and Infectiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Meyer
- Institute of Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Aachen, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| | - Irina Mäurer
- Department of Neurology, Neurooncology Center, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Lazaros Lazaridis
- Department of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Medicine Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Müther
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Tobias Huber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nils P Sommer
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Daniel F Fleischmann
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, LMU Clinic Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, LMU Clinic Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sonia Ziegler
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Radiation Therapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Julia Wikert
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Palliative Medicine, LMU Klinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Pietzner
- Department of Gynecology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tim Nestler
- Clinic for Urology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Carolin Siech
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Max-Johann Sturm
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Sabrina Sulzer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Medical Clinic and Polyclinic III, University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Charité University Medicine, Medical Clinic m. S. Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Calvo FA, Palma J, Serrano J, Cambeiro M, Meiriño R, Martin S, Azcona D, Pedrero D, Aguilar B, Delgado JM, Moran V, Viñals A, Cabello P, Panizo E, Lassaletta A, Gibert C, Sancho L, de Miguel JMF, de Sierra BA, Alcázar A, Suarez V, Alonso A, Gallardo G, Aristu J. Hospital-based proton therapy implementation during the COVID pandemic: early clinical and research experience in a European academic institution. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:1268-1276. [PMID: 36961726 PMCID: PMC10036962 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03127-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A rapid deploy of unexpected early impact of the COVID pandemic in Spain was described in 2020. Oncology practice was revised to facilitate decision-making regarding multimodal therapy for prevalent cancer types amenable to multidisciplinary treatment in which the radiotherapy component searched more efficient options in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, minimizing the risks to patients whilst aiming to guarantee cancer outcomes. METHODS A novel Proton Beam Therapy (PBT), Unit activity was analyzed in the period of March 2020 to March 2021. Institutional urgent, strict and mandatory clinical care standards for early diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 infection were stablished in the hospital following national health-authorities' recommendations. The temporary trends of patients care and research projects proposals were registered. RESULTS 3 out of 14 members of the professional staff involved in the PBR intra-hospital process had a positive test for COVID infection. Also, 4 out of 100 patients had positive tests before initiating PBT, and 7 out of 100 developed positive tests along the weekly mandatory special checkup performed during PBT to all patients. An update of clinical performance at the PBT Unit at CUN Madrid in the initial 500 patients treated with PBT in the period from March 2020 to November 2022 registers a distribution of 131 (26%) pediatric patients, 63 (12%) head and neck cancer and central nervous system neoplasms and 123 (24%) re-irradiation indications. In November 2022, the activity reached a plateau in terms of patients under treatment and the impact of COVID pandemic became sporadic and controlled by minor medical actions. At present, the clinical data are consistent with an academic practice prospectively (NCT05151952). Research projects and scientific production was adapted to the pandemic evolution and its influence upon professional time availability. Seven research projects based in public funding were activated in this period and preliminary data on molecular imaging guided proton therapy in brain tumors and post-irradiation patterns of blood biomarkers are reported. CONCLUSIONS Hospital-based PBT in European academic institutions was impacted by COVID-19 pandemic, although clinical and research activities were developed and sustained. In the post-pandemic era, the benefits of online learning will shape the future of proton therapy education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe A Calvo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Jacobo Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Serrano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mauricio Cambeiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Meiriño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Santiago Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diego Azcona
- Department of Medical Physics and Radioprotection, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diego Pedrero
- Department of Medical Physics and Radioprotection, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Borja Aguilar
- Department of Medical Physics and Radioprotection, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Miguel Delgado
- Department of Medical Physics and Radioprotection, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Verónica Moran
- Department of Medical Physics and Radioprotection, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Viñals
- Department of Medical Physics and Radioprotection, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Cabello
- Department of Medical Physics and Radioprotection, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Panizo
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alvaro Lassaletta
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlota Gibert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lidia Sancho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Andres Alcázar
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Victor Suarez
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Alonso
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Guillermo Gallardo
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Aristu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|