Brain metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer: are tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors now viable options?

Brain metastases and lung cancer: molecular biology, natural history, prediction of response and efficacy of immunotherapy

Brain metastases stemming from lung cancer represent a common and challenging complication that significantly impacts patients' overall health. The migration of these cancerous cells from lung lesions to the central nervous system is facilitated by diverse molecular changes and a specific environment that supports their affinity for neural tissues. The advent of immunotherapy and its varied combinations in non-small cell lung cancer has notably improved patient survival rates, even in cases involving brain metastases. These therapies exhibit enhanced penetration into the central nervous system compared to traditional chemotherapy. This review outlines the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of brain metastases in lung cancer and explores the efficacy of novel immunotherapy approaches and their combinations.

Optimal timing of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

For epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with limited brain metastases (BMs), who eventually receive both tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment and brain radiotherapy, the optimal timing of radiotherapy is not clear. The present retrospective analysis aimed to partly solve this problem.

METHODS

In total 84 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with limited BMs, who received both TKI treatment and brain hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT), were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups based on whether the HSRT was administrated 2 weeks before or after the beginning of TKI treatment (upfront HSRT), when intracranial lesions stabilized after TKI treatment (consolidative HSRT), or when the intracranial disease progressed after TKI treatment (salvage HSRT). The clinical efficacy and toxicities were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall PFS calculated from the initiation of HSRT (iPFS1 and PFS1) of all patients were 17.5 and 13.1 months, respectively. The median iPFS and PFS calculated from the initiation of TKI treatment (iPFS2 and PFS2) of all patients were 24.1 and 18.4 months, respectively. Compared to consolidative and salvage HSRT, upfront HSRT improved iPFS1 (not reached vs. 17.5 months vs. 11.0 months, p < 0.001) and PFS1 (18.4 months vs. 9.1 months vs. 7.9 months, p < 0.001), and reduced the initial intracranial failure rate (12.5% vs. 48.1% vs. 56%, p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the three groups for iPFS2, PFS2, and overall survival. Hepatic metastases and diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (ds-GPA) at 2-3 were poor prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

For patients who receive both TKI treatment and brain HSRT, the timing of HSRT does not seem to influence the eventual therapeutic effect. Further validation in prospective clinical studies is needed.

Evolution of the Management of Brain Metastases: A Bibliometric Analysis

A systematic review of the published literature was conducted to analyze the management evolution of brain metastases from different cancers. Using the keywords "brain metastasis", "brain metastases", "CNS metastasis", "CNS metastases", "phase III" AND/OR "Randomized Controlled Trial" (RCT), relevant articles were searched for on the SCOPUS database. A total of 1986 articles were retrieved, published over a 45-year period (1977-2022). Relevant articles were defined as clinical studies describing the treatment or prevention of brain metastases from any cancer. Articles on imaging, quality of life, cognitive impairment after treatment, or primary brain tumors were excluded. After a secondary analysis, reviewing the abstracts and/or full texts, 724 articles were found to be relevant. Publications significantly increased in the last 10 years. A total of 252 articles (34.8%) were published in 12 core journals, receiving 50% of the citations. The number of publications in Frontiers in Oncology, BMC Cancer, and Radiotherapy and Oncology have increased considerably over the last few years. There were 111 randomized controlled trials, 128 review articles, and 63 meta-analyses. Most randomized trials reported on brain metastases management from unselected tumors (49), lung cancer (47), or breast cancer (11). In the last 5 years (2017 to 2022), management of brain metastasis has moved on from WBRT, the use of chemotherapy, and radio-sensitization to three directions. First, Radiosurgery or Radiotherapy (SRS/SRT), or hippocampal-sparing WBRT is employed to reduce radiation toxicity. Second, it has moved to the use of novel agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and third, to the use of molecularly directed therapy such as TKIs, in asymptomatic low volume metastasis, obviating the need for WBRT.

The Efficacy and Safety of Afatinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastasis: A Meta-Analysis

Aim

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of afatinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis based on meta-analysis.

Methods

Related literatures were searched in the following databases: EMbase, PubMed, China Knowledge Network (CNKI), Wanfang, Weipu, Google Scholar, the China Biomedical Literature Service System, and other databases. Clinical trials and observational studies that met the requirements were selected for meta-analysis using Revman 5.3. The hazard ratio (HR) was used as an indicator of the impact of afatinib.

Results

A total of 142 related literatures were acquired, but after screening, five literatures were selected for data extraction. The following indices were compared: the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and common adverse reactions (ARs) of grade 3 and above. A total of 448 patients with brain metastases were included and were divided into two groups: the control group (no afatinib treatment, with chemotherapy alone and the first-generation EGFR-TKIs) and the afatinib group. The results showed that afatinib could improve PFS (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39-0.85, P < 0.05) and ORR (OR = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.45-2.57, P < 0.05), but had no benefit on OS (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.15-8.75, P > 0.05) and DCR (OR = 2.87, 95% CI: 0.97-8.48, P > 0.05). For the safety of afatinib, the incidence of grade-3-and-above ARs was low (HR: 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.02, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Afatinib improves the survival of NSCLC patients with brain metastases and shows satisfactory safety.

Treatments for brain metastases from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected NSCLC: A network meta-analysis

More clinical evidence is needed regarding the relative priority of treatments for brain metastases (BMs) from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Overall survival (OS), central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were selected for Bayesian network meta-analyses. We included 25 eligible randomized control trials (RCTs) involving 3,054 patients, investigating nine kinds of treatments for newly diagnosed BMs and seven kinds of treatments for previously treated BMs. For newly diagnosed BMs, adding chemotherapy, EGFR-TKIs, and other innovative systemic agents (temozolomide, nitroglycerin, endostar, enzastaurin, and veliparib) to radiotherapy did not significantly prolong OS than radiotherapy alone; whereas radiotherapy + nitroglycerin showed significantly better CNS-PFS and ORR. Surgery could significantly prolong OS (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.52, 95% credible intervals: 0.41-0.67) and CNS-PFS (HR: 0.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.59) compared with radiotherapy alone. For previously treated BMs, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy, nivolumab + ipilimumab, and cemiplimab significantly prolonged OS than chemotherapy alone. Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy also showed better CNS-PFS and ORR than chemotherapy. In summary, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies, especially ICI-combined therapies, showed promising efficacies for previously treated BMs from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected NSCLC. The value of surgery should also be emphasized. The result should be further confirmed by RCTs.

Proteomic analysis of brain metastatic lung adenocarcinoma reveals intertumoral heterogeneity and specific alterations associated with the timing of brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases are associated with considerable negative effects on patients' outcome in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC). Here, we investigated the proteomic landscape of primary LADCs and their corresponding brain metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Proteomic profiling was conducted on 20 surgically resected primary and brain metastatic LADC samples via label-free shotgun proteomics. After sample processing, peptides were analyzed using an Ultimate 3000 pump coupled to a QExactive HF-X mass spectrometer. Raw data were searched using PD 2.4. Further data analyses were carried out using Perseus, RStudio and GraphPad Prism. Proteomic data were correlated with clinical and histopathological parameters and the timing of brain metastases. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD027259.

RESULTS

Out of the 6821 proteins identified and quantified, 1496 proteins were differentially expressed between primary LADCs and corresponding brain metastases. Pathways associated with the immune system, cell-cell/matrix interactions and migration were predominantly activated in the primary tumors, whereas pathways related to metabolism, translation or vesicle formation were overrepresented in the metastatic tumors. When comparing fast- versus slow-progressing patients, we found 454 and 298 differentially expressed proteins in the primary tumors and brain metastases, respectively. Metabolic reprogramming and ribosomal activity were prominently up-regulated in the fast-progressing patients (versus slow-progressing individuals), whereas expression of cell-cell interaction- and immune system-related pathways was reduced in these patients and in those with multiple brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first comprehensive proteomic analysis of paired primary tumors and brain metastases of LADC patients. Our data suggest a malfunction of cellular attachment and an increase in ribosomal activity in LADC tissue, promoting brain metastasis. The current study provides insights into the biology of LADC brain metastases and, moreover, might contribute to the development of personalized follow-up strategies in LADC.

TAS2940, a novel brain-penetrable pan-ERBB inhibitor, for tumors with HER2 and EGFR aberrations

Genetic alterations in human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are commonly associated with breast and lung cancers and glioblastomas. Cancers with avian erythroblastosis oncogene B (ERBB) deregulation are highly metastatic and can cause primary brain tumors. Currently, no pan-ERBB inhibitor with remarkable brain penetration is available. Here, TAS2940, a novel irreversible pan-ERBB inhibitor with improved brain penetrability, was evaluated for its efficacy against several ERBB aberrant cancer models. The selectivity of TAS2940 was evaluated by enzymatic kinase assays. The inhibitory effects of TAS2940 against ERBB genetic alterations were examined using MCF10A cells expressing various HER2 or EGFR mutations and other generic cell lines harboring deregulated ERBB expression. In vivo efficacy of TAS2940 was examined following oral treatment in subcutaneous or intracranial xenograft cancer models. TAS2940 was highly potent against cells harboring HER2/EGFR alterations. TAS2940 could selectively inhibit phosphorylation of targets and the growth of cancer cells with ERBB aberrations in vitro. TAS2940 also inhibited tumor growth in xenograft mouse models with ERBB aberrations: HER2 amplification, HER2/EGFR exon 20 insertions, and EGFR vIII mutation. TAS2940 was effective in the intracranial xenograft models of HER2/EGFR cancers and improved the survival of these mice. TAS2940 has promising therapeutic effects in preclinical study against cancers harboring HER2/EGFR mutations, especially metastatic and primary brain tumors. Our results highlight potential novel strategies against lung cancers with brain metastases harboring HER2/EGFR exon 20 insertions and glioblastomas with EGFR aberrations.

Post Hoc Analysis of Lorlatinib Intracranial Efficacy and Safety in Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer From the Phase III CROWN Study

PURPOSE

Lorlatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus crizotinib and showed robust intracranial activity in patients with previously untreated advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase III CROWN trial. Here, we report post hoc efficacy outcomes in patients with and without brain metastases at baseline, and present data on the incidence and management of CNS adverse events (AEs) in CROWN.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line lorlatinib (100 mg once daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice a day); no crossover between treatment arms was permitted. Tumor assessments, including CNS magnetic resonance imaging, were performed at screening and then at 8-week intervals. Regular assessments of patient-reported outcomes were conducted.

RESULTS

PFS by blinded independent central review was improved with lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with and without brain metastases at baseline (12-month PFS rates: 78% v 22% and 78% v 45%, respectively). Lorlatinib was associated with lower 12-month cumulative incidence of CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with (7% v 72%) and without (1% v 18%) brain metastases at baseline. In total, 35% of patients had CNS AEs with lorlatinib, most of grade 1 severity. Occurrence of CNS AEs did not result in a clinically meaningful difference in patient-reported quality of life. At analysis, 56% of CNS AEs had resolved (33% without intervention; 17% with lorlatinib dose modification), and 38% were unresolved; most required no intervention. Lorlatinib dose modification did not notably influence PFS.

CONCLUSION

First-line lorlatinib improved PFS outcomes and reduced CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer with or without brain metastases at baseline. Half of all CNS AEs resolved without intervention or with lorlatinib dose modification.

Survival Outcomes and Predictors for Recurrence of Surgically Treated Brain Metastasis From Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

There are numerous factors to consider in deciding whether to undergo surgical treatment for brain metastasis from lung cancer. Herein, we aimed to analyze the survival outcome and predictors of recurrence of surgically treated brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 197 patients with brain metastasis from NSCLC who underwent microsurgery were included in this study.

Results

A total of 114 (57.9%) male and 83 (42.1%) female patients with a median age of 59 years (range, 27–79) was included in this study. The median follow-up period was 22.7 (range, 1–126) months. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with brain metastasis secondary to NSCLC were 59% and 43%, respectively. The 6-month and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of local recurrence were 80% and 73%, respectively, whereas those of distant recurrence were 84% and 63%, respectively. En-bloc resection of tumor resulted in better PFS for local recurrence (1-year PFS: 79% vs. 62%, p=0.02). Ventricular opening and direct contact between the tumor and the subarachnoid space were not associated with distal recurrence and leptomeningeal seeding. The difference in PFS of local recurrence according to adjuvant resection bed irradiation was not significant. Moreover, postoperative whole-brain irradiation did not show a significant difference in PFS of distant recurrence. In multivariate analysis, only en-bloc resection was a favorable prognostic factor for local recurrence. Contrastingly, multiple metastasis was a poor prognostic factor for distant recurrence.

Conclusion

En-bloc resection may reduce local recurrence after surgical resection. Ventricular opening and contact between the tumor and subarachnoid space did not show a statistically significant result for distant recurrence and leptomeningeal seeding. Multiple metastasis was only meaningful factor for distant recurrence.

Case Report: Patient With Lung Adenocarcinoma With ALK-HLA-DRB1 Rearrangement Shows Impressive Progression-Free Survival After Sequential Crizotinib and Ceritinib Treatment

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement is a driving mutation that underlies about 5-6% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Lung cancers that are ALK gene rearrangement-positive can be effectively treated with ALK inhibitors. However, the response of patients with rarer ALK gene rearrangements to ALK inhibitors remains unknown. Herein, we described a case of lung adenocarcinoma carrying ALK-HLA-DRB1 fusion in a 48-year-old nonsmoking woman. A similar case of ALK-HLA-DRB1 rearrangement in NSCLC has not been described previously neither in NSCLC nor in other disease. The patient achieved a progression-free survival of 18 months after sequential therapy consisting of crizotinib and then ceritinib during the follow-up. These findings provide basis for the application of ALK inhibitors in patients carrying the rare ALK-HLA-DRB1 fusion.

Outcomes of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases From Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement-Positive and EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

The outcomes after gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) were retrospectively analysed in patients with brain metastases from anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-positive and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to evaluate the efficacy, safety and difference for overall survival and local tumor control.

Methods

The medical records were retrospectively reviewed of 607 patients (25 ALK-positive, 171 EGFR-positive, and 411 wild type) with 2959 tumors who had undergone GKRS.

Results

The median overall survival time after initial GKRS was 14 months. Driver gene mutation-positive patients had significantly longer overall survival than wild type patients (p < 0.0001), and ALK-positive patients survived significantly longer than EGFR-positive patients (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed the unfavorable factors significantly affecting overall survival outcomes were older age, lower Karnofsky Performance Status score, multiple intracranial metastases, uncontrolled primary cancer, uncontrolled extracranial metastases, no administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and driver gene mutation-negative cases. Seventy-three patients died of uncontrolled brain metastases at a median of 12 months. Driver gene mutations had no influence (p = 0.33), and ALK-positive and EGFR-positive patients showed no significant difference in neurological survival (p = 0.83). A total of 174 patients demonstrated distant brain control failure at a median of 15 months. ALK-positive type was significant compared with EGFR-positive type (p = 0.047), but driver gene mutation-positive and -negative types showed no significant difference in the development of new brain metastases (p = 0.2). The median tumor volume was 1.06 cm³ in the driver gene mutation-positive type and 1.85 cm³ in wild type. The median marginal dose was 20 Gy in both types. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month local tumor control rates were 97.3%, 96.1%, and 95.9%, respectively. Driver gene mutations had a significantly positive impact on local tumor control (p = 0.001), and ALK-positive and EGFR-positive types showed no significant difference (p = 0.95). A total of 193 tumors had radiation injury at a median of 12 months after GKRS. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month GKRS-related complication rates were 3.3%, 8.1%, and 8.7%, respectively. Driver gene mutations significantly induced radiation damage (p = 0.021), and the ALK-positive type was affected more than the EGFR-positive type (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

ALK rearrangement-positive NSCLC patients tended to have significantly longer survival, but had higher incidence of new intracranial metastases due to long-term survival after GKRS, compared with EGFR mutation-negative and driver gene mutation-negative NSCLC patients. GKRS induced significantly satisfactory local tumor control in driver gene mutation-positive tumors but GKRS-related complication frequency was higher, especially in ALK-positive NSCLC patients. Therefore, more careful imaging follow-up is necessary after GKRS for patients with driver gene mutation-positive NSCLC.

The Tumor Control According to Radiation Dose of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Small and Medium-Sized Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objective

The effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) in the treatment of brain metastases is well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maximizing the radiation dose in GKR and the factors influencing tumor control in cases of small and medium-sized brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We analyzed 230 metastatic brain tumors less than 5 mL in volume in 146 patients with NSCLC who underwent GKR. The patients had no previous radiation therapy for brain metastases. The pathologies of the tumors were adenocarcinoma (n=207), squamous cell carcinoma (n=18), and others (n=5). The radiation doses were classified as 18, 20, 22, and 24 Gy, and based on the tumor volume, the tumors were categorized as follows : small-sized (less than 1 mL) and medium-sized (1–3 and 3–5 mL). The progression-free survival (PFS) of the individual 230 tumors and 146 brain metastases was evaluated after GKR depending on the pathology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score (PS), tumor volume, radiation dose, and anti-cancer regimens. The radiotoxicity after GKR was also evaluated.

Results

After GKR, the restricted mean PFS of individual 230 tumors at 24 months was 15.6 months (14.0–17.1). In small-sized tumors, as the dose of radiation increased, the tumor control rates tended to increase (p=0.072). In medium-sized tumors, there was no statistically difference in PFS with an increase of radiation dose (p=0.783). On univariate analyses, a statistically significant increase in PFS was associated with adenocarcinomas (p=0.001), tumors with ECOG PS 0 (p=0.005), small-sized tumors (p=0.003), radiation dose of 24 Gy (p=0.014), synchronous lesions (p=0.002), and targeted therapy (p=0.004). On multivariate analyses, an improved PFS was seen with targeted therapy (hazard ratio, 0.356; 95% confidence interval, 0.150–0.842; p=0.019). After GKR, the restricted mean PFS of brain at 24 months was 9.8 months (8.5–11.1) in 146 patients, and the pattern of recurrence was mostly distant within the brain (66.4%). The small and medium-sized tumors treated with GKR showed radiotoxicitiy in five out of 230 tumors (2.2%), which were controlled with medical treatment.

Conclusion

The small-sized tumors were effectively controlled without symptomatic radiation necrosis as the radiation dose was increased up to 24 Gy. The medium-sized tumors showed potential for symptomatic radiation necrosis without signifcant tumor control rate, when greater than 18 Gy. GKR combined targeted therapy improved the tumor control of GKR-treated tumors.

A Bayesian network meta-analysis regarding the comparative efficacy of therapeutics for ALK-positive, brain metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

More clinical evidence is needed regarding the ranking priority of interventions for ALK-positive, brain metastatic (BM) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) for the intended populations were analyzed with random effects, Bayesian network meta-analysis with the estimated hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (95% CrIs). We included 11 RCTs (2687 NSCLC and 991 BM patients) investigating 7 treatments and 5 medication classes. For PFS for BM patients, lorlatinib (hazard ratio (HR): 0.01, 95% CrI: 0.001-0.12), alectinib (HR: 0.05, 95% CrI: 0.01-0.21) and brigatinib (HR: 0.07, 95% CrI: 0.007-0.76) were top-ranking individual treatments; for ORR for BM patients, brigatinib, lorlatinib and alectinib were top-ranking treatments. For PFS for all NSCLC patients, the top-ranking individual treatments were lorlatinib (HR: 0.05, 95% CrI: 0.02-0.13), alectinib (HR: 0.09, 95% CrI: 0.05-0.18) and brigatinib (HR: 0.11, 95% CrI: 0.05-0.28). For OS for all NSCLC patients, we found that no individual treatments were superior to chemotherapy, whereas the following top-ranking interventions were alectinib (HR: 0.29, 95% CrI: 0.03-1.68), lorlatinib (HR: 0.41, 95% CrI: 0.04-4.13), and ceritinib (HR: 0.63, 95% CrI: 0.10-4.25). The results of individual treatments and medication classes were similar. Data were limited in regard to subgroup analyses and adverse events of BM patients. Lorlatinib has the most statistical superiority for BM patients, but ORR differences between third- and second-generation inhibitors are not obvious. All things considered, alectinib is recommended as first-line treatment, followed by lorlatinib, especially after developing drug resistance to alectinib.

Clinical case of lung spindle cell carcinoma markedly responsive to pembrolizumab

A 52‐year‐old man underwent pneumonectomy of the left lung for previously diagnosed primary spindle cell carcinoma (pT4aN1M0, stage III B) with programmed death‐ligand 1 expression (tumor proportion score ≥95%) and without epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene. However, brain metastasis and chest wall tumor relapse occurred. Considering insufficient improvement with gamma knife treatment for brain metastasis and combination chemotherapy (paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab), pembrolizumab monotherapy and palliative irradiation therapy for chest metastases were started after brain tumor volume reduction using craniotomy. Brain edema and chest wall metastases markedly improved following a pseudoprogression of the brain edema accompanied by a performance status decline; this effect continued until 11 cycles of pembrolizumab administration.

Comparative analysis of the tumor immune-microenvironment of primary and brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer reveals organ-specific and EGFR mutation-dependent unique immune landscape

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the characteristics of the tumor immune-microenvironment in brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we investigated the immunophenotype of primary NSCLC and its brain metastasis.

METHODS

Expression profiling of 770 immune-related genes in 28 tissues from primary and brain metastases of NSCLC was performed using the NanoString nCounter PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel. The immune cell profiles were validated by immunohistochemistry of 42 matched samples.

RESULTS

Based on unsupervised clustering and principal component analysis of the immune-related gene expression profile, tumors were primarily clustered according to the involved organ and further grouped according to the EGFR mutation status. Fifty-four genes were significantly differentially expressed between primary and brain metastatic tumors. Clustering using these genes showed that tumors harboring mutated EGFR tended to be grouped together in the brain. Pathway analysis revealed that various immune-related functions involving immune regulation, T cell activity, and chemokines were enriched in primary tumors compared to brain metastases. Diverse immune-related pathways were upregulated in brain metastases of EGFR-mutated compared to EGFR-wild-type adenocarcinoma, but not in primary tumors. The interferon-γ-related gene signature was significantly decreased in brain metastases. The anti-inflammatory markers TOLLIP and HLA-G were upregulated in brain metastases. The proportions of most immune cell subsets were decreased in brain metastases, but those of macrophages and CD56dim-NK-cells were increased, as was the ratios of CD163+M2- to iNOS+M1-macrophages and NCR1+NK-cells to CD3+T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings illustrate the immune landscape of brain metastases from NSCLC and reveal potential therapeutic strategies targeting cellular and non-cellular components of the tumor immune-microenvironment.

Lipid polymeric nanoparticles modified with tight junction-modulating peptides promote afatinib delivery across a blood–brain barrier model

Background

Brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain one of the most challenging malignancies. Afatinib (Afa) is an orally administered irreversible ErbB family blocker approved for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC. However, the incidence of brain metastases in patients with NSCLC and EGFR mutation is high. One of the major obstacles in the treatment of brain metastases is to transport drugs across the blood–brain barrier (BBB). A lipid polymeric nanoparticle (LPN) modified with a tight junction-modulating peptide is a potential formulation to deliver therapeutics across the BBB. FD7 and CCD are short peptides that perturb the tight junctions (TJs) of the BBB. In this study, the use of LPN modified with FD7 or CCD as a delivery platform was explored to enhance Afa delivery across the BBB model of mouse brain-derived endothelial bEnd.3 cells.

Results

Our findings revealed that Afa/LPN-FD7 and Afa/LPN-CCD exhibited a homogeneous shape, a uniform nano-scaled particle size, and a sustained-release profile. FD7, CCD, Afa/LPN-FD7, and Afa/LPN-CCD did not cause a significant cytotoxic effect on bEnd.3 cells. Afa/LPN-FD7 and Afa/LPN-CCD across the bEnd.3 cells enhanced the cytotoxicity of Afa on human lung adenocarcinoma PC9 cells. FD7 and CCD-modulated TJ proteins, such as claudin 5 and ZO-1, reduced transendothelial electrical resistance, and increased the permeability of paracellular markers across the bEnd.3 cells. Afa/LPN-FD7 and Afa/LPN-CCD were also partially transported through clathrin- and caveolae-mediated transcytosis, revealing the effective activation of paracellular and transcellular pathways to facilitate Afa delivery across the BBB and cytotoxicity of Afa on PC9 cells.

Conclusion

TJ-modulating peptide-modified LPN could be a prospective platform for the delivery of chemotherapeutics across the BBB to the brain for the potential treatment of the BM of NSCLC.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Testing and Outcomes in EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Belgium: Results from the REVEAL Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to evolve expeditiously.

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study investigated real-world treatment patterns and EGFR mutation testing in patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC in Belgium.

METHODS

Data were extracted from medical records of adults diagnosed with EGFRm locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2017. Patients were followed retrospectively from diagnosis until 1 September 2018, end of clinical activity or death. Data on demographics, patient outcomes and disease characteristics, treatment patterns and EGFR mutation testing at diagnosis and progression were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were enrolled. At diagnosis, median age was 69 years, 63.1% were female, 88.7% had metastatic disease, 94.3% had adenocarcinoma histology, 76.6% had ECOG 0/1, 70.9% had common EGFR mutations and 29.1% had only rare mutations. In first line, 73.8% of patients received first/second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (1G/2G EGFR-TKIs), while 21.9% received other systemic treatments. Among 61 patients progressing on and discontinuing a first 1G/2G EGFR-TKI, 45 (73.8%) received subsequent systemic treatment while 16 (26.2%) did not; 20 (32.8%) received osimertinib. Among 65 patients progressing on a first 1G/2G EGFR-TKI, 47 (72.3%) were tested for T790M, of whom 25 (53.2%) were positive.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data from Belgium show that a substantial fraction of patients with EGFRm NSCLC do not receive 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in first line and do not receive subsequent systemic treatment after progression on 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. Only a third receive osimertinib upon progression on 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. These observations should be considered in first-line treatment decisions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03761901-December 3, 2018.

Micropapillary Predominance Is a Risk Factor for Brain Metastasis in Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Histologic subtyping offers some prognostic value in lung adenocarcinoma. We thus hypothesized that histologic subtypes may be useful for risk stratification of brain metastasis (BM). In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of histologic subtypes on the risk for BM in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 1099 consecutive patients who had undergone curative-intent surgery (2000-2014), 448 patients who had undergone complete resection for lung adenocarcinoma were included in this study. Correlated clinical variables and BM-free survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Micropapillary predominance was significantly associated with higher risk of BM after complete resection in univariate analyses (P < .001). In addition, multivariate analyses showed that micropapillary predominance was an independent risk factor for BM (hazard ratio = 2.727; 95% confidence interval, 1.260-5.900; P = .011), along with younger age and advanced pathologic stage. Unlike the other subtypes, an increase in the percentage of the micropapillary subtype was positively correlated with an increase in BM frequency. Patients with micropapillary adenocarcinoma showed significantly poorer brain metastasis-free survival compared with those with non-micropapillary adenocarcinoma (3 years, 78.2% vs. 95.6%; 5 years, 67.3% vs. 94.3%; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated a significant correlation between micropapillary subtype and higher risk of BM in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma. This routine histologic evaluation of resected adenocarcinoma may provide useful information for the clinician when considering postoperative management in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Histologic subtyping offer some prognostic value in lung adenocarcinoma. Because brain metastasis is critical and often refractory to systemic chemotherapy, early detection is clinically important to achieve effective local treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the association between histologic subtypes and occurrence of brain metastasis and found a significant association between micropapillary predominance and higher risk for brain metastasis. Our findings may be relevant when considering postoperative management.

Alisertib inhibits migration and invasion of EGFR-TKI resistant cells by partially reversing the epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been widely used in the clinical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. Previous studies have shown that Aurora kinase A (AURKA) is overexpressed in a broad spectrum of cancer cells, which can induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and contribute to the occurrence of acquired EGFR-TKI resistance. However, whether the inhibition of AURKA could overcome EGFR-TKI resistance or reverse the EMT in TKI-resistant NSCLC cells remains unclear. In the current study, we established three EGFR-TKI-resistant cell lines and analyzed their expression profiles by RNA sequencing. The results revealed that the EMT pathway is significantly upregulated in the three cell lines with EGFR-TKI resistance. The phosphorylation of AURKA at Thr 288 was also upregulated, suggesting that the activation of AURKA plays an important role in the occurrence of EGFR-TKI resistance. Interestingly, the AURKA inhibitor, alisertib treatment restored the susceptibility of resistant cells to EGFR-TKIs and partially reversed the EMT process, thereby reducing migration and invasion in EGFR-TKI-resistant cells. This study provides evidence that targeting AURKA signaling pathway by alisertib may be a novel approach for overcoming EGFR-TKI resistance and for the treatment of metastatic EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients.

Factors for incidence risk and prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with synchronous brain metastasis: a population-based study

Background: We aimed to investigate the epidemiology of synchronous brain metastasis (SBM) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: Logistic regression and Cox regression were used to identify the related factors of SBM incidence and cancer-specific survival (CSS). A nomogram for predicting CSS was developed and validated. Results: The incidence of SBM in NSCLC patients was 12.58%. The median CSS was 5 months. Patients with younger age, female gender, and adenocarcinoma had higher odd ratios for developing SBM. In addition, a nomogram was developed based on significant factors from Cox regression. The validation of the nomogram showed that it had good calibration and discrimination. Conclusions: SBM was highly prevalent in NSCLC patients, who also had poor survival.

The impact of baseline brain metastases on clinical benefits and progression patterns after first-line crizotinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer

Baseline brain metastasis (BBM) commonly occurs in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Crizotinib prolongs the survival of patients with ALK rearrangement but lacks significant effect on brain metastasis. It remains unclear whether BBM and local therapy affect therapeutic outcomes and progression patterns during crizotinib treatment.Patients with ALK-positive (immunotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were screened from West China Hospital between May 2013 and January 2019. A total of 155 patients were enrolled in this research, with entirely recorded statistics to analyze retrospectively.Baseline brain metastasis occurred in 64 patients (55.7%). Thirty-seven patients received local therapy, while 24 patients did not. We observed higher overall response rate in patients receiving local therapy (70.2% vs. 41.7%, P = .026), but no statistical difference was found in median progression free survival (mPFS) (12.0 months vs 13.0 months, P = .633). A significantly shorter mPFS was found in patients not receiving local treatment compared with the 16.5 months mPFS of patients without BBM (P = .029). Intracranial progressions were recorded in 35 patients with BBM (71%) and 16 patients who don't have (30%). As for extracranial progression, there is a higher occurrence rate (75.5%) in patients who had baseline extracranial metastases versus 49.0% in BBM patients. A significantly higher occurrence rate of multiple progression was noted in patients with BBM (14/49 vs. 6/53).Baseline intracranial metastasis changes the location and number of progressions after the first-line crizotinib and results in poor prognosis. There is no evidence that local treatment for brain metastasis had a protective effect on intracranial progression.

Determination of intracellular anlotinib, osimertinib, afatinib and gefitinib accumulations in human brain microvascular endothelial cells by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

RATIONALE

Brain metastases are a common complication in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Anlotinib hydrochloride is a novel multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) exhibiting a superior overall response rate for brain metastases from NSCLC. The penetrability of anlotinib and three generations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) TKIs (osimertinib, afatinib and gefitinib) into brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) was compared.

METHODS

A sensitive quantification method for the four TKIs was developed using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Anlotinib and the three EGFR TKIs were separated on an ACQUITY BEH C18 column after a direct protein precipitation, and then analyzed using electrospray ionization in positive ion mode. The linearity, accuracy, precision, limit of quantification, specificity and stability were assessed.

RESULTS

The four analytes could be efficiently quantified in a single run of 3.8 min. The validation parameters of all analytes satisfy the acceptance criteria of bioanalytical method guidelines. The calibration range was 0.2-200 ng mL^-1 for anlotinib and gefitinib, 1-500 ng mL^-1 for osimertinib and 1-200 ng mL^-1 for afatinib. The penetration of anlotinib across HBMECs was comparable with that of afatinib and gefitinib but less than that of osimertinib.

CONCLUSIONS

A sensitive LC/MS/MS method to simultaneously measure anlotinib, osimertinib, afatinib and gefitinib in cell extracts was successfully validated and applied to determine their uptake inside HBMECs, which could pave the way for future research on the role of anlotinib in NSCLC brain metastases.

Classical versus non-classical EGFR mutations: Erlotinib response and impact of renal insufficiency

INTRODUCTION

Erlotinib is an effective treatment option for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. It is important to predict patients who will respond better to erlotinib. We designed this study to investigate the effect of renal insufficiency (RI) on erlotinib treatment outcomes.

METHODS

All patients receiving erlotinib were stratified into 3 groups. Group 1 consisted of non-RI subjects with classical epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, Group 2 consisted of those with RI (Estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min) and classical EGFR mutations, and Group 3 consisted of those with non-classical EGFR mutations.

RESULTS

82 patients were included in the study. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with classical mutation was approximately 6 months shorter in those with RI, although not statistically significant. Median overall survival (OS) in Group 1, 2 and 3 was 34.1 months, 35.2 months, and 15 months, respectively and although not statistically significant, median OS was 20 months shorter in Group 3. Univariate and multivariate cox-regression analysis revealed shorter PFS and OS in males and those with ECOG ≥2 while PFS and OS were longer in those with recurrent lung tumors and generating rash during erlotinib treatment. There was no difference between RI and non-RI patients in terms of adverse events except for fatigue and appetite loss.

CONCLUSIONS

This research showed OS in patients with and without RI was comparable. Although not statistically significant, PFS in patients with classical mutation was approximately 6 months shorter in those with RI patients.

Novel Treatment For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases

Brain metastases is common in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and it is associated with poorer prognosis. Several options to control the secondary brain tumors in the context include chemotherapy, whole-brain radiation, stereotactic surgery, surgery. However, chemotherapy is ineffective to those patients because of poor penetration through the blood-brain barrier. Whole-brain radiation therapy used to be a standard option for brain metastases. However, it potentially damages normal brain tissues and causes neurocognitive decline. Stereotactic radiotherapy has been considered in cases of three or fewer lesions, and the lesions less than 3 cm. In selective cases, surgical removal of brain metastases can be done. These local therapies were accompanied by systemic treatment due to spreading of the cancer. Recently, molecular targeted therapy has opened up a new era in cancer treatment, especially NSCLC with brain metastases. In this review, we discuss brain metastases occurring in NSCLC patients with driver gene mutations with some briefly demonstrated cases.

First-line pemetrexed and carboplatin plus anlotinib for epidermal growth factor receptor wild-type and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

Brain metastasis (BM) is a serious complication in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Pemetrexed is one of the preferred agents in nonsquamous NSCLC with BM; however, the traditional chemotherapy demonstrated limited efficacy partly due to drug resistance and the blood-brain barrier.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 52-year-old male non-smoker was admitted for irritating cough, chest distress, and back pain.

DIAGNOSES

Epidermal growth factor receptor wild-type, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative primary lung adenocarcinoma with an asymptomatic solitary BM (cTxNxM1b, IVA).

INTERVENTIONS

Pemetrexed (500 mg/m of body surface area) and carboplatin (area under the curve of 5) were firstly administered every 3 weeks for 3 cycles, followed by pemetrexed/carboplatin plus anlotinib (12 mg daily; 2 weeks on and 1 week off) for another 3 cycles. Then maintenance anlotinib monotherapy was continued for a year, without unacceptable adverse events.

OUTCOMES

The BM was slightly enlarged after 3 cycles of pemetrexed/carboplatin; however, a complete remission was achieved after the combination therapy. His intracranial progression-free survival was more than 2 years.

LESSONS

Pemetrexed/carboplatin plus anlotinib could be considered for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor wild-type, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative lung adenocarcinoma with BM. Further well-designed trials are warranted to verify this occasional finding.

Biomarkers of Osimertinib Response in Patients with Refractory, EGFR-T790M-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Central Nervous System Metastases: The APOLLO Study

PURPOSE

Dynamic biomarker monitoring may inform pathways for treating EGFR-T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and central nervous system (CNS) metastases with osimertinib. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for real-world patients with EGFR-T790M NSCLC and CNS metastases and to explore potential circulating biomarkers of therapeutic response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

APOLLO (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02972333) was a prospective, single-arm, open-label trial which ran from January 2017 to April 2019. Eligible patients had confirmed EGFR-T790M-positive NSCLC, prior treatment with an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and CNS metastases. All enrolled patients received oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary outcome was overall progression-free survival (PFSo) and secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AE). Exploratory biomarker analysis involved collection of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples for next-generation sequencing and drug penetration analysis.

RESULTS

From January to September 2017, 38 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 8.2 months (range, 0.07-15.6), 23 (60.5%) of 38 patients had disease progression or death. Median PFSo was 8.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.8-10.9]. Overall ORR was 39.4%. Twelve (31.6%) of 38 patients had ≥1 grade 3-4 AE. Median osimertinib CSF penetration rate was 31.7%. Patients with undetectable plasma EGFR mutations at week 6 had improved PFSo compared with those with detectable mutations (not reached vs. 4.5 months; 95% CI, 0.0-1.1; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib had potent activity against EGFR-T790M-positive NSCLC with CNS metastases. Dynamic monitoring of plasma EGFR may suffice for predicting clinical responses, mitigating the need for repeat CSF biopsy.See related commentary by Marmarelis and Bauml, p. 6077.

Death Anxiety in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With and Without Brain Metastases

CONTEXT

Death anxiety is common in patients with metastatic cancer, but its relationship to brain metastases and cognitive decline is unknown. Early identification of death anxiety and its determinants allows proactive interventions to be offered to those in need.

OBJECTIVES

To identify psychological, physical, and disease-related (including brain metastases and cognitive impairment) factors associated with death anxiety in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional pilot study with mNSCLC outpatients completing standardized neuropsychological tests and validated questionnaires measuring death anxiety, cognitive concerns, illness intrusiveness, depression, demoralization, self-esteem, and common cancer symptoms. We constructed a composite for objective cognitive function (mean neuropsychological tests z-scores).

RESULTS

Study measures were completed by 78 patients (50% females; median age 62 years [range 37-82]). Median time since mNSCLC diagnosis was 11 months (range 0-89); 53% had brain metastases. At least moderate death anxiety was reported by 43% (n = 33). Objective cognitive impairment was present in 41% (n = 32) and perceived cognitive impairment in 27% (n = 21). Death anxiety, objective, and perceived cognitive impairment did not significantly differ between patients with and without brain metastases. In univariate analysis, death anxiety was associated with demoralization, depression, self-esteem, illness intrusiveness, common physical cancer symptoms, and perceived cognitive impairment. In multivariate analysis, demoralization (P < 0.001) and illness intrusiveness (P = 0.001) were associated with death anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Death anxiety and brain metastases are common in patients with mNSCLC but not necessarily linked. The association of death anxiety with both demoralization and illness intrusiveness highlights the importance of integrated psychological and symptom management. Further research is needed on the psychological impact of brain metastases.

Challenges and Opportunities in Cancer Drug Resistance

There has been huge progress in the discovery of targeted cancer therapies in recent years. However, even for the most successful and impactful cancer drugs which have been approved, both innate and acquired mechanisms of resistance are commonplace. These emerging mechanisms of resistance have been studied intensively, which has enabled drug discovery scientists to learn how it may be possible to overcome such resistance in subsequent generations of treatments. In some cases, novel drug candidates have been able to supersede previously approved agents; in other cases they have been used sequentially or in combinations with existing treatments. This review summarizes the current field in terms of the challenges and opportunities that cancer resistance presents to drug discovery scientists, with a focus on small molecule therapeutics. As part of this review, common themes and approaches have been identified which have been utilized to successfully target emerging mechanisms of resistance. This includes the increase in target potency and selectivity, alternative chemical scaffolds, change of mechanism of action (covalents, PROTACs), increases in blood-brain barrier permeability (BBBP), and the targeting of allosteric pockets. Finally, wider approaches are covered such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), bispecific antibodies, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), and combination therapies.

Whole-brain Radiation and Pembrolizumab Treatment for a Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patient with Meningeal Carcinomatosis Lacking Driver Oncogenes Led to a Long-term Survival

We herein report a 66-year-old woman with advanced lung adenocarcinoma [programmed cell death and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score 60%] lacking driver oncogenes in whom meningeal carcinomatosis, along with sudden onset dizziness, deafness, and consciousness disturbance, appeared after second-line chemotherapy. Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and Pembrolizumab were subsequently administered, and third-line chemotherapy with Pembrolizumab is now ongoing. At the time of writing, the patient has achieved a 23-month survival without disease progression. Our findings suggest that the combination of WBRT and an immune checkpoint inhibitor is effective for non-small-cell lung cancer patients lacking driver oncogenes who develop meningeal carcinomatosis.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy for Brain Metastases in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Primer for Radiologists

Treatment options for patients who develop brain metastases secondary to non-small-cell lung cancer have rapidly expanded in recent years. As a key adjunct to surgical and radiation therapy options, systemic therapies are now a critical component of the oncologic management of metastatic CNS disease in many patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. The aim of this review article was to provide a guide for radiologists, outlining the role of systemic therapies in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, with a focus on tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The critical role of the blood-brain barrier in the development of systemic therapies will be described. The final sections of this review will provide an overview of current imaging-based guidelines for therapy response. The utility of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria will be discussed, with a focus on how to use the response criteria in the assessment of patients treated with systemic and traditional therapies.

Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor, with poor survival despite treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy with temozolomide. Little progress has been made over the last two decades, and there remain unmet medical needs. Approximately 45% of patients with GBM carry EGFR mutations, and 13% of them possess altered PDGFR genes. Moreover, VEGF/VEGFR mutations are also observed in the patient population. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are emerging cancer therapy drugs that inhibit signal transduction cascades affecting cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis. Indications for small molecule TKIs have been successfully expanded to multiple types of cancer; however, none of the TKIs have been approved for patients with GBM. In this review, we summarize clinical trials of small molecule TKIs in patients with GBM and plausible hypotheses for negative clinical study results. We also discuss the potential TKI candidates that presented significant preclinical outcomes in patients with GBM.

Metastases to the central nervous system: Molecular basis and clinical considerations

BACKGROUND

Metastatic tumors are the most common malignancies of the central nervous system (CNS) in adults. CNS metastases are associated with unfavorable prognosis, high morbidity and mortality. Lung cancer is the most common source of brain metastases, followed by breast cancer and melanoma. Rising incidence is primarily due to improvements in systemic control of primary malignancies, prolonged survival and advances in cancer detection.

PURPOSE

To provide an overview of the metastatic cascade and the role of angiogenesis, neuroinflammation, metabolic adaptations, and clinical details about brain metastases from different primary tumors.

METHODS

A review of the literature on brain metastases was conducted, focusing on the pathophysiology and clinical aspects of the disease. PubMed was used to search for relevant articles published from January 1975 through December 2019 using the keywords brain metabolism, brain metastasis, metastatic cascade, molecular mechanisms, incidence, risk factors, and prognosis. 146 articles met the criteria and were included in this review.

DISCUSSION

Some primary tumors have a higher tendency to metastasize to the CNS. Establishing a suitable metastatic microenvironment is important in maintaining tumor cell growth and survival. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a widely used tool for diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Available treatments include surgery, radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and systemic targeted therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevention of metastases to the CNS remains a difficult challenge. Advances in screening of high-risk patients and future development of novel treatments may improve patient outcomes.

Response rate of patients with baseline brain metastases from recently diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer receiving radiotherapy according to EGFR, ALK and KRAS mutation status

Background

Previous studies have identified that patients with EGFR mutations tend to have better responses to targeted therapy, as well as chemotherapy; however, the effect of genetic alterations in terms of radiotherapy (RT)‐related outcomes has not been fully assessed. We studied the impact of common non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) genetic alterations (EGFR, ALK and KRAS) in relation to objective response rate (ORR) to RT in patients with brain metastases.

Methods

From 2009–2015, 153 patients with an available genotyping status were treated with whole‐brain irradiation (WBI) before receiving systemic therapy. Primary outcome was ORR; secondary outcomes included intracranial progression‐free survival (IPFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Overall, ORR was 47.1%. ORR to RT varied significantly according to molecular status: EGFR (64.5%) ALK (54.5%) KRAS (20%) and WT (35.4%) (P = 0.001). EGFR mutation was the only independently associated factor for response to WBI (RR 3.52 [95% CI 1.6–7.7]; P = 0.002). Median IPFS was 10.8 months [95% CI 8.2–13.5] overall; however, IPFS also varied significantly according to molecular status: EGFR (18.2 months), ALK (18.4 months), KRAS (6.0 months) and WT (8.7 months) (P < 0.0001). OS for EGFR, ALK, KRAS and WT patients was 36.6, 32.2, 15.5 and 22.4 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Intracranial‐ORR (HR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2–0.6], P < 0.001) and mutation status (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.6–0.9], P < 0.042) were independently associated with a higher OS.

Conclusions

RT response varies as per tumor molecular status. The presence of EGFR mutations favors the organ‐specific response to RT, and is associated with longer OS in patients with NSCLC and BM.

Key points

This study addressed for the first time the difference in radiotherapy‐related outcomes in patients with different genotypes of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) before they received systemic therapy.

Results show that response to radiotherapy varies as per tumor molecular status, particularly EGFR‐mutated tumors, have a favorable response to radiotherapy, contrary to KRAS‐mutated tumors.

Effectiveness and safety of osimertinib in patients with metastatic EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC: An observational real-world study

Osimertinib showed encouraging efficacy in patients with advanced EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC in previous randomized controlled trials. This real-world study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of osimertinib in a real-world setting. This observational study (NCT03133234) included 74 patients with metastatic EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC who progressed on prior EGFR TKI therapy and received osimertinib between May 2016 and April 2018 at the Kiang Wu Hospital in Macau. Response rate (RR) and other endpoints (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS], disease control rate [DCR], stable disease rate, and adverse events) were assessed. Survival data were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All patients had stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and 25.6% had brain metastases; median age was 58 years (range 28-84 years) and 83.8% of patients had received at least three prior lines of treatment. The median duration of osimertinib treatment was 8 months (range, 1-25 months). RR and DCR were 67.5% (95% CI 56.9-78.1) and 79.8% (95% CI 70.7-88.9), respectively, while 12.1% had stable disease. The median PFS was 9.0 months (95% CI 6.7-11.2 months), and the median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI 8.8-15.1 months). Nausea (25.8%) and decreased appetite (20.2%) were the most common adverse events associated with osimertinib treatment. Even though most patients had at least three lines of prior treatment, real-world RR and PFS with osimertinib in this study were consistent with those from randomized controlled trials; no new safety signals were observed.

Multidisciplinary expert opinion on the treatment consensus for patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases

The presence of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is associated with higher incidence of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, patients with synchronous brain metastases at diagnosis have generally been excluded from clinical trials. As there is limited clinical evidence for managing this patient population, a multidisciplinary group of Spanish medical and radiation oncologists, and neuro-oncologist with expertise treating brain metastases in lung cancer patients met with the aim of reaching and developing an expert opinion consensus on the management of patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases. This consensus contains 26 recommendations and 20 conclusion statements across 21 questions in 7 areas, as well as a first-line treatment algorithm.

Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers: Indian Consensus Guidelines for Molecular Testing

Novel molecular targets and promising targeted therapies have reshaped diagnostics in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite this progress, the implementation of molecular screening to identify predictive biomarkers in Indian clinical and pathology settings has been challenging due to operational and logistical constraints. This consensus guideline brings together medical oncologists, molecular pathologists and pathologists from India to provide a quick and competent reference for biomarker testing in NSCLC. The guideline summarizes the importance of targetable mutations in NSCLC such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), rearrangements in anaplastic lymphoma kinase and receptor tyrosine kinase encoded by ROS-1 gene, overexpression of programmed cell death ligand-1 and resistant EGFR mutations. It reaffirms recommendations from international working groups, discusses vulnerable pre-analytical procedures and provides a balanced review on the pros and cons of different diagnostic tests (immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, polymerase chain reaction-based testing and next-generation sequencing). The document also provides an algorithm to aid diagnostic decision-making and a checklist to assess the quality of testing laboratories that will help the medical oncologists make an informed choice. Overall, these recommendations are based on evidence and clinical experience and will aid policymakers, oncologists, health care practitioners and pathologists who strive to implement molecular strategies and make informed decisions for improved care in NSCLC in India.Funding: AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited.

Pan-Asian adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a CSCO-ESMO initiative endorsed by JSMO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was published in 2016. At the ESMO Asia Meeting in November 2017 it was decided by both ESMO and the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) to convene a special guidelines meeting immediately after the Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group Annual Meeting 2018, in Guangzhou, China. The aim was to adapt the ESMO 2016 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of metastatic NSCLC cancer in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence, and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the six participating Asian countries. During the review process, the updated ESMO 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines for metastatic NSCLC were released and were also considered, during the final stages of the development of the Pan-Asian adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines.