Clinical Relevance of Intraperitoneal Pressure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Intra-abdominal pressure and residual renal function decline in peritoneal dialysis: a threshold-based investigation

BACKGROUND

The potential impact of elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on residual renal function (RRF) has not been determined. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between IAP and the rate of RRF decline in newly initiated peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and to identify the optimal IAP threshold value for delaying the deterioration of RRF.

METHODS

A cohort of 62 newly initiated PD patients who completed both 6- and 12-month follow-up evaluations was obtained using the Durand method. A logistic regression model was used to identify variables associated with a rapid decline in RRF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the optimal threshold value. Another retrospective cohort analysis was performed to validate the identified critical value.

RESULTS

For each 1 cmH2O increase in IAP, the risk of a rapid decline in the RRF increased by a factor of 1.679. Subsequent analysis revealed that patients in the high IAP group had more significant decreases in residual renal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Z = -3.694, p < 0.001) and urine volume (Z = -3.121, p < 0.001) than did those in the non-high IAP group. Furthermore, an IAP ≥15.65 cmH2O was a robust discriminator for the prediction of the rate of RRF decline.

CONCLUSION

Patients in the high IAP group experienced a more rapid decline in RRF. Additionally, an optimal critical pressure of 15.65 cmH2O was identified for predicting the rate of RRF decline. IAP, as one of the factors contributing to the rapid decline in RRF in the first year of PD, should be given due attention.

Pressure induces peritoneal fibrosis and inflammation through CD44 signaling

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a widely used sustainable kidney replacement therapy. Prolonged use of PD fluids is associated with mesothelial-mesenchymal transition, peritoneal fibrosis, and eventual ultrafiltration (UF) failure. However, the impact of pressure on the peritoneum remains unclear. In the present study, we hypothesized increased pressure is a potential contributing factor to peritoneal fibrosis and investigated the possible mechanisms. In vitro experiments found that pressurization led to a mesenchymal phenotype, the expression of fibrotic markers and inflammatory factors in human mesothelial MeT-5A cells. Pressure also increased cell proliferation and augmented cell migration potential in MeT-5A cells. The mouse PD model and human peritoneum equilibrium test (PET) data both showed a positive association between higher pressure and increased small solute transport, along with decreased net UF. Mechanistically, we found that significant upregulation of CD44 in mesothelial cells upon pressurization. Notably, the treatment of CD44 neutralizing antibodies prevented pressure-induced phenotypic changes in mesothelial cells, while a CD44 inhibitor oligo-fucoidan ameliorated pressure-induced peritoneal thickening, fibrosis, and inflammation in PD mice. To conclude, intraperitoneal pressure results in peritoneal fibrosis in PD via CD44-mediated mesothelial changes and inflammation. CD44 blockage can be utilized as a novel preventive approach for PD-related peritoneal fibrosis and UF failure.

Retroperitoneal leakage as an important cause of acquired ultrafiltration decline in peritoneal dialysis: clinical characteristics and related risk factors

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a widely-used renal replacement therapy while low ultrafiltration volume usually results in technique failure. Retroperitoneal leakage has been reported to be one of the causes of acquired decline in ultrafiltration. The present study investigated retroperitoneal leakage in PD patients and explored related risk factors.

METHODS

This study was designed as a prospective, observational study. A total of 420 PD patients regularly followed up at our center were enrolled from May 2011 to July 2021 and followed until December 2021. Retroperitoneal leakage was determined by magnetic resonance peritoneography and was used as the endpoint. Patients with retroperitoneal leakage were given intermittent PD or temporary hemodialysis (HD) as therapy. Cox regression models were used to identify risk factors for retroperitoneal leakage.

RESULTS

The cohort was followed up for up to 125.0 months (median: 46.4 months; interquartile range: 16.6 months). During the follow-up, 68 patients developed retroperitoneal leakage, with 31 (45.6%) cases occurring within the first year after PD initiation. A total of 62 (91.2%) patients recovered from retroperitoneal leakage and resumed their original PD regimen. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age and gender were independent predictors for retroperitoneal leakage. Younger males were more likely to develop retroperitoneal leakage. In females, waistline and body mass index (BMI) were found to be risk factors for retroperitoneal leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal leakage was common in PD patients with ultrafiltration insufficiency and was usually reversible after appropriate treatment. Age and gender were independent risk factors for retroperitoneal leakage.

The prognostic values of estimating intraperitoneal pressure in the occurrence of abdominal wall complications in peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Increased intraperitoneal pressure is associated with abdominal wall complications and technical failure of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Several equations have been developed to estimate intraperitoneal pressure. We aimed to assess the prognostic yield of the intraperitoneal pressure as estimated by current equations on the occurrence of abdominal wall complications in peritoneal dialysis patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective cohort which recruited 1207 incident PD patients. Estimated intraperitoneal pressure was calculated using four available equations (according to Sigogne, Castellanos, Scanziani and de Jesus Ventura). Abdominal wall complications were recorded during follow-up. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis with competing risk regression were used to assess the predictive power of the estimates of intraperitoneal pressure in the occurrence of abdominal wall complications.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 30 months, 66 (5.5%) patients (1.6/100 patient-years) developed abdominal wall complications. The median time to the occurrence of abdominal wall complications was 5.7 months. Only the estimated intraperitoneal pressure by the de Jesus Ventura equation significantly predicted abdominal wall complications by using univariate analyses. Associations between estimated intraperitoneal pressure by the de Jesus Ventura equation and the occurrence of abdominal wall complications disappeared after adjusting for significant clinical factors.

CONCLUSIONS

We verified the prognostic value of estimation of intraperitoneal pressure by four available equations in predicting abdominal wall complications in our single-center PD cohort. Due to a low diagnostic yield, a novel equation for estimating the intraperitoneal pressure is urgently needed.

Relationship between intraperitoneal pressure and the development of hernias in peritoneal dialysis: confirmation for the first time of a widely accepted concept

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an individual characteristic that can be modified by posture and intraperitoneal volume (IPV). It is considered one of the predisposing factors for complications in the abdominal wall, such as the appearance of hernias. No studies to date have confirmed this. The main aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the development of hernia in incident PD patients and IPP measured at PD onset.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of incident patients in a PD programme between 2010 and 2020. IPP was measured using the Durand's method.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-four incident patients on PD, 68% male, mean age 62.1 ± 15.23 years, body mass index (BMI) 27.7 ± 4.82 kg/m2, 44% were diabetic. IPP in supine was 16.6 ± 4.60 cm H2O for a mean IPV of 2047.1 ± 359.19 mL. Hernias were reported in 18.5% of patients during PD follow-up: 57% were inguinal hernias, 33% umbilical, and a further 10% presented in a combined form. PD hernias correlated positively with IPP in supine position (p = 0.037), patient age (p = 0.008), BMI (p = 0.043), a history of prior hernia (0.016), laparoscopic catheter placement (p = 0.026), and technique failure (p = 0.012). In the multivariate analysis, a higher IPP was independently related to the development of hernias (p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of hernias in PD was related to a higher IPP at PD onset, older age, higher BMI, history of prior hernia, catheter placement by laparoscopy, and technique failure.

Peritoneal Dialysis Care for People with Diabetes, Polycystic Kidney Disease, or Advanced Liver Disease

People treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) often have complicating conditions that require careful management. Three such conditions are reviewed in this article-diabetes mellitus, polycystic kidney disease, and chronic liver disease. Each of these conditions requires an understanding of both its effect on the delivery of the PD and the effect of the PD on the condition itself. In diabetes, glucose absorption from the dialysate complicates metabolic control and affects salt and water management and patient outcome. There is particular benefit in clinical care being delivered through a multidisciplinary team that involves both kidney and diabetes experts. In relation to polycystic kidney disease, a key issue is the potential for increased intraperitoneal pressure due to the combined effect of the enlarged polycystic organs and the presence of the dialysis solution, and therefore, the PD prescription requires to be managed with a particular focus on limiting that pressure. For patients with liver disease, key issues include nutritional support because PD can add to protein losses already consequent on the liver disease itself. Considered approaches are required to manage ascites and reduce infection risk and the potential for hernias and leaks to develop. Mortality in this group is unfortunately high-however, PD may present a better management option than hemodialysis in many patients-particularly in those where the liver disease is complicated by low BP, clotting abnormalities, or troublesome ascites. Overall, the choice to use PD in patients with these complicating conditions should be based on shared decision making with the patient and their family members informed by high-quality information in which risks, benefits, and management strategies are clearly presented.

Abdominal compartment syndrome in critically ill patients

Intra-abdominal hypertension can have severe consequences, including abdominal compartment syndrome, which can contribute to multi-organ failure. An increase in intra-abdominal hypertension is influenced by factors such as diminished abdominal wall compliance, increased intraluminal content, and certain systemic conditions. Regular measurement of intra-abdominal pressure is essential, and particular attention must be paid to patient positioning. Nonsurgical treatments, such as decompression of intraluminal content using a nasogastric tube, percutaneous drainage, and fluid balance optimization, play crucial roles. Additionally, point-of-care ultrasonography aids in the diagnosis and treatment of intra-abdominal hypertension. Emphasizing the importance of regular measurements, timely decompressive laparotomy is a definitive, but complex, treatment option. Balancing the urgency of surgical intervention against potential postoperative complications is challenging.

Intraperitoneal pressure in peritoneal dialysis patients: a need for treatment individualization

High-quality and goal-directed peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription should be provided to all PD patients. Prioritizing patients' goals is necessary for their quality of life, as it is assessment of volume and nutritional status, anemia and mineral and bone management, or small-solute removal. To optimize the removal of small solutes, and depending on membrane characteristics, the increase in concentration gradient difference or the increase in volume (recruitment of all peritoneal capacities) can be performed. Nevertheless, intraperitoneal volume should be tailored by measuring the intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) to avoid PD associated mechanical complications. In this editorial, a brief review on how IPP can be measured, and its implications are noted.

Novel equations for estimating intraperitoneal pressure among peritoneal dialysis patients

Background

Increased intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) is associated with abdominal wall complications and technical failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Since the standard measurement of IPP is limited due to its cumbersome procedures, we aimed to develop and validate equations for estimating IPP.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional study with a total of 200 prevalent PD patients who were divided into development and validation datasets after random sampling matched by body mass index. The IPPs were measured using the Durand method, with whole-body and abdominal anthropometry indices collected. Equations with 2.0-L and 1.5-L fill volumes were generated by stepwise linear regression modelling. The bias, accuracy and precision of the estimated IPP (eIPP) with 2-L and 1.5-L fill volumes were compared with actual IPPs by the Durand method. The eIPP for the 2-L fill volume was also compared with other existing equations.

Results

Two new equations incorporating waist circumference and height from the decubitus plane to mid-axillary line were generated. The eIPPs exhibited small biases in relation to the Durand method , with median differences of -0.24 cmH2O and -0.10 cmH2O for 2 L and 1.5 L, respectively. The precisions evaluated by the standard deviation of the absolute value of the differences were 2.59 cmH2O and 2.50 cmH2O, respectively. The accuracies evaluated by the value of the percentage of estimates that differed by >20% for the eIPP were 26% for 2.0 L and 27% for 1.5 L. Better bias, precision and accuracy were observed for the eIPP equation compared with other existing equations for the 2.0-L fill volume.

Conclusions

We provided two new equations developed from abdominal anthropometry indices to accurately estimate the IPP in the PD population.

Assessing mechanical catheter dysfunction in automated tidal peritoneal dialysis using cycler software: a case control, proof-of-concept study

New recommendations on evaluation of peritoneal membrane function suggest ruling out catheter dysfunction when evaluating patients with low ultrafiltration capacity. We introduce the use of a combination of parameters obtained from the cycler software PD Link with HomeChoicePro (Baxter International Inc., Illinois, United States) cyclers for predicting catheter dysfunction in automated peritoneal dialysis patients (APD). Out of 117 patients treated at the Medical University of Vienna between 2015 and 2021, we retrospectively identified all patients with verified catheter dysfunction (n = 14) and compared them to controls without clinical evidence of mechanical catheter problems and a recent X-ray confirming PD catheter tip in the rectovesical/rectouterine space (n = 19). All patients had a coiled single-cuff PD catheter, performed tidal PD, and received neutral pH bicarbonate/lactate-buffered PD fluids with low-glucose degradation products on APD. Icodextrin-containing PD fluids were used for daytime dwells. We retrieved cycler data for seven days each and tested parameters' predictive capability of catheter dysfunction. Total number of alarms/week > 7 as single predictive parameter of catheter dislocation identified 85.7% (sensitivity) of patients with dislocated catheter, whereas 31.6% (1-specificity) of control patients were false positive. A combination of parameters (number of alarms/week > 7, total drain time > 22 min, ultrafiltration of last fill < 150 mL) where at least two of three parameters appeared identified the same proportion of patients with catheter dislocation, but was more accurate in identifying controls (21.1% false positive). In contrast to yearly PET measurements, an easily applicable combination of daily cycler readout parameters, also available in new APD systems connected to remote monitoring platforms shows potential for diagnosis of catheter dysfunction during routine follow-up.

Imaging and leaks in peritoneal dialysis

Dialysate leaks are non-rare mechanical but dreaded complications in peritoneal dialysis (PD). They usually occur at the beginning of PD, with various clinical events depending on their location. Use of imaging tests such as computed tomography (CT) peritoneography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) peritoneography, or scintigraphic peritoneography, can confirm the diagnosis and guide surgical intervention if needed. These simple, non-invasive, and accessible tests can be done in collaboration between the radiological et peritoneal teams. Depending on the leakage site, PD can be pursued with small volumes with a cycler. In other cases, it must be interrupted and the patient transferred to hemodialysis, in order to permit the peritoneal cavity to regain its integrity by cicatrization or with surgical intervention. Imaging can help to make sure peritoneal cavity has regained its integrity after this period of transition. Early leaks can be avoided by delaying PD start with by 14 days. Intraperitoneal pressure does not seem to contribute significantly. Prevention of PD leaks essentially depends on individual risk factors such as obesity or anterior abdominal surgeries. This article reviews the characteristics of dialysate leaks in PD and the imagery tests to limit transfer to hemodialysis.

Intraperitoneal pressure: Stability over time and validation of Durand's measurement method

Intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) is gaining consideration as a relevant parameter of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in adults, although many of its aspects are still pending clarification. We address here its stability over time and the validity of the usual method of clinical measurement, as proposed by Durand in 1992 but never specifically validated. We performed this validation by comparing Durand's method and direct measurements with a central venous pressure system. We performed a total of 250 measurement pairs in 50 patients with different intraperitoneal volumes plus in-vitro measurements with a simulated peritoneum. Absolute differences between the two systems in vivo were 0.87 ± 0.91 cmH₂O (range 0-5 cmH₂O); only 6.4% of them were ≥3 cmH₂O. In vitro results for both methods were identical. We also compared IPP measurements in the same patient separated by 1-4 h (514 measurement pairs in 136 patients), 1 week (92 pairs in 92 patients), and 2 years (34 pairs in 17 patients). Net differences of measurements separated by hours or 1 week were close to 0 cmH₂O, with oscillations of 1.5 cmH₂O in hours and 2.3 cmH₂O in 1 week. IPP measured 2 years apart presented a net decrease of 2.5 ± 4.9 cmH₂O, without correlation with body mass index changes or any other usual parameter of PD. In hours, 7% of IPP differences were >3 cmH₂O, 22% in 1 week, and 50% in 2 years. In conclusion, Durand's method is precise enough to measure IPP in peritoneal dialysis. This parameter is not stable over long timescales, so it is necessary to use recent measurements.

Peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury: Equations for dosing in pandemics, disasters, and beyond

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a viable option for renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (AKI), especially in challenging times during disasters and pandemics when resources are limited. While PD techniques are well described, there is uncertainty about how to determine the amount of PD to be prescribed toward a target dose. The aim of this study is to derive practical equations to assist with the prescription of PD for AKI.

METHODS

Using established physiological principles behind PD clearance and membrane transport, a primary determinant of dose delivery, equations were mathematically derived to estimate dialysate volume required to achieve a target dose of PD.

RESULTS

The main derivative equation is V_D = (1.2 × std-Kt/V × TBW)/(t_dwell + 4), where V_D is the total dialysate volume per day, std-Kt/V is the desired weekly dose, TBW is the total body water, and t_dwell is the dwell time. V_D can be expressed in terms of dwell volume, v_dwell, by V_D = (0.3 × std-Kt/V × TBW) - (6 × v_dwell). Two further equations were derived which directly describe the mathematical relationship between t_dwell and v_dwell. A calculator is included as an Online Supplementary Material.

CONCLUSIONS

The equations are intended as a practical tool to estimate solute clearances and guide prescription of continuous PD. The estimated dialysate volume required for any dose target can be calculated from cycle duration or dwell volume. However, the exact target dose of PD is uncertain and should be adjusted according to the clinical circumstances and response to treatment. The equations presented in this article facilitate the adjustment of PD prescription toward the targeted solute clearance.

Identification of the Factors Associated With Intraperitoneal Pressure in ADPKD Patients Treated With Peritoneal Dialysis

Introduction

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is reported to be underused in the autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) population because doctors fear technical failure caused by reduced abdominal space and high intraperitoneal pressure (IPP).

Methods

We designed a multicenter retrospective study to be carried out in 15 French centers recruiting 60 patients with ADPKD treated with PD to identify factors associated with IPP. Inclusion criteria were start of PD between 2010 and 2017, available tomodensitometry, and IPP measurement in the first year of dialysis. The clinical and radiological data for each patient were reviewed by the same operator. Total kidney volume (TKV), liver volume, and the volume of the abdominal cavity were measured using contouring.

Results

TKV and the volume of the abdominal cavity in women and men were, respectively, 2397 ml versus 3758 ml and 9402 ml versus 12,920 ml. In the univariate analysis, IPP was significantly and positively associated with body surface area (P = 0.0024), body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.0001), the volume of the abdominal cavity (P = 0.0005), and the volume of the dialysate infused in the peritoneal cavity (IPV) (P = 0.0108). In the multivariate analysis, only BMI was still significantly associated with IPP (P = 0.0004)

Conclusions

Our results identified BMI as the main factor linked to IPP in patients with ADPKD. Despite a reliable assessment of the volume of their organs we did not find any correlation between liver and kidney volumes and IPP. To our knowledge, this is the first study designed to identify factors associated with IPP in patients with ADPKD on PD.

Supine equilibration of extracellular fluid in peritoneal dialysis varies with intra-abdominal pressure

BACKGROUND

Increased intra-abdominal pressure (PIA) leads to venous congestion in splanchnic and adjoining circulations. The aim is to examine whether PIA in peritoneal dialysis (PD) affects the mobilization of extracellular fluid from the lower body in supine body position.

METHODS

Patients were studied during a regular peritoneal equilibration test (PET) in supine body position using multifrequency bioimpedance analysis to determine extracellular resistance and absolute volume overload (AVO) in wrist-to-ankle (W2A) as well as in ankle-to-ankle (A2A) configurations. Measurements were taken at baseline (T0) after draining the peritoneal cavity, at T1 shortly after filling with 2 L of standard dialysate, and at T2 before taking the 2 h PET samples. PIA was measured from the column height in the PD catheter. Extracellular resistance in the lower extremities (RL) was taken as half of the A2A resistance.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (56 ± 15 years, 76 ± 21 kg, body mass index (BMI) 26.4 ± 7 kg/m², 13 men) were studied. After having assumed a supine body position for the duration of 17, 77, and 155 min, AVO continuously decreased from 1.6 ± 1.3 (T0) to 1.2 ± 1.5 (T1) and 1.0 ± 1.4 L (T2). RL significantly increased from 238 ± 57 (T0) to 254 ± 62 (T1) and 264 ± 67 Ohm (T2). This increase was negatively correlated to BMI and PIA measured at any time point, but not to net ultrafiltration volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthostatic fluid shifts from the lower limbs may take up to 2 h in supine PD patients, especially with high BMI and PIA because of venous congestion in splanchnic and adjoining circulations.

Clinical relevance of marginal factors on ultrafiltration in peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

Ultrafiltration (UF) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) is mainly driven by the osmotic gradient and peritoneal permeability, but other factors-such as intraperitoneal pressure (IPP)-also have an influence.

METHODS

To assess the clinical relevance of these marginal factors, we studied 41 unselected PD patients undergoing two consecutive 2 h, 2.27% glucose exchanges, first with 2.5 L and then with 1.5 L.

RESULTS

IPP, higher in the 2.5 L exchange, had a wide interpatient range, was higher in obese and polycystic patients and their increase with infusion volume was higher for women regardless of body size. UF with 2.5 L correlated inversely with IPP and was higher for patients with polycystosis or hernias, while for 1.5 L we found no significant correlations. The effluent had higher glucose and osmolarity in the 2.5 L exchange than in the 1.5 L one, similar for both sexes. In spite of this stronger osmotic gradient, only 21 patients had more UF in the 2.5 L exchange, with differences up to 240 mL. The other 20 patients had more UF in the 1.5 L exchange, with stronger differences (up to 800 mL, and more than 240 mL for 9 patients). The second group, with similar effluent osmolarity and peritoneal equilibration test (PET) parameters than the first, has higher IPP and preponderance of men. The sex influence is so intense that men decreased average UF with 2.5 L with respect to 1.5 L, while women increased it.

CONCLUSIONS

With 2.27% glucose, sex and IPP-modulated by obesity, polycystosis, hernias, and intraperitoneal volume-significantly affect UF in clinical settings and might be useful for its management.

In Search of a Simple and Reliable Method of Measuring Intra-abdominal Pressure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Background:

Patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) are at increased risk of developing mechanical complications such as dialysate leaks and hernias thought to be partially related to an increase in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) secondary to dialysate in the abdomen. However, measurement of IAP requires specialized equipment that is not readily available in the home dialysis unit.

Objectives:

To develop a reliable method of measuring IAP in PD patients that could be easily used in the home dialysis unit. We hypothesized that the handheld Stryker pressure monitor would be suitable for this purpose via connection to the PD catheter.

Design:

Cross-sectional.

Setting:

Tertiary Care Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Patients:

Patients who were having a PD catheter inserted via laparoscopic surgery at The Ottawa Hospital were recruited for the study.

Measurements:

With the patients at end-expiration, the IAP measured with the Stryker monitor connected to the PD catheter was compared with the insufflator pressures of 15, 10, and 5 mm Hg.

Methods:

Bland-Altman plots were constructed and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each pressure.

Results:

Twelve patients participated in the study: 9 men and 3 women. They were on average 53 ± 15 years old and 81 ± 13.4 kg. Two patients had to be excluded from the analysis due to difficulties zeroing the Stryker pressure monitor at the time of surgery. There were also rapid fluctuations in the insufflator pressure recording, creating additional challenges in comparing the 2 measurements at end-expiration. The 95% limits of agreement for the Bland-Altman plots ranged from 7.9 (@15 mm Hg) to 12.2 (@10 mm Hg). The intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability of the individual measurements ranged from 0.015 (10 mm Hg) to 0.634 (15 mm Hg).

Limitations:

Small sample size and lack of a gold standard comparator may have affected our results.

Conclusions:

In our study, we used the operating room insufflator as the gold standard for measuring IAP. By Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients, the pressure values obtained with the Stryker pressure monitor were not a reliable estimate of insufflator IAP especially at lower pressures. Further studies are needed to identify an ideal tool for measurement of IAP to guide PD management.

History of peritoneal dialysis in France

In France the first peritoneal dialysis was performed in the mid-1940s. For a long time reserved for frail subjects in whom hemodialysis appeared more dangerous, it is considered nowadays as a technique equivalent to hemodialysis, provided its indications and contraindications are respected and associated with the respect of the patient’s free choice after objective information. In particular, there is now a consensus to recognize its interest in patients waiting for transplantation, usually in order to preserve vascular access. Over the past decades French teams have played their role nationally and internationally, very often in partnership with their European neighbors, to improve the results achieved and to improve the different modalities. Since the end of the 1980s, the evaluation of practices has been made possible thanks to the participation in a specialized peritoneal dialysis registry.This article is a general review, not exhaustive, of the role played by the main French teams who succeeded one another.